The Supreme Court is here in a case this week about art and who gets to remix an artistic idea. But this fight is not new. Olivia Rodrigo was not doing anything different from Michelangelo or Leonardo da Vinci. Honestly, those guys were looking around seeing what other people did at the time in Florence and Rome and wherever and copying some of it. Let's go to Poppy right law and you, this week on Intuit Vultures Pop Culture Podcast.
最高法院本周在一起关于艺术和谁有权重组艺术创意的案件中出现了。但这场争斗不是新的。奥利维亚·罗德里戈与米开朗基罗或达芬奇并没有什么不同。说实话,那些人当时在佛罗伦萨、罗马和其他地方看着别人做的事情,把其中一些复制了过来。这周我们在《知道天鹅绒猛禽流行文化博客》的 Poppy right law 和你一起探讨。
This is Rico at Media of Peter Kafka. That is me. I am talking to someone who's done a lot of podcasting himself. His name is Bill Simmons. You ran? Co-founded. Who founded the Ringer, which is now sold to Spotify. Welcome Bill. Good to be here. Long time no talk.
We check in every couple of years because I'm curious about you and your career and you've moved from being an internet writer to a podcast guy and now beyond. We're just doing the math. You've done a thousand podcasts of the main podcast. It's 2015. We started the ranger. Yeah. We launched October 1st was the first day I could start doing ranger stuff after my ESPN deal expired and that was when the BS podcast launched.
Yeah, initially, and I was trying to juggle it because I had the HBO show going. We were probably once or twice a week early, but then after the HBO show, it really went to three times a week from the beginning of 2017 on. Like I said, we talk every couple of years and I was going back and looking at our old conversations and the theme for a lot of them was like, is podcasting going to be a thing or podcasting the thing, but is it going to be a business or it should be a business, but it's not a business yet.
You sold your company for about $200 million a couple of years ago. So it seems like it's a business to 50 to 50. Yeah. For some reason that number keeps getting reported around, but yeah, it was okay. It's in filings. I can look it up again. I remember seeing you in 2019 right after Gimlet had sold a Spotify for 230. I think the number was around 200 and you said, that's not a real number, right? And I'm like, yeah, no, it's a real number.
No, no, no, that's got to be like when you pay a quarterback, $100 million, but only 10 of it's guaranteed and I could see the gears going in your head. And then a year later, you sold, I want to ask you about that process. But first I want to just talk about podcasting. Yeah. You started this, I think back in 2007 when you were doing it.
Yeah, it was May 2007 and it was just it seemed more like radio on demand. I didn't really understand what a podcast was, but I remember, I mean, we have a couple interviews from back then where I'm glad they exist because I, we've felt pretty strong when we launched Grantland in 2011. Podcasts are going to be a big piece of it.
And we felt, I felt like I had had enough success with mine at that point that I really felt like it could be a huge asset for kind of this digital multimedia site we're trying to build, right? And ESPN didn't recognize that, which ironically became, I think, a big source of the attention with us. Like we talked about in the past, I'll keep referencing old stuff, but it takes a while for the media business advertisers to catch on the sort of where people are going. You're seeing that right now with TikTok, which is huge, but like severely undermonitized.
Before it became a business, when did you figure out, oh, this is a thing that a lot of people are listening to and a lot more people are going to listen to. And this is meaningful to me and my audience. You know, the first two years, I would say it was more like fun and just an extra thing because I was at that stage, right? I would try everything. I was always trying to add something, you know, and I think 2006, I signed up for it.
I signed a new deal at the beginning of 2007 and I was really motivated to try to branch out beyond just my column. And I was really focused on what else can I add, what else can I do, what chances can I take things like that. And the podcast thing always seemed like just a fun wrinkle because people could hear me. It was on demand. I like the technology of it.
But it wasn't really till 09. I think people's celebrity started asking to come on. People started mentioning to me on the street that, you know, they instead of saying love the column, they would say love the podcast. I thought that was interesting. And then I've talked about this before, but there was this moment. It was some all-star weekend in Phoenix.
I can't remember what year it was, but this jogger was jogging back to hotel and I was waiting for the Uber and he was pointing to his headphones. He was like, I'm listening to you. It just felt like something was happening. And the more I talked to people about how they consumed it, I realized like, it was like on their commutes. It was when they were working out, when they were jogging, when they were at work and just they put something on.
And that was when I thought, all right, this is bigger than just radio on demand.
那时候,我想到了这个问题:嗯,这可不仅仅是一张点播广播的大网。
How is your approach to what the podcast is and how you do it and who you're making for change, if at all?
你对这个播客的理解是什么?你是如何做的,你是为谁做的?如果有必要,可以改说得更自然一些。
I think it's become a little more reactive.
我觉得它变得更加积极了一些。
I think I look back at the ESPN stuff and the celebrities were a huge advantage for me back then because there weren't a lot of podcasts.
我觉得回顾 ESPN 的节目和名人们对我当时来说是一个很大的优势,因为当时没有太多的播客。
The people, I was really just competing against Mark Marin and that was it.
我只是和马克·马林在竞争,其他人不重要。
We were always like, it was always me and him getting the best guess.
我们总是这样的,总是我和他猜得最准。
If he wanted a long forum interview, it was someone interesting.
如果他想要一份长篇的论坛采访,那么这人肯定很有趣。
Yeah.
是啊。
You go to your.
你去你的地方。
And we were also getting people, it was like the first time, it was like being on a first date with people.
我们也在接待人们,感觉就像第一次约会一样,和人们相处非常新鲜。
They had like never done a podcast before.
他们好像从未做过播客。
So over and over again, I would have these people who'd come on and we would just have these wide range of conversations and they just loved it.
所以一遍又一遍,这些人会来,我们会有各种各样的对话,他们真的很喜欢。
I remember even, and that was going even near the end of the ESPN.
我还记得,那是在 ESPN 结束前的日子里。
I remember like in 2015, we're at South by Southwest and we just had a bunch of guests coming on for, you know, six, seven straight hours and one of the people was Brian Gray's or the Hollywood producer and he didn't know what was going on.
He's like, what is this? Is it we're doing an interview or is there people going to hear this?
他说:“这是什么啊?我们是在做采访还是会有人听到这个?”
So we did it and talked about his whole career.
所以我们就这样做了,并谈论了他的整个职业生涯。
I didn't have notes.
我没有笔记。
I'm going through all his movies and afterwards he was just like, that was so much fun.
我正在浏览他所有的电影,然后他就像:那太有趣了。
I think that's gone in 2022.
我觉得那在2022年就消失了。
I feel like anybody who is ever going to be a guest on a podcast would have done a podcast by now.
我觉得,任何一个将要成为播客嘉宾的人现在肯定已经制作过自己的播客了。
You'll still have like, like I went to Sandler's office a couple weeks ago and I did one with him.
你还会有“喜欢”,就像几个星期前我去了桑德勒的办公室并和他一起工作一样。
He keeps a very low profile, right?
他非常低调,是吧?
He's only been I think on a couple pods and we were able to have like kind of an old school conversation about his career and comedy where things are going.
他只在几个播客中露面过,我们能够就他的职业和喜剧方向进行一种传统的对话。
But now I feel like for how my pod has changed, I think the guest piece is probably a little less interesting because they're so available on so many different pods and what's more interesting now is something just happened.
You know, just being in the mix more versus I mean, remember, Sal and I on Mondays we used to tape on that and if I'll put it, it would guess the lines we would do Monday at like, I don't know, one o'clock in the afternoon.
And that's a big thing we think about with the ringer is being there in the moment.
我们认为,环形铃铛的重要意义在于它能够让我们随时随地在场。
And I don't know if I've told this story, but we had this seminal moment.
我不知道是否告诉过此故事,但我们曾经经历过这个重大时刻。
It was the the day Kyry Irving got traded to the Celtics.
Kyry Irving被交易到凯尔特人的那一天。
We were having an MBA meeting at the office and it was in LA and we flew all of our MBA people there and we were actually just meeting and spitballing for the season and spitballing ideas.
And then the trade happened and the way we reacted, it felt like a moment for us where we had a couple people ran off to write quick pieces for the website, right?
I went to do an instant reaction pod that we filmed and then we had I think somebody else was doing another pod.
我去录制了一个即时反应节目,然后我们还有另一个人在录另一个节目。
And within like three, four hours, we had covered it in a couple different ways.
大约三到四个小时内,我们采用了几种不同的方式来解决这个问题。
And I think that we all looked at each other and was like, this is kind of what our site is.
我觉得我们都相互看着,就像说,这就是我们网站的特色。
Because you know, we spent probably two years trying to figure out how is this site different than Grantland and also for our audience, our audience was trying to figure out why I love Grantland.
So even though the internet, a lot of it's about on demand and get it when you want it on your own time and podcasts, especially at meaningful listen to stuff, I do, you know, six months after I recorded, I'm sure this is for you.
You like the idea of almost closer to like old time TV and radio where it's this thing just happened, we're going to talk to you about it.
你喜欢几乎更接近旧时代的电视和收音机的想法,就像一些事情刚刚发生了,我们要对你谈谈它。
For some of the stuff, I think we have a good mix of everything, right?
对于一些东西,我认为我们有一个很好的混合,对吧?
Like we talk a lot about stuff that podcast that can live on and be listened to much later.
我们经常聊一些关于播客的话题,这些播客可以长期保存并在以后听取。
That's why the rewatchables I think is probably our most successful library podcast people.
这就是为什么我认为《可重复观看》可能是我们最成功的库播客。
That's why you're literally talking about old movies.
这就是为什么你在字面上谈论旧电影。
Right.
没问题。
And people can go back and, you know, we might get a new fan for a rewatchables pod and they might be like, all right, I want more.
人们可以回来,你知道的,我们可能会为了重温可观性而获得新粉丝,他们可能会说:“好的,我想要更多。”
What else have they done?
他们还做了什么别的事情?
Well, we've done 250 movies at this point.
嗯,到目前为止我们已经拍摄了250部电影。
And it's like your favorite movies is the Shawshank Redemption Great.
就像你最喜欢的电影是《肖申克的救赎》。这部电影很棒。
We did that in September, 2002.
我们是在2002年9月做的。
So I think having a mix of really smart high-end stuff, ringer versus a good example, right?
所以我觉得有一些非常聪明的高端产品和一些过硬的例子混合在一起是很好的选择,是吧?
I'm really proud of because I felt like we were about a year earlier than everybody else, how we were thinking about it.
我真的很自豪,因为我觉得我们比其他人早大约一年开始思考这件事情,这让我感到非常骄傲。
Explain what that is to people who haven't listened to it.
请向没听过它的人解释这是什么。
So ringer versus a nerd culture podcast, right? It's covering Marvel, it's covering Star Wars, it's covering Stranger Things, stuff like that.
那么,是关于虚荣心与书呆子文化的播客对吗?它覆盖了漫威、星球大战、奇怪的事情等方面。
And you go back to the Grandland days, Grandland was sports and pop culture thrown together, which in 2011 people were like, what the fuck is this? Why are you going to do pop culture if it's a sports?
Why is this on ESPN? We took so much shit for that the first year.
为什么这是在ESPN上播放的?我们在第一年承受了如此多的狗屎。
The ringer was a little more easier to do, but I think pop culture has expanded in a way that we looked at it how we evolved as, I swear this is going to tie back to ringer versus how we evolved is you're trying to cover everything and you realize you can't cover everything.
So by about, I would say, 2019, 2020, we started to gravitate toward what are we the best at, what are the pieces of turf that we can either be the best at or one of the best at.
It was kind of represented what we wanted the ringer to be, which was like the smartest people at the bar, deep dive expertise.
它有点代表了我们想要的那个铃声,就是酒吧里最聪明的人,深入研究专业知识。
And that was literally going over every episode of, of, of Game of Thrones.
那就是逐一回顾《权力的游戏》每一集,真的是一集不落。
Every episode of Game of Thrones obsessively with, with Jason and Mallory, who were just obsessed with the show and were the biggest experts of the world on it.
Jason和Mallory是Game of Thrones的狂热粉丝,他们对每一集都非常着迷,并且是全世界最专业的专家。
And our feeling was, which you would think people would say, don't do that. No one wants to sit through and listen to 70 podcasts about a TV show.
我们的感受是,你会认为人们会这么说,不要这样做。没有人想要坐下来听70个关于一部电视节目的播客。
Right, but we knew, we knew that, first of all, we knew that show for us was like the NBA.
是的,但是我们知道,我们知道,首先,我们知道对我们来说那个节目就像NBA一样重要。
And we knew that people not only wanted to learn more about the shows, the new episodes, but they wanted to go back, rewatch the episodes with a better understanding what happened.
So the ringer versus, we saw this nerd culture thing. It's like a vertical for us, basically.
那么铃声对战,我们看到了这个呆板文化的东西。对我们来说,基本上就像是一个垂直领域。
It was more than pop culture. It didn't just fit in a TV and movies.
它不仅仅是流行文化,而且不仅适用于电视和电影。
It was actually its own universe. And that's what we try to create with that podcast where it's like every time there's a Marvel movie, every time there's a Star Wars movie or show, anytime there's a new stranger thanks season, whatever, we are going to be reacting to that.
So you look at like something like, I don't pick a Marvel movie with the Midnight Boys, Vanna Charles.
所以你看起来像是不会选择含有Midnight Boys、Vanna Charles的漫威电影。
They'll watch the movie. They're going to do the instant reaction. I just watched it. This is what happened.
他们会看电影。他们要进行瞬间反应。我刚刚看完了。这就是发生的事情。
And then we'll have the deeper dive pod later in the week with Mallory and Joanna.
然后在这个星期晚些时候,我们将和Mallory和Joanna一起进行更深入的潜水。
And that's the one where they just go all in on this stuff.
那个就是他们全力投入的地方。
So we have something for everybody.
那么我们有适合每个人的东西。
Now, I think to me, that's what we did with that podcast is a good example of how we think about stuff.
现在,我认为对我来说,那个播客是我们思考事物的好例子。
How much that is instinct versus we're looking at numbers and this is performing really well.
这有多少是本能行为,有多少是我们在看数据并且这表现非常出色所导致的?
Let's do a lot more of that. And we thought this was going to work, but turns out there's no audience for this show where that movie is.
我们再多做这种事情吧。我们以为这会有用的,但事实证明那个电影所在的节目没有观众。
Let's quit it.
我们不做了吧。
I would say it's like 90% instinct.
我觉得大概有90%来自本能。
We have instinct and feel because we have this advantage.
我们有本能和感觉,因为我们拥有这个优势。
And a lot of it stems from the site, from Grantland and then the Ringer.
很多源于那个网站,源于Grantland,然后源于The Ringer。
What do people care about?
人们关心什么?
And it's not just about TV ratings or whatever.
这不仅仅关乎电视收视率或其他方面。
It's you just have a general feel for people care about this. We should be there.
“你只是有一种一般的感觉,认为人们关心这件事。我们应该在那里。”
I think for us, we think about that a lot.
我觉得对于我们来说,我们经常思考这个问题。
We relaunched the Prestige TV podcast that we relaunch last year, which has been successful for us.
我们重新推出了去年推出的《Prestige TV》播客节目,这对我们来说非常成功。
One of the reasons we launched that was because we just felt like succession was a thing.
我们推出这个的原因之一是因为我们觉得继承是一件重要的事情。
It wasn't just like a good HBO show.
这不仅仅是一部好的 HBO 節目。
We felt like it was going to go up a level.
我们觉得它将要提升一个级别。
We could see it anecdotally with people we talked to, how it was being written about people catching up on it during the pandemic.
我们可以从我们与之交谈的人的生动故事中看到,他们在疫情期间追赶它的状态是如何被书写的。
And we knew season three was coming.
我们知道第三季要来了。
And to us, that was that we looked at it the same way as we would like the NFL draft or the NBA playoffs or any of that stuff is we need to be there.
对我们来说,我们认为这与NFL选秀、NBA季后赛或任何其他类似的活动一样重要,我们需要参与其中。
So how are we going to be there?
那么我们要怎么去那里呢?
Well, we need to feed.
嗯,我们需要进食。
We need to react to the episodes.
我们需要对这些事件做出反应。
We need to go back over old episodes.
我们需要重新回顾过去的剧集。
We need deep dive stuff in the middle of the week.
我们需要在一周的中期进行深入研究的工作。
And we just need to be all in on the show.
我们只需要全力以赴地投入表演中。
But it's not a one to one with audience, right?
但这不是一对一的观众,对吧?
Because there's, I talked about this whole time, like Big Bang Theory when it was on, was the biggest thing on TV.
因为有这个,我一直在谈论它,就像《生活大爆炸》播出时一样,成为了电视上最受关注的大事件。
And no one ever talked about it in the world that I would spend online.
世界上从来没有人谈论过我会在网上度过的时间。
You guys don't, I don't think devoted any time to it. Yellowstone. Yeah, that's fair. Is this huge show? I think you guys don't have a lot of this stuff. We did yellowstone. But you're not blowing it out. It's got a much bigger audience than succession. You guys spend way more time on succession. It seems like that's part, just your personal interest and part, like there's an audience that will respond to it and maybe won't free Yellowstone.
Well, it's a huge show. I mean, that always helps. It was like, I don't know, probably 15 million by the time everybody caught up on it. But it also, it was the most fun show to talk about, you know, and I think that one of the things that pumps us out, like we were just talking about this was Stranger Things. And I think Netflix has made such a mistake.
The bench model is fine with certain shows. Like if it's outer banks, I get it. My daughter's going to watch, I want to watch all the outer banks in a row. That's not like a great show, but it's a fun show and you just want to keep going. Stranger Things, they blew it because, you know, for us, if they had just put out two episodes and then one week after that, we would have gotten eight weeks of content discourse writing everything. You would have treated that show like it was the NBA playoffs.
And instead, it's gone in a week. I hear you guys say that all the time and I get it. And out of your self-interest, right, it makes sense. You'd like to have eight weeks of content instead of a week. I do wonder if, if, and Netflix obviously is rethinking a lot of what they're doing. I do think that maybe like their, their aims and your aims don't quite converge, right? Yes, you'd give them free publicity for eight weeks. But if they can satisfy every, my sons and middle school, everyone in his school watched it the first week, they're all totally happy. They watched it. I don't think they'd be any happier if they stretched it out over eight weeks. You would be.
It's funny. I completely disagree. I think Netflix has so few kind of water cooler hits at this point for them to be able to stretch one out for eight weeks. Just look at the difference with succession. Look at a show like Winning Time. I think if Winning Time was a Netflix show and they just dropped it all at once, I think that show does. I think people, a lot of people would watch one episode or two and that would have been it. But because it was on every week, I know, I know people in my life who just gave it a second chance or a third chance, whatever. Stranger things. To me, it's like, can you own the narrative?
And for them, they're competing. It's all this other stuff that's coming out, right? Like within a week, Top Guns in there too, and you know, you're competing for eyeballs and attention. And I think that shows specifically with all the theories and the conspiracy stuff and all the stuff that comes out, you almost need a week to digest each episode and be like, what does this mean? Where is this going? That's part of experiencing the show. I just think they blew it.
I want to ask you more about the show you're making. Has your approach to sort of how you talk, what you talk about changed? When you started podcasting, you were like, kind of well known internet guy for nerds like me. Obviously, your profile's gotten bigger and bigger. It seems like you're kind of well known. Come on, I was doing better than that. You were well known. But you're well known to have your own podcast, right?
But like, you weren't Bill Simmons in 2022. It seems like now you're much more conscious of the fact that stuff you say is going to get picked up that people are going to respond to. Is that an inhibitor for you? Like, I don't want to say this. This is going to get blown out of proportion. No, it's just something you're conscious of. To me, it's like, we talk about this with some of our talent. It's the price of having a platform in 2022, right?
You have to be ready for, like, if you're an MBA writer and you say, I don't know, I heard one of the Suns had COVID before game seven, which was a story that was reported, right? It was a story. All the MBA people knew, but everybody was kind of afraid to be the first one to write it. But everybody knew there was some sort of COVID thing with the Suns. Throw that on a podcast. It's going to get aggregated. You know, and I think for us to balance, and I'm not complaining about this. This is just a reality.
I mean, being aggregated is good for you, right? It's directing more people to you. Yeah. Nah. Sometimes yes and no. It depends. Like, are they taking stuff at a context that you said? I think podcasts have a specific nuance. So I think our goal with the podcast is we want to sound conversational. We want, like, this podcast right now, we want it to sound like you and I are sitting at some, I don't know, some restaurant and we're shooting the shit about. That's, that would ultimately be your goal, right?
If we're talking basketball with two people that work for us and we're all about basketball, you want it to be conversational. You want to bounce back and forth. So you're going to lower your inhibitors a little bit.
But I think the difference is, if you're going to throw stuff out on a podcast that actually might make news, you just have to think about it for a split second. But I also think with Zooms with Twitter, with everything else, I think people have this natural mechanism now that they'll at least hold on for a split second.
2008, 2009, you go back to those days, man, people, they were no repercussions or you didn't know about the repercussions really for anything. So you look back at some of the tweets from back then, all that. It's just, that stuff's out there and nobody realizes the screenshot air is coming.
So you, like off the top of your head, I think, like say something about Jalen Green is a rookie for the right. Yeah, that was, that was the funniest thing. And yeah, and Drainmon, Drainmon Greens taking you on and Instagram, do you, is that funny to you? Is that awkward? Are you okay with that?
That one was funny because I knew the facts were completely on my side. So and I, you know, when it's going to start snowballing, when somebody's, and in that case, it was the Houston fans, they're like, they're grabbing this, they're screaming, he's like, fuck Jalen Green. And it was like, all right, you can go back and listen to the conversation. It was really, we were trying to make each other laugh. I was talking about how much I love this guy, Herb Jones and New Orleans and how I voted for him over Jalen Green. I was like, fuck Jalen Green. And I knew the facts were on my side, but ultimately the best way for that to play out was I just had Jalen Green on my podcast because this is a good guy. I think he's really talented and we had a good conversation.
And, you know, I think, I think when the facts are on your side, it's better. I think when, if you say something, you know, that starts a new story that you just didn't intend it to happen that way, that's a little different.
There's a mode of that as you know, the stems from talk radio and then the internet's really expanded on that of stirring shit intentionally because you want attention. Do you ever feel yourself tending that way? Like, I'm going to, I'm going to piss somebody off. Watch this.
I like when it's quiet. Those are my favorite times because I've been doing this. And this is my third decade now as a national person. I'm just trying to do good stuff, trying to consistently be a little ahead of the curve and I like when nobody's talking. That's why I don't do a lot of interviews.
I mean, we did one was last time we didn't interview. I don't know if I've done a real interview about like, how well the ringer's doing. I mean, that's tough. I just don't do that stuff.
I don't, I know if we're doing well. I have an inner circle. We talk all the time. We really care about this stuff. We really care about the quality of the work we're doing, who we're bringing in, the culture that, you know, that we've tried to build. And that's what we care about. I don't care what other people say about us.
Well folks, here we are. Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury. I'm Pete Barara, the former US Attorney in Manhattan. My podcast Stay Tuned is about law, justice, power, and democracy.
Recently, I broke down the indictment with a group of former federal prosecutors who understand how the justice system really works. Joyce Vance, Barb McQuade, and Ellie Honeg. We discuss the questions on everyone's mind, like, Can you directly tie Donald Trump to the way these payments were booked and logged? Are prosecutors considering additional defendants or additional charges? Is this the kind of conduct that merits a charge of a former President of the United States?
I think this is a serious crime preet, and I think it's one that I would charge. And where do we go from here? The presidency from prison, right? I mean, add to the crazy. Add to the crazy.
You're making a lot of TV for HBO. You're making movies and docks. Do you ever want to be on camera again?
你正在为HBO拍摄很多电视节目,你制作电影和记录片。你有想再次在镜头前露面的愿望吗?
The ringer film stuff has been, that's, I've spent a lot of time on that. And I do feel like we've created something really cool. Like I think we're a player in that space. From the TV side, I just didn't like it that much. I really like what we're doing with this stuff more.
The Ringer电影部分已经完成了,我花了很多时间在这上面。我确实觉得我们创造出了非常棒的东西。我觉得我们在这个领域里是一个有竞争力的选手。从电视方面来看,我就不是很喜欢。我更喜欢我们现在做的东西。
And I've had some offers and some feelers and things like that. I look back at what happened with the show.
我接到了一些报价和询问,还有一些类似的事情。我回顾了一下节目发生的事情。
And is your HBO show?
你的HBO节目是什么?
Yeah, there's a million things I would do differently. But ultimately, I went into that show with the mindset of these interviews I'm doing on my podcast are really hitting people love them. This should work as a TV show.
But the reality is podcasts have replay shows like that. And by 2017, I realized it. Like, I remember I had Kevin Durin on the first time we did it in March. It was like probably like three four shows after my show got canceled. And we went to this restaurant. We just talked for like an hour and 20 minutes.
And now a lot of players are doing stuff and it feels way more normal than it did. I think in 2017. Players have their own podcast. Yeah, players have their own pods. Players are popping on other pods, all that stuff.
Back then, it didn't feel as normal to just have one of the best players in the world sit down for an hour and 20 minutes and just record it. And we ended up doing I think six.
当时,只让世界上最顶尖的球员坐下来录制一个小时20分钟的视频并不觉得很正常。最后我们录了六个视频。
But that first one, that was when I realized like this is just better than like we could have edited this because I had had him on my TV show. We did a really good segment.
So stuff like that that just made me think, what is the upside at this point of a TV interview show versus a podcast?
像这样的事情让我想,现在一个电视采访节目与一个播客相比有什么优势?
And I'm not a comedian like I'm not Bill Mar. I can't come out and do a monologue, things like that. Playing off other people was always going to be how the show succeeded or failed.
And I think, you know, just look at all the talk shows that have launched. Bell and he did a podcast about this a couple weeks ago. Like all the streamers have tried them. All these different ones.
I think the last show, maybe the last late night show that launched successfully was Corden. Is it possible? Did he launch after after John Oliver? Yeah, but John Oliver is not a talk show. John Oliver is, you know, a content show.
我认为最后一档成功推出的晚间节目可能是 Corden。是这样吗?他是在 John Oliver 之后推出的吗?是的,但是 John Oliver 不是一个脱口秀节目。John Oliver 是一个内容节目。
So, but think about how many successful pods have watched with huge audiences and they're on demand.
所以,想想有多少成功的播客已经拥有了庞大的观众群,并且可随时随地进行点播。
I think the future for us was Spotify. And this is something we've, you know, we're involved a lot with at this point. It's just what is the video player for them on their app? It's a huge differentiator. They have to, we have to get that to the point that that basically becomes TV on your phone on the Spotify app. And that's something nobody else has.
We know it. Like we have Rogan and we have Alex Cooper and some other people. We have higher learnings on there to be able to see what you're watching. That's what people under 25 want. My son doesn't want to listen to anything. He wants to watch what he's listening to. Right.
So is there a middle ground for you where I mean, I know obviously you're focused on audio, but where you just say, look, we're also, I mean, you do film it. You don't film all of them, right? We just go, this is, this is our TV. This is a, if you want to watch this for 40 minutes, you want to listen to this 40 minutes you pick. Yes.
And that was one of the reasons we went to Spotify ironically. We did a lot of this, we did it at Grantland and then we did it the ringer. We built, and Grantland, we had an electoral closet that was turned into a video studio. And we tried to do a bunch of that stuff.
And we had some real success. I mean, the stuff me and Jalen did it really did well. And I think it helped elevate Grantland. And we had some other stuff too. The ringer same thing. We had two studios.
Our thought when we were joining Spotify was like, they're building this billion dollar compound in downtown O.A. It's going to have all the state of the art stuff. This will take us to another level. A show that Kyra learning was conceived as a TV podcast. You know, we, we started talking to them about that. I don't know, January, maybe December, January, 2020, I can't even remember, it was before the pandemic.
And we're going to be in a studio. It was going to be twice a week. We'd have big guests. And when we launched the podcast in, I think May was a Zoom show. You know, so I think now that stuff's ending.
We're really trying to gravitate toward how can we get people in a room? What's the best place for this? And, you know, I think for us, it's, it's, I always used the word malleable, probably too much.
But we just, it dates back to the Grantland days. Like, how can you be malleable? How can you have a bunch of things going? How do you, how can you offer a bunch of things that different people might want?
Like somebody like my son likes watching the YouTube clips of my podcast. They're short. They're like seven, eight minutes, but that's what he watches. He doesn't listen to my podcast. So how do we get all types of people? And then how do you battle in the TikTok era when everyone under 22 basically is just staring at their phone and you have to win their attention in two seconds?
And that's the next generation of consumers for us. Are they going to even listen to podcasts? It's kind of scary. Does that excite you trying to figure out how to reach a, uh, 12 year olds on TikTok? You go, you know what? That's going to be someone else's problem. Someone else figures this out. I'm going to do what I'm good at.
Well, for the ringer, probably not as big of a problem, but for Spotify, it's something that I think behind the scenes is something we talk about a lot. What is that audience? What are they going to want? How are they going to want it? And I think that's why video is so important to Spotify right now. They've been trying to crack it forever. You embraced, you didn't embrace.
You just sports betting was always part of what you did. Yeah. Yeah, that's an embracing. It was by DNA. It was a DNA and I had no interest in it. I listened to so many guests, the line shows. I had to figure out what you were talking about. Took me years to figure it out. Yeah. And then obviously it's legalized two years ago and everyone now went from like ignoring it to bear hug and basically a ton of money coming in. You know, $50 million for Levittar and John Skipper. You guys have fan dual deals. But those are bad businesses right now.
They can't keep spending all that money. They're trying to do what Netflix and the other streamers are doing to get market share. So eventually I assume that money goes away or shrinks. Are you thinking about that?
I disagree. I don't think the money goes away. You think they'll continue to throw as much money as they are right now at you and other media companies?Well, I don't, I mean, throw money around. I would feel like we earn the money.
We have a really good platform and it makes sense. You know, we've always done really well with all those places dating back to the beginning of the ring. I think you're going to have to prove that you can differentiate yourselves in some way to keep getting the money. I think that's what's changed.
I think, you know, it was, it was a little like in 2015, Fando and DraftKings were in that holy war about fantasy sports, right? And there was a six month span where everyone was just throwing money around and then it ended. And it was like, all right, who is going to now come out of this and still be able to make money and then we saw how that played out.
And I think the same thing with this, there's probably too many gambling companies right now. It's a little like the streaming universe. But on the flip side, it's not legal in California. It's not legal in Texas yet. It's not legal in half the states in the country yet. And as that evolves, there's just going to be more money in play. And I think I also think it's, it's just part of how people consume sports now.
You know, it's way different than it was when sound I were doing guest aligns and we had to like teach people what we were doing and explain it the first year, explain the lines a little bit and stuff like that. Now it's like, people are really, I think, I think what's the right word? I'm blanking people, people are versed in the gambling language now. I don't feel like they were 10 years ago.
Do you think that finally there's still a line between like we'll talk about it basically up until the game starts and then during the game, we kind of steer clear of it. But do you think that eventually just bleeds into the broadcast and they're talking about covering a spread, etc?
I think it plays out like fantasy did where if they're trying, if you're trying to shoe horn in, sure horn it in and it's not authentic, it just sounds awkward. Like remember that whole stretch with fantasy when all these dudes were on there and they're like, oh, be great to have him on your fantasy team. And it just, it just didn't work.
I think from, from a gambling standpoint, part of like part of the science of why the lines are the lines, why they moved, future bets, things like that. It's actually really interesting. I mean, it's stuff that we've done certainly on my podcast for a while where, because that ties in to narratives, things that people think should be, but maybe they shouldn't be.
I remember like the defensive part of the year, we did a ringer gambling show about it. I'm going to say in like March and Marcus Smart was like 16 to one to win defensive part of the year. And BAM out of bio is the favorite. We had this conversation about it. We're like, that's weird. BAM out of bio is going to end up playing like 52 games. The Celtics have the best defense in the league like Smart 16 to one. Those are crazy. But it was organically, we were talking about the perception that, you know, BAM was the best defensive part of it, but maybe he wasn't and that Marcus was underrated. And I think that's the future of this stuff.
And are you thinking through like, okay, some of my audience is really into gambling and they're, they're in for this and some just want entertaining content and they're not necessarily for it. And so I need to balance that out. And I can't constantly be talking about spreads and long shots and odds.
Yeah, I don't, I don't feel like we do. I, I mean, I've been doing that piece for so long. It's always organic to my podcast. We never try to shoehorn it in unless it's like a break or something like that. But for the most part, if we're talking about stuff, it is always tied to some sort of interesting angle, right? Like why are the chiefs the number two favorites in the NFL right now when they traded Ty Reco and it seems like this could be, you know, transition year for them or anything. And then that's a segment, things like that.
I think the analytics are way better too. And just in general, like, I think that's really elevated the sports discourse, you know, like the stuff like second spectrum and the stuff that Warren Sharp does, the stuff that Haral Bob has when he comes on my podcast, the stuff that our ringer NBA guys are using. And I think that stuff makes understanding basketball better. I've gotten really into men and blazers this year who you used to work with a lot better and they haven't talked to them about this, but they maybe once an hour, they'll mention like some kind of staff, but almost the rest of it's totally anti-staff. Like it's all narrative kind of sports rightery and like in a world where like, it doesn't exist. Yeah.
我觉得数据分析也比以前更好了。总的来说,比如像second spectrum和Warren Sharp所做的那些工作,还有Haral Bob在我的播客上谈到的那些,我们的Ringer NBA团队在使用的那些东西,都大大提高了体育话题的水平。我今年非常喜欢和你过去合作过的Men and Blazers,但我还没有和他们谈论过这些。但是他们每隔一个小时左右会提到某种数据,但几乎其余的都是完全反对数据分析的。就像在一个没有数据分析的世界里一样。是的。
Does that, do you ever feel like, I'd like to go back to that era, like where we weren't doing saber metrics and whatever the money ball stuff was? I think soccer is a little bit easier to feel that way. I think it really hurt baseball. I looked back at the first three years of my podcast, how much I talked about baseball and how much more fun it was to talk about baseball and now everything has to be based in some sort of statistical thing. You know, and I just don't think it's that interesting to listen to. I have trouble with it. Some people like it, but in terms of 20 years ago, and I'm not saying this is right around, this is just the way it is. We would have maybe 22 years ago. These Geter Nomar arguments, pre-podcast, where we would just argue and it was all I test stuff. However you felt, it was a little like if you're arguing now about a Steph Curry better than LeBron. We have that stats with this stuff, but there's still an I test piece to the NBA that makes it more fun. The NFL in quarterbacks, it's another one. If you're saying is Russell Wilson a top 10 quarterback still, I can bring up stats, but I can also like do I test and I can bring up examples and there's not a definitive answer to it. Like we've seen this with the MVP where Traut would win the MVP and the Angels would win 74 games. And they were like, well, he had the best stats, so he's the MVP. Once that stuff starts happening, I don't, there's not a lot of places to go. You know, so I think it's definitely her baseball. Yeah, I tune out. And there was a period where you and your writing would start dropping in a lot of data blocks. And I'm like, I'm just going to scroll down. Yeah. It was weird to write about baseball and not have to lean on the stats, you know, but that's where we were.
All one of the reasons that football is so much fun is there's so much randomness to it. And season to season, even month to month sometimes guys can go up or down. There's still some great stats. I use them, especially for gambling. I think they're really helpful. But but you can still have arguments like, all right, if Tom Brady was on the Saints instead of the bucks, would he still be Tom Brady? And then you go and now you're arguing for five minutes. I think it's tough for with other sports.
And how does this data centric view the world apply to you or not apply to you world to running this this company in terms of I like this podcast. Its numbers aren't really moving. At some point I got to let it go or you know what, this is really good. We're just going to keep doing it or I want to talk about a movie from the 70s, but I don't think the audience is going to be there. But you got to serve an audience. I assume you go back and forth on that.
I'm way less relying on that than I think maybe some other people would be. I'd never want to know what my numbers are. I only want to know if they've like dramatically done something, but I don't look at them.
我比其他人可能更不依赖那个。我不想知道我的数字是多少。我只想知道它们是否有重大变化,但我不看它们。
In terms of you know the podcast network has a whole obviously if you have pods that aren't doing well, that's not going to be awesome. But I think you know, I'm trying to think of the right way to answer this. For ad sales purposes, it matters at least a little bit. You have to report this stuff really objectively where it's really helped us. In one of the reasons we want to go to Spotify was they have incredible war chest of intelligence on the habits of people who listen to podcasts, right?
So if we like a certain podcast, we can actually go and see how many people are listening to it. If we feel like there's a piece of kind of turf available, then that can inform like who's in that turf, who's doing well? Could we beat this? Could we have a bigger audience in this? I think Derek Thompson is a good example, right? There was kind of that those smart podcasts that are kind of the news about. Derek writes for the Atlantic and did a little bit of podcasting for them. Yeah, and he, I think is one of the best writers right now.
And you know, always wanted to work with him really liked him. I had him on my podcast a couple times and he was really good and started to think like, all right, what kind of podcast could we figure out? He told me he thought that was a tryout. Was that explicit in your mind? Like I'm going to try and out see how he is. Did he say that? Yeah, to me. Yeah. Interesting. I didn't feel that way. I just, I thought he was interesting. I wanted to have a lot of people on. I think after the pod that made me start to realize that guy's good. Like, that would be cool if we had the pod.
But the kind of pod that he was able to bring to us was a pod we didn't have. It's the things that he talks about. And sometimes he's in the moment reacting to stuff too, which works. But really smart, great guests. And a perfect example of like if we're going to add a podcast to our network, does it bring something to us that we don't have?
You've always been really good in your team about spotting talent, young talent, new talent, bringing him in. They go off and do amazing things. I was talking to Wesley Morris about this. He'd already won Pulitzer's, but you still managed to blow him up even bigger than that. He didn't need any blowing up. He was great. He's still helped.
Is assessing someone as a podcaster a different skill set than figuring out if they're a good writer or is it just assessing talent and you're good at it or not? Definitely a different skill set. I think the people that succeed, we bring some advantages, right?
Like we have, I think, you know, this new thing now where people are like, I've started a network. It's way harder than just I've collected a 10 podcasts and they're all next to each other. Like if you're really doing a network correctly, you've got to figure out how to raise awareness for a new podcast that you're doing or a podcast that you have, right? And I think at Grantland, we had nine of the 10 biggest pods at ESPN. Part of the reason was we, there was a connective tissue with all the pods and I could promote them on my, my pod are social feeds. But also a sensibility, right? It's not just that you know, they all made sense together in some way.
And I think for us, when we're looking at bringing somebody in, it's like, from a chemistry standpoint, do they seem like they make sense of us? Is it somebody like, why isn't he, Lambert is a good example, right? He's, he's somebody we've liked for a while. He just came in and he fit perfectly, right? He can pop up on my podcast. Where did you, where did you find him? Well, he was at the athletic. But he had, he'd been, he'd been around for a few years and he was just really likable. But he came in and he just fit in seamlessly, right?
He was, he could pop on Ring or Ambatio, he could host shows, he does fashion stuff, he could do culture stuff. We've, he's been on prestige TV, he's been on rewatchables. So those type of people who it's like, I don't just have this specialty. I'm good at a bunch of stuff. I think are the people that dating back to the Grantland days we've, we've always succeeded with. I honestly don't think we've gotten enough credit for all the talent that we've either found or elevated.
I would, I would put our, the track record dating back to 2011, Grantland, all the people that have passed through our universe just tell me who did better. Yeah, I've, I talked to a lot of them because you're good at finding them.
There was a thing a couple of years ago with the staff at the Ring or the Writing Staffs that, hey, we want to be on more podcasts where we're not getting our chance and bills having his friends come on and what's up with that. And there was a New York time story and you had a quote there, you emailed them saying this is not amateur hour.
Is there any way you replay that and give more people from the staff a chance or you made the right call? Well, I think the first couple of years were your startup. When you're a startup, you're throwing stuff against the wall and you're trying to survive.
I think what we realized started in 2020 on is that we had to have the best possible people on all the, all the best possible podcasts. And that's how we did the mindset. Going back to the first couple of years. I just think we were trying a bunch of things, you know, and would I do that? Do it that way again? Yeah, in some ways, but in other ways, I look back and I just don't think people realize how hard it is to start something from scratch and how many variables there are.
Like we look back, we didn't have HR. We didn't have a single HR person. I don't think for the first 18 months of the company or maybe it was like the first 20 months, something like that. Pretty standard for a startup. That seems crazy to me now. That should have been one of the first things we had, but it's a million things like that where you look back and you go, man, why do we do it that way?
And I think for us, like we're just trying to keep getting better. I think it was unfair to expect a company that had a digital media company that had been together for basically three years to do everything perfectly. There's certainly some things I would do over again, but ultimately, you know, we're in years six now. I think we've done a really good job.
I mean, you think about, we've been profitable the whole time. We were one of the only digital media companies that didn't have any layoffs at all. We've continued to hire. I'm really proud of the people we're hiring. I think from a diversity standpoint, we've done way better and we feel like we're continuing to do better and it's something that we continue to care about and we've continued to find talent. So you know, six years in and I'm proud of where we are.
Yeah. So, like I said, you sold the company early 2020 right before the pandemic, other than a lot of money, than $250 million, why sell the Spotify and walk me through how you went from not trying to sell the company to sell in the company. Two things. One was we didn't need to sell. We never hired a banker. It wasn't sure when we would sell it, if we would sell, it wasn't like one of those things.
This is how you bankrolled yourself mostly, right? HBO helped out. And HBO helped out a little. But you didn't bring, did you bring on other investors? It did not. Okay. So it's all you. Well, pretty much. I think we were looking at it like feeling like we were a mid major in college basketball that we could compete, we could get to the tournament, we could win some games, maybe we could even make the final eight.
But ultimately, we just, until we were aligned with somebody bigger, it just felt like it was going to be tougher for us to attract talent and retain talent. Not just talent on podcasts and writers and stuff like that, but people behind the scenes. We were just having, there was this sense that we could feel it. Like, are those guys, are those guys going to be sticking around? What's going on with those guys? How are they funded? All that stuff.
And I think when you're aligned with a big company, that stuff goes away. And I think I look at just the infrastructure we have now from a hiring standpoint, HR, from a sales standpoint, all these things that we're able to take that stuff off our table so we could just concentrate what we're good at. That really helped us.
So for me, competitively, I looked at Spotify, I looked at the trajectory of where I thought they were going, that I thought they had a chance to be the leader in audio. I knew how I felt about audio and all the opportunities there. And I felt like we were in pole position with it. And one of the people in pole position with it. And it just seemed like this makes sense. I feel like I'm catching these guys at the right time.
And the same way at ESPN, in 2008, 9 range, ESPN was really becoming a powerhouse. I caught them at the right time. And that was what I was hoping would happen in Spotify. So I think word that you guys were talking to them was out there, maybe in the fall. And if I heard about it, obviously people who would money would hear about it. Where are the folks coming and saying, we go with us instead of Spotify. We'll match that offer. We'll beat that offer. We had, I mean, going back to 2018, I mean, 2017. We really had people kind of kicking the tires on us the whole time.
But it was, I was so determined to be my own boss and not have to work for somebody else. I just, after the ESPN experience, I just wanted to be on my own. I wanted to have my own thing. I wanted to be in charge of it. I wanted to be in charge of who, you know, who we hired, what we did and what deals we made. And that's what I wanted. And I had a great inner circle and that everyone is still part of it. It's the same inner circle we've had for six years. And it was just really fun.
I think, you know, starting probably in 2019 range, you start going, is there a ceiling on this? What are we going to look like two years from now? I mean, the pandemic, Jesus, if we had been on our own for that, that would have been, you know, I think we would have been fine. But it was a lot easier that digested part of Spotify. But the pandemic, the crazy thing about the Spotify part was we officially, the sale went through on March 1st. And then on like March 8th, they shut their offices down. And then March 11th was the Rudy Go Bear game.
So we, for the first two years, we hadn't met pretty much anyone we worked with. We were doing everything on Zoom. We weren't in an office. The office was a big part of like the spitball culture we had and things like that. Like that was gone and just trying to navigate. How do we continue to do content? And now I look back. I'm like, holy shit. This was, we just do it on Zoom. Record on your ends. Like get good mics. Why the fuck didn't we know this in 2018? It took everyone a few months to figure it out. Oh my God. I was going into my office on Sunday nights to do the football pod with Kyle and we, I drive into the office and we tape it. I could have just done it at my house.
So stuff like that, you look back and you go, man, how did we not know that? But on the other hand, I do think it set us back because we joined this big company and we were doing everything on Zoom and then obviously some, some people come and go and things like that. And by the time we're actually in the office, it's the, a lot of the people aren't even there from two years ago.
We spent a long time working for Disney. You got fired. You went and built your own company. Now you're really. I think I fired. That did not renew your contract. They did not renew my contract. Which they announced the New York Times before telling you. Yeah, because they were being decks. So then now you are working for Spotify and Danielaq.
What did you learn from being an employee at Disney that's going to change the way you work for this company? Good question. Well, first I'm older, which I think helps. I definitely look back at some of the, I'm not saying I was blameless and some of the ESPN stuff. I think if I had to do over an ESPN thing, I just, I don't know why I cared so much about some of the stuff, you know?
Like there are certain things. Grantland, the fact that they wouldn't give us more headcount, to me, is still indefensible because I don't look back at what we created for those four years. It was like the genesis of something really special. It was a digital multimedia site. Really before. There were a lot of those. You know, and it's like, damn, if they just kept that and watered the plan on it, what would that have been worth now?
I've had people that worked there now in higher positions who were like, I can't believe we fucked that up. But I think from my standpoint, like, yeah, I maybe shouldn't have cared so much that this happened or that happened or whatever. Should I have cared that we didn't have a social media editor for four years into the site? Yeah, I should have. But I think from a Spotify standpoint, I think just realizing that with a big company, sometimes things get clumsy. Sometimes this will happen. You have no control over it. Sometimes this person will leave and that sucks. Whatever that, you just kind of have to ride it.
It's like being on a huge boat and you just kind of never know what's going to happen. When you're in control of your own stuff, it just feels more serene, even though it's not, you have more responsibility on that stuff. So much more stuff's out of your control of the big company. You have to learn how to deal with that.
So what is your job there now? Are you running the ringer and doing what you're doing before, except now you're on a, now you're an employee before you were in boss or are you doing additional stuff because you're at Spotify? Well, I'm running the ringer and then now I'm running global sports for them.
So what does that mean? That means we have to figure out a comprehensive sports strategy for audio and storytelling with other opportunities are popping up that aren't just domestic and it's something that I've been helping them with the last two years. But I think we formalized it because we had to. Some of the other countries are behind from an audio standpoint, but you know, really trying to figure out some stuff that will elevate the company in a sports standpoint. We want to be the place that if anybody is doing something sports related, if there's like a big personality, there's a big property or whatever, we'll be one of the people that come to.
Is that budget and people? Do you have more, are you managing more stuff now or? Yeah, we're figuring that out now. It will be more stuff.
那是预算和员工吗?你现在有更多的东西要管理吗?是的,我们正在弄清楚。将会有更多东西。
And do you imagine like this, you know, that we keep having these conversations about when it sports rights, one of the going to peak, they keep going up, they keep going up. Is this something where you guys see you can imagine like you're bidding for rights for audio or video for sports or do you think you're always going to be sort of commentating? I think audio definitely storytelling stuff, I think will be way more in the mix, especially I mean, we already are to some degree with the ringer films, but I think that's, there's some stuff that's coming that we're going to announce that I think people will be surprised by. And then, you know, I just trying to use some of the technology and use the platform that they're building in the giant Spotify audience, trying to leverage that in the right ways around the world.
Do you think about like basketball and soccer and F1 and some of these sports? Like who's me in Germany? Right, who's were silo in Brazil? Who's Kevin O'Connor in Australia? Like can we find more people like that? I think the daunting part for me is I, we can find talent in domestically, like we'll just always be able to do that. But how do we find talent abroad? How can we help some of those markets, you know, learn some of the stuff that we've learned and then execute them in their own ways?
And then what are the opportunities? I think from a video standpoint, we've seen sports is just going nuts, you know, now that Amazon is in a big way like Spotify, the video player isn't close yet. But there will be a point down the road when we'll be able to run live stuff on the video podcast player. And is that an ambition? Like we'd like to, we'd like to broadcast a game or you go, we're never got, even though we're Spotify, we're never going to compete with Amazon or Apple or Tencent or whoever it is for NFL rights. Well, for Spotify, it's not just sports, obviously music would be an even bigger draw for that, right? So, if the technology gets to a place where, you know, could you watch day one of Coachella on Spotify? Could you watch, I don't know, the Euro League championships on Spotify, whatever. Can we get the technology to that point when's that going to be?
And maybe we won't, maybe that, maybe they'll just decide that's not what we want to do. But you think of all the ways the company's grown. The thing people forget about Spotify is they've only been in content since 2018, like really, like in terms of making their own stuff, yeah.
Making their own stuff, buying companies, buying sales components, buying technology, all the stuff they've done, they weren't doing it in 2017, I don't think. So it's, this is year five. I think we're in pretty good shape. Like you think some of the purchases, like megaphone things like that. And then some of the companies they bought and the talent that they've been able to bring in, I think it's in a pretty good spot.
Speaking of talent, they brought in Joe Rogan, multiple blow ups. I think during the biggest one, I was watching your pods pretty carefully on your site. I don't think you, I think Derek mentioned it once and beyond that, you guys steer clear of it. Was that an edict from you? Like let's just steer out of this or did Spotify say it's just to stay out of Rogan? No edict. No, it's, it's, you know, there's four million podcasts now and Spotify has a bunch of them and it's, it's us. I don't worry about stuff I can't control. Whatever Joe's going to say in his podcast, whether you agree or they're not, I don't really care.
What about just covering it as a topic? Like this is something people are talking about. We did. We covered it on, I think we covered on press box. I think we covered it on Derek Thompson's podcast. That's fine with that. I think we've, we've never shied away from stuff.
I mean, we even go back to my podcast at ESPN. Like I certainly wasn't afraid to talk about stuff that seemed to overlap. I think that thing for us, we always just want to be fair with how we discuss it. I think, I think we were.
How much longer it's Spotify? You sold two years usually when you sell a startup, it's like a four year deal. Yeah, I have a couple of years left. Yeah. And what, what happens after that? Do you stay on as an employee? Do you have an itch to make a new thing? I don't know. I haven't thought about it and I'm not going to worry about it because I feel like, we've grown, we've been able to grow the ringer so much and I'm so proud of like all the people we have and especially the way some of the people behind the scenes have really grown and taken on more stuff.
And then from a Spotify standpoint, like to even think about it when we're just going back in the office. Like we had, we had a managers meeting on Monday and we had I think like 30 people in our office all together. People that work for us, right? We have like 150 employees, 140 employees at this point, 150 people in our universe. And that was the first time we'd had more than like, at least that I'd been there, that we'd had more than like 10 people in the office since like March 2020. So it's hard for me to think about what's next when I don't even feel like we've had a fair chance at just having a normal office and whole organizational situation. So hopefully that'll go back to normal.
And then I think I want to see how the next year goes for us. A lot of people who are writers get promoted into management and turns out they're terrible at management. They were really good at being writers and they shouldn't be managers.
Yeah. Do you like being a manager? So make you happy. I really like, I mean at this point, I'm pretty up there now. So I have like the inner circle, right? I did love the, I, Grantland, I really did like it. I think we had a smaller company obviously and I really felt and it was a different era too. You know, we probably had, I don't know, 35, 40 people, 42 people. I don't remember what the final thing was, but I felt like we were all, you know, we were just trying to push a rock uphill that whole time, but I was really proud of what we did.
And I think as, as you get older and I think social media has made some of the stuff more complicated too, there's probably just more stuff that pops up now. But I still like the idea of like, can we create something from scratch? Can we, can we maintain it? Can we water the plant? Can we, can we keep getting better? Can we keep innovating? And I think from an innovation standpoint, that's the part I like the most. Like, I never want to be in the same spot that I was six months ago with anything I'm doing.
And I still feel like, like, ringer films and things like that, like our video podcast stuff. Like, we're at a real position of strength now with the, with the podcast network and the website. And I just feel like across the board, we just have such good people now. So now when we think about adding anything to that, it's like, is this person really good?
And I was saying to somebody last week, it really reminds me of the spot we hit at Grantland in 2014 where it just felt like a lot of people wanted to work for us. And we had just hit this, I can't, this cool checkpoint where it was like, people knew what we were. Everybody really liked working for us and we're doing really good stuff. And people from the outside wanted to be part of that. And I feel like that's happening again.
Last question. Who is your dream podcast guest you haven't had? You have to answer that. I mean, it's David Letterman that's always going to be the answer. I think he seems available now. I know. It does stuff. It's weird. I'd almost be afraid to ask because I wouldn't want to fuck it up, but I think I'll be nervous.
The only time I really had like nervous energy for a podcast, it was Larry Bird, which we did in person in Indiana, and it was funny because I did a, I did an Obama podcast in the White House. I think within probably a month, one way or the other with that. And I was way more nervous for, for Brad. I just want to screw it up. So I think with Letterman, there's so much to ask and it's, but it's really tough to interview somebody who meant a lot to you. I'd feel the same way. Like Eddie Murphy would be another one. He would never do the podcast, but the people that I grew up who just had this profound influence on me.
And then Kimmel, Kimmel goes the other way, Kimmel, like, befriends everybody that he loved when he was a kid. He's friends with Huey Lewis and Letterman and Howard Stern, all these. He's gone a whole other way.
I'm still, when I meet people like that, I still feel like I've become a 14 year old. Yeah, I feel like I'm a 14 year old again. So I think the Letterman thing would be a good challenge for us.
All right. I want to hear the Letterman interview because I really like his Netflix interviews, especially that Chipel, which is great. So I think you do a good job. Thank you. And with that, I'm going to let you go.
I'm going to give you a little sentence. Wait, I have a question for you. Okay. I'll answer a question. When we did, what was the one we did where we wrote about? It was like two months before I left the ESPN and I did that interview with you. Wasn't it South by Southwest? That was the South by, yeah. Yeah. And we did interview about podcasts.
Yep. I watched you interview Horatio Sands who was really high. He was very high. What was your perception of where my head was at at that point? You were flingering. Did you feel like I was like on my way out?
Yeah. You were fuming. You could tell. But you were trying to play it and you were very, you were very concerned about the way ESPN was going to treat you, but also your staff. That was a big concern. And also, so you were, I don't think you were 100% sure, but I also talked to Jimmy because he was doing something at South by two.
And I talked to him about you and he said, oh, he's leaving. I said, well, I don't know what he is. He says he doesn't, not sure because no, no, he's leaving because Disney treats their talent like shit. By the way, he's still working for Disney, but he was convinced you were out.
Yeah, I deep down was convinced, but I still had such, I'd such ties to some of the people we had that I still felt like near the end that is there some way to save this, even though I was like 90% out the door. But I think I've been vindicated by some of the other exits. I think it worked out and you've had Bob Iger on your podcast.
Yeah, it all worked out. It was probably time for me to go and it was what it is, but I remember when I did that interview with you, I was so mad because I think it was right after we found out we just weren't getting any more headcount. I just felt like the site, I didn't feel like it was sustainable how hard everyone was working. I could see, that was the first time I was like, you pretty much had steam coming out of years.
I remember we were wandering around the four seasons trying to find a space to do the interview and we finally sat down and just, yeah, it was great. Yeah, it was weird that they didn't see what we had going, but I think they do now at least. They figured it out.