Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Bank of America earnings announcement. It is now my pleasure to turn the program over to Lee McIntyre. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, Katherine. Good morning. Welcome and thank you for joining the call to review our second quarter results. I trust everyone has had a chance to review our earnings release documents. They're available on the investor relations section of the Bank of America dot com website and include the earnings presentation that we'll be referring to during the call. I'm going to first turn the call over to our CEO, Brian Moynihan, for some opening comments before Alistair Barquich, our CFO, discusses the details of the quarter.
Before I do that, let me remind you that we may make forward-looking statements and refer to non-GAP financial measures during the call. The forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risk and uncertainties. Factors that may cause the actual results to materially differ from expectations are detailed in our earnings materials and SEC filings that are available on the website. Information about our non-GAP financial measures, including reconciliations to U.S. GAP, can also be found in our earnings materials that are available on the website.
So with that, my pleasure to turn the call over to you, Brian. Thanks.
所以,我很荣幸将电话转给你,Brian。谢谢。
Thanks, Lee, and good morning to all of you. And thank you for joining us. I'm starting on slide two of the earnings presentation. This Morning Bank of America reported one of the best quarters and one of the best first tasks that net income the company's history. Our results this quarter, once again, include solid performance on things we control by delivering organic growth and operating leverage. We did that in the economy that remains healthy and had a slowing rate of growth. It was also a quarter that included volatility from the debate about the debt ceiling, continuation in the central bank monetary tightening action, and a slowing in consumer spending and a slowing in inflation.
As you look at it now, our customer spending pattern is now more consistent with the pre-pandemic lower growth, lower inflation economy. Before Alster takes due details, let me summarize Bank America's quarter two performance. On slide two, you can see the highlights. We earned $7.4 billion after tax and grew earnings per share 21% over the second quarter of 2022. All business segments perform well, and I want to thank all my teammates for doing so.
We grew clients and accounts organically and at a strong pace. We delivered an eighth straight quarter of operating leverage, led by 11% year over year of revenue growth. We further strengthened our balance sheet, improving our common equity tier one ratio was 110 basis points year over year at 11.6%. And we have $867 billion in global liquidity sources. We also produced strong returns for our shareholders with a return on change of a common equity of 15.5% continuing a streak of many quarters at that level or above.
While our business has performed well this quarter, I would particularly highlight our global markets and sales and trading team and our investment banking teams. Both have appeared outperformed their industry peers. Investment made over the past couple of years in global markets capabilities under Jimmy DeMarra's leadership, as well as Matthew Coder's leadership in the global corporate investment banking area, allowed us to prove our market shares for both of these peoples. I'd also note the strong contribution by our middle market clients to that in our teammates there, led by Wendy Stewart.
I'd also like to touch a few additional points before turning the call over to Alistair. These points will help illustrate continuing investment in the franchise and work we do to drive growth. Let's start with the organic growth slide on page three. On that page, we highlight some of the important elements of organic growth. You can see evidence in every business segment as you look at the page. In consumer, in quarter two, we opened 157,000 new checking accounts. Consumers now had 18 straight quarters of positive net new checking account growth. These are core primary checking accounts across the board, allowing our tremendous deposit franchise to continue to prosper and take market share.
While the progress here may appear inchmeal over the last three years, we've grown our core customers and consumer checking account customers from 33 million to 36 million. We opened another 1 million plus credit card accounts this quarter and have 10% more investment accounts this year than we did last year in the consumer business. Consumer investment business balances reached a new high of $387 billion, aided by a 30% increase in new fund consumer investment accounts you every year and frankly, moving our money from our depositors into the market as they've done so.
In global wealth, we added 12,000 net new relationships in Maryland. the private bank. Our advisors opened more than 36,000 new banking relationships in the quarter, sharing a strong differentiation in our model of fulfilling both investment and banking. In the past 90 days, we added 190 experienced advisors to our sales force in addition to the digital capabilities to help us deliver at scale.
In global banking, we added clients to increase the number of solutions per relationship. Over the past three years, we've added net new relationship managers and increased our client facing headcount by nearly 10%. We've also improved our tools for prospect colleagues for investments in technology and its benefiting our ability to add customers to improve our solutions per existing client. Year to date, we've added about 1,000 new commercial and business banking clients across the United States, which is the same number we added in the full year of last year. Again, the operationalizing that ability to do this at scale increases our speed on boarding these clients.
In our global markets area, we saw one of the highest second quarters for sales and trading in our history. It's another quarter of good organic growth. The key that growth will manage in our expansion trajectory, which Alistair is going to cover, requires an inherent efficiency progress from digital and other applied technology across all our units. Digital superiority is key to our operating dynamics. First, it produces a great customer experience, resolving strong customer retention and strong customer scores. It ensures our position as lead transactional bank for our customers, whether they're consumers, companies or investors. Third, it preserves its strong deposit balance, is a good price and do the core nature of transactional deposits. And last but importantly, it leads to efficiency.
So how we're doing on digital progress, you can see that on slide four, first with the consumer. In consumer, we now have 46 million active users that are digital engaged with our digital platform and are logging over 1 billion times a month, and even with this scale, the stage of maturity logins is up to double digits from last year. Customer uses of ERCA continues to be the expectations. This was an early application of natural language processing and artificial intelligence that we built in our company and it continues to learn about it with additional use. Interactions with ERCA rose 35% in just the past year and now it's crossed over 1.5 billion kind of interactions in the first five years of introduction. There's a lot of questions about artificial intelligence out there, but one can't clue together a series of systems. We have to build a system that is highly regulated, highly customer focused business. In ERCA is one such application, you can see its impact. Likewise, Zell has a slowdown either. The number of people using Zell grew 19% this past year.
Remember, these aren't new functionalities at this point. They've been around for years, but they continue to grow a very strong growth rate showing customer desire and acceptance of the activities. You can see the digital sales continue to grow. We continue to have both great high tech and high touch options. As part of that, we've added 310 new financial centers since 2019. By the end of this year, we have refurbished every one of our existing centers in our company. We plan on hoping 50 more centers a year for the next few years, which include expansion in nine new markets we announced a few weeks ago. The branches to these markets is enhanced by digital and leads to strong low success. Just to give you a point of reference, for all the expansion markets of the last several years, for branches open a year or more in those expansion markets, our average deposit balance per those branches are $160 million in each branch.
You go to the wealth management digital on slide five. You can see that they continue to be the most digitally engaged clients in our company. Our advisors have led the way in driving a personal driven advice model supplemented by our digital tools. You can see the client adoption rate of 82% in Maryland and 92% in the private bank. 78% of embraced digital delivery as a tool of service, providing more convenience for them and our advisors. Eric and Zell also continue expanding these clients' sets. A new program announced just a few. quarters ago has generated 20,000 digital leads to 7,000 advisors. It's called Advisor Match matching our clients with advisors of their choice.
On slide six, you can see the digital engagement in the global banking area. Corporate Treasures. Corporate Treasury teams and our clients appreciate these doing business with us digitally. Cash Pro app sign-ins are up nearly 60% from last year, where the value of payments through cash pro app are up 20%. As you can see, every line of business is delivering strong organic growth. The investments made in technology have enabled us to grow industry-link positions and digital tools while enabling our clients to do great things and making us more efficient. This provides her a very satisfied, stable customer and client base with Bank of America's primary provider. And by doing it with a digital application, that also produces operating leverage.
On slide seven, you can see our streak of operating leverage continued in the second quarter of 2023. We're now back in eight quarters in a row. The chart on slide seven covers eight and a half years of 34 quarters. And all but eight of those quarters, and you can see those identified, six of which were in the heart of the pandemic. We've achieved operating leverage. Operating leverage is that simple task of growing revenue at a better growth rate than expense. As I said, Alistair's going to discuss with you our good and declining expansion trajectory, which sets us up to continue to provide operating leverage even with a shifting economy.
In sum, in the quarter we deliver earnings at a 19 percent higher than a 15 percent return on table common equity. That was driven by continued storing organic growth and operating leverage in a volatile economic environment. Alistair's going to talk to you about a bit more strength we see ahead in our netherage income for the balance of the year. That provides a better start as we think about 2024. You're going to hear our expectations for the quarterly declined expenses in the following quarters for the rest of 23, even as we keep investing. And you hear about the resilience of credit and strong trajectory capital. This all positions as well to continue both our streets of organic growth and operating leverage. With that, let me turn over to Alistair.
Thank you, Brian. And on slide eight, we list the more detailed highlights of the quarter, and then slide nine presents assembly income statements. I'm going to refer to both of those. For the quarter, we generated 7.4 billion in net income, and that resulted in 88 cents per diluted share. Our year over year revenue growth of 11 percent was led by a 14 percent improvement in net interest income, coupled with a strong 10 percent increase in sales and trading results, X, DVA. Revenue is strong, and it included a few headwinds, and I thought I'd go through those headwinds first. We had lower service charges from both higher earnings credit rates on deposits for commercial clients, and the policy changes we announced in late 2021 to lower our insufficient funding overdraft fees for our consumer customers.
The good news on the consumer piece is year over year comparisons get a bit easier starting next quarter as the third quarter of 22 reflects the full first quarter of these changes. Second, we had lower asset management and brokerage fees as a result of the lower equity and fixed income market levels and market uncertainty that impacted transactional volumes compared to a year ago quarter. Third, we had a net DVA loss of 102 million in this quarter compared to a gain in DVA of 158 million in the second quarter a year ago. We also recorded roughly 200 million securities losses as we closed out some available for sale security positions and their related hedges and we put the proceeds in cash. Lastly, and just as a reminder, our tax rate benefits from ESG investments, and those are somewhat offset by operating losses on the ESG investments which show up in other income. So this quarter, our tax rate is a little bit lower, and the operating losses are a little bit higher from volume of these deals. So you have to be careful in analyzing the lower tax rate without considering the operating losses and that in turn often offsets what would have been higher revenue elsewhere. Our tax rate for the full year is expected to benefit by 15% as a result of the ESG investment tax credit deals. And absent these credits, our effective
End. tax rate would still be roughly 25% and we continue to expect a tax rate of 10 to 11% for the rest of 2023. Expense for the quarter of 16 billion included roughly 276 million in litigation expense which was pushed higher this quarter by the agreements announced last week with the OCC and the CFPB on consumer matters.
Asset quality remains solid and provision expense for the quarter was 1.1 billion consisting of 869 million in net chargeoffs and 256 million in reserve built. The provision expense reflects the continued trend in chargeoffs toward pre-pandemic levels and it's still below historical levels. The charge off rate was 33 basis points and that's only one basis point higher than the first quarter and still remains well below the 39 basis points that we last saw in Q4 2019 when remember 2019 was a multi-decade low.
I'd also use slide 9 just to highlight returns and you can see we generated 15.5% return on tangible common equity and 94 basis points return on assets.
Let's turn to the balance sheet starting with slide 10 and you can see our balance sheet ended the quarter at 3.1 trillion declining 72 billion from the first quarter. A 33 billion or 1.7% reduction in deposits closely matched a 41 billion dollar decline in securities balances through paydowns from the whole to maturity and sales of available for sale securities. Securities are now down 177 billion from a quarter to 22. Cash levels remained high at 374 billion and loans grew 5 billion. As Brian noted our liquidity remains strong with 867 billion of liquidity up modestly from the first quarter of 23 and still remains nearly 300 billion above our pre-pandemic fourth quarter 19 level.
Shareholders equity increased 3 billion from the first quarter as earnings were only partially offset by capital distributed to shareholders. AOCI decreased by 2 billion driven by derivatives valuation and AFS securities values were little changed. So there's little change in the AOCI component that impacts regulatory capital. Tangible book value is up 10% per share year over year. During the quarter we also paid out 1.8 billion in common dividends and we bought back 550 million in shares to offset our employee awards and last week we announced the intent to increase our dividend by 9% beginning in the third quarter.
To regulatory capital our CET1 level improved to 190 billion from March 31st and the ratio of CET1 improved more than 20 basis points to 11.6% once again adding to the buffer over our 10.4% current requirement while our risk-weighted assets increased modestly in the quarter. Also noteworthy on July 3rd we initiated dialogue with the Fed to better understand our CCAR exam results and the remaining discussions today with no news to update as of now. In the past 12 months we've improved our CET1 ratio by more than 110 basis points and we've done that while supporting clients for loan demand and returned 11.3 billion in dividends and share with purchases to shareholders.
A supplemental leverage ratio was 6% versus our minimum requirement at 5% and that leaves us plenty of capacity for balance sheet growth. Finally the TLAQ ratio remains comfortably above our requirements.
So let's now focus on loans by looking at average balances. You can see those on slide 11 and there you can see average loans grew 3% year over year. The drivers of loan growth are much the same. Consumer credit card growth is strong and then commercial loans grew 4%. The credit card growth reflects increased marketing enhanced offers and higher levels of account openings over time. And commercial we saw a little bit of a slowdown in this quarter driven by higher paydowns from borrowers and weaker customer demand as opposed to any credit availability from us. We are still open for business for loans. While loan growth has slowed it's generally remained still ahead of GDP and commercial client conversations remain solid as our clients seem to be waiting for some of the economic uncertainty to lift before borrowing further.
Slide 12 shows the breakout of deposit trends. That's on a weekly ending basis across the last two quarters and it's the same chart that we provided last quarter.
In the upper left you see the trend of total deposits. We ended the second quarter at 1.88 trillion down 1.7% with several elements of our deposits seeming to find stability. Given the normal tax seasonality impacts on deposit balances in Q2 and the monetary policy actions we believe this is a good result.
I want to use the other three charts on the page to illustrate the different trends across the last quarter and more specifically in each line of business.
我想使用页面上的另外三个图表来说明上个季度各个业务线的不同趋势,特别是每个业务线。
In consumer looking at the top right chart you see the difference in the movement through the quarter between the balances of low to no interest checking accounts and the higher yielding non-checking accounts. Here you can also see the low levels of our more rate sensitive balances in consumer investments and CD balances and they're both broken out here. In total we've got still more than 1 trillion in high quality consumer deposits which remains 274 billion above pre-pandemic levels.
In the second quarter that decline in consumer deposits was driven by higher debt payments, higher spend and seasonal tax activity and some non-checking balances that rotated from deposits into brokerage accounts. We did see some competitive pressure this quarter within about roughly 40 billion of CDs as some of the financial institutions' post-price is higher and at this point with deposits far exceeding our loans we've not yet felt the need to chase deposits with rate.
Broadly speaking average deposit balances of our consumers remain at multiples of their pre-pandemic level especially in the lower end of our customer base. Total rate paid on consumer deposits in the quarter rose to 22 basis points and remains low relative to fed funds driven by the high mix of quality transactional accounts. Most of this quarter's 10 basis point rate increase remains concentrated in those CDs and consumer investment deposits and together those represent only 11% of our consumer deposits. According to wealth management this business is also impacted by tax payments and normally shows the most relative rate movement because these clients tend to have the most excess cash.
The previous quarter's trend of clients moving money from lower yielding sweep accounts into higher yielding preferred deposits and moving off balance sheet onto other parts of the platform seemed to stabilize this quarter and our sweep balances were more modestly down at 72 billion.
At the bottom right note the global banking deposit stability we ended the second quarter at 493 billion down 3 billion from the first quarter. We've now been in this 490 to 500 billion range for the past several quarters and these are generally the transactional deposits of our commercial customers that they use to manage their cash flows. And while the overall balances are being stable we've continued to see shift towards interest-bearing as the Fed raised rates one more time during the quarter before pausing in June. Non-interest-bearing deposits were 40% of their deposits at the end of the quarter.
Focusing for a moment on average deposits using slide 13 I really only have one additional point to make. While you've seen the modest down tick in deposits for the past several quarters as the Fed has remained some accommodation we just want to note that deposits remain 33% above the fourth quarter of 2019 pre-pandemic period. And as you look at the page every segment relative to pre-pandemic is up at least 15%. Consumers up 40% consumer checking is up more than 50% and as noted global banking is being right around 500 billion for the past five quarters and it remains 31% above pre-pandemic.
So let's move to slide 14 and we'll continue the conversation that we began last quarter around management of excess deposits above loans.
所以我们转到第14页,我们将继续上个季度开始的关于管理超过贷款额的过剩存款的讨论。
In the top left note the balances in the second quarter of each year since the pandemic began. The excess of deposits needed to fund loans increased from 500 billion pre-pandemic to a peak of 1.1 trillion in the fall of 2021. And as you can see it remains high at the end of June at 826 billion.
In the top right note that the amount of cash and securities held has increased across time in line with the excess deposit trend. And you'll also note the mix shift over time. This excess of deposits over loans has been held in a balanced manner across the period shown with roughly 50% fixed, longer-dated held to maturity securities. And the rest has been held in shorter dated available for sale securities in cash. Cash and the shorter-dated AFS securities combined was 516 billion at the end of the quarter and cash at 375 billion is more than twice what we held pre-pandemic and you should expect to see that come down over time.
We made these investments given the mix and transactional nature of our customers' deposits, particularly given the excess deposits built. But also in the bottom left chart the combined cash and securities yields continued to expand this quarter and remain meaningfully wider than the overall deposit rate paid. That's a result of two things. Securities book has seen a steady decline since the fall of 2021 when we stopped adding to it. With less loan funding needs proceeds from security paydowns have been deployed into higher yield in cash and through this action and the increased cash rates the combined cash and security yield has risen further and faster than deposit rates.
Deposits at the end of the quarter were paying 124 basis points while our blend of cash and security says increased to 319 basis points. So over the past year the deposit cost has risen by 118 basis points and the cash and securities yield has improved by 164 basis points. And as a reminder this slide focuses on the banking book because our global markets balance sheet has remained largely market funded.
Finally one very last one last very important point that I want to make is on the improved NII of our banking book. The NII excluding global markets which we disclose each quarter, trough in the third quarter of 2020 at 9.1 billion and that compares to 14 billion in the second quarter of 2023. So almost 5 billion higher on a quarter basis 20 billion per year. That's led to a stronger capital position even as we returned capital to shareholders and supplied capital to our customers in the form of loans and other financing capital.
And then more specifically on the whole maturity book the balance of that portfolio declined again 10 billion from the first quarter. It's done 69 billion since we stopped adding to the book in the third quarter of 21. The market valuation on our whole to maturity book which is in a negative position worsened 7 billion since March 31st, 2023 driven by a 54 basis point increase in mortgage rates. The OCI impact from the valuation of our hedged AFS book modestly improved this quarter.
Let's turn to slide 15 and we can focus on net interest income on a gap or non FTE basis. NII in the second quarter was 14.2 billion and the fully tax equivalent NII number was 14.3 billion. So I'm going to focus on that fully tax equivalent. Here NII increased 1.7 billion from the second quarter of 22 or 14 percent. While our net interest yield improved 20 basis points to 2.06 percent. This improvement has been driven by rates which includes securities premium amortization, partially offset by global markets activity and 137 billion of lower average deposit balances. Large loan growth during the period of 32 billion also aided the year over year NII improvement.
Turning to a link quarter discussion NII of 14.3 billion is down 289 million or 2 percent from the first quarter and that's driven primarily by the continued impact of lower deposit balances and mixed shift into interest bearing partially offset by one additional day of interest in the period global markets NII increased during the quarter. The net interest yield fell 14 basis points in the quarter driven by a larger average balance sheet due to the cash positioning we chose and some higher funding costs. This quarter's compression we believe was just a little anomalous driven by our decision late first quarter to position the balance sheet around higher cash levels.
Turning to asset sensitivity and focusing on a forward yield curve basis the plus 100 basis point parallel shift at June 30th was unchanged from March 31st 23 at 3.3 billion of expected NII over the next 12 months from our banking book and that assumes no expected change in balance sheet levels or mixed relative to our baseline forecast and 95 percent of the sensitivity remains driven by short rates. The 100 basis point down rate scenario was unchanged at negative 3.6 billion.
Let me give you a few thoughts on NII as we look forward. We still believe NII for the full year will be a little above 57 billion which would be up more than 8 percent from full year 2022 and this could include third quarter at approximately the same level as second quarter so think 14 to 14.3 and then fourth quarter somewhere around 14 billion that's a slightly better viewpoint than we had last quarter for the third and fourth quarter with a little more stability closer to the second quarter level and therefore provides a better start point for 2024.
So let's talk through the caveats around our NII comments. First it assumes that interest rates in the forward curve materialize and an expectation of modest loan growth driven by credit card. In deposits we're expecting modestly lower balances led by consumer and we expect continued modest deposit mix shifts from global banking deposits into intersparing. The past few months have provided us a little more positive outlook around NII given the apparent stabilization of some elements of deposits. as well as better pricing and now we'll see how the rest of the year plays out.
Okay, let's turn to expense and we'll use slide 16 for that discussion. Second quarter expenses were 16 billion that was down 200 million from the first quarter and as I mentioned the second quarter included 276 million of litigation expense. In addition we also saw a little higher revenue related expense driven by ourselves and trading results. Those higher costs were more than offset by the absence of the first quarter seasonal elevation of payroll taxes and savings from a reduction in overall full-time headcount. Now excluding the 2500 or so summer interns that we welcomed into our offices over the summer months our full-time headcount was down roughly 4000 from the first quarter start point to 213,000. That's some good work after peaking at 218,000 in January.
Our summer interns will leave us in the third quarter and hopefully many will return as full-time associates next summer and at the same time in Q3 we welcome back about 2600 new full-time hires as college grads many of whom interned with us last summer and that's a very diverse class of associates who are excited to join the company.
As we look forward to next quarter we would expect the third quarter expense to more fully benefit from the second quarter headcount reduction even as we remain in a mode of modest hiring for client facing positions. Additionally the proposed notice of special assessment from the FDIC to recover losses from the failures of Silicon Valley and signature banks could add 1.9 billion expense for us 1.5 billion after tax and we just remain unsure at this point of timing to record that expense.
Let's now move to credit and we'll turn to slide 17. Net charge-offs of 869 million increased 62 million from the first quarter and the increase was driven by credit card losses as higher late stage delinquencies flowed through to charge-offs. For context the credit card net charge-off rate was 2.6% in Q2 and remains well below the 3.03% pre-pandemic rate in the fourth quarter of 19. Provision expense was 1.1 billion in Q2 and that included a 256 million further reserve built. That's driven by one growth particularly in credit card and it reflects a macroeconomic outlook that on a weighted basis continues to include an unemployment rate that rises to north of 5% in 2024.
On slide 18 we highlight the credit quality metrics for both our consumer and commercial portfolios. On consumer we note we continue to see asset quality metrics come off the bottom and they remain below historical averages. Overall commercial net charge-offs were flat from the first quarter and within commercial we saw a decrease in C&I losses that was offset by an increase in charge-offs related to commercial real estate office exposures. As a reminder commercial real estate office credit exposure represents less than 2% of our total loans and this is an area where we've been quite intentional around our client selection, portfolio concentration and deal structure over many years. As a result we've seen NPLs and realized losses that are quite low for this portfolio. In the second quarter we experienced 70 million in charge-offs on office exposure to write down a handful of properties where the LTV has deteriorated. Our charge-offs on office exposures were 15 million in the first quarter. We pulled forward some of the office portfolio stats provided last quarter in a slide in our appendix for you. We continue to believe that the portfolio is well positioned and adequately reserved against the current conditions.
Moving to the various lines of business and their results starting on slide 19 with consumer banking for the quarter consumer earned 2.9 billion on good organic revenue growth and delivered its ninth consecutive quarter of strong operating leverage while we continue to invest in our future. Note that top line revenue grew 15% while expense rose 10%. These segment results include the bulk of the impact of the costs of the regulator agreements from last week. Our reported earnings were strong in both periods at 2.9 billion. It understates the success of the business because the prior year included reserve releases while we built reserves this quarter for card growth. EPNR grew 21% year over year even with the added cost of the agreements. The revenue growth overcame a decline in service charges that I noted earlier. Much of this success is driven by the pace of organic growth, of checking and cardigans as well as investment accounts and balances as Brian noted earlier. In addition to the litigation noted expense reflects the continued business investments for growth. And as you think about this business remember much of the company's minimum wage hikes and the mid-year increase salary and wage moves in 2022 impact consumer banking the most and that therefore impacts the year over year comparisons.
According to wealth management on slide 20 we produced good results earning a little less than a billion dollars. These results were down from last year as asset management and brokerage fees felt the negative impact of lower equity, lower fixed income markets and some market uncertainty impacting transactional volume. Those fees were complemented by the revenue from a sizable banking business and that remains an advantage for us. As Brian noted earlier both Merrill and the private bank continue to see strong organic growth and produce solid client flows of 83 billion since the third, since the second quarter 22. Our assets under management flows of 14 billion reflected good mix of new client money as well as existing clients putting money to work. Expenses reflect lower revenue related incentives and also reflect continued investments in the business as we add financial advisors.
In slide 21 you see the global banking results and this business produced very strong results with earnings of 2.7 billion driven by 29 percent growth in revenue to 6.5 billion. Couple with good expense management this business produced strong operating leverage. Our global transaction services business has been robust. We've also seen a higher volume of solar and wind investment projects this quarter and our investment banking business is performing well in a sluggish environment. Year over year revenue growth also benefited from the absence of marks taken on leverage loans in the prior year period. We saw modest loan growth on average year over year and link quarter. The utilization rates declined and more generally we saw lower levels of demand. As we noted earlier the deposit flows have stabilized in the 490 to 500 billion dollar range over the past several quarters reflecting the benefits of our strong client relationships. The company's overall investment banking fees were 1.2 billion in the second quarter, growing 7 percent over the prior year and 4 percent link quarter. A good performance in a sluggish environment that softy pools down 20 percent year over year. Provision expense declined year over year as we built more reserve in the prior year. This was held relatively flat year over year even as we drove strategic investments in the business including relationship management hiring and technology costs. And additionally comparisons benefit from the absence of elevated expense for some regulatory matters in the second quarter of 22.
Switching to global markets on slide 22. You had another strong quarter with earnings growing to 1.2 billion driven by revenue growth of 14 percent and I'm referring to results excluding DVAs we normally do. The continued themes of inflation, geopolitical tensions and central banks changing monetary policies around the globe along with this quarter's debt ceiling concerns continue to impact both the bond and equity markets. And as a result it was a quarter where we saw strong performance in both our macro and micro trading businesses. The investments made in the business over the past two years continue to produce favorable results. Year over year revenue growth benefited from strong sales and trading results and the absence of marks on leverage finance positions last year. Focusing on sales and trading, XDVA revenue improved 10 percent year over year to 4.4 billion. Thick improved 18 percent while equities was down 2 percent compared to the second quarter of 22. Year over year expense increased 8 percent, primarily driven by investments in the business and revenue related costs partially offset by the absence of regulatory matters in the second quarter of 22.
Finally on slide 23 all other shows a loss of 182 million. New included 197 million of losses on security sales and increased volume of solar and wind investment operating losses that create the tax credits for the company. As a result of the increased solar and wind tax deal volume and their associated related operating losses, the effective tax rate in the quarter was lower 8 percent. But excluding ESG and any other discrete tax benefits our tax rate would have been 26 percent. So with that let's stop there and we'll open it up for Q and A. If you would like to ask a question please press star and one on your touch tone phone. You can remove yourself from the queue at any time by pressing the pound key.
We'll take our first question today from Gerard Cassidy with RBC. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning Brian. Good morning Alistair. Brian can you give us a view from your standpoint of the new proposal the nation say new but the speech by vice chair bar about the likelihood of capitol ratios going up for large banks like your own. And then second there was a report today on Bloomberg that the capitol requirements for holding residential mortgages may go up meaningfully any thoughts on that as well.
I think you're broadly stating I think as was said by many people that have held the position of the year as a capital industry is sufficient and I think there's been a desire to finish up the Basel III. Those rules will come out we think in a few weeks and you know like anything else will deal with them we have 11.6 percent CET1 ratio our requirements currently are 10.4 and so we got plenty of capitol and it's built up. So you know I think from a global competitiveness standpoint we've got to be careful here because the US industry is the best industry in the world and actually does a lot of good for all the countries will including the US and we and frankly the rules of the flight tend to be more favorable to those outside our country and so we got to be careful to maintain the competitive parity. But at the end of the day Gerard you need to finish this and get this behind us and then the industry will adopt and move forward and but they've got to think through the downside of some of these rules and that they could push stuff outside the industry to non-banks to half the asset classes across the board and non-banks including mortgage lending which you referenced half of a goes through non-banks and those resilience those institutions is interesting to watch through cycles and then the second thing they have to worry about is competitiveness overall but and then also just slowing down the economy a 10 percent increase in our capital levels would disable us from making about a hundred fifty billion dollars of loans at the margin and you want our banks to support the economy like we do so I think all this has to be balanced out as they go to adopt these rules.
Very good and then as a follow-up Alistair you talked about the balance sheet I think you said a hundred basis point increase would lead to over three billion and then interest revenue growth over the next 12 months and a hundred basis point decrease would lead to a decline of just over three billion dollars of revenue. Can you share with us when do you think you might change well what would make you change that position to be liability sensitive would you rely on the forward curve or what's the outlook for the balance sheet management that you're looking at now?
Well Gerard I don't think much has changed for us we've talked about the fact that for us it's this idea of balance that's key and if you look at our disclosures around interest rate risk over the course of the past couple years you'll see it's more balanced both upside and downside and it's a narrower corridor over time so that we're trying to sustain NII at a higher level for longer that's what we're trying to engineer so I think going forward there won't be a lot of change to our philosophy in that regard we feel like we're in a pretty good position in terms of balance we'll be tweaking at the margin but what will largely drive things from here is just normalization of deposits and good old fashion longer.
Very good thank you. We'll go next to Glenn Shor with Evercore your line is open. Glenn Glenn. Good morning. So no one could take issue with 600 base points of operating leverage but I just always like doing a little gut check expenses up 5% I heard all the reasons why a lot of investment that the IC charge is coming but I just want to make sure did anything change over the last like decade or so you've been basically flat for life is expenses more of a relative gain relative revenues or do you think you can keep expenses in and around the same area as you continue to invest. Thanks.
Glenn, I think if Alistair gave you a trajectory which if you look at it from fourth quarter last year the fourth quarter this year gets your relatively flat year over year and as your revenues flatten out because it industry movements flatten out you know you'll see that as we decline in the quarters that'll be strong so as we think about it as we think about the forward you know we think about the ability control head count and have expenses continue to come down but they're going to stay you know a level that's relatively consistent where we are now over time and the goal is then to grow revenue faster and expensive.
We've been doing it for many decades you can see that in our data and you know and but the way we do it differs you know from five years ago to ten years ago to last year and that the ability to move the branch configuration around when we had 6,000 branches down to 4,000 or 3,900, 3,800,000 is different from 3,800 to where it might end up and so you should expect us to continue to engineer by applying massive amounts of technology. You know Erica saves a lot of transactional activity. Deposes by mobile phones save a lot of activity. All that goes on and then what we're offsetting with that is from the decade you talk about we probably went from two and a half billion of technology initiatives a year to 3.8 billion and we went we have a lot more revenue it's compensated for thinking about the wealth management business and that's those are things we fight all the time so we expect to manage expenses in line with the revenue as we got to 19 we told you that we're going to have to start growing expenses at a modest growth rate relative to the revenue growth rate we got the economy on revenue expensive growth up on a basis points lower kind of going to be back in that mode frankly it just with inflation they kicked up and now we flatten the back out then we'll get back in sync as we move to 24 and beyond.
And Glenn look the only thing I would just add to what Brian just said you know we put up 16-2 in the first quarter we were 16-ish this quarter obviously you know we kind of feel like next quarter just with all the work that we've done around headcount and getting the firm in the place that we want now we feel like we're well positioned to deliver 15-8 this quarter if we if and when we keep going we think we're going to be somewhere around 15-6 or so in Q4 so to Brian's point number one we like the trajectory now we've shaped the headcount over time to get to the place where we want to be and that would compare bigger than Q4 last year was 15-5 so you know when you talk about that sort of flattish idea in an inflationary environment we feel like that's a pretty good way to end this year and a pretty good way to set up for next year.
Totally great thanks for all that I appreciate it. We'll take our next question from Mike Mayo with Wells Fargo your line is open. Hi Mike. Good morning so I don't think consensus has you the positive option of the third quarter and I do for make sure I heard you correctly Brian your opening remark is you expect that eight quarter of consecutive positive offering of which to continue so you expect nine quarters or ten quarters or as long as you can and on the you know the one reason is just the NII headwinds you said it should be kind of flyish in the third quarter which and then down some in the fourth quarter and you said the commercial loan demand is a little bit less and utilization is less on the other hand you did this give some specific expense numbers and maybe I guess so the specific question is how long do you expect their eight quarter slots are we done with that you expect that to go and then to what degree to your digital efforts you know your first three slides by four five and six play a part in sustaining this positive offering leverage say through 2024 and 2025 is that a goal is that an expectation.
Our goal is always to maintain it and Mike you point out that you know the toughest time was when you have sort of a twist in the interest rate environment and you could see that again in the 19 and then we got right back into it right after the environment stabilized but you know I think about the question you asked me a few years ago Mike was you know when NII is coming in you're going to let it fall the bottom line you're going to spend it in about 80 plus percent of it is fall on the bottom line which shows you how we position the franchise from you know the second quarter 21 till now as we went through the interest rate rate you know the fast interest rate raising so we gave it specific as you said the specific expense guides by quarter we expect that should produce operating leverage it'll be it gets tougher and then it will get easier as we start to see the stabilization of deposits and loans and loan growth you'll sort of routinely come through an economy frankly shaking through whether we're going to have a recession or not and so we feel good about what we've done that's why I try to give that longer period of time so people have the context that it's very different environments how we've achieved it sometimes revenue fell and expense fell faster sometimes revenue grew and expense grew but slower and you know all the different ways so we'll keep working at it.
McKee leading the cater we like is we've been able to manage the headcount down as Alster said earlier and frankly that is in the face of a turnover rate year over year which is dropped in half which is good because then we're not training and hiring as many people and that then sets us up for the second half of the year because that headcount benefit it's not really comes through the P&L and we'll offset some of the other inflation. And then as it relates to NI specifically you said that the last few months you're a moment more confident given stabilization and pricing I guess we're not seeing that every bank right some bank getting worse some banks getting better so what is it that gives you more confidence on the NI I front and the deposit stabilization price. Well I can't look I can't speak to other banks Mike but obviously we know we're in a privileged and advantaged position relative to our plant base. I just think it's interesting you look at that global banking set of results over the course of the past year and a half in particular that's extraordinary resilience and look Q2 is tax season so you look at the wealth management business for example deposits for down 9 billion but we know they paid tax payments of 14 15 16 billion last quarter so there's beginning to be a little more stability and obviously our focus has always been on transactional primary operating and we may be seeing the benefit of that in some degree but we'll continue we show you on slide I think it was page 12 of the earnings deck that's where it is and we showed that last quarter we showed again next quarter but it's just you know the feds engineering this across the board and we're just reacting to what we see from our customer base.
We'll take our next question from Jim Mitchell with C port global your line is open. Hey good morning maybe just a follow up on deposit behavior I appreciate the comment that you have very low loan to deposit ratio you don't have to chase rates so it feels like betas can stay low but how do you think about how are you thinking about the mix going forward we are seeing and you know NIBs come down CD demand is picking up so how are you thinking of what are you seeing in your deposit base with respect to mix.
我们将从C port global的Jim Mitchell那里提出下一个问题,你可以开始发问了。嗨,早上好,也许只是关于存款行为的后续问题,我很感激你对低贷款存款比率的评论,你不必追逐利率,所以感觉贝塔系数可以保持在低位,但你是如何思考未来的组合及其变化的?我们看到NIBs降低了,CD需求正在增加,那么就存款结构而言,你是如何思考的,你又看到了什么?
I think Jim one of the things that as we think about deposits we think about across each of the customer bases and that's what your page 12 shows you we think about what do they have cashless for that cash to transact and they have cash that's an excess of that and what happens is depending on the customer segment that cash moves to the market that excess cash moves the market but the transactional cash is all with us that transaction cash far exceeds for us our loan balances so we have excess transactional cash and a lot of it is low interest checking no interest checking you know even if it's a money market that's sort of cushion that you know consumers and wealthy people wealthy consumers and average consumers maintain you know to pay their bills and unexpected expenses so that's what you've seen and that produces the cost of deposits of you know 1.24 which is far different than we see other people have and that you can't you know that's just happens another question is how much moves and as Alistair said earlier we're after tax time now where we have a big wealth manager payout to the to the to the you know to taxes we also pass the point where you know people have way past the point of last time there's payments where people will have to that money's been an accounts and still is in their accounts to a large. degree as we as we look at them and they're paying that down slowly to the average balance in our checking accounts has gone from a high of 11,000 to 10,000 you know 600 or 500 or something like that so all that dynamic but you got to go back and say it's the mix of interest bearing and non-trust bearing is actually a little bit of a misnomer because it's really what the customer uses the cash for and if they use it to transact and run their household that's a very stable base and that's what this data shows across time and it's fundamentally a lot higher than pre pandemic so consumers 700 billion pre pandemic a trillion now checking of that if you look on the on the pages in the deposit descriptions you'll see those numbers are page 13 I think it is you know those numbers will show you how much is stayed in checking that's because maybe have more customers but more importantly the average consumer you know through inflation if that has more money around and that provides great risk for the mill. Right so do you feel like that mix shift is starting to slow and stabilize? Well that's what the data on page 12 shows you that's why we show you this level of detail in our customer bases or lines of business that many don't show you to demonstrate that that difference is there for us and you know other people maybe there too I just can't find it in their data but if you look at that's why we show you page 12 CACCC during the second quarter year of the week by week average balance movement and it's as Alistair said earlier you know it's very stable in GWIM it's very stable in Gold Bank and even in non-interest bearing piece half of that is excess balance half of it is earnings credit rate to the GTS process and so you got to be careful that and then you look at the consumer and it's bouncing around the high 900 you know 80 to a trillion dollars depending on the thing and then it is a trillion and you know that happens when payrolls happen all step but that's hugely hugely advantage price 20 odd basis points in total for the consumer business and you ask about CDs we only have 40 billion of CDs so we we are you know we're when our customers are asking for CD rates we give them to it's just not the core business and then we have the investment side we push you know those wealth management flows and the consumer investment flows are part of our deposits moving over to the market when this excess cash right all very helpful thanks a lot.
We'll go next to Chris Katowski with Oppenheimer your line is open. Yeah good morning and thanks for taking the question in in the press release for last week's settlement would be a CFDB director Chopra alleged that you among other things open customer accounts without consent and I'm just wondering how is such a thing possible in the post Wells Fargo era and and can you compare and contrast you know what what happened with at your firm with what happened at Wells.
Quite frankly Chris it when we went all through the horizontal review by the OCC and all the practices and everything were changed then and these these the small number accounts that are part of this are from that time period it just did not the other agencies you did anything and then the consumer bureau had to sit it sitting around me kind of cleaned it up this quarter so that was that was that was the time period of reflects which time period it reflects up to the current time but the accounts were from you know 60 16 and before 17 back when remember the control occurred the curry did the three phase review of all their firms and they didn't find you know they can go look at the data and then all the way up the next controller testified in Congress and you know started to bomb administration after Wells and then led into the early part of the Trump administration without a controller hiding and you can go look at that was cleared up and we made the changes in those processes at that time.
Okay thank you that's it for me. We'll go next to Erica Najarian with UBS your line is open. Hi Erica you let me unmute. Dr. Maybe we can come back to Erica. Absolutely we'll go next to Betsy Gracek with Morgan Stanley your line is open. Hi good morning. One Betsy. A couple questions one on operating leverage that I know you discussed earlier I mean in the past when you had the record number of consecutive quarters of positive operating leverage it seemed like it was being driven primarily a lot of inputs but one of the big drivers was consolidation of branches and now it's an investment spend environment in branches so I'm just wondering if there is if you would agree with that and if there's a different way that you're going to be delivering this positive operating leverage as you're increasing investment spend in one of the you know core platforms of the company.
Betsy, that's kind of what I said earlier. It's been gotten by different ways, different periods of time. But even in the last year, the numbers of branches I dropped over from thirty-nine hundred to thirty-eight hundred and change. And so even as we deployed new ones and so your consulting branches in markets you've been in a long time with lots of branches. You know the ATM count continues to drift down, but importantly if you go to the digital pages and look at the activity levels by customers, and you're speaking mostly to consumer business but affects all customer basis. And you see things like you know Zell transactions far exceeding checks. Remember that what that means is we don't have to process a check on the back end of that and so and then you process it push it through so all that continues to grow very quickly and continues to change the overall operating costs in our consumer business. Your cost of operating it plus the cost of pays and deposits is still 130 odd basis points or whatever it's very strong if you go where the big moves are coming is what we’re doing in the markets business. For example, in terms of deeper digitization, there was always you know equitrating was always digitized but the operational process behind that, the throughput of the amount of stuff that's going straight through, and then what's behind that also in the wealth management's customers getting their statements. You know, in statements not being delivered to customers home but delivered at Conne's a half million dollars in you know benefit that's accumulated over time. And so, if there were some magic you think you could pull you know you pull it, but these are a whole bunch of operational access ideas it seems inchmeal to the general public but it just is constant improvement. The platform allows this constantly managed people down as a percent, you know as a percentage of work done by people always comes down. And then how with artificial intelligence and all enthusiasm leave aside that's in the future the way we've applied it so far has enabled us to do things like our business bankers are more efficient at calling because we use artificial intelligence and programs to tell them which prospects to go to not to tell that they have no other clients and they run it but which prospects they should approach first so they're more efficient or the advisor match which you know has an intelligence based bill into to match the client to an advisor that's you know you saw the statistics about the numbers of leads twenty thousand leads you know all this is adding efficiency so yes the brand system it got you know if you come it's come down a slope and that slope is starting to flatten out but in that slope is a massive reinvestment in rehabs and a massive opening and then more and more deposits over top of that which keeps that efficiency going so your point on enthusiasm for AI but in your in your comments it sounds like there's more like to that that you're anticipating going forward as well as that there yeah it Erica. We started working on probably eight years ago now it's a natural language processing capability that could answer questions that we can make sure the answer was what we wanted it to be in every. And on our proprietary systems and so it's an algorithmic you know that it anticipates the answer the question but it comes from our data and then looks in your account but those 165 million interactions in the last quarter all of them would have been an email a text a phone call and they were all done you know through the customer entering it into Erica and getting an answer and then going on and and you know started. But that will just keep expanding to become a higher and higher functionality. It is a you know start at a methodology which you know these new programs are far in excess of that but they're not tested on data they hallucinate and all these wonderful things that you hear the experts talk about that have to be carefully controlled before you apply. But Erica is using some of the same principles that apply in a very controlled environment and by the way when we do it with our drafting a CEO credit offer memoranda or we do it with a business of targeting that we talked about. You know all those are ways that we apply but it's a very controlled setting so it's a lot more out there frankly as it gets understood better and how it works better and how it can be at attribution accountability those types of things have to build on but Erica that was built in from the start.
Paragraph 1: Okay thanks and then just one follow up on the capital question. I know that you are you know reviewing the SCB with the fed but I'm just you know trying to understand what kind of expectations you have for buybacks as we look forward here realizing that you know there's some puts and takes with battle three but you know there's some benefits here with the SCB thanks. Yeah so we got the final stress capital buffer along with the rest of the industry in August. so we'll wait for that obviously and then that's I think we'll likely have to wait for Basel 3 final clarity that's still you know moving it said we don't have to propose rule yet then we have to wait for the comment period then we got to wait for the final rule so there's a lot that needs one before we get full perspective but I think Brian said it well I mean we've got plenty of capital we've been buying back enough shares to offset the share dilution and we got flexibility to do a little bit more so the other thing that you see over the course of the past year is obviously stress capital buffer last year and we had to add 90 basis points well we've added 110 over the course of the past year and kept return intentional coming equity around 15.5% while buying back shares so we've got the flexibility to do a little bit of everything but I think we want to see what the final rules look like before we make too many decisions.
Paragraph 2: Yeah all right thank you. We'll go next to Ken Houston with Jeffries your line is open. Good morning Ken. Good morning just one question on credit to follow up your comments so it looks like the card normalization is progressing very gradually 90 day past years but only kind of marginally. Just your points about the consumer having still plenty of cash the economy holding up well just your view on just ongoing normalization of card losses specifically and just anything else that we should be mindful of when we think about credit normalization thank you. Ken I think you nailed it that's sort of been you just you watch our you know if you look at our charge offs for example that's mainly about loan growth and a little bit about the rate picking up just a little bit but it's still well below pandemic you can see that and fourth quarter 19 was a great quarter for asset quality and cards so it gets back to this idea that the consumer still in a pretty healthy place you can see that in unemployment statistics and you can see it in the way that they're just continuing to spend a little bit more money year over year so you know I feel like they've been pretty consistent the consumers pretty resilient that remains the case and we're benefiting it from right now and the card experience.
Paragraph 3: And thanks and so just one more follow up on the B side can you help us understand you know the card that's the positive service charges asset management kind of all been stable to slightly lower have the effects that you put through in terms of all the service charges changes and new rewards type of card benefits and all that are we close to getting that run rated any signals of stability in some of those areas. So as Alistair mentioned earlier there's been a 10 year change in how we worked in the overdraft area and the biggest in another set of changes were made and fully implemented in the third quarter of last year so you're in the current run rate it's just a year of year comparisons this quarter picks up a little bit of pre-final changes to post so if you look at the FDIC data I think we're down to $30 million a quarter or something like that and overdraft fees compared to others there are multiples of that but we've it's all through the system it's all done and all the changes required of under the recent announcements and stuff that have been made for a couple years so that it's in the run rate so to speak.
Paragraph 4: Great thanks a lot got it. As a reminder that is star and one for your questions we'll go next to Charles Peabody with Portalis your line is open. Good morning. A question about your interest in bearing deposits with the fed and I'm looking at page 8 your average balance sheet and those balances were quite considerably quarter over quarter and yet your deposit base was relatively flat so I'm just curious what the thinking behind that was was it a desire to build liquidity was there an arbitrage opportunity for NII what was why build the balances so aggressively. So if you go back to we talked about this at the end of last quarter Charles at the end of last quarter was an interesting time for the industry and we felt like it was prudent to just build cash during a period like that and so that's what we did and it said it was obviously an extraordinary period since then as the environment is normalizing I had anticipated and I talked about that earlier you'll see our cash levels just continue to come back down and so that's all that's happening was a choice on our part to position with cash and you'll begin to see that drift lower now.
Paragraph 1: Okay and the follow up and would that imply that the average balance sheet or more importantly our WA's will start to shrink and that would help your capital and just understand the capital. No it shouldn't really impact our WA's because most of that is sort of low or zero RWA what it should impact is if you look at our net interest yield that's always a question of numerator and denominator and when we increased the cash balances that inflates the denominator for a period of time. So that doesn't hurt NII but it does inflate your balance sheet just a little bit so I think as you look forward to what you should expect is we just get back to work on both parts of that numerator and denominator will grind away at the NII side and then on the denominator side we'll have a smaller more efficient balance sheet as the environment normalizes and in the meantime it hasn't hurt NII in any way.
好的,跟进一下,这是否意味着平均资产负债表或者更重要的是我们的平均权重资产(WA)会开始收缩,这对您的资本有所帮助,并且希望理解一下资本状况。不会对 WA 产生太大影响,因为其中大部分是低风险资产或者零风险资产。它所带来的影响应该是在净利差率方面,这始终是分子和分母的问题,当我们增加现金余额时,会暂时膨胀分母。因此,这不会对净利差率造成伤害,但会略微增加您的资产负债表,所以我认为,如果您展望未来,我们将会在分子和分母两个方面努力,不断推动净利差率的发展,并且在分母方面,随着环境的正常化,我们将拥有一个更小、更高效的资产负债表,而在此期间,这并不会对净利差率造成任何伤害。
Paragraph 2: Thank you. Welcome to Erica Najarian with UBS your line is open. Hi good morning I'm sorry I missed the earlier call. On the net interest income trajectory Alistair clearly a big focus for your shareholders you mentioned when you were responding to Gerard's first question is that you narrowed the volatility of net interest income and I think that you know investors are I'm sure I'm going to start asking you guys and us about the starting point of 14 billion for NII next year. I guess we're wondering you know if the Fed stays higher for longer doesn't move you know how does that impact that 14 billion run rate. But does that 14 billion capture you know a cumulative deposit beta that would sort of fully reflect what you would expect experience through the cycle and then I have a follow up question from there.
Paragraph 3: Well all of our asset disclosures reflect the betas that we believe at the time so that part's always in the disclosures. It's too early for me to say on 2024 we're giving guidance for the rest of the year so you have a pretty good sense of what we're pretty confident around but last time I looked at the forward curve we had one possibly two hikes this year and then as many as five declines next year so there's a lot between here and there and I think we'll just as just as soon take the next three to six months to figure out Erica exactly how we feel about 24.
Paragraph 4: Totally understand so going back to the down 100 you know down 100 basis point disclosure that would yield to down three billion for a full year basis how much of that you know given that you you have exposure to the shape of the curve not just a short end of the curve because of your securities book how much of that is short rates versus long rates in terms of that drop. I guess what I'm trying to figure out is if I you know simply divide divide you know three billion by four right that would get me a run rate of you know 13.25 billion on a quarterly basis and you mentioned that there are about five cuts in next year but if it's not all the short end right and if it's half half then I could get to a run rate of 13.75 billion so just you know I know there's a lot in there so it wouldn't just love your thoughts on everything I just said.
Paragraph 5: You lost me a little but I'll say this we've got it's actually down 3.6 billion it's not done for you doing it so that's number one. Number two you should think about the short end being the vast majority of that and number three part of the reason that I think we feel like we've narrowed this corridor and we've got a little more stability around it is A the securities book and B just as importantly there's been a large rotation into interest bearing and so as rates you know in a disclosure like this as rates come down one would one would expect that will be somewhat insulated from that in a different way than we might have two years ago when we didn't have as much interest bearing.
Paragraph 6: Understood thank you. We'll take a follow up from Mike Mayo with Wells Fargo please go ahead your line is open. Hey I just keep staring at slides four five and six for the digital progress that you're making and trying to connect that to your expenses and operating leverage and I guess where I get to is certainly you're signaling that trend should be good for revenue versus expense or at least you're trying to have that but I still look at the efficiency ratio of expenses for revenues of 64% or 62% and then you compare that to the levels from 2018 and 2019 when it was 57 and 58% so I guess the question is do you guys with all these digital initiatives and progress and again I appreciate the disclosure on these slides that and it'd be great to have more of your peers disclose that. It's all that progress why can't you get back to levels from 18 and 19 or at least below 60% and so how long would it take. Mike the link of Joe the digital activity to produce the many quarters of operating leverage at the last eight and a half years etc. is an absolute tie in and that's about the branch count and all the things that we've done.
Paragraph 1: The efficiency ratio for us is has a plain element which is the wealth management business is a big part of our revenue base and has a different operating dynamic because of how it's reported as you well know that the revenue has a cost of compensation percent of revenue is high and we basically make 50 cents on the dollar for every dollar pass the revenue take out which the advisor compensation level and we'll continue to try to improve that and make the advisor more efficient and things like that but that's a major change.
Paragraph 2: We'll improve year over year and frankly we're still cleaning out some dynamic related costs and things like that so we'll continue to drive that down and as net interest income has come up and be a more important part of the business that helps push that efficiency ratio back down and that's the goal. I mean you're describing what we go to work and do every day and the way we do it is the application of technology across the board and then removing work from the system and bringing that out and bringing it to the bottom line and then making the investments we did to make it happen again so we'll continue to do that but the efficiency ratio member for us to go line of business line of business is best in class it's just we have a bigger mix towards the wealth management business than most other people.
Paragraph 3: Let me just try one more time on the Erica and you know it's going to be Bank America AI maybe you've spent out your Erica business but you guys highlight a number of hours it saves in manual labor and do you have a connection of that to what that saves in expenses or what that could save or should save over the next few years? It'll continue to allow us to do more with the same amount so if you think about from 19 and out Mike remember the number of customers who do their core checklists is up 10 percent you know so it's not up and that is a lot of people it's 3 million more customers doing the 2030 transactions a month and all that's going through on a relatively flat expense base and we've been you know we've had the inflation and wages and things we've absorbed all that as part of the thing and that's that's that's that's what it costs to change but you know the route is we flat map back out and then we'll keep driving it back down and if you look at the cost of the positives which is the cost of running all that as a percentage of posits you know you can see that on a consumer page it still maintains a nice break against the rate they would receive for their deposit balances so we're working at you know simply put we had a hundred thousand people in the consumer business a decade plus ago we now have you know 60 and going and it comes down a little bit every quarter even though we're putting you know new branches with an average of five to ten people and depending on the location and things like that going on and so that just keeps going in the right direction now if you take that across other things you know in our operations group the team there continues to have flathead count the downhead count and we've invested back in the technology side for more developers you know twenty-odd thousand on our payroll plus another ten or fifteen or third parties that go through frankly the top lines and so we keep trying to drive it in to make us more efficient so all the principles you're saying is right and we expect it to continue to have a benefit.
Paragraph 4: All right thank you. There are no further questions and Q at this time I'd like to turn the program back over to Brian Moynihan for any additional or closing remarks. Thank you and for joining us all. Number as you think about the quarter you know strong profitability strong at fifteen percent return on tangible common equity or better continue to drive organic growth continue to drive operating leverage and you know we gave you clarity on the future path of expenses in NII but above all else in the quarter where we've had a strong capra market performance and a strong investment bank in performance I think along with our other usual great performance is business and we feel good about the company as a position going forward.