Hello and welcome to the History Extra Podcast from BBC History magazine, but in its best-selling history magazine. I'm Ellie Corthon. During today's episode, you'll be hearing from the archaeologist and television presenter Neil Oliver. On his new book, The Story of the World in a Hundred Moments. It's a whistle-stop tour through some of history's key events, from the world's first poet to the death of one of Britain's last First World War veterans. BBC History revealed Staff writer Emma Slatterly Williams spoke to Neil to find out more.
On your new book, The Story of the World in a Hundred Moments, as the name suggests, takes us through human history through key events. What made you take on this mammoth task of exploring the history in just one hundred moments? I asked, that is the question. It was, I knew it was going to be big. A big job. Once I started on it, I really, I almost panicked and threw up my hands and abandoned the whole thing because it just became, well for me, it was quite monumental.
It came from the idea was, I had always, or for the longest time, I had thought it would be great fun to be able to stand up on a stage as it were and tell the story of the world in an hour, I thought. I thought it would be great to be able to summarize human history down to something manageable that, for an hour or so, the people listening might, however briefly, feel that they could hold the whole story in their heads. Even if it would eventually get away from them again. It had been a dream or a pipe dream for the longest period of time.
But then finally, I had written previously the story of the British Isles in a hundred places and I thought this would be the ideal time to try and bring my big dream to life and to make it real because apart from anything else, it felt a little bit like a grand or sequel to the book that was based around Britain. I thought, well this would be the time now to do the world. So I decided that I would make it five thousand years. I decided to start it with the advent of writing because the written word is clearly a significant moment in terms of history because now that once we were able to write things down and keep documents and letters and books and all the rest of it. So I started it with the advent of writing which is let's say about five thousand years ago.
And then I set about the, as it turned out, the mammoth task of deciding which hundred moments to tell. And what I've ended up with, I hope, is a selection that where some of them will be instantly familiar to people. They will have heard of the moment or they will have heard of the principal character involved. Of course, hopefully less so because as with all of my books are quite personal, you might even say idiosyncratic. And I also wanted this to be my story of the world. It's not an academic textbook at all. That's not, I'm not in the business of writing heavy academic tomes. It's supposed to be something that would hopefully draw people in. People interested readers who maybe when they go into the history section in a bookshop, look at the whole dizzying array of titles and don't know where to start.
And perhaps my book might give people a doorway, a springboard into the all-encompassing topic of world history. And maybe when they read my moments, it might make them think, no, you need this moment as well. Or my hundred moments would be these. So I think that's where the idea came from. I wanted to inspire people to think, to come up with what they think is the story of the world and ideally start conversation and debate.
So how did you pick the moments? Well, a lot of them I knew. When I sat down, the first thing I did was sit down and make a list. And I was able to come up with, I would, I'm estimating here, but I would say about 60, 60 to 70 off the top of my head. I thought it has to involve these. Even where it was things that I only had the, even where I thought I only had the barest idea, I thought it must include these. But the process of doing that then led me on little journeys of discovery of my own. And I was moments that I had thought about, fell into the background and I decided they didn't help tell the wider story. And other stories as it were, Elwood, the way to the front that I hadn't even realised were there. And they became part of the story as well.
I wanted it to be a mix. I thought I don't want it to be, you know, to be discouraging and that, you know, someone won't have heard of any of these moments. I wanted it to be a mix of the familiar and down familiar and hopefully that's where we are. But my aspirations are just that somebody might pick up the book. And by reading a few lines about a few pages of it, it might be, it might be a spring board, you know, to have them go off and have their own adventure in history.
We mindful to try and ensure that you've covered as many different periods and countries as possible. Oh, absolutely. Being a story of the world, I was careful.
我们要用心尽量确保你涵盖了尽可能多的不同时期和国家。哦,绝对的。作为世界故事,我很谨慎。
So we start in the old world of the, of the, well, the Middle East, the Near East, Mesopotamia, you know, the ancient civilizations are Babylon, Egypt. And then, you know, gradually spreads it into the, into the classical world, I suppose, the classical world around the Mediterranean. And then the fullness of time it takes in, but quite late in the day, really, you know, we get to Western Europe and Britain.
But the book is also about the Americas, North and South, Australia, Africa, Asia, you know, the far east, Russia, China, hopefully, hopefully it's all there. Hopefully it does have the scope. And as I say, it runs chronologically from, you know, from 5,000 years ago and comes up to the, you know, well, getting very close to the present day.
So you, you begin with the story of the Sumerian poet whose name I'm probably going to pronounce wrong and had Duanna. I think that's close enough. Oh, that's great. So hers is a story that myself and our listeners, perhaps, are not too familiar with. Could you tell us a bit about her and why her significance puts her at the start of your book?
Well, she's, she's, she's regarded as the first named poet, excavations in her part of the world, you know, at her. She was a high priestess of a temple, which was physically quite close to the palace. So Churchill State were quite close together. In Hedjuana was a priestess. They are dedicated to worship of the goddess and the gods and the goddesses that were the pantheon of those people. And she wrote poetry and she wrote poetry in praise of and in awe of the gods and the goddesses.
And she's given the time, given the distance in time. It's hard to know who she was. She may have been the daughter of Sargon, the great who was a king. She was certainly to be placed in that position. She must have had some kind of significance. Maybe she was high born. There's some debate even about whether she actually composed the hymns of praise to which she put her name.
She's the first person. She's the first poet that puts herself into the narrative. She writes in the first person within the hymns about what she is going to do, how much the goddess means to her and how much she wants the goddess to change and own her. So she actually puts herself into the stories for the first time. And she signs them off. They are signed by in Hedjuana.
The only copies that we have are much, much later copies. She had her own scribe. She had so she would have been the images of her dictating and someone else writing it down in Cuneiform. And the only copies that we have are much later than in Hedjuana's time. So what we have are our survival. Long after her day and age, her work was still being remembered and copied and passed on. And it survived in the form of clay tablets and they've been translated and they've been handed down to us.
The epic of Gilgamesh, people might have heard of the epic of Gilgamesh. And Gilgamesh is like the first named real person from history. But Gilgamesh didn't write the epic of Gilgamesh. We wrote another people in Hedjuana is the first person. As far as we know, it's a reasonable statement to say that she's the first named poet that we have. It seemed to me that given that history as stories, it seemed right and proper to start with the first named person we know that was composing and telling stories. Yeah, definitely.
So I want to pick up on the story of Martin Luther actually in the Protestant Reformation a defining moment in the 16th century. You suggest that Luther would have been one of the last people to suspect that he would be credited with the Reformation and that there was never his intention. Could you explain a bit more about this because I think we tend to see him as an avid opponent of the Catholic Church.
He was a very devout figure. You know, he was a very devout Catholic. He was a theologian. He was well read. You know, so he was an educated man. And he was particularly inspired, I suppose, by the idea that his church that he loved so much was falling from what he regarded as the path of righteousness, basically. And he made it playing from the beginning that everything he was saying he was getting from the Bible, you know, that he wasn't making any of it up. It wasn't his own ideas. He was just reminding his church of their own foundations.
At the time of the writing, the 95 Theses, there was another church when moving through his part of Germany who was selling indulgences, which is to say that there was a fundraising effort going on to raise funds for the building of St. Peter's in Rome or a new church in Rome. And the church had been selling indulgences. And it's basically a jail free card in indulgence. It reduces the amount of time that a sinner would have to spend in in parchedry before, you know, before getting out and getting off to paradise.
And so indulgences, it's a way of buying your freedom. And Martin Luther was just horrified. He said, this is not what Jesus came to do. Jesus came to remind us to tell us that it's, you know, lives of faith, you know, living virtuous lives at all times, being good people or trying to be good people. It is what we ought to do. And it's not enough just to go through the motions.
You can't just go to church, listen to the priest, make your confession, get absolution, and then expect to get to heaven. If you're a sinner, you shouldn't be trying to buy your way out of your sins. It's by properly repenting your sins that you make the progress. And this is all in the Bible. It's all there. So it was very much, it started out as this response to the selling of indulgences.
But then he seemed to, his time, he hand wrote the 95thesis, Pindamta Church door, but his time overlap with the coming of printing and where his words might have had a limited circulation. I mean, he sent, he himself sent a copy of what he was saying to the Pope. He did that himself. But his theseses were taken down and set in print and went viral, you might say, because the printing press was available, his ideas were suddenly being circulated to many more people than would have previously have been possible, and he got for himself an audience.
And to some extent, he, and he was a good writer and he may or it seems apparent that he began to enjoy the fact that he had an audience quite understandably, and he wrote more and more, and he developed his ideas and he became more and more controversial. But and ultimately what he did, he was the midwife of the Reformation.
He, his thinking, his, his reminder to the church inadvertently, he gave birth to the Reformation, so which split his beloved church, you know, gave rise to Protestantism, you know, and the, and everything, everything, all the centuries of strife have come ever after, were triggered by, you know, in the first place by Martin Luther. But it was never, it wasn't his original intention.
He was just trying to remind his church that he loved so well that had fallen from the true path. He was suggesting how to get back onto the true path, and then by the law of unintended consequences, he gave rise to the, to the Reformation and, you know, people like John Calvin were, were inspired to take on his message into, and they were, you know, the further, you know, further splitting and fragmentation of the, of the mother church.
But it wasn't his intention, he didn't, he didn't set out to, to break the church into. So that's a bit of a parallel with Henry VIII then, really, isn't it? Because for all intents and purposes, he remained Catholic and, until his death, but he, he wanted, you know, he wanted his divorce, and he didn't want the Pope in charge.
Paragraph 1:
But I believe that he, he still thought of himself as a Catholic until his death. Yes. And Henry VIII believed until he's, you know, believed until he's dying day that his church of England was the Catholic church in all but name.
Paragraph 2:
Well, I will, you know, the story of Henry, it's so well rehearsed, you know, he was desperate to get access to someone, a woman who could give him a son. And when it became apparent to him that that that wasn't going to be Catherine of Aryan his first wife that he had inherited from his dead big brother, you know, they had, you know, they had Mary. There were other children who didn't survive infancy. And he felt this, probably, the need to move on and get access to somebody else that would give him a, that would give him a child. He believed or it became, it became convenient to him to believe that his, that by marrying his brother's wife, he had committed a sin that that marriage was in and of itself unclean.
Paragraph 3:
And he felt that himself justified or he certainly felt that he had the legal grounds for saying this marriage hasn't been right and being punished. I'm not being given a son because this marriage has been unclean. You know, it's like a signal. This is a signish. I need to move on and marry someone else hence the marriage to Anne Boleyn and everything else that happened to him and the subsequent, and the subsequent wives. But again, he, he wasn't trying, he wasn't, it wasn't his original motivation to create a new church. He wasn't trying to, you know, it wasn't to break with the, with the Catholic church, with the intention of starting a new religion. That was just the, the, the practicalities of creating a situation in which he felt justified in, in moving on with his life and, and marrying other people.
Paragraph 4:
So one event that you discuss in the book is one that we don't have a date for the time when probably in the early 19th century, the human population reached one billion. Why was this important for you to include? I think it was, well, it was, it was a, it was a, it was a moment of such significance.
Paragraph 5:
We are now nearly eight billion people, but it had taken it, it, it, it, and we seem to be adding an extra billion people now every 15 or 20 years, but it took, our species is 200,000 years old. It took until about 1800 until there were a billion of us alive at the same time. So that's a, that's a significant moment. And from, and from that, then it took a considerable time to double it. But then the gap between the, you know, the additions of each additional billion has been getting smaller. You know, we're reproducing and making more people faster and faster.
Paragraph 6:
But that, all of that time when our population on the planet was numbered only in the, only in the millions, you know, it seemed to me significant to mark the point, even though we cannot know the best estimates suggest at some point around 1800, somebody was born somewhere that clicked the odometer, you know, over to one billion for the first time. And it just, it does, it does seem like a moment of great, of great significance.
Paragraph 7:
And it's, it also says something to me about as we get more and more, as there are more and more others. It seems to me, perhaps ironically that, or paradoxically, that it's becoming even more important to pay attention to everyone of us. As we are, as we become, you know, once now that there are eight billion of us, there's a tendency to think that each individual one of us becomes increasingly insignificant, you know, drops of, drops of rain in an ocean.
Paragraph 8:
And I think it's incumbent upon us, it's important to remember the importance, the, the sanctity almost of every single person. And you know, I, I illustrate the, I illustrate the story by, by reference to, Merwin Peake, who was, you know, most people were known for Garmin, Gaston, Titus, Grown, but he was a writer and an artist and he was sent that British newspaper to record the liberation of Nelson concentration camp at the end of the war and the end of the Second World War.
Paragraph 9:
And he was, he was clearly from his writings and his work, he was deeply, deeply, you know, profoundly affected by the Second World War. You know, he wrote, in the rhyme of a flying ball, he imagined a sailor running through the streets of London carrying a baby. And while, while the high explosive rains down all around him and you wrote, you know, a tongue came down and a colored road and a tongue came down and a gel and a tongue came down and a freckled girl. You know, so he's imagining, you know, this, this sailor with her precious life in his arms, you know, because of the importance of every single life, including that baby.
Paragraph 1:
And when he was in Nelson, he saw amongst many horrors, he saw a young girl dying in her hospital bed, a dying of, of consumption. If seeing her an hour before her last week cough into all blackness, I could yet be held by chalk white arms and by the great ash-colored bed and the pillow is hardly creased by the tapping of her little cough jerked head. If such can be a painter's ex to say, her limbs like pipes, her head, a china skull, then where is mercy?
Paragraph 2:
In amongst, in amongst all of the horror, you know, he's paying attention to the individual, you know, that, that, that, that single solitary death was important to notice and that, and that the loss of her was not just to be subsumed by the millions and the tens of millions and the hundreds of millions of people who had died and were dying as a result of the war.
Paragraph 3:
You know, as, as we grow, there's all sorts of predictions about us getting to 10 billion, you know, and then, then some people say that, that 10 billion will be the peak and that then there will be a, there will be a falling away that the numbers will start to reduce. But while the numbers are continuing to grow, it just seems to me that we have to, we have to pay attention to the fact that either, either every one of us matters or none of us matter.
Paragraph 4:
So when it comes to the Second World War and and Hitler, there are so many key moments that you could have picked out. Why did you choose the moment in 1933 when he became Chancellor of Germany?
Paragraph 5:
He had such an impact, of course, the power of that, again, you know, the power of the individual of it, one more than one occasion through the, through the telling of the story, I, I tried to acknowledge that individuals, single people have mattered and have made and have made the difference to people like the Buddha, people like Muhammad, people like Jesus Christ. For obvious reasons that I don't need to explain, have changed the world and have and have altered the destinies of millions and billions of people by their, by their very existence. And on the other side of that coin is an individual like, like Adolf Hitler, who, you know, is the power of his will and the influence that he was able to exert just as one person.
Paragraph 6:
You know, what grew from him as an individual was one of the most, I would say that his, his coming to power was, you know, might have been the one of the most or the most significant event of the 20th century because it's set, it's set humankind on a path. You know, and we're still, we're still dealing with the consequences now, the consequences of his existence.
Paragraph 7:
And when it came to, as opposed, I was never going to be able to do something like the Second World War. How, how do you tell the story of the Second World War? It involves tens of millions of people. It involves the whole world. And so how, how does that person go about taking on board what the significance was of the Second World War and, and for me, it just boiled down to the fact that had had the sequence of events not unfolded that gave Adolf Hitler absolute power in Germany, the world would have been a very different place.
Paragraph 8:
And so that, for me, that moment of him being given, being made Chancellor, just set the destiny for the rest of time, everything that has happened since has been affected directly or indirectly by the fact that that Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany.
Paragraph 9:
Still to come on the History Extra Podcast. By, by focusing in on one person, I was, I was trying to, I was trying to humanize and, and make it conceivable to think about the impact of, of the Second World War, of the dropping of the bomb, by, by telling the story of just one person.
Paragraph 10:
So, you, in the book, you have figures like Hitler, but you also have people that are less known, so when you discuss the bombing of Nagasaki, you focus on the tragic story of Tommy San, a Scottish Japanese man who takes his own life a few days after the bombing. What was it about his story that compelled you to include it?
Paragraph 1:
I, um, I only know about this character, Tommy San, because I, I made a documentary, a number of years ago, it was a set of four, actually, the last explorers, and we were looking at British figures who had, who had been, who had caught the tail end of the great age of exploration around the end of the 1800s, early 1900s.
Paragraph 2:
And so we followed in the footsteps of William Spears Bruce, who was a, a Scottish, Antarctic explorer. Before Shadleton, before Scott, William Spears Bruce was down in that part of the world mapping and, and having his own adventure.
Paragraph 3:
We also followed David Livingston into Africa, you know, he was the, you know, the great Christian explorer who was, who was attempting to open up Africa and, and connect Africa to the, to the wider world. He was trying to do that for the benefit of all Africans, but, but providing the root map into Africa for the European nations, you know, enabled a darker path to, to take shape for Africa.
Paragraph 4:
We also followed John Muir, the, another Scott who was instrumental in, in starting the National Parks program in North America, you know, he's associated with Yosemite and saving the, the, the, the Redwood trees, the giant redwoods. And he's, he's regarded as the father of the National Parks movement in, in America. So he had a huge impact on the, on the, on the development of, of his adoptive country.
Paragraph 5:
But we also followed Thomas Blake Glover, another Scott, and they're all Scott into, he was a, he was working in China for a tea company and he was sent into Japan and he was, he was one of the first European merchants to get into Japan when Japan was going through the painful process of opening up to the world after 200 years of having been deliberately closed off.
Paragraph 6:
Japan closed its borders to everyone for fear that Christianity was going to come in and undermine the power of the Emperor. And so Japan became a closed country for two centuries, but the Americans went in and insisted that, that Japan opened its borders. It was like gunboat diplomacy and all the rest of it. So Japan reluctantly and gradually started to open up to the wider world and Thomas Blake Glover went in and changed everything. It's, it's the most extraordinary story.
Paragraph 7:
He was a, he was a very clever individual, very entrepreneurial, he was very quick off the mark. He could speak Japanese. He was very, he understood the need to build relationships with the people and he, he spoke Japanese. He, he, he had relationships with Japanese women. He, he embedded himself in the culture.
Paragraph 8:
And in the long term, he was, he, he, he, he, he was a gun runner. He earned a, a faction during the great fight between the, those in support of the Shogun and those in favor of the, those in support of the Emperor. He brought industrialization. He was instrumental in bringing the, the steam trains, the steam locomotives and, and the railways into Japan. He, he was part of establishing the company that survived to this day as Mitsubishi. He was part of establishing the brewery that still makes Kirin beer, which is the, one of the top selling beers in Japan. He had this amazing impact and, and along the way, he, he married and he was involved with various Japanese women.
Paragraph 9:
He had a son and he had a daughter. He had his son by, by a woman who was more like a common law wife. She was never really his, his legal wife. He left her behind and, and had an official marriage and official wedding, which gave him a daughter, but he, he went back and he seems to have come to some sort of arrangement with that, with that first woman. And he, he got the son and, and took the, and took the son and, and raised him within his own family with his second wife, with his legal wife. And many people, it's, it's erroneous really as far as we can tell, but a lot of people have him as the model for Lieutenant Colonel Pinkerton of Madam Butterfly because the, the story of him going and, and taking the child away and, and leaving this woman with nothing seems to be murdered in, in Puccini's opera.
Paragraph 10:
And Tommy, Tommy San, is that, is that son? And, and Tommy San was, was a, was a figure who fell between two worlds. He was half Scottish, half Japanese, and one way or another, he never really seemed to find a place in either world. He was, he was regarded as an outsider by both. He came to Scotland, he spent time with his Scottish relatives, didn't fit in there, went back to Japan, and, but because he was, because he was half European, he always felt that he was treated with some suspicion. He lived, he lived long enough to come through the Second World War.
Paragraph 1:
He was in Nagasaki when the, when the bomb dropped, but he survived that, but he could see what was coming. He could see that having been treated with suspicion by his, by his Japanese neighbors for most of his life, he was now going to be treated with suspicion by the occupying Americans and allied forces. And he took his life.
Paragraph 2:
He, he did away with his beloved pet dogs first, and then he hid himself in his home. And, to me, he's just a, he's just a, an emblem of the tragedy, of some of the tragedy of the Second World War, of some of the tragedy of what happened to Japan. And again, by, by focusing in on one person, I was, I was trying to, I was trying to humanize and, and make it conceivable to think about the impact of, of the Second World War, of the dropping of the bomb, by, by telling the story of just one person, and it ends the story of Tommy Sain.
Paragraph 3:
Yeah, it's a really, really fascinating, but tragic story. And the last entry in your book is a poignant one as well. You, you end the book with the death in 2009 of Harry Patch, Britain's last surviving veteran of World War I. Why did you, why did you pick his story to end the book with?
Paragraph 4:
I, I suppose it's just in my wiring that for me, the, the, the First World War is just the most extraordinary story for me, the tragedy of it, the, the impact that it had on, on the civilization, you know, that it was the most shocking event.
Paragraph 5:
It, it bled inevitably into the Second World War, you know, for a lot of people, the First World War and the Second World War together are, are another 30 years war, you know, with, with a break, with a sort of a half time break in between them.
Paragraph 6:
But the First World War just transfixes and fascinates me. It was one of the first historical events that I ever knew about, and it was because both of my grandfathers were there. My mum's dad was, was joined, joined the, joined up, volunteered under age, allied about his age, and was in the, in the armed forces, he was badly wounded, it gallipulate, he was shot by friendly fire, in fact, and he was, he was invalidated out of the army before he was out of his teens, and the injuries that he survived, shot in his life, he died long before I was born, but he did survive, you know, long enough to make my mother, else, you know, would be, wouldn't have in this conversation now.
Paragraph 7:
And my dad's dad was at the psalm and at Passiondale, he fought in Albert on the men in road, he was injured multiple times, but survived, likewise. And from a very young age, I was fascinated by that idea that had their lives taken a slightly different path, I wouldn't be here. My mum's dad was so badly wounded, he was lucky to survive, and my, my dad's dad being wounded again and again, you know, if you've been a bit closer to some of the shells that injured him again, I wouldn't have existed.
Paragraph 8:
And so the First World War, as well as being this world encompassing, world enveloping event, it was personal to me, I felt, I felt directly connected to it, I felt, I felt connected to it from, I felt connected to the First World War for as long as I can remember.
Paragraph 9:
And to me, it's, it's, it's Homeric, you know, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like the Punic Wars or the Peloponnesian War, the First World War is just so, it's unimaginable. If it hadn't really happened, you couldn't make it up to Koenakleshi.
Paragraph 10:
And so I'm profoundly affected by it. And so it, and I believe in my heart that we've never recovered from the First World War, and indeed the Second World War, which, which bled out of it.
Paragraph 11:
I believe that, that, that we're still, I believe that our, our parents, our grandparents were, were damaged profoundly by the, by the First World War. They were altered. And that we are, that we are effectively, the descendants, the generations alive now are like the damaged children of born to damaged parents. And I think that the idea that we're, even although we're, you know, a hundred years and we're beyond the First World War, to think that we're over it, I think is, is, is a hopeless, it's a hopeless mistake to make.
Paragraph 12:
I think we're still living in the aftermath of the First World War. And, and because it had such significance for the world as far as I'm concerned, that it changed everything that we're still dealing with the consequences. And, and it was for that reason that it made sense to me to, you know, to tell the story of the last, Harry Patches is the last fighting tomi.
Other people, other people, they've, outlived them that were, that were involved in the First World War. But he was actually a fighting soldier, you know, a man in the Sheen Gunn, he was wounded, he was, he was on the sharp end of the fighting. And he was, so he was the last fighting tomi. So, and when he died, he broke that living connection that had always been there, that we had among us people who had actually been there and seen the things and smelled the smells and witnessed the horror of it. And with his passing, it's now just hearsay. Everything to do with the First World War is now just history. It's now just the stuff of books and photographs and, and movie reels. We don't have anyone who was, who was really there and, and kind of, for a real testimony.
And because of it's, as I said at the beginning, this is a personal, it's my story of, it's my, at 100 moment, it's the story that makes sense to me. And so it made sense to end with, with the passing, relatively recently of the last living witness, the last Sentinel of the First World War.
So, as you just said, it was, it was your 100 moments and you, you see history as personal. Are there any notable events you think people may be surprised you didn't include?
Oh my goodness. I didn't see that one coming. Oh gosh. I do not, I like to think in my, my vanity. I like to think that although it's 100 moments, but there, there's more, I would say, in each of 100 moments than just the specific moment. I have done my level best to at least touch, however likely, on everything I could think of, of significance chronologically and geographically.
I mean, I know that's a bold claim and people will instantly steam in and say, yeah, but you didn't mention this person and you didn't tell that story, but I can honestly say hand on heart. For me, I've told the story I wanted to tell. People can pick it apart, it doesn't bother me or trouble me.
I can already hear the voices saying, how could you possibly pretend to tell the story of the world and not mention? I'm sure people will say that instantly just on having thumbed through the index or look through the content, but I don't mind. So no, you know, in answer to your question, if I'd felt that there was something there that added to my version of the story of the world, it would be in the book.
So this is probably another hard question, then, as you said, you've written it chronologically rather than ranking them. Could you pick your top five?
所以,正如您所说,您按照时间顺序而非排名编写了这篇文章,那么这可能是另一个难题。你能挑出你前五吗?
I think the story of Theodor Dostoevsky seeing the dead Christ in the tomb, the whole by painting, I think huge resonance and significance, Dostoevsky and also Friedrich Nietzsche in the second half of the 19th century, where independently of one another came to the same conclusion, that because we had, as a civilization in the West, done away with God, that there would be terrible consequences. Whether you're a person of faith or not, they were both predicting that, because we had come from a civilization that was founded upon Judeo-Christian principles, that having taken the sort of sharp acts of scientific reason and having used that edge to, you know, to cut down the old growth forest of the thousands of years that had gone before, that there would be dread consequences. They were predicting the 20th century, the Holocausts and Channel Houses of the First World War and of the Second World War, of the rise of communism and the Soviet Union, you know, life behind iron curtain, the gulags, they saw it all coming.
And so, you know, in answer to your question, I think the existence of those thinkers and their intuition about the consequences that they could see that would be born out of the civilization or the world that they were living in, I think is extraordinary, that they saw that, that an independently of one another, although they were aware of each other, that they saw that coming, is so prophetic and so telling.
So that, and for similar reasons, I'm very much affected by Alexander Solji Nixon and his testimony regarding the gulag archipelago. You know, he was there, he saw that and bore witness to it. And you know, within the gulag archipelago he includes testimony of hundreds of people who, with whom he was in contact, who were there and who witnessed it. And then by extrapolation, that that connects us to the millions of people, the anonymous, unknown millions who either perished in those camps or survived and somehow got out and went on to live the rest of their lives.
So that's, I would say, Solji Nixon and the gulag archipelago. You can see a theme, I'm always affected, I suppose, by the individuals. And so the birth and life of the Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, who is the Buddha, the life of Muhammad, the life of Jesus Christ. I mean, how can you, how can you, you know, discount, how can you imagine a world without the impact made by those individuals?
I studied archaeology at university, but archaeology appeals to me for other, I like, I love history because of the stories.
我在大学学习考古学,但我对考古学的吸引力是因为它包含了很多历史故事,我喜欢、热爱历史。
It's no more than that for me.
对我来说不过如此而已。
I'm just fascinated by the storytelling of history.
我对历史的叙事深感着迷。
I think history is a narrative.
我认为历史是一种叙事。
I think history has to be personal because there is no objective truth about why the past unfolded as it did.
我认为历史必须是个人的,因为关于过去为什么会发展成现在这个样子,没有客观的真相。
Hence, that's why I think it is relevant to produce something as personal as mine, because that's the product of me thinking about the moments in history that seem significant to me.
因此,我认为创作属于我个人的作品是相关的,因为它是我思考历史中重要时刻而产生的产物。
And archaeology, although history had been my thing at school, I barely knew that archaeology existed when I was at school.
虽然在学校历史一直是我的强项,但我在学校时几乎不知道考古学的存在。
We certainly didn't have it as a subject.
我们肯定没有将它作为一门课程。
意思是指我们并没有在学校或其他培训机构中学习这个特定的主题或技能。
And it was only when I was thinking about university that I stumbled across the idea of archaeology and it appealed to me again for the simple reason that it promised the opportunity to touch things, to go to place, not just to read about places and things, but to go to places where things had happened, where people had built a house, had a fire and cooked some food, where people had buried one of their dead.
And the fact that you could go to these places and actually excavate them and then touch that.
而事实是你可以去这些地方进行挖掘,然后触摸它们。
Just the thought of that always puts the hairs up on the back of my neck.
只是想到那件事就让我整个人汗毛倒竖。这个想法总是让我感到非常害怕。
And so in answer to your question, my love of archaeology explains why history appeals to me and the way that it does.
因此,回答你的问题,我对考古学的热爱解释了为什么历史吸引我以及它吸引我的方式。
It's just simple excitement.
这只是简单的兴奋。
I find the idea of the past exciting.
我觉得过去的想法很令人兴奋。
And archaeology, the archaeology that I have been involved with over the years thrills me, because from time to time I've had the opportunity to actually physically touch the past.
我一直从事考古学工作,这个领域让我无比兴奋,因为我有时候真的可以亲手接触到过去的物品。
It's childish.
这很幼稚。
I know it's just a small boy excitement about finding something lost in the grass and picking it up and handling it and wondering who dropped it.
我知道这只是小男孩对找到草丛中丢失物品的兴奋,他把它捡起来并观察它,想知道是谁掉落了它。
That's what archaeology does for me and that excitement leads across into why, for me, it's, I suppose you could say that I've tried to distill the history down into the 100 moments so that each of the moments is a little shiny, a little shiny artifact.
Something that catches my eye in the same way that a little bit of broken stone tool would catch my eye on an excavation and it just focuses my attention.
有些东西可以像我在挖掘中发现一小块破碎的石头工具一样引起我的注意,它可以让我专注于它。
So my final question for you, you've told the story of Britain in 100 places and the world in 100 moments, what's next?
As an archaeologist, it partly explains why some of the moments are in this book and not others.
作为一名考古学家,这部书中包含的场景比其他的一些更为重要,这在一定程度上可以解释原因。
For me, when it comes to being an archaeologist, I was never most excited by finding something or looking for something of great intrinsic value, like a gold coin.
对我来说,当谈到成为考古学家时,我从来没有最为激动的是发现某些具有内在价值的东西,比如金币。
I was always most affected by the slightest trace, you know, a footprint, you know, a human footprint left behind or evidence of a meal cooked 7,000 years ago.
You know, the idea of finding the remains of people cooking a meal thousands of years ago and the images, the pictures that that enables you to build in your head of people coming together to do something so instantly recognizable.
I mean, we can all identify with the idea of gathering together with some people to share some food.
我是说,我们都能理解与一些人聚在一起分享食物的想法。
So, you know, a burnt hazelnut shell, you know, evidence of cooking.
所以,你知道,一个烧焦的榛子壳,是烹饪的证据。
It flakes of stone left behind by somebody putting an edge back on a tool so that they can do something with it sharp on a piece of wood or cut a bit of animal hide to fashion it into a piece of clothing.
I think I'm always drawn to maybe things that might be overlooked, the sort of items that would never get displayed in a museum case because they're not shiny enough or lovely enough.
And so, I suppose when it comes to looking forward, I might be looking at considering some of the things that have been found in the past, the kind of traces that would just otherwise be overlooked, but maybe if you pay a different kind of attention to them, these seemingly insignificant things have stories to tell, and that appeals to me.