Milo, an archaeologist and environmental scientist, launches a multi-part series dissecting Graham Hancock's claims in his Netflix series "Ancient Apocalypse," focusing on whether evidence supports the existence of a lost, advanced, globe-spanning civilization at the end of the last ice age.
Milo begins by introducing Hancock, highlighting his book "Fingerprints of the Gods" and the central theory that all known civilizations were inspired by a lost, advanced society that ruled until the end of the last ice age. Despite Hancock’s sociological background and self-proclaimed "pseudoscientist" status, Milo pledges a balanced and respectful approach, emphasizing that scientific inquiry requires critical evaluation of all hypotheses, even those considered "ridiculous."
He defines the criteria necessary to prove Hancock’s claim, including reliable dates from cultural layers, similar material culture across different locations, structural evidence like foundations and walls, and most importantly, DNA evidence linking populations across the globe. Milo argues that since Hancock claims this civilization "conquered the world," the evidence should be abundant.
The series will proceed by examining each episode of "Ancient Apocalypse" individually, after a brief background on the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, an idea Hancock uses to build his theory. The conclusion will assess the collected evidence and discuss the implications of the show for science and factual reporting.
Milo quickly recaps the Younger Dryas, an abrupt cooling period near the end of the last ice age. He emphasizes the key point that the sea levels dramatically rose during this period. Hancock uses this rapid sea level rise as a core element of his hypothesis.
Episode 1 focuses on Gunung Padang in Indonesia. Milo appreciates the spotlight on this beautiful site but criticizes Hancock's presentation. Hancock marvels at the large size of the stones, each weighing a third of a ton. Milo adds context by explaining that a third of a ton is about 600 pounds, which is significant but not unprecedented for the period and doesn't necessarily require miraculous explanation. Milo also points out that columnar basalt, from which Gunung Padang is made, naturally cracks into these pillar-like structures, so they did not need to be cut. Hancock defines a "pyramid" as a series of terraces rising to a summit, which allows him to categorize Gunung Padang as one. Hancock also mentions a secret chamber beneath the ruins, but Milo suggests it could be a lava tube, given that the site is on a volcano.
The episode ends with Nan Madol, a site in Micronesia. Hancock's theory is that the site is about 12,800 years old, due to the sea level rose from the Younger Dryas Impact, but the archaeological date is about 900 years old. Milo ends the episode complaining about the lack of funding that archaeologists have in order to conduct research on any of these sites.
Episode 2 takes Milo to the Great Pyramid of Cholula in Mexico, where Dr. McAfrin lends expertise, detailing its occupation history dating back to 500 BC. She disputes Hancock's claims of a far older history, while acknowledging human presence in the region around 12,000 years ago, without the monumental structures that Hancock implies. The episode then critiques Hancock's generalization of pyramids, arguing that he ignores the distinct spiritual beliefs and cultural contexts associated with different pyramids worldwide. For example, some were designed for ceremonial practices while others were designed to be burial structures. Hancock also argues that the Tezcozingo pool complex is older than most archaeologists estimate, and also uses this temple to act as evidence to support his hypothesis. Milo ends the video frustrated.