Hey, everybody, welcome back to this week in startups. We're doing another AI roundtable. And this is the best one ever, Vinny and Sunny join me again to demo chat GPT's new code interpreter. This was just released on Friday. We're playing with it over the weekend and we're gonna play with it here on the show.
We take a random couple of CSVs that we grabbed off government websites. We uploaded to chat GPT and it takes this and acts like a data scientist and it starts doing analysis of these documents. It's incredible magic. Make sure you listen to this episode with your teams because at your startup, you're probably wasting tens of thousands of dollars that this new tool is going to remove from your expenses.
These rapid innovations AI are going to change the world. I've been talking about it multiple times per week here on this week in startups and on the all in podcast. I think people are gonna become 30% more efficient this year. But, but Sunny thinks I'm wrong. He thinks it's 300% or more. We get into it. I show you a bunch of details of some GPT stuff I did over the weekend and some stuff I'm doing in Python on a Replet. It's gonna be a great show. You might even blow your mind, stick with us.
This week in startups is brought to you by Open Phone brings your team's business calls, texts and contacts into one delightful app that works anywhere. Get 20% off your first six months at OpenPhone.com slash twist.
Coda is the all in one dock for teams. If you've got a stack of niche workflow tools or if you're buried in docks and spreadsheets, Coda is the dock that brings it all together. Get a $1,000 startup credit by signing up at coda.io slash twist and release. Large enterprises pose unique challenges for SaaS startups. Unlock customers with unique needs for private and single tenant hosting without the toil of DIY with release delivery. Get your first month free at release.com slash twist.
Hey everybody, welcome to another episode of this week in startups with me again, Vinny Lingham and Sunny Sundeep, Madra. We were doing a crypto round table, boys and AI has taken over all of our lives. Crypto still seems like an important technology but it does feel like the amount of energy putting into being put into AI startups, language models is 100x or 1000x what's happening in crypto.
So we'll skate to where the puck is going and continue our discussions about AI here. So this is our weekly AI round table. You have ideas for the producers here. Producers at this week in startups.com if you see something interesting, say something, email producers at thisweekinstartup.com.
All right, so let's get right into it. You shared a link with us, Sunny, on the group chat that some chat GPT users now have access to a code execution or code interpreter plugin. What is this and why is it important? Yeah, so this is really, really big and what chat GPT hasn't enabled, open AI has enabled is the ability for the interface to run code and what's interesting and you can now input data via an upload feature. So one of the really cool examples that people are doing this week and as was just released on Friday, just go show you the paces that you can take a spreadsheet.
That spreadsheet can have data in it. You can upload it and then you can basically have a chat GPT do some basic data science for you. And so it's really, you know, the process to do that before would have been to, you know, go get a data scientist or write a Python program and so it does all of this in line in a very similar way to how we saw the plugins work. We're seeing that now for, you know, running code. And that code interpreter, if you were to just do a Google search right now for, if you do a Google search for chat GPT and you go into chat GPT on the drop down you see, especially if you're paying the default, which is 3.5 version of chat GPT GPT 4 and then you'll see some other things. Like GPT 3.5 with browsing, which is an alpha GPT 4 with browsing that's an alpha and then code interpreter, which is marked as alpha.
这个电子表格可以包含数据。您可以上传它,然后基本上可以让聊天GPT为您进行一些基本的数据科学。所以它真的很不错,之前需要做的工作是去找数据科学家或者编写Python程序,现在它可以在线完成,就像我们看到插件工作的方式一样。我们现在看到它可以用于运行代码。如果您现在搜索聊天GPT,然后在下拉菜单中选择聊天GPT,特别是如果您选择默认的3.5版本,您会看到GPT 4等其他选项。例如GPT 3.5 with browsing,这是一个alpha版本,还有一个带浏览的GPT 4 alpha版本和标记为alpha的代码解释器。
And you see this all in the drop down menu. And if you happen to have applied to the plugins, which I applied to and I've been using and I got my team on, you'll see plugins alpha. I think paying for a chat GPT the 20 bucks a month, we'll get it there. So is code interpreter available to everybody, do you know? I think it's only available to those folks that have plugins enabled, which means that they've been allowed into this very limited beta or alpha group that are kind of developer or centric or people that are real publishing stuff to the community to help educate everyone. So it's not widely available yet.
Got it. And so an example of this might be what? And this is stuff you might ask a data scientist to do and Google Sheets or Excel previously or to query an SQL database or something.
Exactly, that's normally how someone would deal with it. Yeah. So inside your organization, Vinny, people are like, oh, we got this Google Sheet. Oh, we exported our Google Analytics. Oh, we downloaded some data. We got some client data. We've got, we exported something from Salesforce or whatever tool we're using. Now the team has to go find somebody smart who is either in the accounting department, the data science department or it just happens to be good at hacking this stuff together. And this is something that civilians, the other 80% of people who work at a company just don't know how to do. It would be too hard for them to do. You have that experience, I guess, in your startups as well, Vinny?
Yeah, I mean, it's definitely a lot easier to, I mean, the barriers to using data science right now is coming down by the day. Yeah, this is where it's democratizing data science. Like I've got a friend who's a data scientist and you know, I invest in his company and he's been using data science models for years. And like, it's just, I think it's a game changer for them. I mean, some of the data science companies out there right now, they tried to ridiculous amounts of money. I mean, we're talking like millions and millions of dollars to do data science for companies and there's some big businesses out there. I think one's data dog, I think, and there's a couple others. And opening eye and chat to PT is basically reduced the ability to do this to, you know, it's a means enterprise individuals can do it.
What I think is interesting though, on a slight deviation here is Google has got access to so much company data to the Google suite. So if you like to run a startup and you're on Google, Google Drive, you know, Google Docs, Google Docs, Google Sheets, everything, that information is incredibly powerful. So now Google just need to take part and say, we'd like to activate BOD on your company documents and then create like, you know, obviously, to figure out the privacy stuff and, you know, rights, I mean, but basically you have access to DOS. I've already been done in an organization, right? Like generally speaking, the organization should have set their permission. So, well, so just keep this in mind, right? If BOD starts learning across the company, it needs to be able to partition the knowledge and not infer information.
Sure. That only you have access to. So if I'm the HR department and I've got a bunch of documents that only the HR departments are and then somebody in sales does a query, hey, how much do we pay our people internally and what's their compensation? You don't want that coming up in the results. Exactly.
So that is an important permission issue. Yes, but, but, but if you're the CEO, you should have, you know, do you have access to something? Do you have access to anything? Or do you have access to something? And what about like if J.Kell's got a private Doc Sheets in there that no one else actually, are you allowed to see that or? Of course, I mean, the organization owns it. This is like a fallacy that some employees have that. I'm paying corporate account. Yeah. I agree to. Yeah. If it's personal information, you shouldn't have it on the company's servers anyway. I am the company's foundation. It should not be, if it's company information, it should be available to your manager. Your manager.
Alright. So that's a pernition to flag. But, you know, just as a fair warning to everybody there who works at a company, everything you say on your email is saved for all attorney, your documents, your Slack for all eternity, do not expect anything. Focal's as well. A lot of companies record all calls in coming in. I mean, in some of its compliance and some of its just the default, when you leave a company, you assign the documents to the next person or to the CEO. So if you wrote your diary or your journal in your corporate account, I mean, wake up people. It's 2023. Don't do that because it's going to be indexed. And then somebody's going to be able to pick it up.
So poor initial flag. Stop using your personal phone for your startup in 2023. You have to stop doing this. It's such a common mistake that founders made open phone has totally rethought every detail of what a business phone should look like in 2023. And it's so affordable. You have no excuse. They make it super easy to get a business phone number for everybody on your team. It works through a beautiful web app on your phone or your desktop. And I can tell you it's amazing because our sales team and our ops teams use it daily.
Recently, we found so much values in open phone for our angel summit communications. Open phone is the number one rated business phone on G2 for customer satisfaction. And Twistner's are going to love it. Brian Jagger, he's the co-founder of startup called Atlete. He tweeted the following, I'm literally cashflow positive from listening to this week and startups for listener deals. And he explains that he previously got open phone money from this incredible discount that they give to this week and startups founders. And he says, I'm not paid to say that. I don't know Jason. Pure honest for you back in appreciation. And you know what? I'd love to hear this because there's so many people who listen to this podcast were founders and you need to use these tools. But listen, you might be cash constrained or you might want to put that cash into your product. Open phone is already affordable. Had a starting price of only $13 per user per month. But Twist listeners can get 20% off any plan for your first six months at openphone.com slash twist. And if you have existing numbers with another service, no problem. Open phone will pour them over at no extra cost. So head to openphone.com slash twist start your free trial and get 20% off.
最近,我们发现开放电话对于我们的天使峰会沟通非常有价值。在G2上,开放电话是客户满意度排名第一的商务电话。 Twistner(笔者注:指听众)会喜欢的。创业公司Atlete的联合创始人Brian Jagger在Twitter上这样写道:“我从这周的Startups for the Rest of Us节目中获得的折扣已经让我实现了现金流盈余。之前他已经从开放电话中获得了资金,因为他们会为这周和其他创业公司的创始人提供惊人的折扣。我不是为了说这些话而受到报酬,我也不认识Jason(指节目主持人)。我是真诚地表达我的感激之情。”我很高兴听到这样的消息,因为有很多听众是创业者,他们需要使用这些工具。但是,你可能会有资金限制,或者你可能想把这些资金投入到产品中。开放电话已经非常实惠,每个用户每月的起始价格只有13美元。但是,Twist的听众可以在openphone.com/twist上的任何计划中获得首6个月20%的折扣,如果你已经有了其他服务的号码,也没问题。开放电话会免费转接。所以,请前往openphone.com/twist开始你的免费试用,享受20%的折扣。
You have an example to show here, so many of people are watching at youtube.com slash this weekend or Spotify or the video. Let's go for a GPT4 here. And I have to stop that with this weekend. They got interesting too that I'll share. Okay, so I'm gonna share here. Give me a second. All right, and we're doing this live because we just got the data set from our producer. Okay, so we're inside of chat GPT here and we're gonna upload this electric vehicle data set. And that when you said send a message, there's a link on the right there. And if you on the left of send a message and that's where you upload from. Yeah, right here. There's like a little like a, there was a, yeah, see this little plus icon and normally the, so you can see the first thing. I didn't know that. Is that only for? That is only for the code interpreter. Got it. And so show just so people can see the interface here because we have never done this. But we just hit a new chat there. Let me just show people the interface and then just describe that for folks. Okay, we'll go ahead and chat. Okay, let's go. You click new chat on the top left. You hit this down arrow, Kate. Now you can see all the different items, plug-ins, default, et cetera. So you got a sports guest. That's a little bit so people see it. And then it gives you a little description of what it is and how good it is and the sort of internal rating of what it does. But you picked cold out code interpreter. Interpreter correct. Got it. All right. And then you hit the flood suite. And now, yeah, this is about, I think, a 29 meg file. And so it's going to take, you know, a few seconds to upload here. I see that.
And so now what it's going to do, and none of us have really seen this file yet, which is fascinating. It is fascinating. And so you're doing this alongside of you. Yeah. So this is the code. So it's generated this code. This is Python code here. Jay, Kyle, you're asking about this weekend to read that file. And it's still generating and it's understanding. Now you can see here it's starting to tell us, hey, the data has been rolled into a data frame. And from the first few rows, we can understand that this is the data. So we're going to let this just let this complete. And I'll tell you the next, the next piece, which would Vinny was talking about a second ago was like, you know, where you normally have to go get a data scientist and so to do something like this. And so, and it, you know, throws some things up here and it says, okay, so it's done. So then my next question is going to be this. Well, let's just run what I showed there. It's loaded the data. And it says, oh, it looks like the data contains Vin location, model year, make vehicle type MSRP, and light department of licensing vehicle ID, some locations, utility and some census track.
So what Nick, producer Nick gave us was the electric vehicle population data. And if you're not what's in there and it's reflecting that back to you in plain English. Correct. It is. And it's saying, hey, I'm ready to do something. It's loaded it. What I'm showing here is the prompt where it's loaded it into like a Python library called pandas, which is what a lot of data scientists would use to start analyzing data. So there was a, and it showed a carat there that said show the work. So after it uploaded it, when it finished work, it asked you to do that. And fascinating, when it did yours, for me, it did a different response to the same data, which is really interesting. Like Chatchy P4s told me the data second tains information about electric vehicles with each where I'll represent a specific electric vehicle.
The columns in the data set are as follows and it did it one through 10. It actually gave me a list of them, which is really like a totally more helpful response as very fascinating that we had two different. And that's sort of the nature of LLMs that can happen.
But this next question, which I'm putting down in the prompt, so I'll read to everyone, says, can you conduct whatever visualizations and descriptive analysis you think would help me understand the data? Because I have this producer next centess this file. And so now, let's see what it does in this next phase here.
And so what it's starting to tell us is we'll look at the following aspects of the data, the distribution of electric vehicle types, battery electric vehicles versus plug-in electric vehicles that's BEV versus P-Hav, top 10 most popular electric vehicle makes and models, distribution of the vehicles by year, geographic summary of the vehicles, and summary statistics of the range and base MSRP.
And that's all of that just based on this question, which was, can you conduct whatever visualizations and descriptive analysis you think would be helpful to understand this data? And so now it's doing the work to basically do those five things for us. And again, you could imagine that is that you did a very generic question, which is you asked the CEO question, all right, thanks for the data. Data scientists in a meeting. Why do I care?
Just get to the point. What did you learn by studying the data? And it's basically just starting with some general ideas here to get you started and you could pick one to double click on.
Yes, correct. It's now doing the work and what you can see here. Oh my god. Like, you know, yeah. And so what does it remember? Imagine people are listening, sunny, source cascades.
Okay, so it gave us five examples of things to look at the data. So the first is the distribution of the different, yeah, exactly of chart that shows us the distribution between battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. And this is a visualization.
It would have taken someone a few minutes to, you know, maybe 30 minutes to generate this chart in PowerPoint. And it's been generated for us automatically. And it shows us that the distribution is almost five to one here, right? Maybe four to one in terms of there's way more battery electric vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles. And according to the data set that we were given.
The next chart is we're going to look at the 10 most popular electric vehicle makes. And we see here that Tesla is a clear leader with Nissan at number two, then Chevrolet, then Ford, and we see a visualization that chart there. Next, we're going to look at not by make, but we're going to look by model. And we can see here that the most popular model is the model three, then the model Y, then the leaf and so forth if you look at this chart.
And then when we look at by year, and obviously, you know, this, we're only part way into 2023. And we see that the by year, the distribution of electric vehicles has generally been increasing with a little bit of a slowdown in 2019 and 2020 and a pick up back in 21 and a huge jump back in 2022.
And we're only, you know, quarter, a little bit more than a quarter away from 2023. It would be my interpretation. But what's interesting here is now that you start to see some of these things, you could actually ask Chad, GPT, why is there a spike? But you could just do that in another window with Chad, GPT-4.
What's your takeaway here, Vinnie, just to bring you in on the conversation? I mean, I'm, I mean, I've thought using this to analyze my wine condition. Fantastic. You have it. I can see that. I see that. I see that. I'm uploading. What would it tell me about? That's exactly what I'm going to do. I'm going to go and just put it right now and see if I can go, you know, come up with some some, some train stats.
It's, you know, recommend other wines for me. That's what I'm going to tell you. You had, do you have plugins? Go do it. It will show it on the air if you're comfortable. What's interesting here also is based on the visualization and summary statistics.
There are some key insights from the data. It actually wrote some of these and it said, top 10 most popular electric VLSS.3, Tesla Model 3 is the most popular electric vehicle model, followed by Nissan Leaf, etc.
So you start getting into some really interesting concepts here. And for mine, I, let me share mine. This will be very interesting to do if I may. Oh, did you have another one you wanted to do, sunny? No, no, no, that's what, you know, I wanted to just show that capability because that's the new feature that I'm logged is uploading the data set, which I know you've been thinking about a little bit, Jay, because you have a lot of spreadsheets.
I know. A lot of spreadsheets I got. Can you see my screen now? Okay. Yes.
我知道。我有很多电子表格。你现在能看到我的屏幕吗?好的。可以。
So I did the same thing. I uploaded the same file, but what you'll see here is that, if you're seeing it, remember I said it gave me just a list of what are the columns. Is it a game in the list of columns? And then I asked a slightly different question. What are the three most interesting trends in this data?
I said, to identify interesting trends in electric field population, we need to analyze various aspects of the data set pretty generic. Let's explore the following three trends. Electric field vehicle adoption over time. Most popular electric vehicles makes a model distribution of electric field types like yours. And then it gave me a couple charts. It did a different design style, which is weird, but electric vehicle adoption over time instead of using a histogram, it did a line chart for time. It did the same thing. It did the same thing, the distribution, and it, too, gave me some highlights here.
And what I could do here is an interesting one. Let's see if this works. Please give me the same analysis, but take out all Tesla models. And if it gets this right, that's like game over, right?
Because this is something you might ask. You're like, okay, we know Tesla is running the table on everything, but I don't care. I mean, we all know Model 3 outsells everything because it's, you know, the greatest model why I think is the greatest car I've ever made. But those two, but let's just take out all Tesla's and see if it does that, right? So now you're starting to be able to do things with data. I mean, it's just stunning. What can be done here?
I was over the weekend trying to do things here inside of it. I'll show it. Well, I can't leave the screen. Is one of the problems with chat GPT-4? I think if you leave the screen, it will look like a lot of things. It can stop. Yeah, sometimes. Yeah. I guess they're trying to get people to not do this. But all of these little blocking and tackling things will be worked out over time, like doing multiple queries simultaneously.
Like just for the love of God, Greg and give me a corporate account here. Let me put all my people into chat GP4, let all of this data be shared in a common repository. I need multiplayer mode for chat GPT-4 and I would pay $200 a person per month. I would pay $4,000 a month, $50,000 a year.
Right now I'm paying $20 across everybody in my organization and hopefully everybody in my companies is actually doing this now. If you hear my voice, I've been like tweeting about just, oh, wow, here we go.
Let's see. Electric vehicles over time without Tesla. That's interesting. And then the models, yeah, wow, it nailed it. Most popular electric vehicles makes without Tesla models. You see a very more even distribution in the chart, Nissan Chevrolet Ford BMW are one, two and three, but it's not as spiky because you're taking out. And then you see here that actually the hybrid, since I guess Tesla doesn't produce a hybrid versus battery electric vehicles becomes much more normalized.
So here peak sales in 2022, it looks like is 14 hours. Well, it's just the 23 is not complete yet, right? So that's why it's so small. Last complete year, it was 25,000 over 25,000. Oh, sorry, number of EVs, would that be 25 million? What is the left hand here? No, it can't be 25 million, it would be 2.5 million maybe. 5 million? Yeah, probably that makes more sense. So it's, it is like, yeah, it says 14,000, but it actually means add probably 2.0. So 1.4 million. So you're just taking out a lot of vehicles, probably. Yeah, Tesla sold what looks like 500,000, is that right? No, 50,000. This is maybe a commercial close to a million. This might be US, because it was a huge area. It had state vehicle and other information. What's the time frame for this? What's time frame for this? Like, yeah, mine. No, it's two thousand. It went back a few years.
Yeah, the data was back. I mean, this is just incredible. I mean, you just see like we're lifelong technologists. We know how much time this kind of takes to do this kind of stuff. Can you take your website information or your podcast data and then you start slicing and dicing that now? Yeah, and imagine the work and the number of people it took and the time it took.
You Jason would want that answer right away. Where are the listeners from? Which ones? All the different, you know, you're going to go after this, Jason, and download all your data and going to be uploading it immediately is my guess. Right.
Yeah, I mean. I mean, it doesn't need to have a developer account for that or like what do you need to have to be able to use this? Right now you have to be, um, have a developer account and you need to be, uh, let in by OpenAI. This is the year you need to perform. You need to be focused and I want your startup firing on all cylinders and how you're going to do that.
You're going to use code up code up helps you do more with less in code of your team can work on entire projects from start to finish. That's right. One product you have everything you need in one place where in the efficiency revolution, you have to do more with less and right now is the perfect time for you to jump in and learn about all the amazing features that Coda has. Coda is the dock that brings it all together and it's efficient and it's fast. We use Coda at this very podcast to track my J trades.
If you just go to J trading.com, it'll take you to a gorgeous Coda page of all my J trades. Not an amazing product, it's always advancing. The templates are next level, but here's the important call to action. You can operate and collaborate in one place to get your projects done faster.
Take advantage of the special limited time offer just for startups. Sign up today at Coda.io slash twist and you will get the $1,000 startup credit on your first statement. That's right. CODA.io slash twist for a $1,000 sign up credit and this offer is so generous. I want you to take advantage of it right now because I don't know how long this absurdly generous offer from Coda will exist. CODA.io slash twist for $1,000 in sign up credits right now.
There is a wait list for plugins. But this is so. It's a compute intensive, Jay. Jay, let's go back to the old GPU shortage problem. This is compute intensive. They gave every $100 million users plus access to this. They were just fried the system. They don't have the capacity for it.
Honestly, I think we're getting to the point where this is so valuable for organizations that Azure and AWS should just start offering your own. What is it A100? Is the Nvidia. I mean, Amazon is working on it, but it's not that simple just to expend these things up. It's going to take a couple of years to get. Oh, I mean, just racking them is going to take time producing them. You have to basically.
Jay, kill. There's a shortage. There's a chip shortage update. I absolutely understand. But what I'm saying eventually was the word I use, Vinicius. Eventually, I think organizations are going to start provisioning their own GPUs for this because it's so valuable. If you told me right now, an A100, you know, cost $10,000, would you like me to sell you one for $20,000 to have it in your organization today to start doing this? I mean, it's a diminimous amount of money compared to the value created.
I just answered another question. I was like, which dates had the most growth in 2021 and 2022? And it's based on this, the electric vehicles dates 2021. Here are the two top states with the most growth. You want to take a guess? Which dates had the most growth percentage rise? Without California? No, no, without California. No, I said percentage growth. I said, which dates had the most growth in 2021 and 2022? Interpreter that as percentage, not run numbers.
So it is. I'll say Texas. I'll say Texas. Okay, which are okay, keep going. I'm not going to say this right. Texas and probably move Florida. Maybe Washington. Yeah, I'd say yeah, like Washington. Yeah, smart. Sorry. What a number of minutes in F bomb.
Washington is number one. They grew from 18 to 27,000. Yeah. A growth of 9,000 EVs, 50% growth. And Texas was number two. Yeah. Actually, it got that wrong. It says number of EVs in 2021, 3, number in 2022 for. It's Washington state data specifically. It's in Washington state. Oh, this data set? Yes, this data sets Washington state data from Washington state.gov.
Oh, sorry. Okay. So what we're looking at has nothing to do with by state. Okay. That's why the numbers were low. Okay, great. Yeah. I'm looking at the CSV though. It does have all kinds of counties and cities. Like I see saying. I can't leave it all in. We just took, by the way, for the first listening, we just took a random data set the producers found and just uploaded it. So we found this data set. It doesn't have perfect information. And so just understand like the where this is kind of an interesting use case. Somebody sends you a CSV. You don't know what it is. And it starts interpreting it for you.
All right. Well, producer Nick, who is an exceptional producer. You hear people talk about producer Nick on all in and here at this week in startups. It a wonderful job producing today. And he said, uh, explain to the audience what you found and what you did while we were alive on air.
Yeah. So I found a website where they have a bunch of CSV files from government data, one of which was the one that you just saw previously, the Washington State EV data. I also found one which has something to do with the topic that we're covering today about FDIC bank failures, which was from the actual FDC FDIC.gov website, which you can see right here. Pretty amazing.
I uploaded it. It found a formatting error on the CSV file. And I was about to look up how to fix it. And Chatchee, we teach us fix it itself. Found a Unicode error. Okay. Yeah. That's common. And then just fixed it. Pretty crazy. Perfect.
Um, then it's, I asked it one of the most interesting ways to visualize this data. Gave me some examples. I said, okay, do that. Um, and here you go. Okay. So let's take a look here. Um, it said bank closures by year, bank closures by state, top acquiring institutions, fascinating heat map of bank closures, timeline, heat map of bank closures, timeline of bank closures. This is fascinating.
So let's scroll down here and see what Chatchee came up with. Uh, again, finding errors and fixing them, scroll down. Now, let's proceed with creating visualizations. They'll start with bank closures by year, bank closures by state, type acquiring top acquiring institutions is fascinating. And obviously we see by year, scroll down 160 or so in, uh, the financial crisis and then it slowly went down. But what's interesting about that, Vinnie, if you look at it, you notice that the bank closures that started in 2008 peaked in 2010. So it was a full two plus year process of peaking and then trailing off, you're going to have some per year, but it still took a, it was basically four years of bank closures.
Well, well, so just remember, so a lot of this was back in the days we had, uh, we, we've had a lot of the smaller banks being consolidated up and then they passed the laws on other bigger banks as well. So it's unlikely for us to see the same sort of tail right now because all the small banks have been cleaned up. However, if you look at the latest data and just the amount of money that's in the banking sector is blowing up in the past two or three months out of like five banks, we've had, um, more AUM blow up.
I think in 2023, then in 28 and nine in 1011, like the whole banking crisis, we, in the past three months, we've had like, like, like Washington Mutual versus Silicon Valley bank versus first republic, et cetera. Like the scale is so different right now because these banks are so big. It's interesting also about what Nick found here is like, you could see some of these didn't have acquires they just shut down some of them, uh, you know, were acquired by state bank and trust company, first citizens bank, the Maris Bank, US bank, NA. So just fascinating ways to look at data.
If you're listening to this in your organization, there's going to be two possibilities of what happened. This is what I've been trying to explain to people. Maybe I have to go back to base cow and start using all caps on Twitter. But I am finding that 30% of what I do can be done inside of chat PT for today. I'm finding my producers and you sort of Nick pull up his thing there and I start questions in his thing that were questions I was asking during live this week and start up. So when I'm doing the show, the producers are looking up data. They're using chat GPT for all day long, um, and even during shows.
So this to me is what I would implore people to try to understand right now. Smart people who are using this are taking, I would say between 10 and 50% of their job and automating it and then they're quiet quitting or they're doing more work and they're going to be more effective in their organizations or their boss is going to figure this out. And everybody's going to get more work done.
And instead of hiring, people are going to start firing and getting more done. So just think about gains, 30% gains across an organization of let's take my investment firm about 20 people. That's the equivalent of having 26 people.
So one of two things is either going to happen. If you had 20 people, you're either going to go down to 14 and save that money or you're going to act like a 26 person organization or something in between. That's how management thinks. Now for my team, we're just doing a great job.
I just want you to become 30% more efficient so we don't have to hire more people. But other people are going to look at this, Vinny, and they're going to take a different approach, which is, okay, we have how many data scientists? Great. Half their requests are not necessary.
They're going to be done by chat GP2Fore people are not going to need them. So we just get ready to half the data scientists. Now take a moment to think about what I just said.
There's been a competition for data scientists. Some organizations say, how many of these data scientists do we need?
最近出现了一个数据科学家竞赛。一些组织在问,我们需要多少这样的数据科学家呢?
Well, I'd say right now, Jacob, we probably don't have enough on a global basis. So I don't think there's going to be a shortage of data scientists anywhere in the future. They may be reallocated from companies that have seven down to three and then those four go elsewhere that's needed.
So I think you probably need fewer data scientists per company, but there's still companies out there that's going to need that never thought of having data scientists because they just didn't have the, you know, you sort of have to pay them for the licenses, right? And then they use it, which is like millions of dollars a year. So now the cost of the software has come down dramatically.
You still need the people to operate it because, you know, some people just need to be focused on the stuff and a lot of companies are data and multiple databases and spreadsheets and it's all very disparate, you start to build data warehouses that have all information et cetera. So it's not as simple as that. I think that. Is it not as simple as that?
No, I don't think so. I think in a world where everything was highly efficient and everything was run properly, not maybe, but we're so, I mean, the gap right now between the haves and the have-nots in data science is very, very, very, very big.
I don't know, Sonny. I might disagree. This weekend, I started learning Python. You already called me Sonny right now. Vinny. No, I was going to Sonny. I was going to throw to Sonny. I thought you did, I was like, oh my god. I was going to throw up Sonny. Listen, you guys are Sonny and Vinny. Two of my best friends, the names are different by one letter. Sonny and Vinny.
Two letters. Sonny and Vinny? Two letters. Oh, right. Yeah, sorry, sorry. I had a long weekend. I had the kids alone. Anyway, I am going to disagree Vinny and Sonny, I want you to reflect on this.
You and I, we're chatting. We're trying to get together over the weekend to do a little co-gem, but you know, kids whatever got in the way. But I started on a warrior game. This loss, warrior is one incredible shout out stuff, Curry. Replit is like a coding environment. So I just signed up and I started taking their Python course. I was like, oh my god, this takes so much concentration.
I'm never going to be able to do this. Like this is not going to be my chosen career, but I do want to see how far I can take it because they have a bounties thing on Replit and I put a bounty up and then I explained in details.
I'd like an order GPT agent that checks our database of already contacted companies by URL. So these are startups we've talked to. So we say hey, calm.com and uber.com are in the database right now. We don't need to call them. Then finds new startups on CrunchBase.com to LinkedIn and sends them a semi-automated email from one of our researchers introducing our venture fund. Acceptance criteria.
App is able to find a recently updated CrunchBase profile within a specific criteria, geography, investment stage and sends an email to that founder. Pretty simple, right? I put this up for 27,000 cycles, I guess they call them on Replit. Shout out to the team at Replit that emailed me immediately after I talked about it on the pod.
I put it up for $270. I got four applications. As you can see here, one person says Jason had built this in the past and building for a few funds. I'm not the only one thinking like this.
We'd love to chat more about you and check my GitHub linked in for resources. He's done three bounties. I'm a fan of the pods. I've read your book, Dumb luck. I'm poking around Replit and see what all the fuss about. I'll tell you about it.
Regarding your bounty, I'd like to help ask you to flesh out your criteria. I do either of these free as long as we can take pretty much the time to coach you. My personal churn. I don't like taking free stuff.
Anyway, my point here, Vinny, and then I'll go to Sunny, is I am the CEO of the company. I'm the GP, the general partner of the fund. I'm looking at this and I'm like, I wonder how long it is between when I can describe something to a bounty program and have code sent to me.
Then I run it myself, just like I am using Chatship T4. I feel like I'm on a collision core sunny between using Chatship T4 with plugins and uploading stuff myself. Then working with the developer community to write tiny little scripts for $270, that a $50 salary or $40 salary or $60 salary for, let's say, an operations person in our organization. That would take five hours. I can basically take what is 50 hours a week of work in our company.
Two researchers doing 50 hours a week of work, $1,500 a week, maybe $2,000 a week fully baked with benefits, $100,000 a year of work, and I can just automate it for $270. Am I crazy or is this going to change the world? No, I mean, you're 90 days away. To the count for 90 days away. At the pace we're going at right now because what you put in here is mostly just doable. I said we're entering a world where the core framework is being absorbed by OpenAI.
If you just saw what we did, they're taking their time right now from a safety perspective that the code interpreter that we were just playing with, J-Kell, doesn't reach out to the internet just yet. We know that they have browsing capabilities because there's other plugins that can browse. As soon as they allow code to go out to the internet, which they've controlled that, it's not like they don't know how to do it, then you have that problem solved right inside code interpreter.
I'm not surprising because you would describe your problem inside code interpreter and say, here's my spreadsheet, go to CrunchPace. So the same thing you did in the Replic, you'll do inside there.
Developer Talent is the most precious resource for B2B startups. You know that. And you want your developer's focus on product, not on compliance, right? When you're selling B2B software to large enterprises, you need to jump through a ton of security and compliance hoops, and one of those hoops is large customers need you to host your software on their cloud. And you need to build that out on a per customer basis. Think about that.
So B2B startup companies constantly face this dilemma. Do you keep developers focused on infrastructure, which could hurt your product velocity, or do you keep them focused on the product velocity, which would then delay your ability to close large customers? And I have a solution for you, and it's called release delivery. What release delivery does is it automates the creation of enterprise class app delivery for private clouds and single tenant applications.
Basically, this led you to deliver your software seamlessly into any customer environment. This will unlock a ton of revenue potential for you, and release delivery will put all the tedious stuff on autopilot for you. So you can turn your ideas into apps and deploy those apps quickly and flexibly into their clouds.
So here's your call to action. Let release show you the power of release delivery and get your first month free at release.com. Slash twist. What a domain name. Are EL E A SE dot com slash twist. Sub to $10,000 in value at release.com slash twist.
这是您的行动号召。让Release向您展示发布交付的强大之处,并在release.com/twist上获得首个免费月。这是一个多么棒的域名:EL E A SE点com/twist。在release.com/twist上获取高达10,000美元的价值。
I would agree with Sunny on this. I mean, guys, this is the fifth generation language. We never really got to it. This is natural language programming. Everyone's a programmer now. You just need to speak English at this point. You'll do it. Not even English, other languages as well. Check if you can translate for you. So as long as you can.
Evening, but language is code. Natural language is code. We had to create this layer with digital software programs machines could interpret what we're saying accurately. And could the human brain so complex? The language is a very complex thing for us. But machines that we've had to instruct machines based on a very limited number of words, functions that we have that was written. And now it's fully expansive.
Like now you have the entire English vocabulary that you can use and the machine understands what you mean. You can be extremely precise in what you're saying to it as well. Whereas in the past, you have to write functions to do certain things. It basically now understands every single word and English dictionary to a very, very deep level and every single word becomes effectively like somewhat of a function or a describe or something.
So like, I posted a tweet yesterday, we'll put it up and I think this is a very important point that we should very touch on today and get your views on this. I think that in the next cycle, so we're in a bare cycle right now. We're heading to one or whatever you want to call it.
Obviously, we may not be in a recession. I think we are in a recession for what I'm seeing and seeing the signs of a recession already. The next cycle that we go through is either depression or it's a recovery and a boom. So whatever you want to define in the next cycle. Regardless, I think we're heading for deflation in a big way.
And I think that this will become the number one driver of deflation. I think you're exactly correct. What's going to happen is massive efficiency will come to the companies that get on this early.
Then what will end, you know, if you're running a company right now, you should just give everybody the tool, ask them to show you what they did with it. And if you have 10 people in your department, if seven people use the tool and three people don't, you should fire the three people who don't use the tool.
I know this sounds crazy. But this is exactly what I saw happen in the early 90s. We put PCs on people's desks. Some people literally did not want a PC on their desk. They wanted their secretary to have the PC. And those people lasted, I think, you know, less than a decade in corporate America.
And that was back then when, you know, you got to keep your job for a long time. There wasn't as much turnover for boomers. But there were boomers who were like literally when I was installing computers in the early 90s who were like, yeah, just I don't want the computer. You can, don't put it on my desk, put it on this like little cubby over here in my law office and my system will do it. And they never logged in. And those people got phased out. They were relationship people. If you're not using this every day, you're, you're literally a dinosaur. You're literally a dinosaur. That's my belief.
So you're exactly correct. This will be make every company 30, 40, 50 percent more efficient. And then what you have to ask yourself is, are there enough problems in the world that your company addresses for you to solve to generate revenue and a capitalist society? I believe there are decades of problems left. I don't think that this is going to result in a UBI universal basic income where all the jobs are done.
I think humans are going to be creative and find more things to do. But I literally believe efficiency of 5 percent gains per year for humans. Let's say if everybody got, maybe let's say everybody got 10 percent. And every year, every seven years people doubled their efficiency.
I think what we're going to see is everybody's going to become 10 percent more efficient, like a month or let's say quarter, which means every seven quarters, every year and nine months, people are going to be twice as efficient.
What do you say, sunny? Well, I think there's a great example, Jay, Cal. And I've seen it, but Nick, if we can pull it up in terms of efficiency. So this is someone who's working on a do not pay plug-in. Oh, Josh Brown. He's not a program. Yeah, yeah. No, there you go.
So maybe Jay, just, you know, Josh Brown or his billbrow. I don't know if you're going to be able to do that or who wrote the book Red Notice's son. He's an entrepreneur. And he has do not pay his name of company. He's been on the podcast. And his whole thing was to help you like get out of like reoccurring subscriptions, et cetera.
也许是Jay,你知道的,Josh Brown或者他的账单Brow。我不知道你是否能够做到这一点,或者谁写了《红色通缉令》这本书的儿子。他是一位企业家,拥有一个名叫“Do Not Pay”的公司。他曾经在播客上出现过,他的主要目标是帮助你摆脱像重新订阅之类的重复的订阅服务。
But he's also a good. So let's do a reaction thing, Jay. Cal, why don't you read this because you've seen it. So go for it. I haven't seen this. So what did it say? Okay.
So this is, you know, do not pay. It's an app on top of a chat GPT leveraging it and goes, ask, how can I help you? He says, find me money is it connect the apps is connect your bank account, he connects account. And then it finds the subscriptions that this person is paying it. It's whatever. And it says, what do you want to do? Is this like a cancel? Yeah. Yep. Okay.
So let's go to the next spot. Incredible. Okay. And then this he says, first using do not pay at plaque connection. I had. It's scan all about 10,000 bank transactions. So it found $80.86 leaving his account every single month and offer to cancel, offer to cancel those. Great. Right. Let's keep scrolling. Okay.
And the bots basically got working mailing letters in the case of gyms. Right. And it used a USPS API and chatted with the agents to basically start working on the cancellation. And so like we can scan through this and we'll maybe drop the link of the notes. But the beauty here is going back to efficiency. Think about the time and effort. There's one last example. If you can go back there Nick where it actually found a bill for a Wi-Fi connection. And he it turned around and asked, hey, was that did the Wi-Fi work properly? And he said no, it drafted a letter to send to go go whoever the Wi-Fi company was and asking for a refund for that.
And we all experience that where we pay for it and it doesn't work or it's bad. And basically, yeah. And so there's similarly negotiation process to cancel that and get a refund. Yeah. And then similarly it started a negotiation process for with Comcast. It's just that's what I'm saying, Jacob, where these are apps that are being built on top of the technology. So we are almost where you're talking about. So it's a less than 90 days away from incredible things happening for us, which then aligns the deflationary argument. It's definitely going to be super deflationary.
If you hear my voice, you know, like and you're not using this and you're not getting up to speed on it, man. Yeah. You're not really following how fast this is. I started playing with I'm giving a speaking gig on Wednesday in Laguna down in the Orange County, doing my paid speaking gig being corporate gig and I'm talking about travel. And so I started testing some I was like, you know, in this luxury hotel kind of situation. I would say which one? Okay. But let me share my screen here.
So I started using the GPT forward browsing. Browsing. Web browsing. I don't know if you play with this, but it doesn't work very well. I had said on all in in Shamaaf and sax laughed about this that, hey, you're going to need to start citing your sources and then getting permission from them, et cetera, where else this thing is going to become normally and all these lawsuits have already been filed. But when you hear I said, what are the major trends in luxury hotel travel and it started a browse. And I guess it did a search and it said search major trends in luxury hotels 2023.
We found this link from a website, EHL and then it read the content. Yeah, a bunch of failures. It's not working very well. Their web crawler is terrible or it's really taxed. I don't know what's going on. My team today has been playing with the web crawler, but I only found this one. And then it basically just cribbed it. So now you can kind of see what's happening with chat GPT for. It is cribbing a lot of data and just rewriting it. And then it does some thinking on top of it.
Well, I want to clarify something. This is so in the case when you're without the plug in, you're asking for something, then the cribbing is not occurring. And I think that's a discussion that's happened before. In this particular case, you're asking chat GPT to go look for something with the browser plug in. So then it will crib. It's two very different use cases that we have to be aware of here. So anyway, this EHL insights had written this. And you know, you can see it basically took what they had on their website and it summarized it a little bit better.
And then way down here, it gave a citation. You see that 12? It gave a little tiny citation. And then I said, which hotel chains are known for having the best hotel workspaces? And then offer dedicated work desk and high speed internet over ethernet connections. And it started browsing the web. It's actually doing it right now because it failed so many times. But I want to show you another one I did here.
And this one was a fascinating. And I said, what are the major trends in luxury hotels? And it gave me up to September 21, this is without doing web searching. Personalization sustainability, wellness, authenticated experience, smart technology, blending home, blending work and leisure, unique design and architecture, multi-generational appeal, privacy and exclusivity partnerships. So I said, which three of these are the most important for maximizing a hotel's loyalty and revenue? So I'm asking you to think, you know, a bit here. And it said personalization smart technology and authentic experiences.
And I was like, the first two definitely authentic experiences. I don't know if that's actually like, culturally immersive activities, genuine connecting to the destination. I was like, I don't know. It feels a little woke to me. I was like, what's the opportunity? I was exactly what I took my time with. I was like, what's the time? I was like, please give me 10 examples of how a luxury hotel might personalize a hotel guest's experience. So I just went after the personalization.
And this was incredible. Like, I don't know where it's getting all this from. Like, is it from its web crawl, you know, but it said pre-arrival communication, customized welcome amenities like a favorite drink or snack, tailored room setup, like temperature, preferred lighting, curated experiences, personalized dining options, customized spa treatments, dedicated, conscious service, flexible room configurations, tailored in-room entertainment, personalized turn down service.
I said, you know what, expand that list of 25 ideas. And it just went to town, you know, and customized mini bar. I'm like, well, that's a great idea. I've never experienced a customized mini bar. I've had an idea before personally. Personalized is a wellness programs, customized transportation options, customized bedding and little linens. I've heard about that. Actually, Chimoff has that at the peninsula where they have CP pillowcases with his initials on them. So he had talked about that pet friendly personalization, scent experiences. That's dumb, but interesting. Personalized communication. They do that in Vegas. They do that in Vegas. Yeah. Communicate with guests with their preferred channels, such as text, email or phone. That's actually a really important one.
Everybody's got a different one. So then I was like, okay, well, let's take this to the next level. And I said, let's see if we can set up a scenario where we tell it, you know, to pretend it's something. I said, you are the CEO of a hotel chain. You're building a hundred room hotel. Take these top trends and write a three paragraph, 400 word description of this new hotel. Follow that with 10 bullets about what makes this hotel unique. And it does this. Introducing the premier destination for discerning travelers are 100 room luxury hotel expert leaf uses modern technology. Personalized experiences and authentic cultural immersion created truly unparalleled parallel retreat from the moment's guest arrived. They are welcome into a world of bespoke services and innovative amenities, all meticulously designed to cater to the individual preferences and needs.
It was like really like well written, et cetera. And then it gave like, you know, their top 10 bespoke guest experiences state of the art technology. Yeah. I said rewrite that in half the number of words. And so it's in half the number of words. So it was a little tighter. And then I said, okay, you're a branding executive who has been given the description and location on a beach in Southern California. And you're being paid to name the hotel. It was four ideas came up with terrible ideas. So Cal Serenity Retreat Pacific Sands Haven Coastal Bliss Retreat Azure shoreline sanctuary.
I said, please do that again and come up with one word names. Microsoft sponsored number four. Exactly. So it came up with wave crest sun haven tied song and beach was much better. Much better. Like that. And then I said give me four more, but none of the names should include beach water or wave concepts because I was like, that's too obvious. Well, I like Elysian. Yeah. Zephoria Elysian Solsthi Eden Vista. And this is where I left off in this insanity.
Yeah. So Jacob, can I challenge something that you said you said 30% more efficient. Yeah. If you ask someone on your team to do that, that's more than a day of work, including the back and forth with you. I would say an average college educated person getting paid the average national salary for an operations position or an administrative assistant position, like a non-programming non-sales position is 60,000 a year, 70,000 a year, which if you divide by 2000, you know, is something in the range of 30 to 50 dollars, right? Yeah, that's 50 hour.
I think they would say 50 hours of work to put that presentation together. And to get that level of output because you would be starting from zero, you would basically surf the web for 20 hours. You would write down all your ideas. You would go eat a bunch of bagels and donuts and you'd have come up a meeting with you. And then you'd say, oh, that's too long. Make it shorter. I don't like these names. Come back. Yes. You'd have these each time. It's 50 minutes.
30 minutes is an interaction with you. Yeah. 50 hours of work. I put it out. Times 40 bucks is $2,000. Maybe a hundred hours of work. Yeah. And then forget about asking them to come up with names. You know, that's like a very specific thing. That's an agency which charge you $20,000 for those four names at the end, I think. Yeah. And so it's not 30 percent more efficient. I think it's 300 percent.
Yeah. I can be wrong. Then I wonder if the gains are sustained because these feel like early gains. So now my question back to you, Sonny, is are these like massive gains, 300 percent gains for the first year of AI and then we get to 30 percent a year? Or is it compounding and 300 turns into 3,000?
That's a good question. I hadn't thought about it. But my guess is, you know, this is hard. Well, when the iPhone first came out, right? And even to this day, and we don't get as many Uberers and Airbnb's, but it's still it's still compounding on itself. Yeah. We're 10 plus here, I mean, we're 15 years in, we're saying 10, right? Yeah. We're 15 years in and an iPhone still compounds. Crazy. Yeah. So I think it compounds.
This is back to the whole thing with like human beings are really bad at being able to see like the compounded growth charts. Like we, you know, exponential growth, when it's sitting right in front of us over the three months or six months, we can't imagine how far this thing's going to grow. We have brains on why to understand the curve.
Yeah. That's really, yeah, we have an evolutionary, not an exponential mindset. Exactly. Exactly. We only understand evolution. And even evolution took thousands of years for humans to experience.
Yeah. The idea that we evolved from primates and primates evolved from, you know, reptiles or whatever. I don't know what the exact forking was. That took thousands of years for us to understand this.
But if we have three billion people, three to four billion people who are, I would say, you know, activated in the global economy. So they have an internet connection. They have it, you know, they have access. Like it's a highly networked place. Like we think about this, right? Like a hundred years ago, I mean, the most connected network of people, maybe people living in New York or London or like, yeah, that's maybe a hundred thousand people.
Yeah. It was separated by obviously distance. And maybe, you know, what's the telephone? That knowledge. Yeah. And it's an access. And with the telephone came up, now you had like a wider connection. So you could access people, you know, over space and time quicker. But that, you know, it took airplanes. It took for airplanes, trust me.
Now we've got, now we've got this. I mean, this is thinking. This is like taking the number of people. Like if you like work out some sort of, let's just say, for example, you said the number was, you know, this is, it's a hundred million people 20 years ago squared was the number, right? Now it's, yeah, and then you bring the 18, that's what it was, right? Now you've got three billion people squared.
Like that number is, or is a magnitude more than a hundred million squared. It's insane.
这个数字就像超过一亿的平方倍数一样巨大,简直是疯狂的。
What's really going to happen here, I think is such a great point is, think about the, the impact of giving somebody internet access, then high speed internet access. Now you give them this. So for somebody who's a knowledge worker, I said, oh, 30% more efficient. And suddenly said 3000. And now imagine you are a person 300, 300% sorry, 300%. Now you're a person in San Paulo. And you just, you had low speed access sometimes flaky internet access. Now imagine you get a Starlink connection and you've got a hundred megabits down and you get Cheshire beauty for.
And instead of you having to figure stuff out, you start asking a questions like this. And you ask it, okay, how do I create a hotel chain? How do I name a hotel? You start asking these questions, or how do I code? And it starts teaching our code. This is crazy. Like those people are going to experience, they're going to be comparable to somebody who is educated in New York at NYU or in Boston at Harvard, like the ability to close the gap in knowledge and ability. And network is crazy. Just like LinkedIn made it possible for I get people emailing me from Hong Kong or Australia because they found me on LinkedIn.
But yeah, this is, it's hard to comprehend. It's when a billion people have access to this.
但是,这很难理解。当十亿人都可以接触到这个时。
So if you're taking down to like the biological compute stack of the human being, right? You've got this like ability to store data in our brains and we have ability to compute data. And so what's happened over the first, you know, the internet in the first 20 or 30 years, I'd say let's say the last 20 or 30 years on the internet was that we basically all floated and with mobile as well. We've all floated the storage layer to the internet. So whatever you wanted to know something, you didn't have to remember all these facts and figures. You had a Wikipedia, you searched, you find this information and we just did the compute on that. That's how we did research.
You know, get this in fact, stake hours and hours to find the data. And then we go interpret that and see what it produces and then we'd like to apply it in our lives with this business or personal.
What what what open AI and check to be T and AI in general is doing is basically, you know, the compute function for the human brain is being now is the same process is happening to the story. So so now we've got storage on the internet and now we've got compute on open AI.
So the human brain now is not is no longer about doing compute. Like we're not going to sit there. I'm not going to take a spreadsheet and do the graphs and do the analysis and trying to figure out the financials of a company now.
I'm going to take the company financials, stick it into open AI and say, okay, this public company, you know, based upon Buffett's methodology, how would you value this if you saw sales growing at 20% faster than the current projections. It would do all the calcs for me.
It would come back and say, yeah, actually, you know, based upon the Buffett style of investing, this is a great investment. I know it's a really shitty investment. And that happens in minutes. I can analyze the entire company's financial statements in minutes. And that's what I wanted.
So yeah, so it's the very, it's the point. So what's really what's really happening with the human brain right now. So we've all flowed the storage. We've all floated or we offloading, you know, the compute starting to want the third thing which we're not offloading and we shouldn't. And this is where the debate gets in is, is decision making, right? Because these systems are not making decisions for us. Morality ethics decision making. Exactly. Exactly.
And then when you have this like now, you know, it says this is what it looks like. This, this company looks like a good investment. Now you make the decision, do I want to deploy my capital in there? Now you can automate that eventually. But that's, you know, and the financial decisions are the easy one. But the morality stuff is where we're going to have these conversations.
Let me go to you, Sonny, in a second, but I just want to give a shout out to Coro's Poe. And if you, you can log into it at the web now, it's poe.com and they have something called Sage, but they also have GT before, quad plus, quad instant, Nevis AI. They got everything here. I think you can create bots. It's, they're really cooking with oil over there.
And it's that I asked it, what are the major trends in luxury hotels to try to, you know, do the, the core data set. And it gave me really great stuff. What they do is they highlight keywords, which is really interesting.
So again, you get technology, local experiences, social responsibility. And then I said, okay, give me 10 specific trends around points two and four. And I said, sure, here are 10 specific trends around personalization and technology. Again, the same as I was doing in the other chat, you'd be two, for instance, it gave me all these things.
And so then I just clicked on smart room systems because I didn't know that smart room systems was a category. But I clicked smart room systems and it appended, tell me more about to that. And it started explaining, you know, one of the key features, adjust room sliding, temperature, all that stuff. And it gives you, it gives you prompts now.
So it's actually telling you what to ask next. This is really getting interesting. So it's, this is pre cog. If you watch a minority report, sunny, where like, no, you're going to commit a crime. It knows what you want to do next. And it kind of gives you the next one. What are some examples, smart room systems, how they prove and nagging, say what are examples. And boom, you just keep Philip, you, so now I'm like, you start thinking about the research, again, back to your point of like, how many hours this would take.
We're going to have companies that work 20 people will be five, you know, or they'll be able to do twice as much of the way I can told my team Sunday night and this morning was if you're not using this, like you're falling behind. And I said, offload as much as you can to these systems. And let's meet with twice as many founders, like let's actually spend more time talking to founders, suppose of researching stuff.
How is this impacting the work you do every day and how you're looking at your entrepreneurial career and running your own company, sunny? Yeah, I mean, I think we've touched on the major points, but like for us, we think about enabling this within the enterprise. That's our primary focus. Right?
So we think that's really important. And how do we do that in an efficient way such that enterprises can harness this? It's not as straightforward for most enterprises to just go to chat GPT4 just yet, but you know, we're working on that problem alongside it.
I think two, what we have to kind of focus in on is how does, how do you know what it's telling you is accurate? Right? And I think we saw a few examples of that where we're kind of questioning what it's told us. Where we started today's conversation, we could see if we give it a data set, it can be very kind of definitive about it. And if not, you have to be careful on what it's telling you and where it's pulling it from. Your example of the crawl was not sort of using Vinnie's framework of memory and compute. It wasn't doing that. It was kind of doing the cheating thing of humans. And so I think I think there's a lot of opportunity here and what everyone should think about is the speed at which you can move in this environment. Right? I think in the speed forces you to basically use the technology to its maximum capability. You have the folks. You can run literally 30% faster every week, compounding week after week. If you embrace these tools and you use them, stop what you're doing. If you hear my voice, this is not a drill.
I know in technology, we get really excited and we hype stuff up. Mobile, broadband, crypto, everything, VR, AR, we hype stuff up. We're excited about it. All of that stuff, different levels of impact. This is different. This is just very different. It's compounding at a pace that I think is a self-fulfilling prophecy on the way to AGI. We're getting to artificial general intelligence. It's so clear. You're beating the touring test already. You're smashing it, being it around like a dead mouse.
If I took this and I put it into a presentation and I gave you that pitch on your luxury hotel, you would think like a bunch of McKinsey people spend three months on it. Not even McKinsey, Jacob, if we can pull up one more thing and we're running short on time here, we won't listen to it but maybe we can drop it in the notes. This developer basically built an entire Google Translate but that works. It takes an account, two of these trends. We're talking about this AI voice treatments. What it does is it takes his voice and what he's asking, translates it and then speaks it in the language that he's looking for and he's got a link to the program here. It's all open source.
如果我把这个东西放进演示文稿中,并在你们的豪华酒店上进行宣传,你们会认为这是一群麦肯锡人花了三个月的成果。不仅如此,Jacob,如果我们能再展示一件事情,我们时间有点紧了,或许我们可以在笔记中记录下来。这位开发者基本上建立了一个完整的谷歌翻译,而且它还真的管用。它采用了两项趋势,我们刚刚谈到的 AI 语音翻译。它会抓取他的声音和他所问的内容,将其翻译并用他要找的语言发音,这里还有一个程序链接,它完全开源。
This one person basically built an entire Google Translate that speaks out the translated version of what you're asking for in his voice. So I can do this week. Yes, start-ups as in Spanish, but it would be in my voice. In Spanish. It would be in your voice. It's bonkers. He built that and all the code is there and it's just incredible. Think about the armies of people. This does take at the Google's of the world or meta-sale world. It wouldn't be done.
I've been pitched many years for taking this podcast and now all in and making a German language version or a Spanish language version and they're like, we hire voice actors to redo your podcast every week and for 500 bucks or a thousand bucks we can make another language version of it and I'm like, yeah, and they're like, you can sell advertising. I don't have the time to do this. This seems like a lot of work. But if I could press the button and take this podcast and put it into 10 languages and then have 10 different websites with it, I would do it. Yeah, for sure. I would do it. And I would pay 50 bucks to do that. I wouldn't pay 500 though. So if somebody wants to take this episode and translate it into Spanish and then use our voices, I would pay 50 bucks for that and you could do it every week and I'd pay you 50 bucks a week.
I mean, that literally might do all 250 episodes a year. It wouldn't be that much money. Yeah. Not that much. 10,000 bucks. For 10,000 bucks I would translate this all into Spanish every year. So that's a business opportunity for somebody. That's not a jump change if you can automate it. Vinny, any plugs? Any plugs? Your engine? I mean, your engine lunch here. Yeah, thank you. I mean, obviously excited about what we're doing at Weightroom and really would love to see what people are using.
Tell people about what that is. Yeah, Weightroom is basically a video advertising platform that's going to be fully AI-driven. We're launching our features in May, the AI features. Our first feature will be probably catch up, which means that if you jump into a core leg with your colleagues, it gives you a summary of what just happened before you got there. And I think that that's going to be rolled up. I mean, the features are running out the next month. It's going to be pretty awesome. So check out the website, www.weightroom.com.
I will say that in building weightroom now on, we're using OpenAI. It's really interesting because as we start working with companies to understand what their businesses are about, and integrating into their sales force and notion, et cetera. We may have to start building our own custom LLM. It's just basically understand how to take conversations and meld them into something more useful to the company because you need context around what the company does and training the language to understand the company better. We're using OpenAI right now. Maybe it evolves so fast we don't need to, but it's something that we think about building features.
You have to ask yourself, is it some of your building, which is LLM sort of agnostic, or is it caught your business? I'm very interested in what happens over time, where the companies build their own ones, or take open source one, fork it, and build some customized ones, or you use the standard one.
If there's a cloud available, unless you're Dropbox or YouTube, you're going to rack your own storage. But if you're below Dropbox or Box, you're going to just use Cloud Storage. Well, the data privacy issues as well, and I know that OpenAI has tried to deal with that, but some companies probably wouldn't feel comfortable with, you know, your own platform. You just do on Cloud 5. And then if you do that, then you have to have your own LLM, because you can't really use OpenAI for on-prem. Maybe you can. Do they have on-prem? They do. They have versions now that allow you to do the demo. So any blogs? Any blogs?