Hey, Prime members, you can listen to business movers add free on Amazon music. Download the app today.
嘿,Prime会员们,您可以在亚马逊音乐上免费收听商业巨头的节目。今天就下载应用程序吧。
It's January 2010 at an auditorium on the Apple campus in Cupertino, California. Steve Jobs, Apple's iconic CEO, stands on stage hosting a question and answer session for employees. He waits for their applause to die down a little and peers out over the audience.
Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. We all know what a great product the iPhone is. Why, thank you. But competition in the smartphone market is growing and more and more companies seem to be using Google's Android operating system. Should we be worried? There's a ripple of nervous laughter in the audience.
非常感谢您,先生。我们都知道 iPhone 是一款非常棒的产品。非常感谢。但是智能手机市场的竞争越来越激烈,越来越多的公司似乎正在使用 Google 的 Android 操作系统。我们应该担心吗?听众中传出了一阵紧张的笑声。
Ah, yeah, that's a good question. No, no, we shouldn't be worried, but we should be angry.
I know a lot of people at Google and we work closely with them integrating their products into the iPhone. But this mantra they have, this don't be evil thing, it's a load of crap. They've stabbed us in the back.
I said to Google, I met with them two years ago. I said, if we had good relations, we would guarantee Google access to the iPhone, guarantee it one or two icons on the home screen. And that's not an offer we made anyone else, but what did they do instead? They ripped us off.
Ripped us off wholesale. They've copied our designs and our ideas. Put an Android phone and an iPhone side by side and tell me, tell me that Google didn't steal from us. You can't do it.
We didn't enter the search business. They entered the phone business. You're giving Android away for free to any manufacturer that wants it and that's how much they want to cut us in undermines. Because make no mistake, they want to kill the iPhone, but we won't let them.
The crowd leaps to their feet and Steve presses his message home.
人群跃起站立,史蒂夫传达他的信息并加强宣讲。
We've been innovating like crazy in the last few years. We file for over 200 patents for the inventions in the iPhone and I can tell you now we intend to protect them. I will spend my last dying breath on this if that's what it takes.
Android is a stolen product. I'm going to destroy it.
Android是一款盗版产品。我打算摧毁它。
In 2007, Apple sold 1.3 million iPhones. Just two years later, annual sales were over 20 million. And in 2010, Steve Jobs hoped to double that number. But there was a problem, the rise of Google's Android. Steve recognized that Android was a threat to the iPhone and as he said, he was determined to do everything in his power to protect his dominance in the market.
But Steve wouldn't have the opportunity to finish the fight he started in January 2010 on stage in Cupertino. The following year, in October 2011, Steve would die from cancer. The task of battling Apple's rivals would be left to Steve's successor, Tim Cook. And in the wake of Steve's death, Tim would take the fight to the competition, not just in the marketplace, but in the courts. At stake were billions of dollars in the future of Apple itself. But Tim, the newly appointed Apple CEO, was determined to finish what Steve started, achieved victory in what would come to be known as the smartphone wars.
In a four-part series, the Generation Y podcast unravels the story of Khalif Browder, a young boy falsely accused of stealing a backpack and held it record island for three years without trial. This is a story about a young life caught in the middle of the justice system. Listen to Generation Y on Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.
Tim Cook was perhaps an unlikely successor for Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. As Apple's long-time chief operating officer, Tim was a brilliant administrator. During his decade at Apple, he had reshaped the company's supply chain and logistics. But he didn't have Steve's eye for design, or his passion for new technology. And Tim knew that many people, inside and outside the company, had doubts about him and questioned whether he was the right man to take Apple forward.
For his part, Tim was keen to prove to the world that the tech company was in good hands and that the future would be just as exciting and dynamic as the past had been under Steve. In September 2012, Tim took to the stage at a special press event in San Francisco and unveiled the iPhone 5, the first iPhone to be developed entirely under his leadership.
On stage, Tim trumpeted its new, lighter, and thinner design, one that his predecessor Steve no doubt would have loved. And when the iPhone 5 went on sale later that month, Apple sold five million units in its first weekend. That was a record for the company, but it was also the weakest year-on-year growth in sales in iPhone history. Wall Street was unimpressed and Apple's stock price slumped to a six month low.
But for Tim Cook, the bad news didn't end there. With the previous versions of the iPhone, Google Maps had been the default mapping software. But Google's move into the smartphone business had soured relations with Apple. The dispute over Android led Apple to discard Google Maps and build mapping software of its own.
The iPhone 5 was the first product to feature this new application, Apple Maps. Apple had promised customers that Apple Maps would be even better than the Google product it replaced. It would be more beautiful, more intuitive, and more in keeping with the company's ethos of sophisticated simplicity. But the software didn't work. On release, Apple Maps was riddled with errors.
Entire cities were mislabeled. Major landmarks were missing, and the directions given were often outdated or inaccurate. The app was greeted with frustration and mockery by iPhone users and with delight by Apple's competitors. As criticism grew in the media, Tim Cook was embarrassed and furious.
Apple's grip on the smartphone market it had created was already weakening. Now, more and more companies were producing touchscreen devices that further threatened the iPhone's dominance. In this increasingly competitive environment, the Apple Maps Fiasco was a misstep the company could not afford. But external competition weren't the only troubles mounting for Tim.
Internal rivals were circling as well. After the death of Steve Jobs and Tim's rise to CEO, there were those at Apple who felt the top job should have gone to them instead of Tim. The internal discord was about to plunge him into his first crisis as Apple CEO. And to resolve it, you would have to remember some of the last words Steve Jobs ever said to him.
Apple's co-founder had told his successor not to obsess wondering what Steve might have done. He told Tim to do what he felt was right. In the midst of these internal rivalries, Tim would remember Steve's advice. Step out from his predecessor, Shadow, and fashion Apple in his image.
This is the second episode in our four-part series on Tim Cook, Rivals. It's late September 2012, almost three years after Steve Jobs attacked Google on stage at the Apple campus. CEO Tim Cook takes his seat at the head of the table in the company boardroom. He's called this crisis meeting with Apple's top executives, but there's one man not here he's dying to talk to. Scott Forstall, the public face of the iPhone's iOS operating system.
There are all sorts of rumors floating around about Scott. Some say he's bitter because Tim was chosen to replace Steve over him. But today, Tim doesn't have time for the rumor mill. He's called this meeting because he wants to get to the bottom of ongoing problems with Apple Maps.
"All right, I think everyone's here. Hey, can you hear me, Scott?" "Yeah." "Well, thanks for dialing in. I know you're on vacation. No problem, Tim. What can I do for you?" "Well, Scott, can you tell me about the testing, the QA process on Apple Maps? Where did we drop the ball in that?"
"Well, this is a complicated bit of software. Google spent a decade building their app and what we've achieved in a fraction of that time is incredible. We pushed the envelope, I think, in the best traditions of this company." But hearing this, Tim seats, "You have it Scott, in the best traditions of this company, the software works." "Well, I've been using it in my car for weeks. We're not seeing these problems that people claim are happening. You and your team live in the Bay Area, right?" "Yeah."
"So it works in San Francisco and Silicon Valley. But what about the rest of the world? We had a team of QA testers working on that very question. And how many? I think eight. For 81 countries, across the globe, Tim grabs a piece of paper off the table. Look, I printed out a list of just some of the complaints. Paddington station in London disappeared.
In Dublin, we have an airfield that doesn't exist. In the Australian Outback, we've got towns marked miles and miles away from their actual location. Authorities there are warning people not to use our product because it is an I quote, unsafe." "Tim, there are bugs in every product launch." "I don't want excuses, Scott. I want solutions. So first things first, we need to issue an apology."
"An apology? Why?" The other executives around the boardroom shift awkwardly in their seats at Scott's open challenge, Tim. "I mean, Tim, I mean, what's the goal here? We should absolutely issue a statement, yes, but we shouldn't apologize. We should stress how successful maps has been. Usage is strong. The flyover feature people love it. We say all of that and say that we'll address the small number of problems down the line."
"It's not a small number, Scott. Look, an apology just takes us off target. And we have to think about the future here as well. I mean, culturally, if we're going to a base ourselves in public every time anything goes wrong with a challenging product, then who's going to put up their hand with the next crazy idea, the next iPhone, the next iMac? Where's the innovation going to come from if we're too scared to make a mistake? We've let our customers down, Scott.".
We're going to apologize. Well, Steve wouldn't. Tim takes a deep breath. He certainly knows how Steve would have reacted to this show of defiance, how angry he would have been. But Tim is not Steve. He keeps his composure. You know, Scott, one of the last things Steve said to me was not to waste my time wondering what he might or might not have done in my shoes. He told me just to do the right thing. Making an apology is the right thing. That's what we're going to do.
Despite Tim's wishes, Scott refused to be part of any public apology. When Apple issued an open letter to his customers on September 28, 2012, it was signed by Tim Cooke alone. In the letter, Tim apologized and advised customers to use Google Maps or Microsoft Bing while Apple ironed out the problems in its own software. Recommending rival products was an unprecedented and humiliating move for Apple. It was a sign of just how badly Tim felt things had gone wrong.
With a map's fiasco didn't simply come down to the failings of Scott Forstall. The embarrassing episode had revealed to Tim an entire executive structure at Apple that was run into its core. When Steve Jobs was Apple's CEO, he was reluctant to give too much power to anyone individual. Back in the 1980s, he had been ousted from the company he co-founded by a man he appointed. It was not an experience Steve wanted to repeat.
So when he returned to Apple in the 90s, he implemented a flat corporate structure and encouraged rivalries between different executives and departments. He believed this competition spurred innovation. It also left him as the arbiter between those warring egos with total control over the company. But what had worked for Steve Jobs was not necessarily going to work for his successor.
Steve's abrasive style wasn't Tim's preference. Tim was quieter, more reserved, someone who always favored a more collegiate approach. When he first arrived at Apple in the late 90s, Tim had avoided politics and drama. He was a demanding boss with high expectations of those who worked for him, but he couldn't stand egos, and he had no time for those who took undeserved credit or tried to avoid blame.
Still, Tim knew the company was going through a disruptive and emotional time following his co-founders' death. Tim didn't want to rock the boat in his early months as CEO, so Tim stressed continuity. In February 2012, Tim addressed investors at the Goldman Sachs Technology Conference in San Francisco. He told the audience there that Apple has this unique culture that you can't replicate. I'm not going to witness or permit the slow undoing of it, because I believe in it so deeply.
But the Apple Maps fiasco demonstrated to Tim that something had to change. A month after the release of Apple Maps, it was clear that the problems were not going away. The buggy software was somehow only getting worse, and Tim decided its development had been catastrophically mismanaged. More attention had been lavished on the look and feel of the app than the all-important data that underpinned its functionality.
There was plenty of blame to go around, but Tim laid the fault at the feet of the man who was in charge of making the app a success, software chief Scott Forstall. Scott was a smart and talented engineer. With his black shirts and jeans and his combative style, he deliberately mimicked Steve Jobs. Businessweek magazine once described him as the Sorcerer's apprentice, just the taskmaster Apple needs to stay on top. But like Steve, Scott was also a divisive figure. He was a man with an ego, unafraid to fight, and ultimately Tim decided, it was time to make a big move.
In late October 2012, Tim called Scott to his house in Palo Alto and welcomed him inside with a severance package ready for Scott to sign. The Maps disaster gave Tim the opportunity to eliminate his rival. But for Tim, the decision was not about company politics or even maintaining power, at least not entirely. And it wasn't exclusively about Scott's failures either. In large, the decision was about his refusal to recognize his mistakes and apologize.
By dismissing Scott, the so-called Sorcerer's apprentice, Tim was reshaping his executive team in his image. The press release, which announced Scott's departure, emphasized those who remained at the company in their roles and responsibilities. In the statement, Tim heralded a new era of collaboration across hardware, software, and services. But what Tim called collaboration, others called control. To some observers, the executive shake-up seemed like a victory for Apple's administrators over its creatives. No more would radical thinkers be given a free reign to come up with new ideas. As Tim Cook, a lifelong operations man, was stamping his mark on the company.
But Tim didn't see it that way. He may have changed the executive structure, but he was determined to preserve the innovative spirit he saw as the heart of the company. In fact, Tim ensured that one of the big winners from his corporate reorganization was a creative, the British designer, Johnny Ive.
Before his ouster, Scott Forstall had controlled the look and feel of the iPhone's operating system. Now, Tim gave that responsibility to Johnny. The design of iOS had been one of the few genuine creative differences between Johnny and his mentor Steve Jobs. Steve liked the iPhone's grid layout of colorful squares, with their textured icons of folders and trash cans. But Johnny hated it. He thought the icons were clunky and worked against the simplicity and elegance of the devices themselves. Johnny dreamed of completely redesigning the operating system, making the software as beautiful to him as the physical hardware was. That was impossible under Scott Forstall, who jealously defended his territory. But with Scott gone, Johnny had his chance.
Tim had reshaped the executive team in a manner of his choosing. But there was another inheritance from Steve Jobs that Tim could not escape. Apple's bitter rivalry with his competitors. Steve had always felt that Google stole Apple's ideas when it created the Android operating system. And Tim didn't disagree. But the simmering dispute with Google was nothing compared to the battle Tim faced with a brand new rival in the smartphone market, a South Korean electronics company Samsung.
In May 2012, Samsung released its latest flagship device. The Galaxy S3 was hailed by press as the best smartphone in the world, and dubbed an iPhone killer. The models of the Galaxy S3 were boosted by a $200 million marketing blitz. At the start of 2012, Samsung and Apple shared the global smartphone market was about equal. Both companies held 19%. With thanks to the Galaxy S3, by the end of the year, Samsung had more than doubled its share to almost 40%.
Tim Cook watched the rise of Samsung's Galaxy S3 with growing irritation. In Tim's eyes, just like Google, Samsung had copied Apple's designs and ideas. Their so-called iPhone killer wasn't just a rival. It was a rip-off. One that Tim intended to expose.
Hey, everyone. I'm Patrick Weiman, host of Tides of History, the podcast that covers thousands of years of recorded history, taking you back in time and placing you in the lives of those who came before us. With five seasons and over 250 episodes, there's something for everyone. If you're interested in the Iron Age, check out the entire season devoted to that era, which explores myriad topics including classical empires like the Neo-Assyrians, the Phoenicians, and Greece's Dark Age. Or listen to our deep dives into Renaissance Italy, the invention of news, the Protestant Reformation, witch hunts, and even the Black Death. And if you prefer more contemporary history, listen to our episode about the unparalleled rise of capitalism.
大家好,我是Patrick Weiman,Tides of History播客的主持人。这个播客涵盖了数千年的历史,将您带回过去,并让您置身于我们之前的那些人们的生活中。有5个季节和超过250集,适合各种人。如果你对铁器时代感兴趣,可以听一整个季节关于那个时代的内容,涵盖许多主题包括新亚述帝国、腓尼基人和希腊的黑暗时代等等。或者听我们深入挖掘的内容包括文艺复兴时期的意大利、新闻的发明、新教改革、猎巫运动,甚至是黑死病。如果你更喜欢当代历史,可以听我们的剧集关于无与伦比的资本主义崛起的内容。
Whether you're a history buff or just have a passing interest, Tides of History will fill you with wisdom and wonder for everything that came before. Follow Tides of History wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen ad-free on the Amazon Music or Wondery app.
It's a cloudy, cool morning in early February 2013 at Apple headquarters in Cupertino, California. Tim Cook warms his hands on a cup of coffee as he strolls through the tree-lined park at the heart of Apple's campus. Tim turns to look at the man trotting beside him. Apple's head of product marketing, 52-year-old Phil Schiller. Greyhaird and stocky New Englander has his face buried in his iPhone screen. As he walks, he reads aloud an article from the Wall Street Journal about the rise of Samsung and its best-selling smartphone, the Galaxy S3.
Listen to this, Tim. The deep-pocketed Korean company has used a combination of engineering prowess, manufacturing heft and marketing savvy to create smartphones that can rival the iPhone in both sales and appeal. Tim shakes his head. Samsung sure is the media darling right now. Well, this is the part that really got me, though. A former Apple customer who ditched his phone for the S3 said, if you see this stuff on TV enough, it gets you thinking. Tim, this is a marketing problem. The iPhone 5 is a better phone than the S3. It just is. But that's not the public's perception.
Phil thrusts his phone into his pocket in frustration. Their stupid ads aren't even that great. I mean, they're not original. They're just, God, they're ripping us off again. It's like, I'm a Mac, I'm a PC. Yeah, well, only now we're the uncool ones. Back in 2006, Apple began a series of ads which comically played out its reputation for effortless cool in comparison to stuffy old-fashioned PCs running Windows. Now seven years later, Samsung is using the same trick, but this time mocking Apple as the company that stuck in the past.
And you know, the Samsung ad shouldn't be that hard to beat. But look at our ads. They have no style, no cut-through. The fact is we're just not getting what we need from media arts. And to be frank, Tim, we haven't been for a while. Media Arts Lab. Apple's Los Angeles-based advertising agency has been responsible for some of its most iconic commercials. But Phil isn't happy with their recent efforts or the agency's attitude.
你知道的,三星的广告不应该很难打败。但看看我们的广告,它们没有风格、没有冲击力。事实是,我们从媒体艺术中没有得到我们需要的。坦率地说,蒂姆,我们已经有一段时间没有得到了。苹果在洛杉矶的广告代理商Media Arts Lab负责创作一些标志性的广告。但菲尔对他们最近的努力或代理机构的态度并不满意。
We need to hit back at Samsung. And I brought this up with them. With media? What'd they say? They're denying there's even an issue. They want to talk about us slipping, not them. We are the most successful tech company in existence. We make the world's best products. And they don't seem to accept that first and foremost, they need to do a better job for us. Hearing this, Tim pauses. Takes a sip of coffee.
Well, we've been with them for over 15 years. I know, I know. But loyalty is a two-way street. If they're no longer giving us what we need, then we need to do something about it. Should we look for another agency? Well, let's put some feelers out. They'll hear about it. Well, good. I don't want to let them go. But they have to realize that we have options if they don't improve. They need us a lot more than we need them. And maybe this will light a fire underneath them.
And if it doesn't, look, I want a campaign that will change the public's perception of Apple and take the fight to Samsung. If media art slab isn't up to the task, then I'll find someone who is. The pressure Tim put on Apple's long-time advertising agency worked. A couple of months later, media art slab returned to Apple to present their ideas for a new branding campaign. He wasn't a commercial for a particular product, but for the company itself. Tim Cook and several senior members at Apple's marketing team filed into a conference room to see what the ad men had come up with.
The first pitch was titled, Leave It Better Than You Found It. The commercial featured an animation of a seed growing into a sapling and then finally into an enormous apple tree. The message resonated with him. Apple had changed and it had grown. At its core, it was the same idea, the same seed, make things that inspire others. Horton by Tim's enthusiastic response. The executives from media art slab introduced their second idea, Intention. A 90-second commercial conceived to summarize Apple's creative ethos. The film was a minimalist animation of swirling black dots on a gray background, narrated by simple text that took viewers on a journey through Apple's design process. From conception through to production, the moment when it was finally worthy of the statement etched into every product the company made, designed by Apple in California.
As the lights came up in the conference room, Tim smiled. He knew Intention was the one. His answer to Samsung's mockery wouldn't be hurling insults in return. It would be an earnest statement of Apple's ideals. A commercial which said, This is who we are, so we've always been. And that's not about to change.
While Tim got ready to fight back against Samsung in the media, another more serious and expensive battle was already taking place in the courtroom. On April 15, 2011, back when Steve Jobs was still alive, Apple filed its first lawsuit against Samsung. Samsung was one of several rival technology companies that had responded to the spectacular success of the iPhone by developing smartphones of their own. So to many in Cupertino, these devices were nothing more than cheap imitations. Apple challenged some of the smaller manufacturers in court and forced them into settlements.
But Samsung was a more formidable foe, a sprawling conglomerate with billions of dollars in resources that could not easily be bullied or cout into submission. And there was another complication of which Tim Cook, master of Apple's supply chain, was all too aware. Samsung wasn't just a rival for Apple. The South Korean firm was one of their most important suppliers as well. By 2010, Apple was spending billions of dollars a year on microchips, memory drives, and LCD displays made by Samsung. Tim knew that Apple's success was due at least in part to its vital relationship with the company. And he was also fully aware that a legal dispute would likely bring that mutually beneficial relationship to an end.
So Tim urged his boss, Steve Jobs, to settle the dispute out of court. In the summer of 2010, Steve and Tim met with the president of Samsung to try and iron out their differences in person. And for the next six months, the firms negotiated through their lawyers. Each accused the other of stealing their intellectual property. Apple claiming Samsung copied the design and interface of the iPhone with Samsung claiming Apple stole its mobile communications technology. But in spite of the serious charges being levied, Tim hoped that both sides could reach a deal, one where they would share patents and avoid a lengthy and costly court battle.
But then in February 2011, Samsung released the Galaxy Tab 10.1, a 10-inch tablet computer that looked remarkably like the iPad. Steve Jobs was furious. In his mind, the South Koreans were cheating, and he decided enough was enough. On April 15, 2011, Apple submitted a 38-page complaint against Samsung in the United States District Court for Northern California. In it, Apple lawyers accused Samsung of infringing on its patents in numerous smartphone and tablet products. One week later, Samsung counter-sued, accusing Apple of stealing their patents. The two companies were at war.
But Steve didn't get to lead his army to victory. After Steve's death, Tim Cook would continue to fight, and within a year, more than 50 lawsuits were underway in jurisdictions around the world. There was the potential for hundreds of millions of dollars to be awarded in damages. But that wasn't the real prize. In junctions were what each side really wanted. These legal orders would ban the sale of any rival product deemed to have infringed on a patent. Tim knew these legal issues weren't so much a battle over what had happened in the past. Instead, they were part of a turf war over the future of the smartphone market. The losing side faced the destruction of their market share, and the winner could rule for years to come.
On August 24, 2012, the jury in the US District Court for Northern California returned a verdict. Despite the complexity of the case, the jurors deliberated for just 21 hours, and the result was a triumph for Apple. The court awarded them more than a billion dollars in damages. Tim was delighted, saying it was a vindication of everything Steve and he had claimed. Samsung had copied them. In email to company employees, Tim wrote, today was an important day for Apple and for innovators everywhere. Values have won, and I hope the whole world listens.
But the war with Samsung was not over. Apple had won a lawsuit, but they had also only been awarded damages. They'd yet to secure any injunctions against the South Koreans, stopping them from selling the disputed products. Apple's lawyers would continue to press the attack, seeking to stop Samsung once and for all.
But to Tim's dismay, the legal battle didn't slow Samsung's growth. If anything, the free press provided by the ongoing courtroom drama only helped their sales. While the lawyers for each company argued back and forth, Apple's rival continued to expand its share of the smartphone market, making billions of dollars of profit along the way.
Tim was now more than a year into his reign as CEO, and doubts were beginning to spread in the media, on Wall Street, and inside the company's headquarters. After Steve Jobs, Apple could do no wrong. But now, it seemed to many that the company was floundering without him. In this moment of frustration, Tim didn't spare. Instead he pinned his hopes on a series of new and innovative products that would be unveiled in the year to come. Tim was confident that in 2013, with all that he had planned, he could turn the tide, silence his doubters, put Apple on the path to ultimate victory.
It's June 2013 at the opening of Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco. In a packed hall, delegates sit and watch a new Apple commercial, playing on a large screen. This is our signature. And it means everything. As the words, designed by Apple and California, appear at the end of the ad, one young software engineer wearing a checkered green shirt leaped to his feet. Pulling out his iPhone, the engineer takes a few hurried photos as Apple CEO Tim Cook strides back on to stage and addresses the crowd.
Thank you. Thank you. Really glad you liked that. You'll see you on TV beginning this evening. Designed by Apple and California. I tell you those words mean a great deal to us. And that helped them in a lot to you as well. Have a great conference. Enjoy the week. Thank you.
Tim disappears off stage as the house lights come on. And the audience of journalists and software developers gather their things. The young engineer in the checkered shirt turns to a friend beside him. Well, that was great. It was nearly two hours. I need to bathroom. No, man, fantastic. Looking at his iPhone, the engineer flicks through the photographs he's just taken. They're not that good. Tim Cook is a little more than a blurry thin streak. God, look how close we were. Yeah, cool. Yeah, good seats.
The engineer's friend isn't really listening. He cranes his neck and looks at the massive crowd moving slowly toward the exit. Oh, I've got to hit the head. Come on, let's go. As his friend pushes his way toward the exit. The engineer follows behind, still excited. Why did you think of that ad? Didn't you think it was good? Yeah, yeah, sure. I mean, this is our signature. I love that. Yeah, sure. You didn't like it? His friend shrugs. I mean, it was fine. I thought there might be more. More what? I didn't sit for two hours to hear about the latest version of iCloud. I was waiting for some big reveal and never came. Cook's not exactly a showman, is he? Well, no, but he's better. Just saying the word incredible doesn't mean anything is incredible. You know, I was there when jobs unveiled the iPhone. Oh, wow, really? Yeah, that was incredible. You felt like the world was changing in the room. You couldn't take your eyes off of it. There wasn't anything else in your mind. But today, I mean, I spent most of it regretting that second cup of coffee.
Finally, the two men reached the exit and stepped out into the crowded foyer. Without a word, the friend starts to walk away. Where are you going? I'm going to the bathroom. You're going to be in the next session? Oh, sure. I wouldn't want to miss hearing about the new color scheme on iOS, would I? I'm sure it's going to be incredible.
The Apple conference didn't just unveil a new ad campaign. It also showed off a new operating system for the iPhone and a new desktop computer to call the Mac Pro. Tim Cook hoped this would represent a fresh start for Apple, the beginning of the company's fight back against Samsung. Tim knew there would be some doubters among the Apple faithful. But he was heartened by the enthusiasm in the crowd while he made his speech in San Francisco. But Tim knew it wasn't his employees' reactions that mattered most.
苹果公司的发布会不仅仅展示了新的广告宣传活动,还展示了 iPhone 的新操作系统和一款名为 Mac Pro 的新台式电脑。蒂姆·库克希望这代表苹果的新起点,标志着公司开始向三星发起反击。蒂姆知道在苹果忠实粉丝中会有一些怀疑者,但他在旧金山演讲时观众的热情使他倍感振奋。但是蒂姆知道最重要的不是员工的反应。
In June 2013, Apple released its new television commercial to the world. It was based on the intention pitch that had so wowed Tim Cook at Cupertino. The Apple CEO hoped the campaign would reinvigorate sales and remind the world of what the company stood for. But the designed by Apple in California ad was a flop. With viewer surveys rating the spot far below what they had come to expect for Apple campaigns. On the ads' journey from pitch to finished commercial, major changes were made. The original ad featured a striking animation with a constellation of black dots whizzing around the screen. This elegant design was replaced in the final commercial with shots of photogenic customers and joining Apple products. Critics dismissed it as bland, generic, and even arrogant. One reviewer from Slate magazine blasted the commercial as backward looking, a snotty Laurel's resting manifesto of a company taking itself way too seriously.
Tim was disappointed by this response. He knew how important advertising had been to Apple's success in the past and how important it had been personally to Steve Jobs. Once again, the company's new CEO seemed to lack his predecessor's magic touch.
Still, Tim knew advertising wasn't everything. The quality of the product still mattered. Tim had empowered Johnny I to reinvigorate the look of the iPhone. Now Johnny's redesign was finished and Tim was eager for the public to get their hands on it.
iOS 7 was a complete visual overhaul for the smartphone. Johnny claimed the new look had a profound and enduring beauty in simplicity. To him, the iPhone software finally matched the elegance of the device. And after iOS 7 was released in September 2013, millions downloaded it. But it wasn't the clear victory that Tim had hoped for either.
Some reviewers felt that Johnny's redesign was little more than a new coat of paint, lacking meaningful improvements to how the software actually worked. Others found the new, minimalist style difficult to use. They missed the original design that Johnny had hated so much.
So now, with iOS 7 faltering, Tim put his hopes on the other new product Apple had been developing, the desktop Mac Pro. This new computer had a striking design. With its powerful chips housed inside a radical black cylinder, this Mac Pro didn't look like any other desktop computer on the market.
But it wouldn't be the game changer Tim had hoped for. Unlike Apple triumphs of the past like the iMac, this was not a product for the mass market. The Mac Pro was far beyond the budget of most Apple customers. And after the computer was released in December 2013, sales quickly dried up. Inside the company, the Mac Pro soon earned a mocking new nickname, the trash can.
In the last quarter of that year, Apple sold almost 34 million iPhones and 14 million iPads. Revenue for the year were four times what they had been in 2010, taking annual profits to our gargantuan $37 billion. But in many ways, 2013 was still a disappointment.
Tim Cook's company had failed to live up to Steve Jobs' promise of destroying Android. In fact, Google's operating system was gaining users at an even faster rate than the latest redesigned iOS. Apple had also failed to take down its South Korean rival Samsung. They may have won some victories in court, but the legal tussle was dragging on with no clear end inside. And meanwhile, in the marketplace, Samsung continued to perform well, selling almost half a billion phones worldwide in 2013.
Tim had reshaped his executive team, cutting out disruptive influences and encouraging collaboration and cooperation. But some wondered whether this new, less competitive setup had made his team more averse to taking risks. And whether the innovation which had been Apple's hallmark under Steve Jobs was a thing of the past.
Three years had now gone by since Apple introduced the world to the iPad. It was six years since the first iPhone. Apple's profits had been growing under Tim's leadership, but the company had yet to do anything truly innovative. If Tim Cook was to keep delivering the higher revenues and profits which investors had come to expect, he would need to take a page out of Steve Jobs' book and seek out new products, new markets, and new worlds for Apple to conquer.
To do this, Tim would turn to the company designed Guru Johnny Ive. Together, Tim and Johnny would set out to create a device as innovative, as bold, and as original as anything Apple had made in the past, an effort to launch the company into the future.
From Wondery, this is episode two of the Apple Genius Tim Cook for Business Motors. On the next episode, Tim Cook tries to banish doubts about his leadership with a new type of product which he hopes will be as revolutionary and influential as the original iPhone.
Hey, prime members, you can listen to Business Movers, add free on Amazon Music, download the Amazon Music Cap today, or you can listen add free with Wondery Plus and Apple Podcasts. Before you go, tell us about yourself by completing a short survey at Wondery.com slash survey. If you'd like to learn more about Tim Cook, we recommend After Steve by Trip Mikkel and Haunted Empire, Apple After Steve Jobs by Yucari Iwatani Kane.
This episode contains re-enactments and dramatized details. And while in most cases, we can't know exactly what was said. All our dramatizations are based on historical research. Business Movers is hosted, edited, and executed produced by me, Lindsay Graham for Airship, audio editing and sound design by Molly Bond, music by Lindsay Graham. This episode is written and researched by William Simpson, executive producers, our Stephen Walters for Airship and Aaron O'Flaherty, Jenny Lauer Beckman, Marshall Louis for Wondery.