Good day, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Gary and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome you to the Ford Motor Company first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note, this event is being recorded.
At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Lynn Antipas Tyson, Executive Director of Investor Relations. Thank you, Gary. And welcome to the Ford Motor Company's first quarter 2023 earnings call. With me today, or Jim Farley, President and CEO, John Lawler, Chief Financial Officer, and also for Q&A is Marion Harris CEO for credit. Today's discussions include some non-gap references. These are reconciled to the most comparable US gap measures in the appendix of our earnings deck. You can find the deck along with the rest of our earnings materials and other important content at shareholder.for.com.
Our discussion also includes forward-looking statements about our expectations. Actual results may differ from those stated. The most significant factors that could cause actual results to differ are included on page 25. Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons are you over year, company EBIT, EPS, and free cash flow are on an adjusted basis, and product mix is volume weighted. Want to make sure you've got a few near-term IR engagements on your calendars. On May 21st and 22nd, we'll host our capital markets event in Dearborn, Michigan.
For the first time in over seven years, we're looking forward to welcoming representatives of the capital markets to our headquarters. The event will feature unprecedented experiences, including one of the largest displays of our global vehicle portfolio and recent memory, any immersive presentations on the strategic plans of our three new customer-centered business segments. We will also feature details of our software and services strategy, both retail and commercial, as well as ample time to network with our senior leaders. On May 25th, Jim Farley will keynote at Morgan Stanley's Sustainability Conference in New York City, and on May 31st, Jim will participate in a fireside chat with Tony Saganaki at the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference, also in New York City.
Now I'll turn the call over to Jim. Thank you, Lynn, and hello, everyone. And thanks for joining us today. I'd bottom line the first quarter like this. Our team delivered a solid quarter while making real progress on our Ford Plus growth plan. And I hope that becomes a trend at Ford, boringly predictable when it comes to execution and delivering financials, but extremely ambitious in dynamic and creating the Ford of the future. For the quarter, we saw growth across all of our key metrics. In addition, Ford Pro and Blue were profitable in every region where we operate.
Our balance sheet is strong. We ended the quarter with close to $29 billion in cash, even as we invest in growth and return capital to our shareholders. With each quarter of the passes, I'm more confident and convinced and thankful we made the decision to create three separate customer-focused businesses. This is unleashed clarity, speed, and accountability across the company, not to mention a whole new level of discipline on capital allocation. So let me cover a few highlights. I'd like to start with Ford Pro.
I know many of you were surprised at the true size of the pro-business in March when we recast our financials. Pro starts with marking leadership in our vehicles across the world, tremendous scale, and customer knowledge. We're layering on top of that the future of our industry in the ecosystem of software and services and EV charging that we believe will be invaluable to our commercial customers. This will unlock tremendous loyalty and profitable growth. Our strong order books in North America and Europe, as well as all the demand signals we can see for pro, support our target to nearly double pro-Z bit this year.
In March, we launched the all-new Super Duty in Kentucky and Ohio. It has received tremendous reception and it's going to strengthen a franchise that is already the market leader. Importantly, Super Duty is a platform for software and services that help our customers maximize their uptime, accelerate their productivity, and lower total cost of ownership. I would also say the Super Duty launch is a good case study for the disciplined approach we're implementing across our industrial system.
Simply put, we slowed the launch down, significantly increased on road and implant quality testing. We dispatched a large and skilled launch team to our plant. We added test vehicles, we drove millions of miles to prove our durability and we deployed new technology and artificial intelligence to catch issues. Basically, we put all the pressure in the system to find and then prevent future quality issues rather than speeding up the line to match our launch curve. Short-term patience, we believe, that will result in long-term gain for our customers and yes, the company.
In the quarter, Ford Pro extended its leadership in true commercial vehicle categories. Our share of the class one through seven truck and bands in the US increased by one full share point to 41 percent share. In Europe, we've already been the top commercial brand for eight years now running and our share grew to more than 15 percent. We also maintained our EV strength in North American Europe. In the US, E-Transit has already has already a 50 percent market share and in the quarter, we want a contract to deliver more than 9,000 E-Transit bands to the US Postal Service. Ford Pro's paid software subscriptions rose 64 percent in the quarter, including higher revenue per unit software sales like our telematics and charging software. With these and all the other initiatives, Ford Pro is developing into a resilient business certainly less cyclical than the broader automotive sector.
In Ford Blue, the team is focused on capitalizing on our red hot product lineup. Our opportunity to smartly grow extends to valuable franchises with great pricing power like the F-150, the new Maverick, the new Bronco, and of course the Mustang. We'll grow our leadership position and pickups in off-road, in performance, and in SUVs with all new derivatives. For example, we just introduced the Bronco less than three years ago and already it's neck and neck and sales with the Jeep Wrangler and it has higher transaction prices. We've also recently expanded the Bronco lineup with exciting derivatives like the Bronco Everglades, the Bronco Raptor, and the Bronco Heritage. The ridd is not only continued to contribute to our growth but importantly, they can also drive higher transaction prices and higher returns. See these derivatives often have 80% per commonality with the base models, but their contribution margin percents can be 30% higher with a twofold increase in capital efficiency.
We also have one of the strongest products years coming for Ford Blue, so it's just beginning. We have the new Escape, including the new Hybrid. It's just arriving in dealerships now. Next week, we will reveal the all new Ranger and the highly anticipated Ranger Raptor. That will be followed by an all new Mustang and high performance Dark Horse Mustang this summer. While I can't get into the details yet, we have more exciting news to share about two of America's best-selling vehicles, the F-150 and the Explorer later this year. On top of all that, we have the Lincoln Corsair arriving in dealerships now, and of course, we just revealed the Lincoln Nautilist.
Now Ford Model E operates with a startup intensity to build a profitable EV business with the differentiated portfolio and the differentiated customer experience. US investors now have true visibility into how Ford Model E's profitability strengthens over time, supported by volume-driven operating leverage, improvements in design and efficiency, and of course, lower battery costs. We're on track this year towards a contribution margin approaching break even in Model E. And for our first generation products to be EBIT margin positive by the end of next year.
现在,福特 Model E 一直在打造一个盈利的电动汽车业务,并通过不同的产品组合和有差异化的客户体验来实现创业初期的强劲发展。美国的投资者现在可以真正地看到福特 Model E 的盈利能力随时间的增长而增强,这得益于规模驱动的运营杠杆效应、设计和效率的改进以及成本更低的电池。我们今年的计划是让 Model E 的贡献利润接近盈亏平衡点,并在明年年底前让我们的第一代产品实现 EBIT 的利润率为正。
Full sales were down in the quarter, which de-leveraged our cost structure. Part of the decline was planned, as we have brought Mustang Machee production down for several weeks, so we could almost double the capacity, and we are now hitting a 35-hour run rate in the plan. Bolleims were also impacted by the lower output of F-150 Lightning. We did the right thing, and I congratulated my team many times by immediately stopping production and working with our battery supplier, finding and then fixing the root cause of a fire that happened on the Ford property. We're now shipping Lightning's, again taking new orders, and increasing production to an annual run rate of 150,000 units, about double what we do now. We are also revealing, we revealed, an all-electric explorer in Europe, which is now very well received.
We made progress of Model E in the quarter, advancing our industrial system to scale EVs. The site preparation is already underway for our LFP battery plant in Michigan. Construction continues at the Blue Oval SK Battery Park in Kentucky and of course Blue Oval City in Tennessee. We now plan to transform our Oakville assembly complex into a Canadian hub of electric vehicle and battery pack manufacturing. We also continue to make progress towards locking in all the raw materials that we need to support our capacity targets in 26 and beyond.
Model E is our center of excellence for technology, including software. A good example of that is Blue Coos, which continues to be hit with our customers. Consumer Reports rated it the top-advanced hands-free driver assist system on the market in the US, and that was just version 1.0. Our latest release, which we're OTAing to customers, is version 1.2. It automatically changes lanes with the tap of the turn signal and it delivers a much more natural driving experience hands-free. We also launched Blue Coos in the UK on Mustang Machee and became the first OEM to gain approval for hands-free, highway driving, speed anywhere in Europe. With more than, and now Blue Coos has more than 70 million miles driven to date and we continued to upgrade Blue Coos for customers with each over their update.
Model E是我们技术卓越中心,包括软件。一个很好的例子是Blue Coos,在我们的客户中一直很受欢迎。消费者报告将其评为美国市场上最先进的无手动驾驶辅助系统,并且那只是1.0版。我们的最新发布版本是1.2,我们正在通过OTA向客户发布。它可以通过打转向信号来自动换道,使驾驶更加自然。我们还在UK的Mustang Machee上推出了Blue Coos,并成为欧洲首个获得无手动驾驶高速行驶认可的汽车制造商。迄今为止,Blue Coos已行驶超过7000万英里,我们将继续为客户升级Blue Coos每一个版本。
Before we turn over, John, I want to share our thoughts on how the EV market is evolving in our eyes. It's easy to look at the landscape of the EV market as a monolith, but we plan to be surgical about where we play and how we win with the right products, the right cost structure, and the right price points. We do not subscribe to a win vehicle share at any cost approach. We look at share of vehicles, of course, and share revenue. We also look at share of profits and share of the customer lifetime value. And we believe this is the only way to ensure we drive appropriate returns or return on capital over time.
By 2025, we now expect there to be 45 EV models to be offered in the US in the small and medium utility segment. It will be a very saturated two-row EV market. Against this backdrop to ensure profitable growth, we know we have to have a fresh, compelling offering with the right cost structure, something we continue to improve with the Mustang Machi. We also found the customers are very loyal to full EV powertrains once they enter, but they are not brand loyal for their first purchase. We capitalize on that by getting to the market early with the Mustang Machi and our whole lineup, and it continues to reward us with over 60% of the customers new to Ford.
We're seeing that the second EV purchase is much more loyal to the brand in these developed EV markets. So we're glad that we have all these customers in our digital and physical ecosystem. We are aggressively lowering our product costs for our current and next generation products. You'll find out a lot more in capital markets today, but in fact, from Mustang Machi from launch to the end of this year, we'll have reduced the bill of materials for Mustang Machi by $5,000 per vehicle. Now in contrast to two road cross-overs that we believe will be a very saturated market, we believe modeling can be highly differentiated in markets where we know the customer well, like the three-row utility space. And as I said, we'll share more about our capital markets event later this month on our product strategy.
I had a chance along with John and most of our leadership team to go to China in the last few weeks and look at the EV market in a Genba Go-N-C activity up close. It's interesting to see how customers are no longer just attracted to traditional luxury brands with EVs or even hardware design anymore. Outstanding hardware styling, performance, quality, or just a given in the EV digital marketplace today. The best new brands are offering integrated digital, retail, lifestyle, and experience that are software defined. This is firmly in our sights for our second generation EVs. This software as a differentiator plus a radically different cost structure and the ability to attract attach value-added software and services gives us confidence we can compete and win in unit revenue, profit, and vehicle share while delivering appropriate returns. And Ford Pro is already there.
We're wrap up by saying we are pleased, but we are not satisfied. As I said, solid execution and some really thrilling progress advancing our Ford Plus plan. I look forward to seeing many of you in person in three weeks for a capital markets event where we will go much deeper into our strategy and our progress. Thanks, Jim.
First quarter, we, uh, whole sales were up 9% year over year as we delivered 3.4 billion in adjusted event margin was 8.1% up 140 basis points. Ford blue and Ford Pro profit improved reflecting favorable mix and higher net pricing and as expected, those benefits were partially offset with a loss in model E as we invest in our clean sheet next generation EVs and scale our leading portfolio of first-generation electric vehicles. For the quarter, we delivered 700 million of adjusted free cash flow improving consistent free cash flow from our industrial footprint combined with discipline capital allocation provides us with significant flexibility to fund our growth while also consistently returning capital to our shareholders. Our balance sheet remains strong. We ended the quarter with close to 29 billion of cash and over 46 billion of liquidity. In addition, despite the recent market volatility, we successfully completed the renewal of our 17 billion sustainability linked corporate credit facilities.
So turning to our customer focused business segments with whole sales up 6% Ford blue delivered 2.6 billion in even 10.4% margin that was 400 basis points higher than a year ago supported by favorable mix and higher volume. Our fresh and exciting product lineup continues to drive strong demand. We have a sales from model E declined in the quarter reflecting plan downtime that allowed us to almost double our production capacity for Mustang Machi. Now the profitability of any EV startup, including Ford model E is highly levered to volume. Importantly, holding volume constant. Our first quarter EBIT margin would have been roughly flat compared to the fourth quarter at around negative 40%.
We expect Ford model E EBIT margin to improve to around negative 20% in the second half of this year, reflecting stronger per unit contribution margin and significantly higher volumes. In fact, we expect model E contribution margin to approach break even this year and we continue to target positive EBIT margin for our first generation vehicles by the end of 2024. Ford Pro delivered an 18% increase in whole sales and EBIT improved 900 million to 1.4 billion for the quarter delivering a margin of 10.3%. The improvement in profitability was supported by higher net pricing, increased volume and favorable mix. Importantly, this was achieved during a quarter when whole sales for super duty were down both year over year and sequentially as we ramped up production of our all new version of this highly popular truck.
Ford Credit delivered EBIT of 300 million down 600 million from a year ago, reflecting lower financing margin, higher credit losses and lower lease income, all of which has been reflected in our full year outlook. Credit loss performance remains strong and is still below the historical average, but beginning to normalize auction values remain robust, but down from their peak in the first half of 2022. Ford Credit liquidity remains strong at 26 billion, up 5 billion from year end. In addition, despite the volatile market conditions, the company has already completed 12 billion of public issuance or roughly 50% of its 2023 funding plan.
Turning to our outlook, we continue to expect full year 2023 total company adjusted EBIT of 9 billion to 11 billion, adjusted free cash flow of about 6 billion and capital expenditures between 8 to 9 billion. This guidance includes headwinds that reflect global economic uncertainty, higher industry-wide customer incentives, as vehicle supply and demand rebounds, lower past service pension income, exchange, and investments in growth such as customer service and connected services. And tailwinds driven by improvement in the supply chain are our higher industry volume, with SARS of about 15 million and 13 million in the US and Europe respectively. Launch of our all new super duty and lower cost of goods sold, including materials and commodities.
Turning to the segments, Ford Blue to deliver full year EBIT of about 7 billion, cost improvements and higher industry volumes will likely be offset partially by pricing headwinds. As inventory stocks continue to normalize and industry incentives rise through the year along with adverse exchange. Ford Model E to report an EBIT loss of around 3 billion, largely reflecting discipline investment in new products and capacity. We also anticipate Ford pros EBIT to nearly double to around 6 billion compared to our 2022 result. And this is driven by improved pricing and volume, including the benefits from the launch of our all new super duty. And EBIT for Ford credit is anticipated to be around 1.3 billion.
转向细分市场,Ford Blue将实现大约70亿的全年EBIT,成本改善和行业销量增加可能会被定价方面的困境部分抵消。随着库存继续正常化和行业激励的增加以及不利的汇率影响,这种趋势将会持续到今年。 Ford Model E预计将报告大约30亿的EBIT亏损,主要反映了对新产品和产能的审慎投资。我们还预计,与我们的2022年成果相比,Ford Pro的EBIT将近翻一倍,达到60亿左右。这是由于价格和销量的提高,其中包括我们全新超级重型车型的推出带来的好处。Ford Credit的EBIT预计将达到约13亿。
Additionally, I hope that all of you are blocking time for our next capital markets event on May 21st and 22nd here in Dearborn. A couple of days as we update you on Ford Plus strategy, take a deep dive into financial targets and KPIs for each of our customer-centered business segments and talk about our capabilities and expectations for software and services. By the time we're done, I believe you will even be better equipped to value the expected contributions of each of the segments to forge overall growth and return.
So that wraps up our prepared remarks. We'll use the balance of the time to address what's on your minds. Thank you, operator. Please open the line for questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you were using a speaker phone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two.
Our first question comes from Adam Jonas with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Thanks everybody. So Jim, you've compared the current environment for EVs to the year 1913. Same and no one should really be surprised that Tesla is cutting price so much. And then I think you asked the question maybe rhetorically, who's going to blink on growth? So if I put your own question to you, Jim, will Ford blink on growth?
Thanks, Adam. It depends. You know, well, first of all, our first three EVs are all very different in terms of pricing. I think the lightning's price is up $11,000 since we launched and he transits up a lot. So and of course, we're increasing production to get that scale benefit. So the most important thing we've learned three, four years ago is be careful where you compete. And we have selected where we compete extremely carefully. We want to go after segments where we have a great reputation, but there's a lot of conquest customers. And we want to innovate beyond just the powertrain, like pro power on board and as well software.
谢谢,Adam。这要看情况而定。首先,我们的前三款电动车的定价都非常不同。我认为,自从我们发布以来,闪电的价格已经涨了11000美元,而Transit的价格也涨了很多。当然,我们正在增加生产规模以获得规模效益。我们三,四年前学到的最重要的一点是要谨慎选择竞争的领域。我们已经非常谨慎地选择了我们要竞争的领域。我们想去攻占我们声誉良好,但却有很多征服客户的市场。我们还想在动力系统之外进行创新,比如Pro Power Onboard和软件方面。
We now know the three shipable software stacks, safety and security productivity for pro and of course partial autonomy. And all those are really great hedges against the inevitable over capacity in certain segments. We could see the over capacity in the two row electric utility segment like years ago, Adam, literally like before we had finished the Machi development. We knew this was coming. That's why we got a team together. And the cost of the bill material by $5,000. We aren't waiting for a minor change. We're not doing things like we normally do. And we continue to get the data off the vehicle to make the software better and better so the customers vehicles get better every day.
I would say the message from me as a CEO is that we are not going to price just to gain market share. We will always balance a healthy profit road map in the first generation of products. And we are going to be able to do a pretty challenging because we didn't know what we didn't know four years ago when we designed them. But now we're two years in designing the second cycle. And in capitol market this day, we will take you through why we believe that 8% margin is totally realistic. Despite all the pricing pressure that we will absolutely get because everyone wants to grow. And we are going to be able to do some of the pure EV players who are pricing just for growth. We will always balance that because we want a profitable EV business. And we're pulling every level we can in the first gen products. The second gen is where we can really make a.
I appreciate that Jim. And just as a quick follow up. I know that you are going to be able to do a lot of things with the market share. I know that you are going to be able to do a lot of things with the market share. And I think you are saying this. Now the fact that we are going to have to have a different regulation. And we are going to achieve that. I also want to bring you something that is, the NKG-99PU, which is the result of soon the 5.75 Mass Effect, But, you know, that is not success. In fact, I would say the more we study this, our trip to China was a real piphany for our leadership team.
我感谢你,吉姆。接下来我很快就会跟进。我知道你会用市场份额做很多事情。我觉得你也这么说过。但现在问题是我们需要不同的规定。但我相信我们可以做到。我还想给你带来一个消息,就是 NKG-99PU。这是不久前5.75 Mass Effect的结果。但你知道,这并不是成功。事实上,我们对此进行的研究越多,我们的中国之行对我们的领导团队来说就是一个重大启示。
I would say the more, the thing that I look for as a CEO is not necessarily just the vine growth. It's actually how fast we use the data off the vehicle to make the customer's software experience better. That to me, the quickness of that loop is the fitness for differentiating brand and profit in the future for this new digital product category. We happen to call electric vehicles. To me, yes, volume's important, but that quickness of that loop, which were already on our 10th million OTA, we've now gained 65% more miles traveled on Blue Cruz in three months. We were only 42 million miles three months ago. We're now at 70 million. And the reason why that's growing so fast is because we continue to do OTAs to Blue Cruz to make it better and better. On Ford Pro, those subscriptions are growing fast. So to me of all the metrics I look for as a proof point for our success in this new digital product category we call EVs, I think that's the one Adam, I look for the best. And we will always balance profit with scaling. Thanks, Jim.
The next question is from Rod Lacey with Wolf Research. Please go ahead. Hi everybody, I'd actually like to follow up on Adam's question. I'm just looking at the $900 million increase in structural costs in the quarter. And I know that the investments that you're making are aimed at driving growth, but in the past when the industry's experienced higher structural costs, it put a lot of pressure on everybody to hit volume targets, which ultimately wasn't good for pricing. And I know you said, Jim, that you're planning to target segments where you've got strong price can power and you're confident in conquesting customers, but can you just talk a little bit about whether you agree with that assertion that there's gonna be pressure even on Ford, just given the magnitude of the structural cost increase that you're taking on. And what kind of flexibility do you have to make the targets if volume or pricing assumptions come in a bit short?
Yeah, let me, sorry, you've all went up on Adam's question. Let me start off on the cost there. Yeah, you're right. We did see our structural costs go up in the quarter on a year-over-year basis as we continued to invest, as Jim said, in our EVs, in our digital architecture and our software. I think for us, a key part of that is bringing those structural costs down in blue over time and then driving efficiencies on our overall cost structure in contribution costs, some material costs, warranty and freight, et cetera. So that's where we need to see the turn on our cost structure in those areas as well. And then cost structure coming out of blue as we continue to invest in EV and Pro.
Now, of course, we have to do that at an efficient level so that it doesn't put that much pressure on the business. But Jim can talk about this more, but as we're investing in the growth of EVs, we're not doing it where we're proliferating. We're looking to be very focused on the segments we're going into, be very disciplined on the complexity in the number of top hats and models that we have, have the right footprint, the industrial plants need to have the right efficiency levels. And we'll talk more about that at Capital Market State, but we're very, very thoughtful of the fact that as that investment goes in, it needs to be very efficient.
Okay, and just maybe secondly, just switching gears to your variable costs like material freight commodities were up, a billion, three and a quarter, are you still expecting a billion of savings and variable costs and a billion, a billion and a half in quantities? And that's the case. You also have the super volume ramping later this year. I just would be curious about whether you can give us a little bit more color on the first half that's going to have assumptions since your full year guide implies some pretty meaningful decline in the year. Of course, the level we're seeing right now.
Yeah, so when you look at it from a cost standpoint, let's just unpack what happened last year. When you look at the cost increases in 2022, only about 15% of that happened in the first quarter. So on a year-over-year basis coming out of last year, this was a tough read. If you look at it sequentially, when you look at our cost on a sequential basis, our costs were down in the quarter. Then they were down significantly in blue. They were up a little bit knee and they were about flat and pro. So yeah, we have got to gain traction on the cost reductions for sure as we go through the second half of the year. And you'll start to see that come through in the second half. Overall, when you look at it from a cost standpoint, we expect our total cost to come down and the cost to get sold to come down about two billion versus the two five. And that's primarily reflecting the fact that commodities aren't coming down as quickly as we thought. So that's where we see costs unfolding through the second half of the year.
Good afternoon, guys. Just a first question on flea because that seems to be leading the vine recovery here early in 2023. I was curious how much of a tailwind that was for you and where that shows up in the numbers, whether it's all in pro or do we actually see some, something actually showing up on the blue and in east side. And how much do you expect that to continue to sort of be a tailwind, as good for the course of this year, maybe even for the next year or two?
Yeah, the flea business is largely sitting in pro, John. We see that continuing through the year. We see a strength in pro as we go through the year. There's considerable pent up demand. We now have the new Super Duty will be launching the transit the second half of the year. And we expect that to continue. So that's where we see quite a bit of opportunity as we go through the years. We expect profits in pro to double this year versus last year.
On blue, what we saw in the first quarter for blue was about flat pricing was up to 10th, a strong mix. Really strong mix and some volume increases in blue in the first quarter. And that strong mix was on F series. And that's because last year we had the traco issue which kept our F series mixed down. Plus we were launching escape this year in the first quarter. So when you look at it, that's where we see things unfolding. When we go through the rest of the year on blue, we expect that mix to come off. That's not gonna repeat itself. As we run through the rest of the year.
On pro, I just wanna highlight a few things, John. There was a huge back order of vehicle, pent up demand for small business in the US and Europe that is still not even close to being satisfied. So yeah, a lot of the bigger fleets, you hauls, you can imagine that they are the truck and van customers. We've done a good job getting them the product they want.
They still want more, a lot more. And this is before we launch a new super duty and of course a new transit in Europe. So there's a lot of pent up demand for large fleets. But most of the real profitable pro business is small, a medium sized business. And they have been waiting literally three to four years for their transit and super duties. So the pent up demand we're seeing now is really those customers. And there's still a lot of pricing power and lots of pent up orders for.
And especially now that we have brand new super duty and transit in Europe, it's gonna be even more intense to get those products. So the larger fleets, we've done a good job getting them more product, but there's a ton of pent up demand for pro vehicles with those small and medium sized business, which is the heart and soul of the team.
And Jim, if I could follow up just on the pricing discussion, there seems to be a change in the philosophy of the way that people are thinking about this, particularly that new large competitor that is cutting price. And that you can cut price on the front end and not make a lot of money on the hardware, but you can make a whole lot of money on the software and services on the back end. So you're not so worried about profit on the front end. You're worried, you think you can make it up on the back end.
And as you think about your business evolving over time, do you think in five years time plus that you're gonna be sort of selling the vehicles hardware and making all the money on the back end? I mean, how should we think about sort of the balance of how the money is earned on vehicles going forward?
Well, that business model, I mean, outside of maybe Tesla, that business model is live at well at Ford right now in Pro. So when I answer your question, please understand that we are operating that kind of business where our after sales and software is now, large 30 plus percent attach rates. And I would say the answer is, I am not giving any relief to my vehicle teams for software sales or any kind of margin advantage.
They, those products have to get to 8% on their own. And we see the software and especially for Pro, the physical after sales, those attach rates and charging equipment that we're seeing 30 plus percent attach rates, that's plus business for us. That's an annuity we wanna create. And we do not wanna commoditize our products. That is not our strategy. Maybe someone else's, but not ours. And that's coming from a company that is already doing, like we could do that now with Trump, but we are not gonna do that. I hope that's clear.
Very helpful, thank you. The next question is from Ryan Brankman with JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
非常有帮助,谢谢。下一个问题来自JP摩根的Ryan Brankman。请发言。
All right, thanks for taking my question. I read Jim that you recently said at a charity event in Detroit, we're going to have to rethink what the Ford brand means in a place like China. So where do you think you stand with regard to your China operations currently? I mean, Lincoln seems like a bright spot, but what aspirations do you have for your operations in that market, either in terms of the portfolio or margins or returns and for what timeframe would you like to achieve those aspirations?
Well, thank you, and I guess that's the end of my charity work. But, you know, we, you know, pro and blue are profitable everywhere in the world, including China.
But I'm glad you asked this question because we went to China to finalize our strategy as a leadership team. And I guess I would explain, so our ice business there is profitable, Lincoln's a success, you know, but you have to look at China through the strategy lens because it's not a huge business for us. And we believe that not only is it the biggest EV market in the world, but customers digitally are ahead of the rest of the world.
And so it's a really important market for us. And what we really see in our presence there is battery tech, digital experience for the customer and advanced product, both software and hardware integrated. Our strategy going forward in China will change. We're gonna go to a much lower investment, leaner, more focused business in China with higher returns.
And I'll give you an example, and I want to lay out the whole strategy here, but since you asked the question, I think our partnership with JMC is a good example. We are gonna double down our commercial business, including EVs in China. We also believe that JMC can be an export hub for affordable EVs and ice commercial vehicles using the Ford distribution network for our pro business around the world. We have great pro dealers in South America, South Africa in Australia and Mexico, places that we can export.
And now we have a source of a fantastic, affordable EVs and commercial ice products with JMC. That's an example of how we're gonna approach China from now on. And we're not gonna try to serve everyone. It'll be a lower investment, leaner, much more focused business in China. And we're gonna have a team on the ground that will be global resources for the company because of how important the market is in EV.
Okay, great, thanks. And then just lastly, what is the latest you're seeing in terms of, auto-lone APR, credit availability, maybe in light of some of the turmoil that we've seen in the banking sector in the US. The SARS been very strong this year. Inline are stronger than your expectation for 15 million total SAR, particularly in light of the higher rates, maybe helped by the strong equity news vehicles.
But just curious, if you're hearing anything maybe different at the margin from your dealers or customers or just how you're thinking about the auto-finance market generally. Yeah, Ryan, it's Mary. And we have seen a number of banks pulling back from auto-lending, which is kind of a whole market of banks through difficult markets.
And that's created a bit of a pricing opportunity for us as well as improvement in share, financing share for us. So I don't see it getting a lot better over the coming months for banks, but the credit availability is still there for customers and captives. Across the industry, you're going to continue to support the OEMs.
Very helpful. Thank you. The next question is from James Tickarello with BNP Parabas. Please go ahead. Hey, hi everyone. It is first question on price. So it's pricing overall. You still expect it to be neutral for the year.
New sounds as though blue is guy to be negative for the full year as incentive spend picks up. But yeah, can you just help them back how we should be thinking about this year's price for Model E and Pro with the super-duty strength still to come.
新的声音像是暗示蓝色可能会在全年内保持负面趋势,因为激励开支在上升。但是,是的,你能帮助他们回到我们应该如何看待今年 Model E 和 Pro 的价格,同时超级强度仍在到来。
大意:这段话提到了一些市场趋势以及企业的产品定价策略,建议重点关注今年的车型价格以及即将推出的可行驶距离更长的超级车型。
Yeah, so overall for us, our bridge, from 2223, we expect pricing for us to be neutral. We still expect that to be the case. We do expect the second half to see pricing pressures, especially on blue as we see supply and demand normalized.
Pro, we believe, they'll be pricing strength throughout the year. And on E, we see pricing being slightly down on a year over your basis as well. So overall, no change to what we had talked about at the teaching, we see pricing is neutral for Ford. Okay, got it.
And then just to confirm, you talked about 20% of minus 20% Model E margins for the second half, is that right? Contribution margin, yeah. Contribution margin. Okay, all right, thank you. Appreciate it.
然后只是确认一下,您提到了Model E 在下半年的20%利润率减去20%的情况,是吗?是贡献利润率,对的。好的,谢谢。感激不尽。
Total, sorry about, no, no, no. Total margin, contribution margin positive. Total margin would be, even margin would be minus 20. Got it, yeah, so that might follow on to that. That's what I thought you'd say. Can you help ridge what the benefits are from a materials perspective, scaling?
In terms of the buckets, maybe that you provided at the teaching, what helps get to that minus 20% of minus 20% run rate for the second half, thanks.
关于您在教学中提供的桶,能否说明一下如何帮助我们在下半年达成负20%的运营率,谢谢。
It's not different than what's in the teaching. I mean, when you look at it, we're gonna scale through the year. We start to grow volumes. We have the LFP battery coming in, and then we have the design reductions that Jim talked about getting to about a $5,000 reduction on Machee, we have a significant reduction in play on lightning as well.
So it's the same buckets that we talked about at the teaching. Thanks. Next.
所以这些桶是我们在授课中谈论过的相同桶。谢谢。接下来。
Next question is from Dan Levy with Barclays. Please go ahead.
下一个问题来自巴克莱银行的丹·列维。请你提问。
Hi, good evening, thanks for taking the question. I just want to follow up on that last question on the contribution margin. And I know you didn't disclose contribution margin at the teaching, but you know, at the midpoint of, if I look at what you disclose in your deck, it's roughly negative $4,000 contribution margin right now. And you said a lot of this is on sort of material reduction. So I just want to understand how easily you can reduce content mid cycle, you know, the product.
I know you said that there are some design changes that you can do, but physically you see more material, content modifications at the end of a product cycle. So just want to get a sense of your visibility on content modifications to get that contribution margin to break even.
So there's a couple of things you can do from a content standpoint to drive your costs down. One of them is we're using the digital connectivity of the vehicle to understand what features the customers find valuable. And if they're not using something that we have on the vehicle, we can design that out. The other thing we're doing is, as Jim said, we didn't wait on Machee. So we started to put together what we thought of as bundled actions into minor programs as we work through Model E and we're launching those as we go through the year this year and into next year to get us to that $5,000 reduction.
You know, as a first mover, you know, we felt it was important to get to market quickly. We've readily admitted that the design and efficiency of our first generation products isn't where it needs to be. And we're working on that, those reductions now. And we're taking all the learnings from that and incorporating it into our second generation products. And we'll talk more about that in a couple of weeks at Capital MarketStid. So yeah, there's things you can do. You just need to be thoughtful about it as you go through the product. And where there's opportunities, you bundle them together, you do a minor launch, you do a change, and you go. And that's what we're doing on E. And we're using the connected data to take out features that the customers don't value.
Great, thank you. And then as my follow up, I just want to touch on some of the earlier questions that were asked and this notion of how you're looking at volume. You know, and I think the message clearly you're making is that you're not necessarily, you're balancing that volume with profit. But historically, this has been a business that is dictated by volume.
This is dictated by utilization. And if I read your comments correctly that you're focused on sort of unique segments and you want to sort of get out of the fray a little bit, that would probably tell me that if you're punching at 4 million units a year now, which is low versus actually where you've been historically, that if you're focused on these more premium segments or more unique segments, that there could be a much lower volume going forward.
So how should we think about your volume or volume? I realize that's probably a better question for the CMD, but how are you thinking about sort of structurally what type of volume you should look at in the future?
Good question. So I want to make it really clear that our growth strategy for the company is very aggressive and it focuses on conquest customers. So we plan to grow and that capacity increase for E and Pro is mostly additive to the company's overall growth. And what gives us confidence in that is that we are targeting conquests, vehicles, and software to customer categories that we know really well.
It's not lost on us that when we launched lightning, almost all the full-size pickup truck, EV customers were new to Ford and new to the segment. So what we learn in lightning's case, a segment traditionally has been 13% of the industry for pretty much my whole career can be much, much bigger when you add new product features like a frunk, lockable storage for full-size truck, zero emissions, and the ability to power your house for three days. A lot of new customers bought a lightning that never owned a pickup truck before.
And we intend to do that with free-raw crossover and with a bunch of EV Pro vehicles, which we think will be huge growth for us. So you should expect that a lot of that capacity we're putting in is for growth for the company, but we are not gonna grow at any cost. We're gonna manage that incremental new growth for profitability and growth together. And we've put a lot of thinking into our product strategy.
One of the most important aspects of our product strategy is not to have too much top-hat engineering. We wanna have a lot of scale per top-hat. And again, we'll go into this cap on market stage you said because I think it's best to answer there with real examples where you can really see our strategy coming to life. But we've learned a lot from lightning and from Machee. Frankly, the number of new customers we're seeing is very encouraging for us because of our capacity increase. And we know that the second cycle product can be radically simpler and lower cost. Aside from the scaling effect. And again, we'll lay this out in cap on market stage for you and for everyone else.
Great, thank you. The next question is from Tom Nareian with RBC. Please go ahead. Hi guys, thanks for taking the question. Just had two quick follow-ups. So for blue, it sounds like the downshift that I implied in the rest of the year is really coming more from MIX and not price. As you're saying in that neutral on price for the full year, is that right? Yeah, so MIX, we have very strong MIX and Q1. We don't expect that to repeat as we go through the year. And we do expect on the full year basis that we will see some pressures on pricing in blue on a full year basis as we go through the second half of the year. Remember, what's really important is to understand that run rate of price as you come out of the back end of the year because you have the approval impact for all of the units that are in stock. And then you have to take the incentive levels from Q1 of 2024 and apply it to those units that are in stock. So you've got to think about that on a run rate business coming out of the end of the year. But overall, yeah, it's for blue, we definitely see that there'll be some pressure on pricing. OK.
And then another follow up. So on this question of attach rates, you have 30% attach rate on Pro, which is amazing. And just curious, as you think about that, is there an incentive perhaps to increase that attach rate perhaps by sacrificing on price? Presumably, those subscription revenues come in at higher margins. Or is the view, we're not going to, at the end of the day, we make these products and the subscription services are add on to enhance the product. I mean, how do you think about that trade off? Thanks. It's a great question. Right now, given the order bank we see for Pro's business, the more we can invest in profitable, high growth products that the better. But you should think it's a very important question you're asking for Pro, because I don't think everyone would realize that the margins on software and the margins on parts are actually pretty similar. So in the end of the day, the customer wants us to have fantastic products for Pro, but they're largely regulated, kind of a box or pick up truck pet or whatever. So really, for the customer, the value is going to be the software, the attached rates, and the experience they get with an integrated approach.
Think about this future state, which we are executing to. 100% prediction of failure of components before they fail. You censor the vehicle to do that. It's integrated in software. The software gets better every day, so you can predict failure more precisely and for more components. The customer gets a vehicle that never really goes out of service. If you're a small, medium-sized commercial pro customer, which is most of the time in Europe and US, those customers, they take one van down. That's 20% of the revenue. So they will pay because they can drive more business with a vehicle that's never off the road. So think about this not as a trade-off between the vehicle profit, the parts business, and the software. Think about it from the customer standpoint as an integrated approach, where everything is designed for each other, where you can't think of doing prognostics without a vehicle designed to do that, or the fulfillment of the parts business pre-picking the part before the customer even gets there so that they can do the service really quickly. So the vehicle is not off the road for very long, if it does need service.
So I don't really think we think of it from the customer standpoint as a trade from margin. We think of designing the whole system so that every piece of it adds value. And you can't kind of think of the physical product of the software independently of each other. Now, it may turn out over time, let's say, on the low part of pro that's a software in the parts business more profitable. But from the customer standpoint, we're designing the pro business where they're inseparable. Like the prognostic example. I hope that makes sense to you. Yeah, it does. Thank you.
And the last question today is from Emmanuel Rosner with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much.
So I think you're an unsurprised cut on the Mac E today. And to your point, Jim, I think this is a more competitive segment within all the various EV segments. Can you maybe comment on the demand environment for lightning? There's, I've seen some anecdotal evidence of some decent amount sitting on some dealers' lots. I read that you're planning to ship some to no way, which it feels like the US pickup market should have more demand than your ability to supply. So can you just maybe talk a little bit about where lightning demand is in general and where there's sort of like cost actions on EDs in order to bring down the price?
But there's only one or two in the market. So I can understand why maybe some people would look at it that way if they don't have a product in the market. But from our standpoint, the lightning demand is outstanding. We've taken $11,000 worth of pricing, enlightening $11,000. And yes, thank goodness that we are seeing now some dealer stock for the first time in like two years for lightning. And we're really excited about our cost reductions. And of course, the software we're shipping to the vehicle like Bluepoos 1.2. But the demand for lightning is really, really strong. I look at, bring a trailer every week, because two years ago, it was like, I don't know, the most popular new vehicle on bring a trailer was a lightning with four miles on it that someone was flipping. And the prices have come down, and they're basically at MSRP now. So we're selling it a full MSRP. The demand is higher. In fact, I would say that the pricing is higher than MSRP still. And we're totally sold out in Norway like we are everywhere. So this is a global segment, we believe. Ford is clearly the number one pickup truck maker in the world. Or we're not going to just keep our pickup trucks in the US. It's a global market. So we feel great about the demand or else we wouldn't be doubling production this year.
Thanks for that, Jim. And then just maybe one follow up for John. So, curious if you could just put a final point on the puts and takes for your unchanged 2023 guidance. I think you mentioned in terms of costs from materials and freight, maybe now $2 billion benefit, instead of $2.5 billion. Are there any other big pieces which are there more or less of a benefit or headwind than you saw previously?
Yeah, sure. So we had shared what we thought the bridge was earlier this year. And so, as I said, we think pricing overall for us will be about neutral for the year. We said that our COGs are primarily material logistics. We had said it would be about $2.5 billion. We think it's about $2 billion now. That's primarily due to commodities, not coming down as quickly as we had thought. Volumes, we were up 9% in Q1. We expect to be about up about 6%, 6% for the full year overall. So I think you can look at that. And those are the three areas that have basically changed versus what we had bridged before. We see past service pension at about $2 billion negative credit. We don't change there. We're about that one for. And we're going to continue to invest and grow up. And then we saw exchange another of about a billion. So that bridge largely remains the same, except we got a little bit of movement between some volume and some commodity costs.
Perfect. Thank you. Excuse me, this concludes the Ford Motor Company first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.