So Sam, tell me this. Do you like watching sweaty men fight to the death in their underwear? Me too. Every weekend. I build my Saturdays around it. Well, I think you should invest in their Saturdays. My pick for Stocka Palooza 2024 is.
All right, we're live. Sean, did you just go to the Black Friday sale at Tommy Bahama? What's going on? I went into the old dad's closet today and got a little shirt because special occasion and I needed to dress up. That's your version of dressing up. Yeah, this is up, dude.
Alright. What are we doing today? Today, this is Stocka Palooza, the first ever first annual Stocka Palooza, which you may not know what that means because we made it up. Basically, me and Sam said, what if we did an episode where we pick a stock? So each of us are going to go through the stock market. We're going to each pick a stock that we have to make a case for. If you've ever seen, there's a conference called the Zone Conference and it's kind of like a TED talk, but for stock pickers and all the biggest names go there. Bill Ackman goes there and Drucken Miller and whoever, Chama, they get on stage and they make a 20 minute case for a particular stock. Why they're long or why they're bullish on something? Those guys are good and those talks are fun. We wanted to try it too and do it our way. The MFM style of this, it's called Stocka Palooza.
好的,我们今天要做什么?今天是股票盛典活动,这是第一届年度股票盛典,你可能不知道这是什么意思,因为我们是自己编的。基本上,我和山姆说,我们要不要做一个选股的节目?所以我们每个人要参考股市,挑选一只要为其提供理由的股票。如果你见过一个叫作 Zone Conference 的会议,它有点像 TED talk,但是是给股票挑选者的,很多大牌都会去那里。比如 Bill Ackman、Drucken Miller、Chama,他们上台演讲约20分钟,为某只特定的股票提供理由,说明为什么看好或者看涨?这些人很牛,那些演讲也很有趣。我们也想尝试一下,按照我们的方式来做。我们的方式是 MFM 风格,就叫股票盛典。
Both me and Sam have picked a stock. We do not know what each other have picked. We're going to get 20 minutes each to present. So if you're on just the audio podcast feed, I know I've been telling you YouTube is where it's at. Today, YouTube is for sure where it's at because we got slides. Your boys came prepared and I have data. I got charts. I have a whole bunch of stuff here. So you want to go to YouTube where you're going to actually be able to see the screen and see us sharing slides. So we got 20 minutes each to do it.
Alright, everyone. We have a quick ad for HubSpot. Sales super teams aren't built overnight. They require unicorn level talent, endless training, huge budgets and lots of luck. Or you could just use sales hub from HubSpot. It's an all the one platform built with all the tools for your success. Smaller prospecting, check. Faster revenue, yup. Scales with your team sure does. But in Sam speak, I'm going to put it way simpler. Just go to hubspot.com slash sales and it will make selling easier, faster and more efficient. Hubspot.com slash sales.
For the listener who are on not YouTube, we have to ask them to do something when they finally go to YouTube. That's right. That's right. If you go there and you don't hit the subscribe button, a curse is placed on your family for seven years. And I don't want that for any of you guys. So go ahead and hit subscribe when you're there because it's super important for your family. It's a simple pitch. We put all this work in and they don't have to pay us back with anything other than a subscribe on YouTube. It's free and easy for them and it makes just a ton of difference to us. So just go do that.
Alright. Now, what are you saying? Okay, so you're ready to begin. Do we need to? Should we just go into it? No, rules. Okay, so we're kind of making up the rules of the fly. So we're going to talk about 20 minutes. So you get 20 minutes. I'll ask questions, but I'll try not to interrupt too much. And then we'll do like, we'll talk for about it for a few minutes afterwards. And then I'll pitch and then the last 10 or however many minutes left. We'll each vote. But then in the YouTube comments, you guys actually have to vote who wins.
But when we say when, what does win mean here? Because we're not exactly, we're going to be you guys can like, we can play a drinking game where it's like count the disclosures. You're going to see the disclosure constantly of saying, we have no idea what we're talking about. It's just something fun and cool. But how do we base win on? Is it by showmanship? Is it by what the company you think is going to have a long term best case? But what does best mean a 10 year? Well, I don't know. And that's part of the fun here. We can say, entertainment because that's different. Well, this is definitely entertainment. But the entertainment has to have a foundation of you can't just be making shit up, right? We got to have actual good insights or good analysis presented in a wonderful way, right? The way that any presentation is sort of scored, you have style points and you have substance points. And we're going to take both of those factors into consideration to pick the ultimate winner.
I don't know if you've ever gone and watched any of these, by the way, like, you know, in, I remember when Chamath went on stage in 2016 and he was like, there's there's a multi trillion dollar company hidden in plain sight. And he made a case for why Amazon was going to get to three trillion by 2025. This is back in 2015. What is it now? It's currently like close to two trillion. And we got a year left. He's not far off. He then went up and did a case for box and I bought a shit ton of box stock and box then just shit the bad for the next three years. And if you go back, all the smartest guys, Bill Ackman, he goes up there and he makes a case for some housing thing. Terrible stocks, right? I went back and I actually charted how these picks did really bad. So actually, we might be just as good as them because we're also going to be terrible. What's considered good for these guys? Like, is it like a batting average? Or it's like, if you're 300, if you're, you know, which 30% right, you're the best? No, I think it's just based on the returns, right? So like how much you put in versus how often you're right, right? The multiple of those two. So, you know, they just got to get enough right where the overall returns are there. But we should say this. First slide is the most important slide, which is that this is not financial advice. This is entirely for entertainment purposes only. My lawyer has told me to say that, but it's actually true. This is only for entertainment purposes. I forbid you from actually investing in any of the things that we talk about. I am an idiot when it comes to the stock market. So if you take my financial advice, I consider you an idiot too. That's my disclaimer. There needs to be a song where it's, what did you say? Throw your hands in the air and lose your money like you just don't care. Exactly. Stock up a loser. That's the stock up a loser. Alright, let's jump in. Alright, my turn. I'm going to start my clock. Let's go.
Okay, so here's the general idea. If you're buying one stock, Sam, I know you're an index fund guy, right? You like to go into the SP 500 and spread out your risk. And you're right. If you're buying one stock, you're taking more risk than the index. And if you look back last 10 years, the index has given you about a 10 and a half percent annual return over a 10 year period. 10 and a half percent over 10 years. So that's, we'd have to beat that to justify taking the additional risk of picking one stock. Because that's going to basically 2.7 X your money in a 10 year span. So if you want to do a little better than double, almost triple your money in 10 years, just put it in the SP 500. So we're looking for something that if we're going to take more risk, we need to get more reward. So here's what I'm thinking. I decided to peg for what do I think could get me a 5X in 10 years? Okay, 5X in 10 years double what the what the SP 500 is going to do. So which stock did I pick Sam? I'm sure you're wondering. Well, let's ask the Oracle of Omaha, AKA Buff Daddy. What would Warren Buffett do? Because I'm not a great stock picker. So I wanted to go and study the great stock pickers of all time and look at what would be their criteria. What are they looking for so that I can learn from them? And I went back and I learned everything it could from Warren Buffett. And I realized that there's five big things that he looks for. Okay, so you're ready for the five big ones. The first understandability, meaning he doesn't invest in shit, he doesn't understand if it's too complicated or if it's outside of his circle of confidence, he's simply not investing. And so the idea is, is the business simple enough that an idiot like me can understand it. And that ideally, an idiot can even run it, right? It's such a simple business. So understand ability. Number two, an economic moat. So we want few competitors, we want some pricing power. And we want to make sure that this business is so defensible that it's going to be around in 50 years because Warren is usually a buy and hold investor. He's not really trying to trade in and out in time the market. He's looking for time in market. And he's looking to be in the in the company for a long time. And so we want an economic moat, something that's super durable.
All right, number three, competent management. So management, basically a strong management team is always going to be a, you know, big benefit for anything for any stock.
好的,第三点,有能力的管理层。所以管理层,基本上一个强大的管理团队对于任何股票都会带来巨大的好处。
Okay, last, last two margin of safety means we got to be buying this, we can't be buying this at some extreme price, even if it's a great company, if it's massively overpriced, it's too hot in the market, then we're taking too much risk. So what we want to do is buy dollar bills for 80 cents, right? That's a that's a great margin of safety. And of course, lastly, strong financials. So higher earnings, low cap X, low debt, that's really what we look for.
Okay, so this is why Warren Buffett is buying brands, not stocks. I love this line actually in my research, he goes, don't buy a stock by a company. Subtle difference. But he's looking to basically like, what would what don't try to buy the stock? Because you think the pricing to go up by the company, because you think that company is going to endure and be successful and just grow steadily for a long period of time. That's a new thing that he did. So it's not new for I mean, he didn't start doing that until his 60s. So before he was buying stocks purely in the financials, he's like, I don't care what they sell. And then he like met Coke. And then he like invested in Washington Post. He's like, Oh, no, the brand is actually where it's at.
Exactly. He used to do the cigarette butt investing where you know, if there's two puffs left on the cigarette, okay, let's do it. There's value there. But he credits Charlie Munger for showing him that actually it's better to pay, a fair price for a great business than a great price for just a fair business. And so that's why he's now invested in Apple, Bank of America, American Express, Coca-Cola, Geico. These are brands that have been around for 50 years. And that's what he's looking for.
Okay. So simple buffet formula, just to summarize, buy brands that you understand that'll be here 50 years from now that spit off cash at a fair price. If you do all that, you can hold forever. You've done well.
So I looked and I looked and truth be told, I actually started with one in mind and then reverse engineered this whole presentation. But I have one. So Sam, tell me this. Do you like watching sweaty men fight to the death in their underwear? Me too. Every weekend. I build my Saturdays around it. Well, I think you should invest in their Saturdays. My pick for Stockapalooza 2024 is TKO. TKO is the stock that owns WWE and UFC. And I think that TKO is a buffet stock. And here's Buffett, you know, looking ready for WrestleMania.
Why is it? Why does it fit the criteria? So understandability, very easy to understand. It's a holding company that owns these sports franchises and owns these leagues underneath them. Okay, that's the that's all the businesses. It's it does nothing else besides that.
Finding is the easiest thing to understand in the world. I don't know if you've heard this great thing that that Dana White says, he goes, let's say you walk out into a sports field on a Sunday and there's a soccer game over here in a basketball game over there. And these guys are playing flag football. And you can go look in any one of those directions. You might have a favorite sport. But if somebody else fight and there's a fight going on, everybody's heads going to turn. It is a human nature thing that we like to watch people compete and fight. And it is global everywhere in the world. People don't, you know, if you go to China, people don't know the rules of football. You come to America, people don't know the rules of cricket, but everybody understands the concept of these two guys are going to fight each other, everybody around the world. And so it is the easiest to understand product and business. The business is very simple. Fans pay to watch fights, people pay pay per view.
发现是世界上最容易理解的事情。我不知道你是否听过 Dana White 说过的一句伟大的话,他说,假设你走进一个体育场,周日这里进行足球比赛,那边在进行篮球比赛。而这些家伙在玩旗标橄榄球。你可以朝任何一个方向看。也许你有喜欢的体育运动。但如果有人在打架,所有人的头都会转过去。这是人类的本性,我们喜欢看人们竞争和争斗。世界上任何地方都是如此。中国人可能不了解足球规则,美国人可能不了解板球规则,但全世界的人都可以理解这两个人将互相搏斗的概念。因此,这是最容易理解的产品和业务。业务非常简单。粉丝们付费观看战斗,人们付费观看点播直播。
Sam, how much do you think you've paid in pay per view per year? What are you spending on your UFC fandom?
山姆,你认为你每年在付费观看上花了多少钱?你在UFC球迷上花了多少钱?
So I would probably say I buy the five a year. So that's $500, I think. And then I only have a ESPN subscription. Like, dude, I don't know anything about sports. I just found out that's the Super Bowl is this Sunday. I thought it was in November. I only I pay per ESPN just for that. So that's our 60. And then I attend one to three a year, which is quite expensive. That's $1,000 a show, at least.
Okay. So let's go through these down. Economic moat. Name the competitor to the UFC name a competitor to WWE. They've all come and gone. Bellator was the most well-funded competitor to UFC. It was funded by Viacom. They put hundreds of millions of dollars into this thing. It failed. And they just sold it for less than what they put what they invested into it. It's sold it for $100 million. The number two competitors sold for $100 million. The UFC sold for $4.2 billion. So that's the gap between one and two. Growing up, I love WCW. That was the big competitor to WWE. Guess what? It folded and they took all the wrestlers. AEW, all those things. Basically, these two brands have over 95% market share in their market. This is total monopoly. More than Google has in the search market. Do you know how popular WWE is on YouTube? Did you look into that? I have a couple slides later. They dominate social media. It's the tenth. The tenth most popular channel on all of YouTube is WWE. That's insane. Like the fact that these two have more market share in their market than Google has in the search market shows you they just cut it complete and utter dominance. And the fact that competitors have come and gone, people have taken their best shot and they haven't been able to touch them. So you have two brands that have been around for a while and will be around for a while.
Okay, competent management. We have Aria Emanuel. If you've ever seen Entourage, the character Ari Gold is based on Aria Emanuel. He is an absolute power player, power broker in the entertainment business. You have Dana White, the guy who's basically been a founder CEO of this essentially since they bought it for 2 million bucks bought it for 2 million sold it for 4.2 billion. And he's still going and he's still going strong. This guy is an absolute animal. And we have Egan Durbin who's with Silver Lake Partners. That's their kind of institutional capital behind this. And that guy's also got a pretty crazy track record with multiple billion dollar or multi billion dollar plays like Skype and whatnot. So super good management team.
好的,管理层很称职。我们有Aria Emanuel。如果你曾经看过《明星伴我行》,角色Ari Gold就是以Aria Emanuel为原型创造的。他是娱乐业中绝对的权力派人物和交易经纪人。我们还有Dana White,这个人基本上从他们以2百万美元购买UFC到现在一直担任创始人兼CEO的角色。他以42亿美元的价格卖出了UFC,而且他仍然按兵不动,依然强势前行。这个人简直就是个野兽。我们还有Egan Durbin,他是Silver Lake Partners的成员,他们为UFC提供了机构资本支持。这个人也有非常出色的成绩,参与过像Skype等市值上百亿美元的项目。所以管理团队非常出色。
Okay, margin of safety. So I don't know if you know how much money these make, but they basically the combined entities generate over a million dollars, sorry, a billion dollars a year of EBITDA. And it trades at about 14. So it's about a 14 billion dollar market cap company right now with four with with a billion dollars of EBITDA. Just to put this in the comparison, if UFC plus WWE two full like leagues are 14 billion, the Phoenix Suns one NBA franchise just sold for 5 billion. Right. So this is basically three Phoenix Suns. And you get the entire universe of combat sport of, of, of, you know, fighting entertainment, which is wrestling and UFC everything except for boxing. F one, which is, you know, to me seems super niche. Like F one is, it's so so niche. Do you know how much F one just sold for? No idea. Eight and a half billion dollars. And F one has a big problem, which is no matter how popular F one is, they have to pay out to all the teams, the franchises. So, you know, half the revenue goes to the Aston Martin team, and then the Mercedes team and whoever else. So UFC doesn't have any of that. All the fighters are independent contractors. They don't even pay him salaries. There's no guaranteed salaries, independent contractors who make about 15 to 17% of the overall revenue goes to the fighters. Way less than every other sport, no teams, no, no, no rev sharing with anybody. Basically, they get to bring that up later in your presentation. We do. I do have a wrist slide, which is around that. Yes. And the best part, this is all AI resistant. Like we don't know what the hell is going to happen with AI. AI is pretty clearly the next big thing. And it's going to wreck a bunch of industries going to redo the way that insurance works and the way that cars work and the way that, you know, software is built and all this stuff. How are you going to use AI to generate? Like you can't use AI to make two guys fight in a ring. It's not going to happen. And so, this is an AI proof industry, which is nice because Warren Buffett, Buff Daddy, he's looking for things that are not going to change. And I think this is not going to change.
All right, everyone, a quick break because I want to fill you in on a little experiment that I'm doing. I've got a new project. It's called Money Wise. It's a personal finance podcast for high net worth people or young people who are on their way to becoming a high net worth. When I made a little bit of money, I didn't even know how much money I should be spending each month should be 10,000, 30,000, 50,000. And I didn't really have a lot of people to ask. So I created a podcast called Money Wise because I wanted to figure out what are some of the things that people who have a lot of cash and who have a high net worth. What do they do with it? The first episode is with a friend of mine. He sold his company for $200 million when he was 31 years old. He gets super transparent about his monthly expenses, his portfolio, how it impacts his happiness, everything. And so I want you guys to check it out. It's called Money Wise. That's one word. You can find it on my Twitter bio. I'm the Sam Parr or you can just type in Money Wise on Apple, Spotify and YouTube.
All right, everyone, this episode is brought to you by the product boss. It's a podcast hosted by Jacqueline and Mina, their friends of mine. They're part of the HubSpot podcast network. And it's a podcast about taking your physical product sales and strategy to the next level. And they deliver the podcast in an hour long workshop style strategy. Some of their most popular episodes are debunking the myth of daily social media obligations, which dives deep on how you can grow your social media presence from an audience perspective and get audiences eager to buy your products without feeling overwhelmed. They give a comprehensive playbook that's filled with tips and strategy for building a big audience that align with your business objectives. So if this interests you, check it out, the product boss, wherever you find your podcast.
All right, last one, it's growing nicely. So it's grown 20% a year right now, but there's also the big prize with any sports league is media rights deals. And the media rights for both of these are coming up this year and next. And so they have a chance to renegotiate and basically double what they're getting paid for by all the streaming companies by Netflix and by Amazon and ESPN and all the companies that want, they need live sports because live sports are one of the only things that people watch concurrently and have to look at the ads because they're watching during the thing, there's no DVR, there's no, there's no binge mode, there's streaming. And so live sports is one of the few live sports assets that exist. And the media deals are coming up and they might be a lot bigger than people think.
All right, last few slides, consistent cash flows to these are profitable companies are spit off cash. You know, they're spitting off, you know, a couple hundred million bucks a year free cash flow. And they don't need to invest it. They don't own a ton of real estate or they don't have to buy more machines in order to grow. They just put on they just keep putting on shows. It's all variable. A couple of the risks that are worth mentioning, it's got a bunch of debt, they use debt to buy the franchises of these leagues. And so they still have a few billion dollars of debt. The last thing stock performance has not been great. I think this is one where we're going to have to buck the trend. We're going to have to know what the market doesn't know right now. And we're going to have to go ahead and outperform.
What date did that drop? So they merged in like mid 2023. But is that drop because Vince McMahon? Not just Vince McMahon. I think basically what happened was they merged people didn't understand the terms, they didn't understand what was going to happen, what was the plan, all that stuff. And the Vince McMahon stuff happened at the same time. Got it.
And so they dropped about 15% on the merger, which is kind of crazy before they were both public. And they were both trading at about eight to 10 billion in valuation. And so when they merged, they were supposed to be like a 20 billion dollar entity. And they're currently trading at 14 right after they merged. And so that was that's what happened last year.
Lastly, a couple of the risks, like you talked about, fighters not going to be paid enough. So their costs could go up if the fighters ever unionized and were able to collectively bargain, which they haven't done, but the NBA and NFL all has. And lastly, I don't know what's going to happen if Dana ever leaves. He is the powerhouse and the CEO who's driving this thing. He's cashed out. So he does not own the same stake that he owned before. He's not even on the stock filings. He's not on the cap table. So he said he has skin in the game still, but it's not listed anywhere. So I'm not sure what he has. And he might, you know, might retire one day. And I think that would be a big shock to the business like suck retiring or or Bezos retiring, you know, it can affect the business. Can I add a few a few risks? Let me add a few risks. Yeah, go for it.
All right, first, Dana White is insane. So he's mostly insane in a good way. But there's a lot of liability. There's a lot of liability in this industry, because we're talking about grown men fighting in their underwear in front of millions of people. The person who likes that and runs that as well as the person who actually does that in order to be great at that, you have to be insane. And so what that means is there's been risks with Dana. Dana has said a lot of crazy stuff. I don't even think that I'm going to say if I think it's right or wrong, that's irrelevant. What's irrelevant is that a lot of people think it's wrong. He also got in trouble for smack at his wife. And that was on video. Vince McMahon's now in trouble for not even sexual harassment. I think it's beyond that. And then also like the third famous guy in the UFC right now, Sean Strickland. Again, I don't care if you like what he says or dislike what he says. There's a lot of people who dislikes what he says as it regards to like the whole Trans thing and gay thing. And so inherently, there's going to be all types of nutty people like that. I think it won't impact the business at all. It's actually going to make the business better because the people who are behind them are going to be harder behind them. But I do think it will scare institutional money. And that's basically my downside.
Well, in that lawsuit, that lawsuit is actually a pretty big lawsuit. So I think that the only counter to that is usually the risks are what ifs. All the things you mentioned have already happened. They've already happened. They've already happened. And the business is doing fine. So like Dana has been saying crazy stuff for 20 years. It's what okay. I guess he'll just continue it. He continues as is that's business. That's a risk. That's a risk. That's a what if. I think there's some some risk there, but not that much. In fact, I would actually say the UFC has shown tremendous anti fragility. So for example, if this is a business that depends on live events, it's all based on live events and it survived COVID. It can survive anything. Live events had to all shut down and the UFC figured out a way. Why? Because founder CEO, he's got the willpower. The guy went to Abu Dhabi, created a bubble and started created something called Fight Island and hosted the fights in a bubble on Fight Island himself. They found a way around the pandemic. I think they could find a way around. But I'm an idiot. Keep in mind, I'm an idiot. I don't think that's going to impact any of the business. I think all those things are going to make their business, their revenue, the profit greater. I just wonder how that impact if fidelity or one of these big companies wants to buy a huge chunk of the stock. Yeah, I think that's fair.
I think the global nature of this is underrated. And so when you think about where does growth come from for these types of leagues? It comes from two things. One is streaming deals, which are getting bigger and bigger and bigger. And the other is globalization.
I don't know if you know, but the NBA does like crazy amount of work to globalize. They have camps all throughout Africa and India. They go every summer. They broadcast games that cut deals to broadcast games. They will play a game in Europe to try to get fans. The NFL does the same thing. They play a game in London to try to get fans there. But the UFC actually inherently has that. They get champions from all over the world. They've never got to Africa. I think maybe one time they've done one event in China. Basically, China, India, and Africa are still untapped, but they're proven that they have product market fit. They have fans. They just haven't done the events there yet.
And the biggest case for this is really that these leagues develop lifelong fans. You've been a fan and I would guess that 20 years from now, you're probably still going to be a fan. Your kids might become fans. This is how sports works. It's basically generational. People watch them until they're, my grandparents will watch sports, but then they'll take their kids to the events and they'll get their kids involved and they become fans as well.
The UFC is only 30 years old. That's incredibly young when it comes to a league like this. And you know what they're better at than everyone else? Telling stories and creating characters. They are without a doubt the best at this. They kick ass compared to any of the other leagues.
So check this out. This is on Instagram. The NFL, which is the biggest, most profitable sports league in the United States, biggest, most profitable league has 29 million followers. The UFC has 39 million followers because they are better at social media and they're better at storytelling, which is essentially saying they're better at the way the world works now. And the NFL was better at the way the world worked 20 years ago.
Same thing. Here's YouTube. Here's the YouTube channel has 17 and a half million subscribers for the UFC on YouTube, baseball, which has been around for whatever 100 years, 4.9 million subscribers. It's insane how they get dominated by this. And so they, you know, you get to ride on the back of that.
And the other thing is that Ari Manuel's company, which bought bought these, they're just better at negotiating media rights. That's what they've been doing for their entire career, for, you know, actors and television shows and whatnot, better negotiating sponsorships. If you look at where the UFC was when they bought it versus where it is now, you know, it was unprofitable there and growing, you know, growing at an okay clip. Now it's growing faster and more profitable and it is profitable because of the work that they've done.
WWE just kind of a 10 year, $5 billion deal with Netflix just for one of their shows, which is kind of insane. It's going to go from USA network to Netflix. These are now like $300 million a year streaming deals that they're picking up. And that is all Sam. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, stock of Palooza. That was very good. That was very good.
My bias is heavy here. I tell people they ask like what my hobbies are if I paid digital sports, I say I paid attention to only two sports fighting and the other ones way nerdy or track and field. I like track and field and UFC. I'm a super fan and I think there's so many super fans like me. I don't know how the super fans compared to the other sports. I don't know if it's that strong, but I'm a huge fan.
The stock, it's a good brand. I agree. I think the risks are too high though. I think they're, I think they're Dana's is, do you think if someone left, you said that on their second point, it was like, anyone can run it. Do you think someone can run it as good as him? I do think you get the benefit of the kind of founder led company when you have Dana there. And you would lose that if he left. So I do think it will continue to run, but I don't think you'd get that X factor back of what Dana brings to the table and what Vince McMahon brought to the table until he was, how old is Vince McMahon? He's like 80 or something like that. The guy ran the league for like 50 years or something. And he was a character. He was a character in the show. And I think Dana is a character in the show. I think Dana is the most popular UFC fighter. Well, Connor, but like, I think he could run this thing for like 30 more years. Maybe. I think maybe. I think that running this type of league is harder than any other league. Maybe F1 actually would be really challenging because they're like, they kind of seem like divas, but the UFC, I think dealing with these types of fighters, have you ever hung out with a professional fighter or like up and coming professional fighters? I've been around a handful of them. They're insane. They're insane. They're hard to work with. They're nuts. And it would be very challenging. And also the lawsuit that they have. So to put that in perspective, you said that they pay their fighters 14%. How much does the NFL pay their? The NBA or about 50% that's the collective bargaining. That's what they negotiated. And right now, you made a case that they're a monopoly. That's the exact case that the lawsuit is trying to bake, which is that UFC is a monopoly and that you guys, you have to allow us to do collective bargaining. And I have looked into it a little bit, but it seems like they've got a great case and that could meaningfully change the economics. It could. It could. That is, I would put that as the number one risk to shift the economics. Dude, there's some guys like they'll say in the post-fight interviews. They're like, I'm the champion now. Eight months ago, I was driving Uber and like, and I'm still driving an Uber. Yeah. Well, like to put this in perspective, there's this guy named Francis Naganyu. I think he's from Cameroon. He's like the American dream. He came over here with nothing. I think he worked in like a mine, you know, like a blood diamond type of mine, like crazy stuff. He's now champion. Do you know how much money he was? He was a world champion in the heavyweight division of the UFC. He looked like an animal. It would knew think of a heavyweight champion. This is what you want this guy to look like. Look like beautiful story. Great guy. Do you know how much he was getting paid per fight? I feel like it was like 500k or something. It was about $600,000. That's how much this guy was getting paid to fight the scariest people on earth. It's insane. I know a mid-level engineer at Google that makes more than that. It's insane. It's insane. And so that needs to change. I think further to be true longevity for this sport. And if that changes, there's actually going to be bad stuff for the business, or at least it'll be less good. But great presentation. I'm a fan of UFC. I think that was a great presentation. All right. Your turn.
All right. Now it's my turn. So look, we said the disclosure already that this really, we don't know anything. So I'm actually going to not even focus too much on the numbers. I'm going to focus on the story. And I just want to put this disclosure up front. Now, before I get into this, I want to tell you a few other companies that I looked at. I looked at Rivian. I looked at 23andMe. That's a total shit show. I looked at Container Store because there you go. That's the next meme stop. And of course, I looked at HubSpot because I own HubSpot and I'm trying to do a little pump and dump scheme. I'm kidding. I'm kidding. I'm not going to talk about that.
Now, I was trying to think about this. And I was like, should we do like a Wolfle Wall Street pitch? You know how he's pitching penny stocks where he's like, hi, John. The reason I'm calling is I've got this new patent technology that has huge upside potential and little downside potential. Is this something where I could maybe get in on the ground floor? And then I realized I'm not going to do that. I'm just going to tell you, I'm just going to base all of everything that I'm doing here on what do I think is cool and interesting. And so what do I think is cool and interesting?
Look, if you want to make great money, you invest in Amazon. It's a slow, predictable. I think it's a great company. But that's not interesting to me. We all know that same with everything Elon's doing. At this point, he's the man. I can't invest in Tesla. I can't invest in anything he's ever done. That's Dorky plus look at him. I don't want to invest in that. Yeah, I like how you use the pre plastic surgery. Elon won. They're nice. There's a point. I've got a point here.
And then I looked at Bill Gates and I looked at this guy as like, you know, Microsoft also great company. I like the CEO. They're doing great things. But we've been there and done that. I think it all makes money, but it's a little bit boring. It's not for this podcast. So what is interesting? Look at this guy. Do you know who that is? That is the LVM H guy, right? The LVM H guy. We're going to call him S cargo because I don't know how to pronounce his name. What's his name? Bernard Bernard. How do you say his last name? Bernard. Yeah, we're going to call us cargo. Arnold as we go. The slug eaten suit, wear it. Beautiful Frenchman. That's what we're going to call this guy.
So he's great. So LVM H, what here's what they do. This isn't my company, but this is the person I got inspired by. So they own a 100 plus luxury brands, Dior, Fenny, Sephora, Tiffany's, Hublot, they own luxury brands. And the reason why this guy, this guy got into the luxury business and I found three quotes by him. You use Warren Buffett as your kind of like rule setter for how you're going to pitch a stock. I'm going to use this guy. He used to own a construction company. And then he got super into luxury businesses. And I'm going to explain three quotes as to why he said that. So he said, in luxury business, you have to build on heritage. And so have you ever heard that phrase Lindy? So Lindy's a popular phrase that's floating around on the Twitter circles. It basically just means the time of which something has existed is directly correlated to the time that it will continue to exist. So something that's been around for a long time will likely be around for a long time. Something that's brand new and hasn't been around for a long time can go away easier. And so for in order to build a luxury brand, I'm going to track to this guy. He's like, I need something that can last that's been around for a long time. And that means it's going to last a long time.
He also said luxury goods are the only area in which it's possible to make luxury margins. Okay, high margins. So I've got to find a company that has that can last a long time because it's been around for a long time. It has high margins. And then the final thing he says is affordable luxury. Those two words, they don't even go together. Meaning what I've got to find some a product a company that sells a product that is expensive and exclusive.
Now, what fits that bill, Sean? Originally, I thought of James Bond, James Bond, like that's like the definition of cool guy and exclusive and like you dream wanting to be him, but it's going to be impossible to attain. And so the product that in the brand that I almost chose was what's something that James Bond is a synonymous for. Do you know what that car is? The Aston Martin, I believe. That is an Aston Martin. And so Aston Martin, that kind of got me interested. Aston Martin has a strong brand, but they have a shit multiple. They've got a decent product, but it's actually one of the least valuable car companies in the world. I believe right now it's only trading at like $2 billion. So it's not that big of a business.
Now, Aston Martin, it's been around for a long time. I think it's going to continue being around for a long time. I think a lot of young men dream of having an Aston Martin. Their margin is shit. So it's been losing money. So that kind of gets it out of the way. I can't do that.
And in terms of like being exclusive and expensive, it is expensive, but because not that many people want an Aston Martin compared to all the other cars, I wouldn't exactly say that it's that exclusive. So Aston Martin, not good enough.
So what is good enough? So I found a company that has been around for a very long time. It's got huge margins. In fact, it's got the best margins in its industry. It's very expensive. And it's so exclusive that even if you wanted to buy it, in many cases, you cannot. Do I have your interest?
You have me interested. You had my attention. And now you have my interest. Okay, so you probably don't know who this person is. Do you not? All right. This man, he's no longer around, but he was born in the early 1900s. His name is Enzo.
Enzo started out as a race car driver. And he drove, I actually believe he might have drove for Aston Martin at one point, but he also drove for Fiat, an Italian car company. And he was so into race car driving that he goes, these Fiat's, they ain't cutting it for me. I have to make my own car. And I'm going to make the best car.
He goes, I'm basically just going to make an engine and I'm going to put wheels on it. And aerodynamics be damned. That's what you say if you have a shit engine. I'm only going to focus on the engine. And he was obsessed with making an engine. And eventually other people got obsessed with his engines. And so in the first year, he made a car for himself. In the second year, he sold two cars. In the third year, he sold only about eight cars.
And he kept slowly growing. And eventually, that company became Ferrari. So Ferrari is my company. And you're going to like Enzo Ferrari. Enzo Ferrari, he's a crazy person. He's sort of like Conor McGregor, that quote that we have from Conor McGregor. He goes, I'm like Vincent Van Gogh. I've lost my mind of this game. Enzo Ferrari is like that. He's got this great quote, where he goes, a great mania to which one must sacrifice everything without reticence, without hesitation.
So he's one of these guys who is totally bought into his brand, sort of like Dana White, where he lives and breathes the shit. He was known as being kind of a shit dad, kind of a shit husband. And all he cared about was Ferrari making it great.
So let me give you a little bit of high level facts about Ferrari. In 2023, the revenue grew 17% to about $6.5 billion. They're very profitable. Their net profit last year was $1.3 billion. Now here's an interesting stats. An interesting set. So Honda last year sold something like 1.2 million cars. Ferrari only sold 13,000 cars.
Their market cap. Now when I started working on this, their market cap was a lot lower. They released some really big news on Friday and their market cap skyrocketed and they are now worth $72 billion. That makes them roughly this eighth or seventh largest car company in the world. And they're still growing at around 23% a year. Unfortunately, their PE ratio is crazy high. It's like 54. So 54 times earning, which is like one of the highest.
But check out this. Look at the highest or the most valuable car companies in the world. Number one, Tesla, number two, Toyota, and then Porsche Mercedes. And then you go down to Ferrari, $68 billion. I think on Friday, it was like $75 billion. So they're more valuable than being W more valuable than Volkswagen, more valuable than Honda. And they only make something like 13,000 cars a year. Isn't that insane? That's crazy.
So here's my case as to why this is an interesting company. I'm going to try and talk a little bit about the numbers. But again, that's not our specialty. So I'm going to try and say a little bit away from it. But they are at Cash Cow. They are the cash cow of the industry. In fact, Ferrari makes more profit per unit. Every unit they sell, they make more profit than any other car maker in the business.
Some car makers, in fact, like a GM, they actually lose money and they hope to make monies through their other models or through selling parts or fixing the cars. Ferrari makes a profit on everything they make. Last year, or sorry, in 2021, they made over 100 grand per unit sold. The second place company that sold the profit of the second most was Tesla at $6,700.
And then it's saying, wow, so you know, whatever 15x more profit per car than the second place person. But it gets even crazier. So in order to make the same amount of profit, profit that Ferrari makes per car, Ford has to sell 900 cars. Okay. And you think, Ford, that's just a middle line car. Okay. What about Mercedes? Mercedes has to sell 67 BMW also SSL 67.
They make the most profit of any other car, luxury car maker in the business and then make more profit per unit sold than any other car in the industry.
他们是业务中其他汽车制造商中利润最高的奢侈车制造商,并且每单位销售的利润也高于行业中其他任何汽车。
Now here's where it gets even crazier, crazier. You don't choose Ferrari. Ferrari chooses you. So did you do you know about this with Ferrari about their waitlist? I did not know this. All right. So here's how it works.
And there's a lot of mystery around this. Like they don't even openly say like exactly how it works. But let's say you want to buy a base Ferrari, like the cheaper models, a lot of times you could just go and buy it. But if you want to buy the more expensive one, what they do is they have got a waitlist. And they look the waitlist and in order to buy the fancier ones, oftentimes you have to buy three to four of the base models.
And so Jay Leno, you know how Jay Leno is a big car nerd? Yep. He openly says he goes, I refuse to buy a Ferrari because of how elitist they are. You have to, they're not well, he's like, obviously, they're not the every guy, every man car, but you can't even buy one if you want one. And you have to, and once you buy one, if you if you're able to acquire one, you have to sign paperwork that says that you're not going to put any stupid parts on it, you can't repaint it certain colors.
So there's this lawsuit that just ended recently where this famous celebrity painted his Ferrari pink and they sued him. And he had to pay them $350,000 because he posted it on Instagram and they said that that hurt their reputation. Justin Bieber did the same thing. Justin Bieber bought a car and he did three or four things that were crazy.
The first thing is he just left the car at the at a hotel parking lot for like a few weeks or something while he traveled. Another thing that he did was, I think he took like the Ferrari badge off of it. You know, some people debauge the car to be cool. And so they banned them. Justin Bieber can no longer buy a Ferrari if he wants to. Another thing is bummer for the beeps. Bummer for the beeps.
If you and if you and just this is very similar to the Rolex and luxury watch industry. So do you know that if you buy like a Rolex and they find out that you buy it at retail and you flip it for above retail, oftentimes the dealer will never sell you a Rolex again. Ferrari does the exact same thing. So if you flip a Ferrari and you don't tell them and ask for their permission, you get in trouble. And so it's a big deal and they ban you.
And so they have so much demand that they literally ban people from buying a $500,000 item. Is that insane or what? I mean, that's like truly pinnacle of exclusive and elite, like people are dying to have this product. Nothing makes me want to get in more than a wall preventing me from getting in. And they do a great job of creating that wall.
And their brand is incredibly hard to kill. So if you if you Google, what are the most expensive cars ever sold at auction? A recent one is a I forget it's a GTO 250. I forget what year it is, but it was an $80 million car. 11 of the top 15 most expensive cars ever sold our Ferrari. In fact, people love Ferrari so much that there's a theme park, obviously in Dubai, just for Ferrari. They make something. So this company, what did I say? $700 $7 billion a year in revenue? Is it something like that? $600 million of that comes from merch.
So a pretty substantial amount just comes from people buying Ferrari hats. And this is even crazier. So for every Ferrari sold, something like 65% is being sold to someone who already buy or who already owns a Ferrari and has bought one from a dealer, meaning their LTV is massive. They've done a bunch of really crazy, crazy things to keep their brand strong. So they have this bounty program.
So they basically have just created a bunch of snitches. So if you're in the streets and you see someone has painted their Ferrari a certain color, has put a modification on it like a part that that Ferrari doesn't approve of. If you report that to Ferrari, you get an allowance, you get a little bit of money. They pay you to report that people are breaking the rules is they have a new bounty system. It's insane.
Now, I talked about the Lindy effect. So here's the exact definition. The future life expectancy of some non-perishable things like technology or an idea is proportional to their current age. Thus, the Lindy effect proposes the longer a period of something that survived to exist or the longer something has existed, the longer it's remaining life expectancy. So Ferrari has been around. It's it's going to be, I believe they were launched in the 50s or so.
They're going to be around, I think, for an extended period of time. I think Ferrari is a very hard brand to kill. If you put Ferrari on a Rolex, someone's going to pay extra to buy that Rolex. If you put Ferrari on anything, someone's going to want to pay more money to have that item. And that's not the same case with a Honda. I mean, there's a handful of car companies that are able to pull that off or there's a handful of any type of company.
I just went to the website and put a $600 baseball cap into my cart. But I need to have a cool down period before I click buy, just because I think, I don't know if you're selling me the stock, but you're definitely selling me some Ferrari merch today.
Was it really $600? Yeah, it's $600 hat. The cheapest hat is like $180. That's insane. That's absolutely insane. Like, I went to a friend's house every day and their kid had a Ferrari coat that he was wearing because he like, he had Ferrari toys and they sell so much of this stuff. It's insane.
Was it really a $600 hat? What makes it so good? Does it does it does the hat drive? The entire story you just told me made it so good. It's an insane brand. And have you ever been in a Ferrari? I have been in a Ferrari. Yes. I've been in a Ferrari. They're definitely cool.
My takeaway is that they're a fucking pain in the ass to own. Everyone stares at you. So they've that Ferrari red was actually formerly the, it was the national racing color of Italy. And Ferrari was like, oh, we'll just use that. And then eventually they got so popular, they patented or they trademarked that red. So that red is only for Ferrari. But if you're in one of those cars, you get stared at like crazy, which is one of the reasons why people love driving it. I hated driving it for that reason and they're loud and they are kind of rough. They're fucking race cars. It's a race car. And so if you like driving Ferrari, you're going to love it. My opinion was this is a pain in the ass to drive. But I get it. I get the appeal. Ferrari is badass.
But the PE ratio is insane. So I don't know how much value is left to be had here. But they are growing. They are growing consistently. So if you look at, if you look at their last, if you look at their last, I think they went public in 2018, it's grown on average roughly 30% a year. Their stock, their stock price. So it's like been a pretty consistent growth. Ferrari, Enzo Ferrari, when he died, he sold a lot of the business to Fiat and then Fiat spun it off. And they built, they took a public on its own. And so it's been very consistent since it's gone public.
You would had a great return. Recently, they signed a deal with Lewis Hamilton, who's like the LeBron James of like F1 racing. And their price skyrocketed because also their earnings, they're like, dude, we're killing it. So they make something like, I believe their EBITDA margin is 35%. So no car company has that much, that big of a margin. I mean, that's like a ridiculous. You got to do the smart rich guy thing, which is you say, Ferrari is not a car company. It is a luxury brand. And it's priced incorrectly. They're pricing it like a car company, but it's actually a luxury brand. Right. That's what all the stock figures do. They're like, Tesla, it's not a car company. That was my argument. And then I looked at what the P ratios of some of the other luxury brands were. It's actually a chip company, I guess, based on this B multiple. Well, my original point, I was like, this is a luxury company. And then I looked at what some of the numbers were for some of the other luxury companies. I was like, well, this is bad timing. If we would have done this, if we would have done this like two or three weeks ago, it would have made a little bit more sense, but they just had they just released earnings on Friday. And so they crushed it. But there is a bunch of downside. So P ratio is insane. It's at an all time high right now. I think it's what did I say 55 times earning? That's insane. That's a lot.
Another question. When you were a kid, did you have like car posters on your wall, like, or like a folder, like a binder that had a car on it? I did not. I had a life size poster of the rock. Okay. Well, you're didn't do the bro move and prove my point, but many young kids, when we were young, did you go to that book fair and you buy like a Ferrari or racer or you'd buy like a Porsche, a Lamborghini folder, whatever, we cared about that with mere kids. And so it was very aspirational. Do you know that young people nowadays are barely even getting driver's licenses? Yeah, it's like a loser move, right? It's like a loser move to have a driver's license. And so oftentimes, I wonder, are young kids even going to care about this?
And then finally, EU regulations.
So Ferrari is a base in Europe.
The EU is cracking down.
So for a lot of cars, they have to be hybrid.
I think the ruling is by like 2030.
I think all cars have to be have some type of hybrid component.
I don't think it's going to kill Ferrari because they're already making hybrids and a large percentage of the cars, something like 25% are already hybrids.
So I think they're going to be fine.
But that is a risk.
Now, beyond the stock, I just want to talk about a couple lessons here.
Ferrari is an amazing company to aspire to build.
At least if you wanted to build like a luxury product, a great company.
The first thing, they're fucking missionaries.
They're not mercenaries.
A lot of times we talk about we use that word arbitrage.
If Enzo Ferrari heard that word arbitrage, he would take off his leather glove and smack you in the face.
He would ask you about passion.
That's what he cares about.
And it's paid off.
He's built a brand that is one of the most valuable brands known by billions of people in the world that they aspire to attain.
And it's all about him being a missionary.
He's truly bought in.
The people who work there are bought in.
They built a brand that's aspirational.
Now, in order to do that, in order to build one of those brands, you have to do something really hard.
Something you and I struggle with, something that I think every entrepreneur struggles with, which is you have to say no to so many great opportunities.
And that's really hard.
So someone could have said, hey, Enzo, what about like a $50,000 car that everyone likes?
We would just, we'd crush it.
Like the average man would buy this and they all want it.
We'd kill it.
He said, uh-uh.
How did they say no in Italy?
He would say, no.
I don't know how they say it, but I bet it's just no.
That's what he would say.
And they refused to do that.
But that's been very hard for them to do.
I'd imagine because there's so much opportunity, but that's just a real lesson for a builder.
However, the last lesson is if you can say no for that long and you do build a really good luxury brand, it can pay off so much.
I had no idea getting into this.
I would have thought that Ferrari was worth like 10 billion.
I didn't realize it was the seventh largest car company in the world, only selling 10,000, 13,000 units.
That's insane compared to another company like Honda or Toyota that's selling a million plus units.
And by the way, I feel like you're pointed by Italians, not just Enzo, not doing arbitrage.
Have you ever met an Italian run in their arbitrage?
Like, is there an Italian affiliate marketer on Earth?
I don't think I've ever seen one.
It just seems so beneath them as it should be.
There are the luxury brand of ethnicities also.
Yeah, dude.
You want like an old lady in the back.
So I grew up in an all Italian neighborhood, by the way.
I grew up in St. Louis.
For some reason, St. Louis has a large amount of Italians.
I was the only non-Italian at my grade school.
We used to learn Italian in grade school.
They used to teach it just.
We have to go to mass three days a week.
And one of those days was in Italian.
But you didn't know the Italian word for no?
I wasn't a good student, but I could tell you I could tell you they are father Italian.
And the best part was like everyone would have their old grandma like in the back of the house like rolling up these raviolis.
I want to hear you speak some Italian.
Let's go.
Don't put me on the spot, bro.
You just said I could tell you the our father and Italian.
Okay.
Tell me.
No, I don't even want to say it.
I'm so bad.
Dude, I got a thick tongue just like our boy Bernard.
I got a tongue like a slug.
It's a thick tongue.
I can't roll my arms.
It's disgusting.
The back of your head is battered.
My first girlfriend in grade school, her name was Phil Mina.
Like I was all in.
I was all in on the Italians.
I feel like American Italian people like Italian people who live in America are just they give it the wrong rep really.
It's sort of like text mex or whatever.
It's like two American eyes.
Italian Italians, man.
It's just.
Yeah, I want like a really I want a skinny Italian with like we're in skinny, skinny tight jeans, smoking a sick, constantly drinking espresso with a buzz cut.
I don't want these gabagool.
Like, you know what I mean?
That's not the type of Italian.
I don't want Tony's a pran.
I don't want Tony's a pran.
I like the Italian grandmother who still like smokes the cigarettes.
A lot of great car companies are Italian.
Lamborghini is also Italian.
I believe the story, by the way, you know, the story of Lamborghini?
He invented the Lamborghini because Ferrari wouldn't sell him a car.
Oh, French?
And he was making tractors.
Lamborghini was a tractor maker and Ferrari wouldn't sell him a car.
So he made his own.
And so they've been assholes from day one.
And that's why it's such a great brand. You definitely sold me on how cool Ferrari is as a business. I don't think you sold me on the stock just because it's like at an all time high and 70 billion. It's at an all time high. It also sounds like they're not trying to grow fast, right? That's like part of the stick is like sell part of the show. A limited number of these insane margins. And so I think that's, you know, maybe maybe one of the downsides. But very cool story and also more like MFM, more of inspiring for how to build a business than great stock.
Don't discount. Don't discount me. Listen, I actually don't know how stock stocks works. You know, I'm a dummy. How does a stock work? I don't know. Let's go back to this. But if it's growing 20% a year and if we think that it could continue doing that, you're saying the stock price is growing 20% a year, not the revenue revenue is growing 20% a year. If revenue is consistent, doesn't like that that other shit follow. I does. It does. But you didn't talk about that. So, you know, it was on the slide. You know, they go. But you told us, right? The business is growing. It's good.
You started the pitch with, is for my stock analysis, we're not going to be talking about numbers. Was just a masterful.
Isn't that what you said warm buffet said, brands or some bullshit? Yeah, something like that. Something like that. I do think that, you know, that's the best way, right? Like, if you didn't prepare for your speech in school, you're just like, you know what, you rip up. I'm not going to read off those prepared. I'm just going to speak from the heart. It's like you're removing a blank piece of paper, I'm throwing it away. Dude, I did prepare. I prepared a long time for this. I just, I just really took a buff daddy's words to heart and I looked at the brand.
Fair enough. Right. It is kind of an interesting dichotomy here. We did just pitch the two exact opposite things, right? Yeah, exactly. Yeah. The highest of high fashion and luxury and sort of the lowest form of human behavior, getting in your underwear and fighting in front of other people for their entertainment. We give you the full spectrum here on MFM, right?
So let me think about it. Okay. So if I had to put my own money, if I had to put $100,000, let's say, into either Ferrari or TKO, I think I would go Ferrari. I think I would go Ferrari, but I think TKO has significantly higher upside significantly. Right. Right. Right. So that's right. I don't know how you want to gauge the way I had to put my money in either. I would put it in neither. It's my takeaway from stock of Palooza. Oh, I emphasis on the if I had to, which I don't have to, which I will not. Yeah. Which I'm not in that position. And by the way, I don't know if it showed, but I definitely worked backwards from I looked at the stock and I was like, I actually, what happened was I saw that they merged and I was like, so these companies have no competitors. This is that true monopoly. And in tech, people, you know, from the Peter Thiel school of thought really value a monopoly. And it's so hard to build a monopoly. Like there are so few businesses that are truly a monopoly. We talked about even duck, duck go eating into Google's market share last time, but Google, Facebook, these are one of the few monopolies that exist. And I was like, huh, it's funny that like, this TKO thing is actually a monopoly, but I don't know how good of a business is. I don't know if that's going to grow, but if you're Warren Buffett and you're looking for something with a sustainable competitive advantage, that would be it.
And so that's where I started and to be truthful, I didn't even consider any other stocks. I started with that. And then I texted Sam, hey, we should do a stock making episode because I already have one picked. All right, I'll give you my vote there. We have it. Unanimous decision. You got the vote too. Oh, amazing. Well, guys, I don't know if I'm supposed to do an accepted speech now or if I should just say, I'm not surprised, but that's that's where I stand as far as stock of Palooza. I hope you guys liked it. Go to the YouTube comments and vote in the comments. Who won? Sam or Sean put it in the comments. We will tally them up and name the official winner after we do that. And if you got any joy from this, or if there was a time that you were pulling your hair out and being like, these fucking idiots don't know anything about this stuff. Whatever the spectrum is, if you got a little emotion, click subscribe. And we'll owe you one.
Alright, that's a pod.