The first quarter of the investing year is in the books. Motelful money starts now. Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money.
投资年度的第一季度已经过去了。现在该开始赚钱了。每个人都需要钱,这也是他们称之为钱的原因。
This is Motelful money. I'm Chris Hill joining me in studio Motelful senior analyst Matt Argusinger and Ron Gross. Good to see you both gentlemen. How you doing Chris?
We got the latest headlines from Wall Street. Brad Stone from Bloomberg is our guest and as always we got a couple of stocks on our radar. But we begin with the big macro.
The latest inflation data. The personal consumption expenditure's price index. Say that three times. No thank you. Showed an increase of 0.3% in February. This is one more data point that the Federal Reserve is watching closely as they decide whether to raise interest rates again or not.
This also coincided with the end of the first quarter of the year for investors. The Dow basically flat year-to-date S&P 500 up around 7%. Nasdaq up around 17% Ron.
Coming into the year if you told me that's where we'd be at this point. I think I would have been thrilled but with all of the bank drama earlier this month. It doesn't seem as good as the numbers would indicate. Yeah. We can get to the macro stuff in a minute.
Yeah, I agree. I want to talk about the markets and the performance because it does not feel to me like we're in any kind of a strong market. January was strong. February was weak. March we had a banking crisis. Well, yeah, March then actually ended up kind of strong. It's been all over the place in terms of volatility. I think rather than the graph being up and to the right, we haven't felt that way.
That's perhaps why when I noticed that the Nasdaq was up as you said 17% I was like, wow. Now, of course, tech was crushed last year. We did get some sort of a rebound. But we're getting a rebound in a rising interest rate environment, which I wouldn't have necessarily predicted that. So people may be feeling somewhat good about their investments, but I think they're still feeling very shaky about the economy.
And as we discussed in previous shows, anything with the word contagion in it is really kind of on the dicey side and creates quite a bit of anxiety. I agree. I mean, it's been such a rollercoaster.
I mean, it feel like we've lived a year in this first quarter. I mean, inflation's been persistent. The Fed's been relentless. We've got recession fears. We've had mass layoffs in the tech sector, and we keep coming in Disney's the latest not really tech company, but we've had the biggest bank failure since the global financial crisis. And of course, this regional banking crisis. And we've got these problems in the commercial real estate market that we should also talk about.
But the fact that we are where we are is pretty impressive. I mean, if you've been an investor who had sat on the beach since the beginning of the year and didn't check your phone, as you said, Ron and Chris, it's like, well, you're feeling pretty good, but then you're not feeling good. But then you feel good again. Well, then you're kind of good again. And the economic numbers are interesting. So we are seeing a slowdown in the economy. We are seeing inflation come down. But slowly, it's taken a while. And that's why I don't think we're done quite yet with interest rate increases. Predictions, you're bound to be wrong, but probably one more than some stagnation and then at some point declining interest rates, which I'm looking forward to. But what the Fed is trying to do is happening. It's just that job market is still very strong.
We need it to continue to be a little bit weaker. We did see that in the jobless numbers, but it's just taking some time.
我们需要它继续稍微弱一些。虽然我们在失业率数据中看到了这一点,但这需要一些时间。
Maddie, I want to go back to the layoffs that you mentioned, because this week we got two more tech companies based in Silicon Valley, Electronic Arts and Roku. They're both laying off 6% of their employees. They're downsizing their office space. And I understand the argument of people who say, well, the tech sector, that's not the whole economy. There's a much bigger part of the economy beyond the tech companies in Silicon Valley. And that's true. But when you look at Silicon Valley, it's hard for me with all of these announcements not to start thinking about the ripple effects, particularly when it comes to commercial real estate.
No, that's exactly right. And if you look at the, according to data from the San Francisco Chronicle, the current office vacancy rate, I was shocked when I saw this. The current office vacancy rate in downtown San Francisco is 29.4%. That in commercial real estate land is a depression. It's eight times the vacancy rate pre-pandemic. And you can compare that to the New York City vacancy rate, which has also been hit pretty hard. It's at 16%. But either way, the point here is, yeah, Silicon Valley has been hit extra hard, but there's a bigger story here about commercial real estate, especially office. Vacancy rates are way high. We are in this new era of work from home or hybrid work where no matter what, corporations just need less space.
The problem is Silicon Valley Bank and others, it was a little bit of a harbinger for what I think could be a pretty big problem with commercial real estate lending. If you look at the regional banks, according to some data, 80% of the lending to the commercial real estate market comes from these regional banks. Ask any bank whether they're excited about refinancing and office building right now, especially with debt that's maturing in the next few years, and it gets really dicey. And that could give the Fed some cover to slow, industry increases more quickly than they might have done otherwise. But it's hard to hope for that. It's hard to hope for a shock to the economy such that the Fed can slow down.
As I've said before, you know, choose your poison. Hopefully the crisis won't be too bad and the Fed will be able to lighten up relatively soon and we can all move forward. So we're about to enter in the near term. Let's just call it a three week period where earnings season is in the past. The next earnings season is coming up starting in about three weeks.
What I'll start with you Matt, what are you going to be watching over the next couple of weeks? And let's just put aside the possibility of another bank story coming forward and adding to the drama. What are you going to be watching to sort of give you an indication? Because it seems like part of what we've been talking about fits the narrative that we've been talking about for a few months now, which is the second half of 2023 appears to be set up for some positivity. Again, even keeping in mind what the market has done year to date, but over the next few weeks, what are you going to be watching?
This is that period where I think companies, if there have been major changes to their business outlook, this is where guidance starts to come in. A company will warn about their quarter. They'll try to get ahead of the news. And I've got a whole list of real estate investments, trust by the way, that I'm looking for for guidance because I'm worried about, especially in the office space as we've talked about. I'm worried about what that business looks like in terms of occupancy rates, net operating income. It's getting dicey. And I think that could tell a bigger story about the overall economy. So that's kind of where I'm watching.
Ryan, what are you going to be watching? Yeah, I was going to say guidance. And also, I want to see what margins look like because I want, especially with retailers, I want to understand what kind of discounting and promotional activity is happening and what pricing power looks like, how much control they have over pricing. And I also want to look at inventory levels because they're too high in a lot of different sectors as a result of weakness in the business. So I want to see if that inventory bleeds off.
This week, Disney began the process of laying off 7,000 employees, including in the group is the 50 people who make up Disney's entire division focused on the metaverse. It's being seen as another move by CEO Bob Iger to reverse decisions made by former CEO, Bob Chapeck. And Matt, we were talking about this earlier. I have to believe that a company like Meta Platforms, which is heavily invested in the metaverse, is not happy to see a company like Disney with all of that intellectual property just shutting this whole thing down.
这个礼拜,迪士尼开始裁员,总计7000人,其中还包括整个专注于元宇宙的50人团队。人们把这看作是CEO鲍勃·伊格为挽回前CEO鲍勃·查佩克的决策而采取的又一步。而马特,我们之前就在谈论这个。我相信像 Meta Platforms 这样大量投资于元宇宙的公司看到迪士尼这样拥有如此多知识产权的公司竟然关闭整个项目,肯定感到不满。
I agree. I don't think that's a good news item. If you're a Facebook meta Facebook. But I don't think this is yet a larger indictment on the idea of the metaverse. I think this is more about Iger just acting anything that he didn't create. So he's just, you know, he's kind of running roughshod over everything. Chapeck kind of created. It reminds me a little bit of Disney Interactive Studios, which was a video game subsidiary that Michael Eisner actually started before Bob Iger got there.
And Bob Iger ended up killing that too because it lost a ton of money. I think it could never really compete with the larger video game publishers. And Iger eventually said, you know, we're just better at licensing our IP to companies like Sony and Activision rather than trying to make our own games.
So I think, I don't think this is Disney shutting things off. I think they're saying, let's wait for this market to mature. If it's a viable media universe, we're going to get our IP in front of it. And maybe this Apple news coming down this year might catalyze the metaverse to the way that Disney could actually start getting involved. Yeah. I think the metaverse does kind of make sense for a company like Disney. Or you actually, right? Or you know, a chain pack called the next great storytelling frontier. I can see that. That doesn't seem silly to me. And again, connecting the physical and digital worlds again for a company like Disney, I think that makes sense. Interestingly, Iger is not necessarily a metaverse skeptic. I believe he sits on the board of a startup called Genies, which is a company that helps users create avatars, which eventually are going to be used in the metaverse. So maybe down the road, we'll get back there.
Welcome back to Motley Full Money. Chris Hill here in studio with Matt Argusinger and Ron Gross. Three years ago, Lula Lemon made its first acquisition ever when it paid $500 million for Mirror, a virtual home fitness company. In December of 2020, on our year in review episode, Ron picked the Mirror acquisition as his choice for the dumbest investment of 2020, saying he was not a fan of the acquisition and comparing it to underarmor, buying my fitness pal for $475 million and selling it years later at a loss. This week shares of Lula Lemon were up 15% after strong fourth quarter result.
欢迎收听《摩特利全额资金》节目!Chris Hill 在演播室里,和 Matt Argusinger 以及 Ron Gross 一起。三年前,Lula Lemon 开始了第一个并购交易,花费 5 亿美元购买虚拟家庭健身公司 Mirror。在去年年终回顾节目中,Ron 将 Mirror 并购列为 2020 年最愚蠢的投资之一,称自己并不是该并购的粉丝,并将其与 UnderArmor 收购 My Fitness Pal 的 4.75 亿美元的交易进行了比较。而后者多年后还亏本出售。这周,Lula Lemon 的股价上涨了 15%,因为他们的第四季度业绩表现非常强劲。
Anything else in that fourth quarter report? I don't like to tune my own horn, Chris, but they did have an impairment of about $443 million out of the 500. So just to review, they paid $500 million and they just wrote down, let's just call it 88 percent of it. Dad is what happened? Nice call, Ron. Nice call. Thank you.
They're not abandoning the fitness market. They're going to pursue it in a non-hardware way with a more app focused strategy, which probably makes sense. And if they had done that in the first place, I wouldn't have had to be critical in the first place. But I do want to say that shouldn't take away from the strength of Lula's business. Yes, that's a mistake. Okay, fine. But this has been a really wonderful business, a really wonderful stock. And the numbers back up the fact that they are continuing to execute quite well. For the quarter, revenue up 30 percent, that's 29 percent in North America and 35 percent internationally, CompSales up 27 percent, Direct to Consumer up 37 percent. Now Gross margins wore down. We still seeing some mark downs that are necessary to clear some inventory out. But in general, you saw very nice control of expenses with operating margins, actually up slightly, 50 basis points. Not slightly, half a percent. And the just the earnings as a result were up 30 percent. So they're continuing to get it done. They're doing a good job bringing inventories down. They're still high, but they're getting them down over time. And they gave strong first quarter and full year guidance, trading at 30 times, a premium price, but a premium company as well.
Walgreens second quarter profits in revenue came in higher than Wall Street was expecting. CEO Ross Brewer highlighted the company's closing of its acquisition of summit health, saying Walgreens is now one of the largest players in primary care shares of Walgreens up more than 5 percent this week, Matt. Yeah, good results. And if you look at their core pharmacy business, the same store pharmacy sales there were up almost 5 percent, really strong, and then if you look at the US health care revenue, someone health is joining on a pro-former basis of 30 percent, you're over here. That's pretty strong.
沃尔格林第二季度的利润与收入高于华尔街的预期。CEO Ross Brewer强调了公司收购峰会医疗的关闭,表示沃尔格林现在是初级保健领域的最大参与者之一。沃尔格林的股票这个星期上涨了5%以上,Matt。是的,这是一个好的成绩。如果您看看他们的核心药房业务,同店销售额增长了近5%,非常强劲,而如果您看看美国医疗收入,峰会医疗在一个形式的基础上增长了30%,你在这里。这相当强劲。
But my question is, will the real Walgreens please stand up? I mean, because there's been so many moving parts to this company. If you look at the 5 billion majority investment they made in Village MD back in 2021, majority investments in companies like Shields and Care Centrics, then you've got the 5 billion Walgreens pay last fall to settle lawsuits, you know, related to its distribution of opioids over the years, then you've got the 9 billion dollar purchase of summit health. I mean, this has all happened within the past two years. And you know, the stock is under perform pretty starkly. It's down, it's lost about a third of its value over the last five years. So I just think if you're an investor looking at Walgreens, you got to let the dust settle on all these major capital moves, figure out, you know, how this US health care revenue business is going to work, and then you can kind of decide if you want to invest in the stock. But to me, there's just too many moving parts right now.
Yeah, it does seem like with all those acquisitions, it's if you're looking at this, if you're the board of directors, you're saying to Ros Brueh are like, okay, now let's put all of this stuff to work. Right. Let's just give it some time to bake, and then we can decide what to how to move forward.
The struggles continue for our age. Fourth quarter profits and revenue came in lower than expected for the company formerly known as restoration hardware shares of our age up a bit this week run, but the last year and a half has really been rough. Stock was at 700 and now we're around 238-ish, really been smacked. I don't want to hit a company necessarily only when it's down. For years, this was a wonderful investment. One of the best performing stocks really that we would talk about. But they have fallen on hard times right now and CEO Gary Feldman kind of went on a rant. I don't know how else to describe it on the conference call blaming the Fed, inflation, interest rates, the banking crisis, all of those things for a decline in the luxury housing market. And that kind of might be true, but ranting is really never a great look for a CEO. So a little bit of a strength there I think would have been the better part of valor. But the business is quite weak. The revenue down 15% gross margins down, operating margins down, 960 basis points. That's 9.6 percentage points, which is really, really weak. Earnings down 14%, but if we adjust for some benefits, some income tax benefits earnings were actually down 49% inventory way up as they're having trouble selling things in this environment. So during what they can, they're eliminating some jobs. They're trying to achieve cost savings of about $50 million annually. Guidance was weak. One thing that they always say, and I really don't like this, they say things like the market opportunity is seven to ten trillion dollars. And if we only get one percent, Chris, that's a $70 billion to a hundred billion dollar opportunity. I do not like to hear that kind of talk for management teams as an investor, as an analyst. That doesn't thrill me. So they'll get back to business once the market firms, but they are spread really thin with hospitality and housing and galleries. They may want to stick a little bit more to their knitting.
Shares of McCormick up nearly 15% this week after first quarter profits came in higher than expected. The Spice Maker also reaffirmed guidance for the full fiscal year.
Matt, what stood out to you in McCormick's report?
马特,麦考密克的报告中什么让你格外关注?
Well, it's the strength of their flavor solution segment, which is their commercial food segment that serves restaurants and other major food manufacturers. The beauty, I think, in McCormick is really, you've got this great balance between the retail and consumer facing side, which makes up about 60% of sales, and this commercial business, which makes up about 40%.
So during the pandemic, as people were at home, they cooked more, and people cooked predominantly for the first time in their life. McCormick did really well with their consumer segment. Now that people are going back to restaurants and going out more, the commercial side of the business is picking up the slack where the consumer business is slowing down a little bit. So it's just got this really great balance, and of course you've got a dividend that continues to grow very nicely.
I just think McCormick always seems to trade with such a huge premium, and it shares right now it's 32 times earnings. Now it's always traded for premium, so I'm not going to, I'm not going to quibble, but I would just say, gosh, if you could ever get this business cheap, which is rare, it'd be quite an opportunity. From memory, I think there are also pretty good acquisitions. Where Chalula was an acquisition, I think made really good sense. Some other, some other, some other, some other. Frank's Red Hot. Frank's Red Hot. I like these acquisitions, and I often don't like acquisitions that companies make. I wonder if they have something else up their sleeve coming up.
我觉得麦考密克总是似乎以极高的溢价进行交易,现在的股票价格是32倍收益。不过,它一直以来都以高溢价交易,所以我不会争论,只是觉得如果你能以便宜的价格得到这个生意,那会是个很好的机会。从记忆中,我认为它们也做了一些非常好的收购。像Chalula这样的收购非常明智,还有其他一些,比如Frank's Red Hot。我喜欢这些收购,而通常我不喜欢公司做的收购。我想知道他们是否还有其他计划。
How seriously do you take the expiration date on spices?
你对香料的保质期有多重视?
That's one of those things where it's like, look, for medicine, I'm taking that very seriously. For spices, I'm like, really? I have to buy a whole new bottle. They do say if it's been sitting in your cabinet for like more than six months or so, that the flavor kind of goes away. But I think you can get away with it.
All right, Matt Argus, your wrong gross guy. We'll see you a little bit later in the show.
好的,马特·阿格斯,你错了,那个恶心的家伙。稍后节目我们再见。
Up next is Jeff Bezos preparing a comeback to his former job at Amazon. Bloomberg Senior Tech reporter Brad Stone weighs in. Stay right here. We're listening to Motley Fool Money.
Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Chris Hill. Brad Stone is the head of Global Technology Coverage for Bloomberg News. He's also the author of several bestselling books, including Amazon Unbound, Jeff Bezos, and the invention of a global empire. He joins me now from California.
Brad, always good talking to you. Thanks for being here.
布拉德,和你交谈总是很愉快的。谢谢你来这里。
Hi, Chris. Good to be here.
嗨,克里斯。很高兴来到这里。
Let's start with Amazon. CEO Andy Jassy has announced a couple of rounds of layoffs over the past few months, 28,000 jobs, which is a small percentage of the overall workforce at Amazon. But it's also a population that is bigger than a lot of towns in the United States. And I'm curious what your thoughts are on the way Jassy and his team are approaching this, because there are certainly those who think if you're going to do layoffs, you only want to do it once. And they've done it twice. And it's, I don't think it's going to surprise a lot of people if there's a third round later this year.
Right, yeah, no, the number might be relatively small, but the significance is high. Amazon has been in growth mode for most of its 30 years. I can point to a couple of years during the dot-com bust where they had some layoffs and slowed hiring, but essentially things have been up into the right.
Now, you know, Jassy has had to deal with some pretty extraordinary circumstances, not just the pandemic, and then the resulting slowed out in e-commerce. But arguably the kind of Jeff Bezos-led over building that preceded the pandemic. And I think he's been in adjustment mode, course correction mode. I also think that, you know, the inflation has thrown another variable into the mix, and probably also a declining stock price down what? 30% over the last 12 months, maybe more. And Jassy probably catering a little bit to shareholders, to investors, to try to write the ship and change the sentiment around Amazon.
To your point, it hasn't been handled as elegantly as possible. The idea that the latest thing is that they were stopping construction on the second phase of HQ2 is, you know, another black guy for a company and a process that was viewed very skeptically by a lot of people for a long time.
So this is the handpicked successor of Jeff Bezos. How happy do you think Bezos is with the overall job that Jassy has done for the last couple of years?
那么这就是杰夫·贝佐斯亲自挑选的继任者。你认为在过去几年中,他对贾西所做的整体工作满意吗?
My belief is that if Bezos is doing a full accounting here, then he probably, you know, a lot of the things that have gone wrong over the last two years can't really be laid at Jassy's feet. I think he would have to look at some decisions that he made himself over the past five years.
Let's look specifically at what Amazon has cut back on or stopped doing over the past in the past two rounds of last. A lot of the physical retail, the Amazon ghost stores, the book stores, those four star stores, you know, that was the Bezos-led initiative. He was pushing the company into physical retail and experimenting and they've rolled it back. Kind of didn't work. The device's business. Alexa, Alexa was originated and envisioned and orchestrated by Bezos himself. And it was an idea that Amazon could be the front-end Genai and that conversational assistance were the way that people would interact with chatbots.
And now over the past few months, we've seen that that may not be true, that there's this technology called chat GPT that is much more interesting than Alexa. It'll be interesting how Amazon pivots there, but they've had to, they've certainly had to take account of that. And then everything in this fulfillment center is Amazon subleasing out space that it bought and didn't need. You know, that's a lot of.
So, I guess my answer is, my guess is that Bezos is in second guessing, Jesse. My view is that he's probably not as involved, even as maybe Jesse and the other board members might have hoped that Bezos has really moved on and that this is firmly Andy Jassy's company. So the speculation that he might pull a bob-ig or pull a Howard Schultz and come back for another run as CEO, you're not betting on that. It's fanciful. He has moved on.
The name of the yacht, the super yacht crest, he might remember. The yacht is called Kauru and it means reinvention. And that's what Bezos has done right in front of our very eyes, physically, romantically, and lifestyle-wise. And he has moved on. We may find out soon that he bid for the Washington commanders. That process is ongoing as we speak. He has bought property in Hawaii. He's got the yacht now. He is fully involved in his climate philanthropy. He's got a set of headaches to deal with at the Washington Post. So no, he's not one to revisit previous decisions.
If anything, if you were to ask me to guess, I would say that we'd be more likely to see him drop the executive title in his role as executive chairman that much more likely than to see him return to data to operations at Amazon. Well, since I'm coming to you from the Greater Washington DC area and it is a regular topic of conversation in these parts with the expectation that Dan Sider is going to sell his NFL team, how serious do you think Bezos is about becoming an NFL owner? I think he's serious.
There's enough smoke here. I mean, we know that he hired Allen & Company, I think the New York Post reported that. We know that Sider, at least early on, blocked him from bidding because of enmity around the post coverage of Sider's tenure as owner. We don't know if that's still true. I'm sure he would love Bezos to bid it up a little bit. I don't know if Bezos has come back to the table after being rebuffed. But all this indicates to me that he sees this as another fun adventure for him to have in the stage in his career. So I think if it's not the commanders, it's likely that when the Seattle Seahawks comes through the state process that it's currently in, that he could be a bit of a team. I definitely think he's interested.
Here this week, Alibaba announced it's going to be splitting itself into six separate companies. How seriously do you think companies like Amazon and Alphabet are considering some version of a similar move if they are even considering it at all? Yeah. Well, let me take Amazon because Alphabet does not necessarily as much in my strike zone, nor do I think the activist pressure would be as intense. And I'll get to that in a second.
But Andy Jassy is a first generation Amazonian. He feels ownership over the entire thing. He started his career in the retail side of Amazon selling CDs and DVDs. He was on the advertising business and marketing business. And then he was basically the founding CEO of AWS before Bezos made him CEO of the whole thing. He's much likelier to have the Bezos view that this business is stronger together.
Now the key point here is activist shareholders who are noting the huge run up in Alibaba stock and all the excitement around the IPOs of the particular six divisions. And I think that's got to be, you know, people are noticing that. And I just do wonder if activists come to Amazon and advocate for something like this. All kind of defense that they could have after a two year period where the stock performance has been so dismal.
Historically, it's been Bezos the founder and his credibility that has protected Amazon. But with the distracted and detached Bezos, I'm not sure the defense is as strong. I don't think they're considering it to answer your question directly. I just don't feel like that's something that Jassy would want to spend time on. But the question is, if the current stock performance continues and the Alibaba split up as seen as a great success, will activist force Amazon to consider it. And I think it's possible. It's likely.
I want to move on to something that you and I were chatting about during the break. And it's, you know, as hot a topic in the tech world as there is. And it's chat GPT. I mentioned OpenAI is based right there in San Francisco. Where do you think all of this is going in the near term? The next six to 12 months. What are you hearing from people you talk to and what are you going to be watching for in terms of business achievements or milestones to give you a sense of what the next 12 months looks like for chat GPT and AI in general?
I don't apologize by the fact that the emergence and popularity of chat GPT and Dolly before it took me by surprise. It took the industry by surprise. Google was taken by surprise. But the attention, the hype around it has been extraordinary. So I don't have a crystal ball. I think that very soon we're going to start to see a litany of competitive responses from the likes of Amazon. In terms of how AWS extends some of these capabilities to its customers, to developers.
Google I.O. is coming up in the spring. I think it's going to be wholly AI focused. This is Google's conference. And we're going to see a litany of announcements. And we're going to see Sundar Pachai and maybe what could be almost considered a job saving campaign because the critics are out for him now. Talking about his personal view and philosophy on AI and why Google is set to recapture the lead. Arguably, it has the deepest bench, but OpenAI really did take it by surprise.
And I think we're going to see more conversation about some of the scary possible ethical implications of these technologies and what it means for jobs and for society and education when kids have access to get AI to do their homework and write their papers for them. And then the next incarnation of these things, GPT-5. We just saw GPT-4, just came out. Subscribers to OpenAI can access it. It's a remarkable leap. The next incarnation will be even more interesting. So I think, to me, it's exciting. It's one of these stages in Silicon Valley where the tech is surprising us and forcing us to reconsider our assumptions about, frankly, how we're doing our jobs and living our lives and what it means that this technology is now available. So it's an exciting and unpredictable time.
In addition to your reporting and writing, you are also involved with the podcast Foundering a show that takes a closer look at drama in the tech industry. What about the latest season? Oh, yeah. Thanks, Chris. I appreciate the opportunity to talk about it. We've now done four seasons of Foundering. I did a season actually on Amazon. That was season three. And season four, we wanted to mix it up a little bit, is the rise and fall of John McAfee. And he's the cybersecurity pioneer who almost invented the industry in the late 80s, early 90s. And I would say right off the edge into the world of drug experimentation and violence and crypto scams. There was a presidential run in there. He was on the lamb and then died under mysterious circumstances. So it's a wild story. And my colleagues did a great job with it. You can check out the Foundering podcast wherever you get your podcasts and pick up a copy of Amazon Unbound Jeff Bezos and the invention of a global empire. It is a great read. And one of the best business books I've read over the last few years, Brad Stone, appreciate the time.
Always great to talk to him with you. Thank you, Chris. Appreciate it. Coming up after the break, Matt Argusinger and Ron Gross return. They got a couple of stocks on their radar. So stay right here. You're listening to Motley for money. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about. And the Motley for may have formal recommendations for or against an on buyer's health stock space solely on what you hear.
Welcome back to Motley for money. Chris Hill here in studio once again with Matt Argusinger and Ron Gross. You can hear Motley for money every weekend on radio stations across America. You can also listen seven days a week on your favorite podcast app. For example, we have a conversation with Motley for co-founder David Gardner coming up on the podcast. So take out your phone, open up your favorite podcast app. And with one click of a button, you can follow Motley for money and never miss an episode.
Our email address is podcast at full.com. Question from Tim and Wisconsin who writes about shares of Moderna in the summer of 2019 after listening to your show. I'm interested in your thoughts about continuing to hold this stock versus selling for other opportunities. What do you think, Ron?
我们的电子邮件地址是podcast at full.com。蒂姆和威斯康辛来信,谈到在听完你们的节目后,于2019年夏季购买了Moderna公司的股份。我想知道你对于继续持有这支股票还是卖出去寻找其他机会有何想法,罗恩?
Good question, Tim. So it is a recommendation on our rule breaker service and that the recommendation is partially based on the excitement around mRNA medicines, which use the patient's own body to manufacture proteins that heal or prevent disease. And that is actually the technology that allowed them to create the COVID vaccine so quickly. They got $18 billion in cash. It will allow them to develop their 46 drugs that they have in their pipeline. But it's not all good news because the COVID vaccine demand is significantly down. There's going to be a 73% decline likely in revenue from that this year. Future revenue beyond 2023 could be even less.
But at seven times earnings with strong technology, strong balance sheet, probably fine as part of a well-diversified portfolio. I just personally wouldn't want it to be an outsized position.
This year Pepsi will celebrate its 125th anniversary. And as part of that, the company unveiled an updated logo this week. Pepsi will start using the new logo this fall in the US and Canada and then roll out to the rest of the world in 2024. Matt, they've been working on this for literally years. I would love to know as a shareholder how much money they spent on this new logo.
I like it. I've seen the logo. It looks good. But if they come out and say we spent $200 million developing this, I'm going to be chagrant. Well, you know, it's, it's, their brand is everything. And I have to say I like it as well. I'm a much more navy blue guy than a royal blue guy. So I like that color. If I had to go mad bit on it, I would say I don't, I think the Pepsi name is a little too bold. But otherwise I like it. It's probably worth every penny. I'm just going to say it's a circle. And it's red, white and blue. And it says Pepsi. I could have gotten that for much cheaper than they fade. Next time Pepsi wants to update their logo, they should get in touch with Ron Gross.
All right, let's get to the stocks on our radar, our man behind the glass, Dan Boyd is going to hit you with a question. Matt Argusinger, you're up first. What are you looking at this week?
All right, I'm going with EPR properties. The ticker is EPR. It's a real estate investment trust. That focuses on experiential properties. So you got resorts, restaurants, bowling alleys, top golf is a major tenant. Places where people go to enjoy fun experiences. But they get 45% of the revenue, Dan, from movie theaters. And by the way, one of their movie theaters, tenants is Regal, whose parent company just filed for bankruptcy. So immediately they say, they're in trouble. But not really. All the rent continues to be paid even by Regal. This could be your record year for the box office. And by the way, Amazon, Apple are looking to spend quite a bit of money putting out films that they want to go to cinemas first. So if you're an investor who can tolerate some risk, Dan, EPR's div and yield is almost 9%. Well covered by the company's operating cash flows, balance sheets and decent shape, and the other parts of the business, non-theater parts are doing just fine.
One question about EPR properties. Matt, I want you to guess the last, the year, the last time I was in a movie theater. 2019. You're correct. What movie did I see, Matt? Oh my gosh. I saw cats and it was terrible. I would have never guessed that. Wow. You must have had that theater to yourself. It was like a Saturday afternoon. It was empty. It was, it was great and also terrible because the movie is real bad.
Ron Gross, what are you looking at this week? I'm looking at Westco International, WCC, originally formed in 1922 as the in-house distribution arm of Westinghouse Electric. You remember Westinghouse? Leaving provider of business to business distribution, logistic services and supply chain solutions. They're capitalizing a lot of exciting growth trends, grid modernization, green energy, automation, digitalization. And then more than a typical distributor, they offer a strong service component to their business and to their customers. So they have those competitive advantage. They have scale, distribution and service. Their backlog is at an all-time high. Free cash flow is set to increase significantly over the years.
Ron Gross,你这周在看什么?我在看Westco International,简称WCC,最初于1922年作为Westinghouse Electric的内部分销部门成立。你还记得Westinghouse吗?他们是商业分销、物流服务和供应链解决方案的领先提供商。他们正在利用许多令人兴奋的增长趋势,包括电网现代化、绿色能源、自动化和数字化。除了一般分销商,他们还提供强大的服务组件来支持自己以及客户的业务,因此他们有竞争优势。他们拥有规模、分销和服务。他们的积压订单创历史新高,自由现金流预计未来数年会大幅增长。
My friends over at Value Hunter Service that we have here at the full thinks that it has meaningful upside at current prices.
我这里的价值猎人服务团队认为,这家公司当前的股价具有有意义的上涨潜力。
Dan, question about Westco International? Not really a question, Chris. That's more of a comment. You know why I love it when Ron is on the show because he brings a company that I've never heard of and it's huge and super important to the entire world. There you go.
That's kind of a nice thought. I can't tell if he's being sarcastic. I'm not. I'm being earnest. I love it. I've never heard of this company and it seems like they're, well, if they disappeared tomorrow, a lot of businesses would be in trouble.
What do you want to add to your watch list, Dan? I'll tell you what I don't want to add to my watch list, Chris. That's movie theaters. All right. That's fair.
That's going to do it for this week's Motley Full Money Radio Show. The show is mixed by Dan Boyd. I'm Chris Hill. Thanks for listening. We'll see you next time.
这就是本周的Motley Full Money电台节目了。节目由丹·博伊德混音。我是克里斯·希尔。谢谢你们的收听。我们下次再见。