Welcome to the History Extra Podcast, fascinating historical conversations from BBC History Magazine and BBC History Revealed.
欢迎来到历史额外播客,这里有来自BBC历史杂志和BBC历史揭示的迷人历史对话。
Headlines have been made recently by proposed changes to the Treasure Act in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, which would see more historical and archaeological artifacts defined as treasure and could help museums to acquire more important items.
Lord Parkinson is a British Conservative member of the House of Lords, who currently serves as parliamentary undersecretary of state for arts and heritage in the UK. He spoke to Matt Elton about the thinking behind the proposals and some of the issues facing heritage in the UK.
So I'm joined today by Lord Parkinson, parliamentary undersecretary of state for arts and heritage to talk through some of the recent developments I suppose in the heritage sector.
今天我很高兴邀请艺术和文化遗产的国会助理大臣帕金森勋爵加入我们,一起探讨近期遗产领域的一些发展。
First of all we should talk about the changes to the Treasure Act here in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and we'll get on to the specifics in a minute. For people who might not have heard what changed and what does it mean?
Well the Treasure Act has been around for just over 25 years, we celebrated its 25th anniversary last year, I love an anniversary as Heritage Minister. And in that time it has saved hundreds of objects for museums and public collections around the country, but the definition is quite specific at the moment of what constitutes treasure.
Items have to be a precious metal and they have to be over 300 years old. And that means that some items like the Roman Helm is that was found in cross-begarit in Cumbria, which are made of other metals fall through the net.
And we want to make sure there's been such an increase in metal detecting, thanks to TV programs and the great coverage that people's discoveries always get. We want to make sure that the items that people find are covered by that definition so that they can be saved for museums and collections around the country.
So we are proposing to change the definition, we've laid it before Parliament and both houses will have the chance to say whether they agree. Our proposal is to bring it down to 200 years to say that items could be made of any type of metal, but also to bring in a new significance test.
So if an item is significant because it sheds particular light on an individual or a particular event from the past, then it could be saved that way. And one of the lovely things about the treasure process is often items end up in museums or collections very close to where they were found, which means that the people that found them can be part of that story and see it proudly on display, inspiring people in their hometowns and villages.
So one of the hopes for this change, this kind of a post change, is that artifacts will end up in museums rather than in private collections, is that right?
所以,这种改变的希望之一,就是文物最终会被展出在博物馆,而不是被私人收藏,是这样吗?
Yes, at the moment, if they don't meet the criteria, then they can be sold on the open market and sometimes private collectors very generously lend items to museums, but there's no automatic process for that happening. If they're defined as treasure, then museums get the opportunity to acquire them. And the people that find them and the landowners are eligible for a reward, so they're compensated for the discovery they've made, but they end up in a museum where they can inspire and educate people for generations to come.
Perhaps you can talk us through some of the reasons behind this proposed change, is it something that people have been calling for? Groups have been calling for?
Yes, we did a consultation on it, and as I say, there have been some cases like the Roman helmet across Bigarrot, I went to go and visit Chelmsford Museum, they've got a wonderful little Roman figure in there, the Burris Britannicus, it's a native, a Britain from the time of the Roman occupation, wearing, well, they describe as an early duffel coat, he's wearing this cloak that's tell you a lot about the weather in the UK at the time, the fashion, the craftsmanship, but also the way that the Romans were taken by us, they obviously wanted to keep warm in the British Isles, but they exported that throughout the Roman Empire.
Now that, again, was made of a base metal, so it didn't counterstretch it, it was luckily saved through another mechanism, the export bar process, so it's ended up on public display, only about two or three miles from where it was found in Essex, but we want to make sure that items like that can definitely be covered so that they can inspire people.
So the hope is by having a more comprehensive definition of what counts as treasure, local communities, and I suppose the nations as a whole, will have a greater understanding of their history through these artifacts.
Absolutely, yeah. I thought, start, I sort of specified that this was only parts of the UK, can you just talk us through which parts it applies to when it goes through and which parts it doesn't and why not?
Yes, this is separate in Scotland, there's a separate law there because the ancient laws of treasure trove are aligned differently in Scotland and predate the Treasure Act. So this is a change for England and Wales, there's also a slightly different process which is rather complicated for Church of England land, but we see we think that the changes here will mean hundreds of items a year being covered by the new definition.
And of course we'll see how the process goes and see whether there's a case for further widening it to other materials in due course, but we want to make sure that the scheme runs well. It's the British Museum and the National Museum Wales help us run the portable antiquity scheme, they do that brilliantly. So we've got to make sure that they in the Treasure valuation committee who work out how much items approximately are worth are able to continue processing the work as they've been brilliantly doing for the past quarter of century.
Under the proposed changes, how will the decision making process work in terms of what gets a label treasure who will be involved in that process? It's a coroner, again, for sort of historic reasons of treasure trove.
So if an item is found, then a coroner determines whether it is a definition, whether it counts as treasure under the definitions, under the Treasure Act, and if it is then museums get first dibs on acquiring it and the Treasure valuation committee meet and they work out the value and how the finder and the land owner on whose land it was found how they can be recompensed for it and then work out how much this needs to be sold at often.
Often the items are only a few hundred pounds so easily acquired by local museums. They can be quite small, the value of the metal can be quite low but the value, the uniqueness of these fascinating items is really beyond financial compare.
And is the funding of these proposals a consideration? How will the money be sorted in terms of how this will work? Well that's for museums to fundraise and through their acquisition budgets and often their private donors and grand making bodies and philanthropic organisations who generously support the acquisition.
And often because of the publicity that items get when they're found it's a great part of the fundraising and the enthusiasm of the local community to make sure that museums are able to keep them.
由于发现的物品经常受到宣传,这是当地社区筹款和热情的重要组成部分,以确保博物馆能够保留它们。
We're talking right at the start of March for people who might not be aware of how this works in terms of the parliamentary process. What has to happen between now and these proposals next step I suppose? Well it's it's secondary legislation so we've laid it before parliament parliament has the opportunity to have a debate on it in both houses if it wants if the houses agree then that becomes law under the Treasure Act.
If parliament wants to tweak it in any way then they've got the opportunity and obviously I'll be at hand in the in the Lords to debate it. If they wish to but I think there's been speaking to people in both houses there's an all party group for archaeology. I've been speaking to colleagues at the the British Museum and some representatives of metal detectorists so I think there's as this follows the consultation that we did we know that there's support for for the change.
I know some people would like us to go even further and cover sort of wooden and terracotta items and so on and where you know we're open to see how that works and see how the act should be extended further in the future but what we want to do is make these small bit important changes about the age the type of metal and the significance test which is probably the most important of the changes and we think that will bring many more items in but allow the process that's been working very well to continue.
So it's sort of sounding out these changes and then potentially making more in the future if it goes well. There was a report early this week that some museums are finding it difficult to be able to store or display the sheer volume of artifacts that they have in their collections.
Do you have any sort of concerns about this adding to that sheer volume? Well yes I mean museums have you know very often what you see on display is only a fraction of their collection and some museums are limited in law from deaccessioning items they have to hold on to them for a future because of course the you know questions of what is interesting change you know the items that you know often sort of put away in the store room but then as we're sort of talking about neglected histories they shed a new light so it's it's important that they are held on to and that curators are able to sort of bring them to the world.
So it's important to sort of bring them out lots of museums of course lend items that aren't on display and that's really important you know it's from you know our big national institutions but small ones as well generously lend them on rotation around the UK and indeed around the world and you know we support that through the insurance to make sure you know items can be transported but you know we talk to museums obviously we have a direct relationship with a handful of museums who are the national institutions who are on to like the bodies for the department and so we talk to them about the storage space that they have but we also have schemes like the museums the states and development fund which the DCMS fund with the Wolfson Foundation which help give grants to museums so that they can look at the the brick and the bricks and water of their buildings make sure that they're able to store things adequately.
But also make sure that their buildings are accessible that everybody can get in and and see them and often sometimes solve that problem of storage that is also display so that you don't have to sort of keep things away from the public eye when you're cataloging them and archiving them and and keeping them for the future.
There's sometimes concern expressed in the archaeology sector that by focusing on the sort of monetary or financial value of these objects it diverts attention away from their archaeological or historical worth what would you say to those concerns yes I mean I so twice now I've had the privilege of going to the launch of the annual treasure report at the British Museum which is wonderful because you meet the people who found these objects and they talk about their incredible pride at being the first human being to set eyes on this for two thousand years and you know it doesn't matter.
You know how much it's worth it just immediately takes you back to well who who dropped this who lost it you know this this item of jewelry this piece of coin this this class that was on somebody's cloak it's you know it immediately conjures up images of how this item you know came to be buried under the ground so it's wonderful meeting the detectors who who found them and seeing their pride at these items going on display so yeah sometimes they're lucky and they're also they have a financial worth but I think people people people are doing it to make money they're doing it for the discovery and the chance of being that you know lucky first human being to hold the item.
One of the sort of more dark sides of archaeology which I think emerged particularly during and after the pandemic lockdowns was nighthawking which is when people sort of illegally often at night time go out with metal detectors and they find and keep objects. Is has that been factored this is that a concern. Yeah well let's say the vast majority of treasure finds are made by metal detectors and the vast majority metal detectorists know what the the law is it's a it's a criminal offense not to report something that is treasure so you know there's a risk to people in floating the law as well as it being the wrong thing to do these these items you know a wonderful and should be shared with the wide audience lots of metal detectorists are part of clubs which is great because that means that you know they're part of a support network of you know explaining how the scheme works understanding the portable antiquity scheme and knowing where to find your local finds liaison officers you can report this and say we're grateful to all the detectors who find things report them and you know then have the pride at the end of the process of seeing one display and of course they should get the credit museums often like to tell the story of how things were found and who buy so it's it's great that there's this in enthusiasm for people to get out there and and help discover the history that's below us all.
I mean as heritage minister do you have a particular favorite heritage site on aspect of history the particular appeals to you well I'm a history graduate so I feel really really lucky to be the heritage minister so wonderful is you know get to jump around the country jump around different eras which is great I'm from the northeast so you know the first historic sites I visited I mean I'm from Whitley Bay so my nearest English heritage site is time mouth priori which is you know wonderful I sort of as a child you know from tobogganing down the moat when it snowed to sort of exploring the monastery and the sort of the the garrison there have been delighted to see seeking Delaval Hall which I've visited as a child that's been you know restored after the terrible you know fire that it suffered you know many years ago and the natural trust have done some great work.
I'm looking forward to going back and seeing the that but it's a real privilege of you know being proud to fly the flag for North and as we celebrated the one thousand nine hundredth anniversary of Hadrian's wall which is you know brilliant you know it's a you know gets so many visitors not just the rule bits of the wall in the county but you know the bits that run through Newcastle city center you can go and visit a Roman temple that's just at the end of a residential street in the west end of Newcastle and that's you know it's incredible this history is around us and and the root of the wall goes goes under petrol stations and and schools and you know this history all around us and I think that that incredible anniversary has been a great opportunity to engage the local community who just live right next to it.
We've talked a bit about funding already in this interview there's been a lot of news in recent years about funding cuts across the whole range of sectors. Does do you think that heritage in Britain is currently underfunded and what what are your funding plans for the coming years I suppose. Obviously during the pandemic we stood by our heritage and cultural venues across the country provided more than one and a half billion pounds of support through the cultural recovery fund because you know so many of the sites depend on ticket sales and visits and the gift shop always exit through the gift shop it's such an important thing and of course suddenly because of COVID that just stopped overnight so the government stepped in to the city.
And the government stepped in to make sure that all those sites were able to continue and welcome people back as soon as that was that was possible and it's been you know I became minister towards the end of the pandemic so I've been and lucky to see how that funding has helped people get back on their feet and but also to see the the changed ways of working. And for a time when people weren't able to visit in person it encouraged people to do more digitally to share things with worldwide audiences and that that sort of hybrid model has has continued and again some of the money that was provided through the cultural recovery funders has helped people invest in in that and that's an important part of sharing our heritage with with with audiences you know some of who may not physically be able to visit sites as easily as others.
And one other strand that's been in the media of recent years is the idea that this relationship between heritage and politics wanted to get your take on whether you think that the heritage sector and heritage organizations have become too politicized recently. I think I'm a history graduates I think it's great that people are debating the past and that is a never ending process you know we the there's no final word on history we should always be re examining and questioning what has come before we should be always asking the question well whose story isn't being heard here what what's the counterpart counterpoint to this argument so I think you know I the sort of the.
There's a very close overlap between history and politics you know history is is you know trying to understand the nature of human relations in different areas and civilizations and sheds important light on current debates so I welcome it I think the important thing is that it's done in a rigorous way a scholarly way museums and galleries and heritage venues should be provoking debate the important thing is that they encourage people to ask the questions and they don't spoon feed them the answers. Let visitors and the people people that come come to see your collections let them make their own minds have given the facts maybe even send them away with more questions in their mind you know encourage them to do some more research to pick up a book to go and Wikipedia to you know to join the debate that's an important part of it it's it's a never ending process.
Some historians have expressed a view in recent years that the government shouldn't necessarily been waiting into the extent that it maybe has into these kind of issues what would what would you say in response to those concerns well you know we don't have an official view of history you know that's not the sort of country we are we live we have a rigorous and open debate I think there's a there's a role for government through things like the the laws on making sure that our national collections are protected I think that is important because it it ensure that we are not going to be a part of the world. Because it ensures that as you know contemporary debates are happening that there is a long term view I think it's important to inject nuance and rigor into the process things are never sort of simple yes or no good and bad and one of the things I tried to do when we've had the debates is is is put that nuance in because that's the job of a historian it's complex there are new easy answers and people just want to know that there's that rigor. That scholarship that nuance in the debate but you know that's that's also coming across very clearly from public historians from museums and galleries who are trying to do the same the same as well so often you know frustratingly the headlines that people see you know covering some of these items make it sound like the debate is being waged in a much more simplistic way than actually it is most of the people engaged in it are here are just trying trying to provoke discussion and inquiry.
And that's that's exactly what they should be doing another subject which is incredibly complex and I suspect need some of the nuance that you just talked about is the easy issue of repatriation what's your view on. Artifact that have been originally taken from other cultures elsewhere in the world and are now in this country in the UK well I think it's you know it has been done case by case often there's a complex story behind it and you know that that provokes lots of questions as it should. We working with the arts council we published some refreshed guidance for museums and galleries and others who are looking at this question and again there is no set outcome I've spoken to lots of curators and museum directors who have talked me through all the possible outcomes sometimes you know you can have a fruitful loan arrangement sometimes you transfer the legal title of an item but they physically stay in your collection but the you know the ownership is transferred sometimes there are a number of different groups of people who have competing claims on items and it's just very difficult to communicate that today so you sort of reach a dead end there and in some cases as they the law says a number of our national institutions are you know prohibited in law from deaccessioning their items but that doesn't stop them lending them as they they generously do to lots of organizations I think the important thing is that wherever you see an item and you know in a sense the question of where you see it matters less than what you take from it.
Because so many of our great institutions are visited by people from around the world because of the ability to share things digitally they can share those with international audiences the important thing is that they tell the full story so it's you know his who made it his who owned it his how it was taken where it was taken from how it got here how it's been looking after since the the many stages of its history down the centuries should all be there for people to engage with and I think that's you know that's as important really as as where physically items are located.
It's a slightly different issue but related I suppose is there any news of when the biotapistry might go on display in the UK well actually I had the pleasure of meeting my French counterpart on a visit to Paris recently and we're obviously preparing for the UK France summit later this month which Prime Minister and President Macron will go to and Lucy Fraser our Secretary of State will go to as well that follows on from the visit that President Macron made to the UK in 2017 when he generously raised the prospect of a loan of the biotapistry west all very keen there are a lot of museums in the UK that are very keen to be part of it it's a very fragile item as you might expect so I think there's some important conservation work that's got to be done.
I was explaining to the French government that you know our conservators and curators and tapestry experts here very happy to help on that while it's going on so that we can. Work out a you know a good time for it to come across the channel and you know it is such a fascinating piece I mean there's some some sort of scholarship that suggests it was made in England rather than in France the you know this sort of this question whether the the arrow that you know some famously there was added in the UK so there's still so much we can learn from it and you know we're keen to see it come to the UK but I think it needs a bit of love and attention before it can.
Finally you're obviously hugely interested in history and although I suspect you don't have the time for this right now if you had to write history book on an aspect of history which which would you choose. Well I have written it's very very niche I wrote a history of the keen Brazilian the debating society as I spent most of my time at university doing debating in student politics and not enough time doing my degree. I graduated I sort of try to make amends for that by writing a history of the Cambridge Union pretty niche area but it was really fascinating because it's a founded in sort of 1815 and it's been a sort of bastion of free speech but sort of at that time of the Napoleonic Wars of sort of really sort of fascinating so climate for undergraduates to be debating contemporary issues.
I for a decade ran the conservative history group which as the name suggests it focused on sort of political history on the the centre right and have been written lots of pieces of articles along the way one on a wonderful political Mavis Tate one of the the early female MPs who was also part of the delegation from parliament to the concentration camps after the second world war there was a cross party cross house delegation sent to go and report on it and the horrific scenes that she saw there at the end of the second world war. Very sadly contributed to her mental breakdown and that and a divorce it seems led her to take her own life just a few years later so it's a really sad story about this incredible pioneering female MP so I've yeah I continue to you know I love you know flicking through the diction of national biography and Wikipedia and thinking of more niche topics to write maybe maybe after after I'm finished in government.
That was Lord Parkinson the current parliamentary undersecretary of state for arts and heritage in the UK. Thanks for listening to the history extra podcast this podcast was produced by Brittany Colley.