Hello, my friends. Today is December 20th, and this is markets weekly. Now, this week markets were very choppy. Didn't really seem like much is going on. And that's centrally that many, including myself, have been expecting just isn't there, at least not yet. Now, we only have a couple weeks left in the year. The S&P 500 is about a couple percent away from 7,000. Let's see if it can get there. Now, I was thinking that this week would be about markets outlook. But actually, this past week was a full trading week. And so we'll do that next week when it's going to be a short and holiday trading week.
So today, let's talk about two things. First off, we have to talk about the massive data down we got the past week. We got sales, we got employment, we got inflation. It really was a lot of data. And secondly, let's talk about what's happening over in Japan or the Bank of Japan. Hiked rates again to 0.75%. And at the moment, it doesn't seem like that's impacting markets too much. So first, starting with the data. So again, everyone has been waiting for the data.
We had a government shutdown that lasted a long time. And so a lot of market participants have been basically flying blind. Now, the Fed would tell you that they have not been flying blind because they have all sorts of data collection capacities, which is true. But still, these government official data releases are very influential. Now, this past week, we got two of the most important ones. Of course, the jobs data and the CPI. Now, starting with the jobs data, well, honestly, we got jobs data for November and October. And it was kind of a mixed bag. On surface, you can see that in October, there was a huge loss in jobs, over 100,000. And maybe that's why that was not released initially.
And in November, you had kind of a bounce back where we had a decent job growth. But you average it two months, of course, it doesn't look that great. Now, looking at other measures in the jobs market report, you can see that the unemployment rate actually ticked up to 4.6%. That's higher than the Fed's median forecast of 4.5%. To be fair, it was a pretty weak 4.6%. It was like 4.55 something and it rounded 4.6. The reason for that increase in the unemployment rate seems to be in part in that the labor force participation rate is increasing.
That means more people are re-entering the job market and looking for a job that increase in supply. Obviously, it's going to make the unemployment rate look a little bit worse. Although wage data, of course, has been decelerating for the past few months. So, again, when you have these supply and demand dynamics between changes in immigration and so forth, it's hard to look at quantities. We can always look at price and the price, which is wages is very clearly decelerating. So on the surface, though, it is a weaker report, especially because of the 4.6%.
At IBM, both in the US and globally, we have the lowest voluntary attrition in 30 years. To me, that's a pretty clear statement about people are not looking to change jobs and the numbers in the US are stock. We often run about 7% voluntary, putting retirement and force to the side. It's under two. Now, Bloomberg has a very useful analysis. When they look at it, they're noting that when you focus on private sector job growth, it is actually on a three month moving average basis, it's actually trending higher.
A lot of the decline in headline jobs has to do with the loss in government jobs. Remember, earlier in the year, Elon, with his DOJ initiative, offered a basically a buyout to government employees that if they would resign, they could get a lot of benefits. It looks like about 100,000 people took that. As those people fell off the payrolls, and the DOJ agreement was that they didn't have to show up in the office, and they could continue to be employed and collect salary, but they would eventually fall off the payroll in October.
That big negative jobs number in October is in large part because the people who took the DOJ offer finally fell off the payrolls. When you exclude that, focusing more on private sector job growth, which I think many people think is a better indicator of the health of the economy. It seemed to have bottomed a few months ago and has been trending higher. Now, President Trump has a very memorable tweet where he says that he could actually get the unemployment rate all the way down to 2%, just by hiring a whole bunch of people through the federal government.
But again, people perceive government hiring to be not as indicative of the health of the economy and probably not as productive either. So there are reasons to think that maybe the labor market could be turning a corner, seeing that private job growth is gradually picking up again.
Now, moving on to inflation data, well, the CPI kind of shocked everyone. The market was expecting about a 3% CPI ended up something like a 2.7 and the core was low as well. That was very, very surprising to many people. Looking in the details, it becomes a bit clearer why it was surprising. If you look at the BLS's CPI data, you can see in this table here that there were a lot of blanks.
Now, the government shutdown impacted data collection for CPI, just like it impacted data collection for the non-farm's payrolls. And so there was a lot of blanks here. And when they started collecting again in November, the thinking was that some of the prices in November were a bit lower than they would, getting that that is a holiday season where you usually see big discounts.
And there's also commentary about some of the assumptions made by BLS such as regarding rents that seemed to be a bit lower than what many people would expect. And so this CPI data seems to be basically not very reliable. And so I think the market seems to dismiss it.
Now, there's also a line of thinking that, you know, are they really, is this real? Are they cooking the books? Now, recall, not too long ago, there was bad data. And the BLS commissioner was fired by the president. And the appointment has not yet been made to replace that person.
And also the night before the CPI announcement, I think it's worth noting that the president actually had an official address to the public. And in that address, aside from giving $17.76 to military personnel as a bonus, there were also a few slides highlighting concern about affordability and inflation, showing that the White House understands that this is becoming a very, very big political issue and is shifting gears to try to address it.
So is one of the ways to address this having assumptions such that we'll get you a lower CPI? I have no idea. I guess we'll find out in the next CPI print, which of course would not be tainted by the government shutdown. And let's see if it is more in line with what private forecasters anticipate.
Now, in addition to these two big data releases, we also got retail sales, again, a good measure of the health of the economy. Now retail sales, if you look at it excluding auto, so looking at the control group, it was actually pretty strong. And it looks like it has been accelerating. Again, retail sales is nominal, so some of that could be inflation as well.
Now, when you take a step back and look at all these data prints, now on the face, you would think that this would be suggestive of easier monetary policy, right? You have the unemployment rate taking up and you have CPI coming down. But there was some volatility, but overall, it doesn't seem to market change too much.
It's expectations of it policy. And we had a Fed official, John Williams come out on Friday and basically dismissed the data prints, noting that there's all these weird things happening because of the government shutdown, and he's totally correct about that. He seemed to suggest that, according to his calculations, the unemployment did tick up a bit, but it's probably at 4.5%, not 4.6, and CPI is probably a 10th or too low.
So, still improving, but not by the massive amount suggested by the print. So on the headline, though, there were some special factors, some technical factors. They're really are related to the fact that they weren't able to collect data in October, and not in the first half of November.
And because of that, I think the data were distorted in some of the categories, and that pushed down the CPI reading, probably by a 10th or so. It's hard to say now. Again, it looks like nothing's happening too much on that front.
On a related front, it looks like there's more a political drama about the next potential Fed head. Looking at Koushi, you can see the odds of Kevin Hasset, who seemed like a lock, not too long ago, has fallen. Still, the favorite, but you see other people like Kevin Walsh, and Governor Waller taking higher in the odds.
From what I hear, it seems like there is a group that is posing Kevin Hasset, and they're trying to make their case to the president. My impression is that group includes Secretary Besset. So that's sizeable opposition. Of course, the president likes Hasset, has worked with him for many times, and he's still the favorite.
But you do have these other people coming up and being interviewed. So it's no longer a lock, as it used to be. I continue to think that Kevin Walsh would be a very strange pick since he is basically a lifelong hawk. We'll see how that plays out.
Announcement for Fed Chair should come they say in early January, but again, they have been known to change their minds. Now, the second thing I want to talk about is what's happening in Japan. Since that is going to eventually have a pretty big impact on markets. Now, if you look at the 10-year Japanese JGB, you notice that it's was sliding for many decades, and now it's basically surging higher, it has highest 2% highest it's been for many decades. And the reason for this is obvious, the Bank of Japan is hiking rates. Now, last week, the hike to 0.75% still sounds really low, but it's the highest it's been for a really long time. The rationale for hikes, of course, it is obvious. Inflation in Japan is pretty high. If you look at their inflation numbers, inflation in Japan is actually higher than it is in the United States. It's around 3%. So they have a 3% inflation 10 years at 2%, and a policy rate is at 0.75%. Obviously much lower than inflation. So policy continues to be very easy there.
In contrast, in the US, policy rate is about 3.5% inflation is a bit below 3%. Now, the Bank of Japan, I really like how they communicate. They understand that they have many people watching the Bank of Japan who don't speak Japanese very well. So they always have these very helpful presentations in English. And in this one page slide, they tell you very clearly that they are hiking rates because, well, a lot of the geopolitical uncertainty has been dampened. Liberation day is a distant memory and it seems like they worked out their trade problems with the US. And wages are accelerating and inflation is high, but notably, they highlight that real interest rates remain very, very low and they are still in easing mode. So even though they're hiking, they're not becoming restrictive. They're just being coming a little bit less easy, which is obvious. You have 3% inflation and yet your policy rate is still below 1%.
And I think that is why you see this reaction where you actually see the gain weakening significantly against the dollar rather than strengthening. Japan, Bank of Japan is hiking, but still not hiking enough. And so monetary policy continues to be very easy. You have to currency depreciate rating. Now, there's a lot of speculation about how this would eventually impact global markets. On the one hand, you could say that as Japanese yields rise, maybe that drags up global yields definitely has an impact. And that could negatively impact, let's say, US equities. On the other hand, you can also say that as the yen is up as interest rates go higher, maybe the yen appreciates and we have this big shock where say, you can have, but they carry trade that could blow up as it did last year, where you had a sudden appreciation of the yen and the people who borrowed in yen to finance investments, let's say in the US, suddenly have to repay. And that was a very volatile moment. But so far, you just don't see that, right? So yen is depreciating. So that means there's no fear yet of a carry trade blow up.
Another potential is that you have Japanese investors eventually repatriates some of their overseas investments and invest in Japan since the yields are higher. Now, if you think of things from a Japanese investor's perspective, over the past decades, they've accumulated tremendous amounts of foreign assets. Now, even without looking at the interest rate difference show, they are sitting on enormous FX gains, right? Their investments were in dollars. The yen has depreciated significantly and dollar appreciated significantly. So if they were to sell that and repatriate back to Japanese yen, they were sitting at a huge, huge windfall on currency alone. The really interesting thing about Japan is that although they have a current account surplus, a very large one, that's actually largely from their overseas investments on a trade basis. The trade, it's sometimes in a little bit of a surplus, but oftentimes in a deficit.
So over the past few decades, when Japan was growing and becoming an export superpower, they accumulated a lot of dollars, a lot of foreign exchange from selling overseas. Took that foreign exchange and invested abroad. Now, they are really benefiting from higher interest rates and yen depreciation on those investments. That's really what keeps their current account in a big surplus.
In the future, China will be in that position. They also have a large trades or plus today and eventually, they're going to have a large current account surplus due to that interesting income from investment to abroad. But moving back to Japan, so far, you just don't see a big repatriation effort from Japanese investors to move back and harvest those multi-decket high yields in JGBs.
So that suggests that rates in Japan still have to go higher before we get that potential squeeze on the carry trade. That is still sometime in the future. Of course, depending upon whether the bank of Japan will continue to hike, they suggest that they will. But remember, we are in a new political regime where the new Prime Minister, the Kachih, has been making remarks that she kind of doesn't want to have more say on monetary policy as President Trump would say.
We'll see how that plays out. That's all I prepared for today. Next week, it will be very, very sleepy. Let's see if we finally get that Christmas rally. The data did come in kind of in line with what would be positive for Christmas rally. But surprisingly, we haven't seen it. It's been a bit disappointing. Let's see if that happens next week. Talk to you all then.