Hello, my friends. Today is January 3rd, 2026. I want to wish everyone a happy new year. Now, before we begin, I want to bring to your attention that I've noticed that some of you are not receiving weekly updates from my blog posts. I've looked into this and discovered that this is a technical problem. And hopefully I will have this resolved by Monday. But remember, you can always access my posts on my website. And of course, whenever I have a new post, I will tweet about it on Twitter.
Okay, so this week, I actually had initially planned to make it a geopolitical episode since we had so many big things happening in the world of geopolitics the past week. Little did I know what we would have this huge, huge event that happened this morning where it seems like President Trump has successfully taken out President Maduro of Venezuela. So this is definitely an earthquake in the world of geopolitics. So we got to talk about what happened and what it all means for the economy and for markets.
And also we have to talk a little bit about silver as well. So silver totally imploded in the beginning of the week. There are some concrete causes for that, although it did recover a little bit more. So first though, let's talk about what happened in the world of geopolitics. So I think there are four theaters in the world. And in each geopolitical theater, we had some pretty big developments from the Far East to Latin America, to Europe, to the Middle East, starting with the Far East.
So earlier in the week, last week, we had China make pretty big military exercises all around Taiwan. And what they seem to be projecting is that they could easily block it Taiwan. And if they were to block it Taiwan, again Taiwan is an island. So it's not self-sufficient in many things like oil. The Taiwanese economy would easily crumble and it would be the end of that pretty quickly. Now the broader context of course is that not too long ago, you had Prime Minister the Kachi of Japan make supportive statements for Taiwan that really angered the Chinese.
And you know, President Trump actually seemed to reportedly intervene to it, maybe just slightly suggest the Japanese Prime Minister to maybe moderate her stance a little bit. Although by all reports, Japan still stands in support of Taiwan in case of potential military conflict. For context here, Taiwan was once a Japanese colony. Many people in Taiwan remember that period positively and look upon Japan in a very positive light.
But of course, if you recall from the United States' most recent national security strategy, the US is basically viewing the world as multipolar where every country has your sphere of influence very clearly. The United States will have a Trump corollary to the monologue doctrine Latin America, North America will be under the United States. And you know, I think the implication of course is that the far east, at least when it comes to Taiwan, will be under China and maybe Russia will have Ukraine.
Now moving on to Eastern Europe earlier in the week, Russia loudly complained that Ukraine would actually launch a very mass scale assassination attempt on President Putin. Apparently there was a large fleet of Ukrainian drones launched and Russia ledges of these drones were targeted towards where where President Putin was and it was an assassination attempt Putin actually complained to Trump, which then complained to President Zelensky.
Now the US seems that reports suggest have determined that this actually was not an assassination attempt that maybe they were targeting other military installations in Russia. But at the end of the day, if Russia is claiming this and perceiving this, then again, that is an escalation in the Russia-Ukrain war and suggests that peace talks are not going well and maybe it could serve as a pretext for further military escalation by the Russians.
Moving on to the Middle East, also another very interesting development. Now you had Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel basically just fly down to Mar-a-Lago, hang out with the President the fifth time he's done this this year. That's kind of a record. And what usually happens of course is that after these discussions, you have some kind of geopolitical escalation.
Now to no secret what Prime Minister Netanyahu would like is to have more military action on Iran, but of course they can't do that without the support of the United States. Last time they attacked Iran, Iran retaliated with missiles and a lot of those missiles were intercepted by US support. And so they really need the US to protect them to be able to attack Iran.
Now reporting suggests that right now what Netanyahu was saying is that, you know, Iran, they have these ballistic missiles, they can attack Israel, they are threat to us, we got to go and take out that capability. Now notice now that the goal posts are moving. Initially, Iran could never have nuclear weapons. And so we need to take that out and you know, President Trump went and bombed the nuclear facilities in Iran. Now the standard is being lowered. It's not that Iran can't have nuclear weapons is that they can't have ballistic missiles. And if the President agrees without lower standard, then yes, that he's green lighting more military attacks in the Middle East.
But of course, the most interesting geopolitical action we have is in Latin America. Remember, not too long ago, the Trump administration told the entire world that Latin America belonged to us. So we are going to call the shots here. Now, earlier in the week, the President surprised the world by revealing that the CIA actually carried covert operations on Venezuela and soil. Now, everyone knew that the US had a navy presence right outside of Venezuela that they had been blowing at Venezuelan boats. But until earlier in the week, they had not done anything on Venezuelan soil.
So that was a very clear escalation. CIA bombing facilities in Venezuelan ports. This morning, it was revealed that around 2 a.m., US forces basically flew in to where President Maduro, Venezuela, was staying, basically kidnapped him and his wife, put him on a ship. The US has Eugeema. And that ship is now on route to New York, where President Maduro will face the US courts. Now, throughout this operation, it was only a few hours. There were reportedly zero US casualties when the US helicopter was hit, but that US helicopter continued to fly when it was able to return to its ships. So this was an amazingly precise attack and amazingly successful.
Now, by orchestrating this, it all by guarantees that the Major regime has collapsed and that there will be regime change in Venezuela. So this is definitely not in line with the America first ethos that President Trump often campaigned on, where the US would not intervene in farm wars, nation building, and all that. But it does fall under the Trump corollary of having more power over the Latin America. Now, why does Trump do this? I think some context is helpful here. So, Venezuela, if you look on a map, is actually pretty large country. It's in South America. The land mass is about, say, 20, 30 percent larger than Texas and has a population of about 30 million about the same population as the state of Texas.
Venezuela, of course, is most known for having a lot of oil. According to studies, it has the largest oil-reproven oil reserves in the entire world. So, it has the potential to be an oil superpower. However, if you look at its output data over the past decade, you notice that Venezuela is actually outputting much less oil today than it did a decade ago. So, that decline in oil output largely has to do with just the tremendous, tremendous, mismanagement of the Venezuelan economy. If you look at a chart of Venezuela and GDP, a decade ago, things were actually going really well.
Now, oil prices were going up. Venezuela was pumping a lot of oil and the country, the people were getting much wealthier. Now, that all ran into problems when the oil price of oil collapsed, and then you had new change in regime and more left-wing regime came to power in Krakis. And they did not do a very good job. And what you see is the complete implosion of the Venezuelan economy. According to the United Nations, about 20 percent of Venezuelans actually fled the country. Now, that's like seven million people. Varo videos at the time would show that many Venezuelans were basically starving. You can see them throwing rocks at cows trying to kill the cow to eat them. It was very much a humanitarian disaster.
Now, you have Benio-Soyle and refugees fled the entire world. You have Venezuelan refugees in Chile, in Colombia, Mexico, and of course, in the United States. This was a tremendous, tremendous capacity. You had a country that was doing on the upswing just, just totally destroyed. And of course, the people, Venezuelans did not like that. And ideally, there would be a mechanism for the people to change course, to have a new government course that was naturally through the ballot box. Now, Venezuela did recently, a few years ago, have an election by all counts. President Maduro lost that election in a big way for obvious reasons.
But he just decided that he didn't want to leave. And so basically became a de facto dictator of Venezuela. So this is a guy who did a terrible job, ruined the lives of millions of people, ruined his country. And it's just not very popular. However, though, and of course, he's not friends with the Trump administration, he's friends with Russia, Iran, and China, basically, friends with people who are not with Trump, Team USA. So it seems like the motivation for this move is twofold. One, of course, is to strengthen US influence in Latin America. And secondly, of course, is for oil.
Now, in his press conference after his president is totally blunt. It's not like President Bush going into Iraq and then not so much telling you about the oil, although a lot of US companies having big oil contracts. It's not the US president is telling you today. President Trump is telling me today that Venezuela has lots of oil. And the US is going to have control over it. And it's this operation in Venezuela is not going to cost taxpayer money because the US is going to get paid through oil. So it's very open about it. The US would like to have more control over Venezuelan resources.
Now a coup attempt has always been telegraphed. Again, you had that military flotilla outside of Venezuela. You also had the US intelligence operations smuggle out Venezuela's opposition leader at Machado smuggled her out into Sweden, where she could get her Nobel Peace Prize, have more international legitimacy. But I think the US has basically changed its mind on that. She was probably a plan B, your plan A, a plan C, or something like that. But maybe looking at how successful the operation was today, the president very openly told everyone that actually the US will run Venezuela. We don't want to be involved with having somebody else get in and we have the same situation that we had for the last long period of years.
So we are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition. Eventually Trump is saying that he will give Venezuela back. But this could be years or decades no one knows when. So it looks like overnight it's not just it was regime change in Venezuela, but the US has a new territory. It will be run by, you know, who knows? A new governor, new prime minister, protector of Venezuela. I'm not sure. But for the foreseeable future, Venezuela will be under US control and eventually it looks like there's going to be more investment into Venezuela and there's going to be more oil flowing out.
So this is a big, big, big geopolitical move and it has some winners and losers. The clear winners, of course, are the US oil companies. They're going to be able to go in and operate on those resources. Shavon was already there. It looks like other people are going to come in as well. So that's very good for the US oil industry. It's going to be very good for inflation and the global consumer. If you have Venezuela there with all this oil, but just kind of not having the infrastructure to be able to extract it, now the supply of oil is going to go up. That's going to be down pressure on oil prices.
Not immediately, of course, it's going to take time to be able to have the facility set up. But you know, in a few years, you can easily see the supply of oil go up, oil prices go down. So this is good for again, the war on inflation. If you remember in January of 2025, Trump actually openly said that his plan to get inflation lower is to get more oil and you have opic pump oil. You have oil prices down a lot and now it looks like this is maybe another part of that. You do have clear losers as well. Now, of course, aside from President Maduro who is now it seems on a ship. You know, it seems like if you look at a chart where Venezuela was selling its oil, a lot of what's going to China.
Now Venezuela was a staunch ally of China, Russia, and Iran. And so now that team is losing a big ally. Now China is still going to be able to get oil from Venezuela. Now the president was very clear that we're going to pump more oil and we're going to sell it to everyone. So China is still going to get more oil, but they probably won't get it at the same discounted price. Venezuela and oil was sanctioned. They really couldn't go to the global market. And so they had to sell it at a discount to other people.
Similar to what Russia does, right? Russia oil was sanctioned. They sell it at a discount to other countries. And so China was getting discounted oil. Now they're not getting discounted oil anymore. China was friends of Venezuela. In fact, reports suggest that they had a Chinese delegation being sent to Venezuela just in a few hours before the operation. Now it looks like they've lost a key ally in Latin America. This of course could also point to trouble for allies of President Maduro, say Cuba, for example, longtime thorn in the side of the US. It doesn't have any oil, but not friends with the US. And of course, Secretary of State Marco Rubio is of Cuban descent. And of course, the Cuban community in the US really doesn't like what's happening in Cuba.
And so I think huge should be a little bit worried. If you are Iran, you could probably upset as well. You're losing another ally. But it also tells you very clearly that the President is a man of action. He says many things, but he also has done many things as well. Many things other presidents will not have done, right? Directly strike Iran, bombs, huge, huge clamp down on illegal immigration everywhere in the country. Of course strikes on Venezuela. But he's also said other things that he hasn't done yet.
So let's say that you are the prime minister of Denmark, who of course controls the Greenland. The President has said that Greenland is very, very important to us from a national security standpoint. So does that increase the probability that maybe one day Greenland will have to change hands as well? Of course, the President also made comments about Canada. And we don't know what will happen there. One thing to note though is that strategically speaking, the oil that Venezuela pumps is heavy crude. That's the same stuff that Canada pumps to as well. And right now, Canada has one captain consumer, the United States and the United States is relying upon Canadian heavy crude as well.
That's what the refiners are optimized for. If you have another source of heavy crude come online from Venezuela, that really, really decreases the bargaining power that Canadian oil companies have. And of course, that is a big problem from a geostrategic way for Canada and maybe why Prime Minister Mark Carney is eager to greenlight another pipeline so that they have other outlets for Canadian oil. So one of the things, of course, you have to think about is that what other thing has Trump kind of obsessed about over and over again, that's lower interest rates.
And as I wrote last week, my blog, the market is really not pricing in that Trump will get his way. The market really doesn't seem to think that, you know, prices interest rates the same way they did months ago. So they don't really place probability on President Trump actually getting his way and able to lower interest rates even though the President has done a lot of really obvious moves to try to do that. So I think that continues to be a significant mispricing of the market. So President has a track record of acting on things that he cares a lot about.
So markets will be exciting this next week, guessing that, you know, since it was so effortless, maybe not even that big of an impact. But, you know, if you have oil prices in the future, maybe that's a little bit downward pressure on inflation. Okay, the second thing that I want to talk about, of course, is silver. Now, last week we talked about how silver was actually surging. It was up 10% a week last Friday. When you do something like that, it looks like an obvious, obvious blowoff top.
And earlier in the week, we did see silver totally, totally implode that there are two concrete drivers of this. One, of course, is that actually one concrete driver of this and another thing we'll talk about. And that is, of course, higher margins from the CME. So professional speculators in silver usually trade through futures. And when you trade through silver futures, you're operating on and regulated exchange. Your counterparty is the exchange.
So a standard future contract for silver gives you control over 5,000 ounces of silver. So that's, you know, about 30, 350,000 dollars worth of silver. Now, in order to have control over super contract, you have to put up a little bit of margin with the exchange. The reason for this is that the exchange wants to make sure that you have money to pay in case the contract goes against you. So let's say that you bought one super contract. And then suddenly the price declines.
How does the exchange know that you are able to you're able to pay the exchange in the case in case that, you know, you continue to lose money or you're under water in your contract? So the exchange collects a little bit of margin just to make sure that you don't default. Now, the amount of margin the exchange has to collect is in proportion to the size of the market value of the contract and also to the volatility of the contract. As silver prices went from say 50 to 75 dollars in a very volatile way, you know, there you need to put down more margin because from an exchange standpoint, there's a higher probability that you could have big, big volatile moves suddenly leaving the exchange exposed to counterparty risk. That is to say you could default if silver would do suddenly implode. So exchange very naturally raises margins.
And what that means is that you have to put up more money to be able to have control over a super contract. Now, if you look at the margin hikes, it looks like it went from, you know, 20 some thousand to 30 some thousand dollars. When you raise the margin, some people say you're a DJN who has been levered up with silver futures, we'll have to put up more money to be able to maintain their position. Sometimes they don't have that much money. And so when that happens, they get liquidated. And when they get liquidated, you know, the price of the contract goes down, maybe that also compels other people to get liquidated as well.
So ultimately, it's kind of a mechanical thing where you have basically a liquidity squeeze where the really, really big DJNs are squeezed out. And this happens a lot if you look at any type of speculation in the 1980s when you have the Hunts brothers squeezing silver to dizzying heights. The exchanges also continue to raise their margin. Again, this is not necessarily some sort of conspiracy or anything like that. It's just totally mechanical. The exchange, you know, is dealing with a more volatile commodity. It's trying to protect itself from defaults. And so it obviously has to raise margins.
There's nothing nefarious about it. Sometimes there is back in the 1980s, they tried to, they changed the role so that you could not buy silver. You could only sell. And so of course, that's putting, I put a lot of downer pressure on silver prices and did ultimately precipitate a huge implosion. They're not doing that today. So far, by accounts, it's just normal functioning of how an exchange works. And obviously, when you have an exchange hiking margins, that's going to put down a pressure on the prices. How much is going to depend on how levered it was. And obviously, if you're going up 10% a day, that's a lot of leverage.
And so you also imploded 10% a day. The second big news came out of China. And that China is going to exercise more control over how it exports silver. Now, China has already been doing this with all sorts of commodities. Remember, they have their, you know, control over their earth and so forth. Now it seems like they're extending this export control regime to silver. I don't think this should be a surprise because China is the largest manufacturer power in the world. And silver, it's not just for speculation. It's also a key industrial input.
And so if you have all these speculators in the West kind of making silver prices really high, that has a real impact on the Chinese economy, Chinese businesses and so forth. And makes, it makes the things like solar panels more expensive. And so if there is a potential shortage or some kind of weird speculation, of course, the Chinese are going to be a bit more careful since this is maybe even a national security issue. Now, China is the second largest miner of silver. The largest is Mexico. So when they put on these export controls on silver, so what that means is that in order to sell export silver, you're going to have to have a license from the Chinese authorities.
They're going to have more control for this. What that means is very clearly that outside of China, maybe the supply of silver is going to be a little bit less because the Chinese export of silver is going to be more controlled. Now, the immediate impact of this should be to have a wedge in silver prices. Where Chinese silver prices are going to be a little bit lower and global prices are a little bit higher since you have less Chinese supply. So this is a bullish development for silver prices, but was not able to overcome, of course, the implosion you have from higher margin rates.
Now, there is always a question whether or not the US or maybe other countries will also declare silver to be a commodity of national importance and then also put on their own bear. So that's something to watch out as well. So if you look at silver prices, they classically follow this formation with a surge to a comically high levels and then just implode. There is a possibility that this is what's happening right now. We could just totally implode, but my gut says that, and I hate saying this, that maybe there's something but different this time.
And so I personally think that the highs for silver are not yet in for the year, although when you have all this technical damage, you do usually need to digest a while. Not necessarily a long time. Remember, when gold had that big blow off, it came down a little bit, steady, steady, and then just recently in being new all-time highs. All right, so that's all I prepared for today. Again, this is just year one in the Trump administration. We have three more years. Maybe the map, the global map in a few years will be different than the one today. All right, talk to you guys next week.