首页  >>  来自播客: User Upload Audio 更新   反馈  

User Upload Audio - Daniel Vassallo — No More Huge Bets. Do This Instead

发布时间:2022-11-23 14:00:10   原节目
丹尼尔·瓦萨洛,一位作家、创始人兼思想领袖,因在 Twitter 上公开构建一系列“小赌注”组合而闻名。他与“启动资金播客”(Boots of Funded Podcast)的主持人讨论了与创业、多元化和心态相关的关键概念。 讨论的核心主题之一是前期收入与经常性收入的重要性。瓦萨洛认为,虽然经常性收入本质上是分期支付的前期款项,但提前收取全部生命周期价值可能是有利的,尤其是在更容易促成首次销售方面。他观察到,许多人对订阅服务存在心理保留,即使每月费用很低,也会导致不愿注册。一次性费用,即使较高,也可以创造一种所有权感,并且经常导致冲动购买。他建议创始人考虑前期付款以简化销售流程,尤其是在客户可能重视所有权的软件领域。他提倡低价而不是高价,认为留一些利润空间可以吸引更多客户、口碑传播和信誉。他强调稍后调整价格的可能性,从最初的经验中学习并随着事物的发展进行优化。他强调尽早获取客户的重要性,即使这意味着免费提供初始产品,以促进病毒式增长和有价值的反馈。 对话的一个重要部分集中在“小赌注组合”的概念上。这指的是将商业想法视为实验,而不是孤注一掷的冒险,类似于风险投资家投资于各种初创公司。瓦萨洛鼓励个人建立多个收入来源,避免过度认同一个单一的商业想法。他以彼得·莱维尔斯为例,强调了他持续的实验和多元化,尽管他的 Nomad List 已经取得了成功。 他强调,商业是不可预测的,因此至关重要的是大幅减少每个实验的精力和投资。小赌注理想情况下应在一个月甚至几周内完成,以便快速迭代和适应。他警告不要过度投入时间和资源,认为在可能最终失败的项目上花费数月会带来很高的心理和财务风险。 一个中心点是拥有一种“好的”想法的重要性,这种“好的”想法被定义为即使失败也不会让你崩溃的想法。兼容的小赌注想法是那些可以快速推向市场,理想情况下在一两周内推出,并且可以独立启动的想法。瓦萨洛也更喜欢时间是他的朋友的机会,避免需要立即成功或时间有限的项目。 瓦萨洛也反对商业中的“验证”一词,认为它应该保留给具有更大确定性的领域,如数学。他提倡将商业信号视为“暗示”或“可能性”,而不是明确的验证。他分享了他个人在“Userbase”上的经验,他在最初的积极信号基础上投入了大量资金,但最终这个项目失败了,尽管它表面上得到了验证。 在谈到多少实验才足够的问题时,瓦萨洛强调保持系统松弛,并不断寻找机会的态度。他提到了彼得·莱维尔斯的众多项目,其中许多项目都在后台被动运行。关键是避免变得过于忙碌,并保持探索新途径的能力。 他不鼓励尝试过于新颖,而是鼓励从多种途径获取灵感。他认为 Twitter 是灵感的主要来源,他可以在那里找到激发他创造力的新想法和视角。他认为,拥抱随机性并探索意想不到的联系对于产生新的机会至关重要。他认为,通过偶然遇到随机事物,可以提高灵感迸发的几率。 他最后敦促听众拥抱随机性,分散他们的努力,并采取持续实验的心态。他分享了他的 Twitter 账号 (@divassalo),作为人们可以联系、提问和获得灵感的平台。

Daniel Vassalo, a writer, founder, and thought leader known for building a portfolio of small bets in public on Twitter, discusses key concepts related to entrepreneurship, diversification, and mindset with the host of the Boots of Funded Podcast. One of the core themes discussed is the importance of upfront revenue versus recurring revenue. Vassalo argues that while recurring revenue is essentially an upfront payment in installments, collecting that full lifetime value upfront can be advantageous, especially in making the initial sale easier. He observes that many people have psychological reservations about subscription services, even if the monthly cost is low, leading to reluctance in signing up. A one-time fee, even a higher one, can create a sense of ownership and often results in impulse buys. He suggests that founders should consider upfront payments to make the sales process easier, particularly in software where customers may value ownership. He argues for undertaping rather than overcharging, believing that leaving money on the table can generate more customers, word-of-mouth, and credibility. He emphasizes the possibility of adjusting prices later, learning from initial experiences and optimizing as things evolve. He highlights the importance of acquiring customers early on, even if it means offering initial products for free, fostering viral growth and valuable feedback. A significant part of the conversation focuses on the concept of "a portfolio of small bets." This entails treating business ideas as experiments rather than all-or-nothing ventures, similar to how venture capitalists invest in a diverse range of startups. Vassalo encourages individuals to build multiple income streams and avoid identifying too closely with a single business idea. He cites Peter Levels as an example, highlighting his continuous experimentation and diversification despite the success of his Nomad List. He emphasizes that business is unpredictable, making it crucial to radically reduce the effort and investment in each experiment. Small bets should ideally be completed within a month or even a couple of weeks, allowing for quick iteration and adaptation. He warns against over-investing time and resources, citing the high psychological and financial risks associated with spending months on projects that may ultimately fail. A central point is the importance of having a "good" idea defined as one that doesn't break you if it doesn't work out. Compatible small bet ideas are those that can be brought to market quickly, ideally within a week or two, and that can be launched independently. Vassalo also prefers opportunities where time is his friend, avoiding projects that require immediate success or have limited runway. Vassalo also rejects the term "validation" in business, arguing that it should be reserved for areas with greater certainty, like mathematics. He advocates for viewing business signals as "hints" or "probabilities" rather than definitive validations. He shared his personal experience with "Userbase," where he invested heavily based on positive initial signals, only to see the project fail despite its apparent validation. Addressing the question of how many experiments are enough, Vassalo emphasizes the attitude of leaving slack in the system and constantly watching for opportunities. He mentions Peter Levels's numerous projects, many of which are passively running in the background. The key is to avoid becoming overly busy and maintain the capacity to explore new avenues. He discourages trying to be too novel, and instead encourages using inspiration from a diversity of avenues. He cites Twitter as a key source of inspiration, where he finds new ideas and perspectives that spark his creativity. He argues that embracing randomness and exploring unexpected connections is essential for generating fresh opportunities. He believes that by bumping into random things, it enhances the chances for inspired ideas to develop. He concludes by urging listeners to embrace randomness, diversify their efforts, and adopt a mindset of continuous experimentation. He shares his Twitter handle (@divassalo) as a platform where people can reach out, ask questions, and gain inspiration.