Hello, my friends. Today is January 24th, and this is markets weekly. So this past week was a whirlwind in markets, so we have a lot to talk about. However, a lot of the things that happened also did resolve by the end of the week. So today let's talk about two things. First off, let's talk about the ongoing super rally in gold and silver. Silver breaching $100 gold just shy of $5,000. And as we discussed that, we also have to weave in what happened in Davos because I think the two are related. Now the second thing, of course, is what happened in Japan. Last week, earlier on the week, we had a lot of volatility in the Japanese bond market. We had a B.O.J meeting. And most interestingly, on Friday, reports suggest that the Fed verbally intervened into the FX markets and that strengthened the yen. That is to say, put downward pressure on USDJPY.
All right, starting with the precious metals. Now if you look at a chart of silver, it looks like it's gone absolutely parabolic. Now as you guys know, silver is basically the original meme coin before there were meme stocks, before there was crypto, before there was NFTs, there was silver. And retail investors really, really liked buying silver. Over its history, silver often periodically goes into these parabolic surges and then implodes. So it looks like we're in another parabolic surge. So when these happen, you have no idea how high it can go. Whispers of 150, whispers of 300. And honestly, not too long ago, the whispers were for 100. Gold is also, of course, doing very well as well. But then that seems to be a much steadier trend.
Now one of the big drivers of the precious metals rally has to do with geopolitics. Last weekend, we had the prospect of an EU-US trade war. The president had told the European Union that he needed Greenland and if he couldn't get it, he would put tariffs on them. European leaders stood up for themselves and also suggested that they would fight back. Now with this background, we kind of had flashbacks from the Liberation Day trade war last year. Remember, last April was a very volatile time in markets. What happened then, though, was that there was a big sell-off in US assets. So the dollar sold off, equity sold off, and even Treasury sold off, and very unusual combination. And retrospect, when we look at the official data, it becomes clear that there was a big foreign exodus from US assets in April. But the foreigners came right back months later and actually, last year, according to official data that we have so far, was a pretty big year for inflows into US equities.
So the sell-america trade last year was fleeting. But it did come back this past week as prospects of the trade were working up. There was very much a sell-america trade. And so there was a lot of uncertainty as to how this would resolve. Now the president went to Davos met with all the European leaders. On the stage, he gave a speech. He basically reiterated the absolute need for the US to have Greenland. He suggested that the US has always been there for NATO. It doesn't seem like it's NATO may not always be there for the US after all. It doesn't have much military. So maybe these guys should be nice and do a solid and give them Greenland or something like that.
So what did calm the market a lot, though, was the president said that he would not use military force to take Greenland. And for some reason, there was rumors or fear of that could happen. And when the president affirmed that, that seemed to calm the markets down a lot. Later on, there were whispers that there was a framework of a deal. It seemed like everyone climbed down and they would work something out, details to be announced. Now this really reversed the sell-america trade pretty quickly. So it was really, again, just a fleeting moment. During that moment, though, you did have European pension funds, one in Denmark in particular, I believe, go out and tell everyone that they sold all their US treasuries. They held about 100 million, so basically zero.
But they were talking heads that were suggesting that maybe the European Union could put pressure on the US by selling US assets after all. We all know that the president cares very much about the stock market. Looking at the data, it's clear that the Europeans do hold a lot of US assets, among the largest category, is US stocks. Not for the goodness, not of the goodness of their heart or for the benefit of the president, of course, but because US stocks have been a pretty good investment, especially if you want exposure to AI, which the European Union doesn't have very much of. But so far, the sell-america trade happened briefly and well, again. But it's something that seems to be lurking in the background. There is increasingly unease with how the world is changing. From the European leaders, I think, a president legarred of the ECB, memorably told everyone that she would do a SWAT analysis, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, like a good technocrat. This is a wake-up call, a bigger one than we ever had.
And I think that Europe is going to look at its strength, look at its weaknesses, do a big SWAT analysis and decide what do we need to do to be strong by ourselves. But of course, technocrats have been doing a terrible job over there for a long time. So it just kind of shows to me, at least, that a lot of people there just don't fully grasp that the world is changing, but they are beginning to. Now one star that stood out throughout all this turmoil was precious metals. Now even last April, when we had the sell-america trade, everything did poorly, but gold did well. It seemed like there's growing awareness in the markets that when you have risk that emanates from the United States, gold is a good hedge. And there's an interesting work from the BIS. Just last month, suggesting that we may be in a bubble in gold because a lot of the inflows were driven by retail investors, which makes sense to me since gold really is more of a retail investment.
If you are a professional investor, you go to an economist school and they read Ben Graham or something like that and they want cash flow. But I think there's more awareness now that you can have gold as a portfolio diversifier. And if that's the case, a lot of the large investment advantages, big accounts, are going to be under-invested. And so that suggests that there could be further upside in gold. I mean, silver, I think, is something separate. But I think this geopolitical issue and this awareness of greater diversification benefits of gold is a good tailwind. Now at Davos, we also had a very memorable speech by Prime Minister Mark Karni of Canada. It was actually a very well-received speech. And I thought it was very insightful. Basically, Karni is laying out that the world has changed.
That we middle powers, we have to unite. If we're not at the table, we're on the menu, as he memorably said. It was very much not so suddenly hinting that the US is behaving in kind of a hegemonic aggressive way in that everyone else, if we don't stand up together, we're going to be taking advantage of, which is very, I thought, a very clear analysis of what's happening in the political situation. However though, it elicits very poor reactions from the president who called him out. And also today, he is announcing that he's going to put tariffs on Canada if they do a trade deal with China. Now, just as Mark Karni is talking about having a multipolar world, being able to hedge relationships with other people, he also is acting on it by going to China last week. It's including a deal with China, where Canada would sell canola oil to China.
And in return, reduced tariffs they have on Chinese EVs. Currently, it's at 100%. Basically, no Chinese EVs into Canada. That's changing now. There is a quota on this. And there is some domestic politics there on Tariyo, where the car industry in Canada is based, is upset about this. But it does show that Mark Karni really is diversifying his relationships, maybe building more better relationships, not just with like Europe, but with China as well. At the moment, Canada does do the bulk of its trade with the US. So it's very reasonable and sound to diversify those relationships. But that did make the president unhappy. His speech was very obviously targeted in a double fine tone towards the president. And of course, we do have upcoming NAFTA renegotiations.
In summer, I wish looked like it was going to be difficult. Now one other thing that when it comes to geopolitics, we have to keep in mind on is that there is increasingly risk, not just let's say in Latin America, which you saw up in Venezuela, but there's increasing reports that there are military assets being moved to the Middle East. And that looks like it's going to be something that is going to keep a bit on gold as if there is war in the Middle East. If the US does decide to strike Iran as is periodically reported in big publications, that's going to be a major toe in for gold.
But looking at more traditional metrics, one other thing that happened last week, of course, was just as the South America trade last year unwound with the Treasury being bid again and equities rallying again, last year though, the dollar did not really recover its big sell off and had a pretty bad year last year. This week something similar happened. The dollar also didn't have a good week if you look at the dollar index, notable decline. And of course, weaker dollar gives upward till and to gold.
Now dollar has been declining against many currencies, but one currency is has not been declining against is the Japanese yen until, of course, this Friday. So secondly, let's talk about what happened in Japan the past week. So Japan just for context is in a very interesting situation. So inflation, it looks like it's around two between two and three percent. So it's definitely at the BOJ's target. But on the other hand, the BOJ has kept interest rates very low. Even, so it's projected to continue to high grades, but right now it's 0.75% on its policy rate. It's a lot lower than say two and a half percent inflation. At the same time, it's running what many people perceive to be more stimulative fiscal policy.
Now, the data suggests that the fiscal position of Japan is improving, but prime minister Takaiichi over there called snap elections is trying to get a bigger majority in a legislator. And I think it's widely perceived that if she were to get more legislative power, she would try to run a more stimulative policy and potentially also have a little bit more say in how monetary policy is conducted. So you have the very much the prospect of some degree of fiscal dominance and also at a time where it doesn't seem like the economy needs that.
And so you have Japanese bonnutes consistently rising. Now to be clear, bonnutes in Japan have been very low. And so for them to adjust to this two, three percent inflation regime plus the prospect that this may continue plus that B.O.J may continue to hike as the market projects is totally reasonable. But it is becoming a little bit disorderly. In the long end of the Japanese bonn, you had a huge, huge upward surge earlier in the week. And that probably played a role in impacting US assets as well as US trajectories as well.
Now when you further out into the curve, it's going to be less liquid. And so some kind of hiccup is to be expected. And so towards the end of the week, we did see some of that retrace at the B.O.J meeting, the B.O.J officials also suggest that working with the fiscal authorities there to try to maybe do something. So it seems like they're aware of this. But it doesn't seem like it's something that is kind of like a total panic. It really seems to me at least so far that it's the rate market adjusting from decades and decades of disinflation to basically return to more of a normal two to three percent inflation and potentially more as a population ages.
Now the flip side, of course, with the B.O.J. keeping interest rates low is that it also has been very negative for the currency. If you look at a chart for USDJPY, you can see that even as the United States dollar depreciated against many other currencies, it continues to appreciate against the yen with the yen surging to around 160 yen to the dollar. Now this has historically been a time where it's been a red line where JAPY's authorities intervene. Part of it is because when you have very weak yen, that becomes a problem for inflation in Japan, especially as they import a lot of stuff like crude oil.
So inflation politically unpopular, the government does something. This time around though, it seems like this was also a red line, but also note that at the moment with energy prices so low, analysts are thinking that this inflationary flow through from weak currencies is not going to be as strong simply because oil is just around $60. The B.O.J. did reportedly seem to intervene. What we saw in the JN market on Friday was that a discrete kind of appreciation in the USDJPY go lower, but then that was just a little bit.
What really seemed to kick in the buying in the end, selling a USDJPY was murmurs that there was a rate check by the New York Fed on Friday. What that is is that New York Fed, which is where the trading desk of the Fed is sits, was calling dealers. When the Federal Reserve interacts with markets, they do it through the primary dealers. They're asking about where the end is trading and so forth. That seemed to tip off to the market that maybe the Fed would intervene into the currency markets since that's what you would do. You would see where the market is trading first.
Now the Fed does not have jurisdiction over currency policy. This is going to be on behalf of the Treasury. What it is, it's seeming like Secretary Besend or whoever over there has had enough of this Yen weakness in doing something about it. They could be doing this in coordination with the Japanese authorities. Maybe the Japanese authorities are thinking that our intervention really hasn't been super effective. After all, we only have so many foreign reserves.
If we have the US step in, the US has basically a dollar printing press that they can continue to sell dollars in buy Yen, that is to say, strengthen the Yen. Maybe that would be more authoritative. In any case, this was very effective and just the New York Fed. On behalf of the Treasury, just making some phone calls really had a big impact on the market. It's telling everyone that it's not just the Japanese authorities are drawing this 160 USDJPY as a line in the sound, but the US Treasury is on board as well.
I think historically speaking, this sudden strengthening of the Yen has been risk negative. It's interesting to see what happens when markets open on Sunday in the global. It doesn't necessarily mean there's going to be a carried trade blow up. Maybe people don't have heavy positions in that. There are going to be people who are conditioned, maybe algorithms and so forth, to say that a strong Yen is going to be risk off. I think that's going to be interesting to see how that happens.
One other thing, of course, is to note that the BOJ did in their meeting last week, revise up their inflation forecast. The market. Again, continue with, continue to think the BOJ would continue to hike. That should strengthen the Yen, but I think the problem is that they're approaching it too slowly. Inflation is 2-3%. Policy rate is 0.75. They are, by many metrics, still pretty easy. That's all prepared for this week.
This coming week, I believe, is a Fed meeting. I'll be back to talk to you about what I think happened at the Fed. It doesn't look like it's going to be much happening, very, very boring. My guess. An interesting development in the Fed chair races that now Rick Ryder of BlackRock is now favored to be Fed chair. There were some positive comments that were whispered about him over the past week. So we'll see how that happens.
He has an interesting view on Montreux policy. There are tweets that suggest he shares kind of an MMT view. So maybe I'll write about that this week. All right. Talk to you all soon.