Hello and welcome to Shopri Things Unlong-term Thinking. Thanks for joining us. I'm Mark and Borthwick, Managing Editor at Bayley Gifford.
大家好,欢迎来到Shopri Things Unlong-term Thinking(Shopri物品非长期思考)。感谢您的加入。我是Bayley Gifford的编辑主管Mark and Borthwick。
The Industrial Revolution was the world's first deep transition. Colon's team transformed how we worked and travelled. People swapped agricultural labour for factory jobs, lured to industrial heartland such as Liverpool, Hamburg and Boston by the promise of better wages, and steam powered trains and ships aided the transport of people and goods. However, it wasn't without its drawbacks. Two centuries later we face climate change, social inequality and biodiversity loss as a direct consequence. Finding solutions to these challenges will require radical innovation and further disruption. What some refer to as a second deep transition as sustainability revolution. In many respects a second deep transition is clearing up the mess from the first deep transition.
Kate Foxes involves in the project to explore what this might mean, led by Utrecht University and the University of Sussex. Kate is a dry manager of Keystone Positive Change Investment Trust and the Positive Change Fund. She joins me here in our Edinburgh studio. But before we start the conversation some important information. Please remember that as with all investments your capsules at risk and your income is not guaranteed.
Kate thanks for joining us on ShopBree Things on Long-Tem Thinking. Great to have you with us. Morning, thanks for having me welcome. So let's start with why our deep transitions relevant to you as an investor.
I think there are two key reasons. Firstly, deep transition needs to happen to undo the harm that's been created by the first deep transition. So you referenced the Industrial Revolution Malcolm. And great things came from that in terms of prosperity, technological advancement, etc. But there have been some unintended negative consequences, climate change by diversity, risk rising inequality. The change needs to happen. And secondly, it's important because from change comes an opportunity. And that's great for long-term growth investors. If we think about the healthcare revolution that will create exciting areas for us to identify the growth businesses of the future. The agricultural system currently is very industrialised. It consumes a huge amount of water, is responsible for up to 20% of global emissions. Change really excites me as an investor. Because that's where we identify the companies that are driving that change. Because they'll be the companies that will generate a tract of investment returns over the coming years and decades.
So let's talk a little bit about the deep transitions research project. One of our former investment managers, James Anderson, began supporting it while he was still at Bayley Gifford. And both James and Bayley Gifford continue to be involved. Let's hear from the leader of the project, Professor Johann Schult from ETHRAC University's Center for Global Challenges. He describes himself as a time traveler. Earlier, I asked him why. It means that I mobilise the past to think about the future. So I try to understand the past, the way it constrains our current behaviour, but also the way it enables new type of behaviours. Because the past consists on one hand of dominant patterns, dominant ways of doing things. But on the other hand, it also consists of roads not taken or alternative practices that have never become dominant, that may become inspiration for the future. And the past can also be used to test some of our ideas and to develop theories. So when we travel to the future, we come armed with a very good understanding of the constraints and the enabling effectors. And this will help us to build scenarios and ways of thinking about the future.
And that's Johann Schult, time traveler and founder of the Deep Transitions Research Project. What attracted you to the project, Kate? Firstly, there's a huge alignment around the sustainability revolution as you described it. And being an impact investor with positive change, we're trying to address those global challenges such as climate change by diversity loss and rising inequalities. Secondly, the long-termism. So to come across a project that was thinking over the last 250 years was really quite unique. And as part of the project, we've been imagining future world scenarios, thinking to 2030 and 2050. Thirdly, impact investing tends to be quite a collaborative discipline. So I was looking forward to learning and interacting with investors from different parts of the world, the global north, the global south, and people that are involved in public investing and private investing. And finally, and probably most importantly, I was really excited about it being an opportunity for me to think differently.
You mentioned earlier imagining future world scenarios. Let's get an idea of what that involved. The year is 2050. Changing attitudes to engineered foods have catalyzed the development of lab-grown meat and the use of urban vertical farms grown genetically in hard-sfruit and vegetables. New technologies allow enthusiasts to safely experiment with biohacking themselves, leading to fierce competition between megacorporations and open-source citizen-run bio labs. Meanwhile, nature has become a world space, largely devoid of agricultural activities.
Ask yourself these questions. How do these changes occur? How will these developments play out? And what other niche technologies would make this world more desirable? How do you think about the future world scenarios? Another involved flying cars, piloted by artificial intelligence, that remove carbon from the air. Well, a third example centered on the use of hydrogen-powered data centers on the moon. These are all exciting ideas that could bring about transformative change in the future.
But what did you discover Kate that we could put into practical use today? So I've learned to think about companies that we invest in and opportunities of companies that we might invest in differently. I think there are two key elements to that, to use some of the language of the project and the frameworks.
First of all, I think you've got a greater appreciation of the fragility of niches within a system. So what's a niche within a system? A niche within a system is a space of radical innovation. So electric vehicles would have been a niche for a number of years. Well, decades really until Tesla did a terrific job of helping them transcend beyond a niche. Plant-based meat products or meat alternatives are still relatively niches at work, so beyond meat burgers. And if we think about another example might be flying electric taxis, that's still very early stage niche.
With a niche, you've got to think about all the different actors within the existing system that dominates who's interest it might not be for those niches to flourish. But that's why we become really important as investors in helping create that space for the niches to flourish.
The second way of thinking that really resonated or was that sort of eureka moment for me in the project was differentiating between systems optimization and systems transformation. Can you give me an example? So electric vehicles they're helping optimize the current mobility system. They are terrific in that they are less carbon-intensive than internal combustion engines. So in a way, Tesla has played a vital role in helping optimize the system.
Now the challenge that Johan and his researchers presented with that is that was that optimizing the current system, which is that we all think we need to own our own car, whereas actually transforming the system would be moving towards mobility as a service. So that would be enabled by autonomous vehicles, perhaps the robot taxi Tesla, so that these vehicles can be used more often. It's a shared system. So the optimization is almost working and improving within the current system and the transformation is something that's completely different that's going outside of the system.
Give me some other examples of companies that you might be looking at that can make that transformative step. Yeah, so following some of the sessions that we've had with the panel, I tried to explore with colleagues a company called DEA, which we invested in positive change, which makes their conic green tractors. What excites us about DEA is its precision agriculture equipment, which uses a combination of sensors and cameras and data to help identify what's plant and what's weed so that it can apply herbicides and fertilizers appropriately, which means that we can increase yields by using fewer chemical fertilizers.
But what I was intrigued to explore is is this contributing to optimizing the current industrialized agriculture system or can it contribute towards transformation where we use more regenerative and nature-based solutions. And I think that there is perhaps a case for DEA helping to contribute towards that transformation as its precision agriculture equipment can help farmers apply things in a more precise manner. Smaller tractors can be more nimble, more agile, so that they can operate farms which are much less ubiquitous. And perhaps a field which has got two crops intercropping, which is much better from a biodiversity perspective.
And are you seeing many hugely transformative companies out there? I think we're at a really exciting point that there are a number of technologies that are exciting in isolation, but also in combination come together that can create a fantastic transformation. If we think about Moderna, for example, where it's the understanding of biology combined with data and AI and machine learning, bring that together and you've got something really quite transformative.
What are the principles of investors should follow to achieve this second deep transition that we've talked about the sustainability revolution? So the output of the global panel work was the establishment of a transformative investment philosophy of which there are 12 principles for different stakeholders to adopt.
So investors in the private and public space, policymakers, lots of different people within the system as you like. Some of those principles are consistent with those that we've been applying at Bayley Gifford for decades. So for example, principle number two, which is about being long term, principle number six, which is about embracing uncertainty and principle number 11, which is about fostering an interdisciplinary research approach.
But there are some that I think will help me sort of keep pushing on and advancing. We're all trying to get better at everything that we do at Bayley Gifford. So one of those would be principle number one of the 12 principles, which is transform the system, which we've just explored. And the second one would be principle number five, which is enhanced portfolio synergies.
So here it's about thinking about a collection of ideas or companies that in combination will support one another and maximize the chances of success. So if we go back to the electric vehicle example, we won't be able to transform the mobility system just by coming up with fantastic vehicles.
We've got to make sure that we've got the charging network that can support that. We've got to make sure that we've got good batteries and there are a number of different battery companies and technologies. Can we recycle those batteries, UMACOR and NorthVolt, for example, would contribute towards the recycling? So that's something else that I think that I'm really excited about applying.
I guess it's a danger of getting tunnel vision about a company and what it's doing without really working out the environment in which it could be successful and what's required for that success? Yeah, absolutely. And I think this is what this project has done. It's about helping remove the blinkers and think, making sure that we, or increasing our chances of thinking at a much broader level, at a systems wide level, thinking about a company's role within a system and between different systems and all the different connections that are going to be required for the company or a niche to thrive.
So how can we implement these ideas in actual investment practice? So the main vision is that we want to bring together a set of front runners who want to experiment with using these ideas in the investment practice and through this develop the narrative around transformative investment. The Deep Transition Lab, we want to create, should also become a mobilizing force for bringing about change.
So it's on the one end, about the front runners, but these front runners need to connect with other investors to enable a larger change in the finance industry the coming decade. Because this is crucially important for enabling the second Deep Transition that investors will change their practice.
Johan Schultt there, what excites you about the next steps that Johan was describing?
约翰·舒尔特,你对约翰所描述的下一步计划感到兴奋的地方是什么?
Yeah, I think the primary thing that excites me about it is it's taking all this thinking to actually doing. It's about applying what we've learnt. I love the fact that it's taking an experimental approach and also the long-term approach. So it's not just about doing the experiments. It's about learning from the experiments and using those learnings to help educate the next generation of investors because this is speaking to be a multi-decade approach.
And this just isn't about Bay the Gifford. This is about trying to mobilise interest and action from the wider industry as well as policymakers and others. Yeah, absolutely. Because it's going to take lots of different groups within society if we were to be successful in addressing the challenges that we face.
In some ways I think this transformative investment philosophy is like a niche within the financial system. So it's fragile but it's important we want to be able to transform or help to contribute towards the transformation of the financial system so that more capital is deployed towards enabling that second and important Deep Transition.
Is it the mobilisation of capital that's absolutely crucial here isn't it in terms of driving change?
在推动变革方面,关键不是资本的调动吗?
Yeah, and I think that's something that I was naive in my understanding when I started out as an investor 20 years ago was the power of capital. Capital can be a really important mechanism for change. It's not the only mechanism for change but it's a key mechanism for change.
Oh, hugely. I mean the last seven years have been absolutely the highlight of my career so far and I'm really excited about the next 15 years of deploying capital towards driving change.
And there's a post of note 10.on Kate thanks for joining us on short briefings on long-term thinking. Thank you for having me. And thanks for investing your time in short briefings on long-term thinking.
You can find our podcast at BayTheGiffer.com forward slash podcasts or subscribe but upper podcasts Spotify are on tune in. And if you enjoyed our conversation about deep transitions check out previous discussions we've had on the podcast ranging from the companies to disrupting the world's biggest killer heart disease to exploring the innovative Scandinavian country that has an earth global giants such as Ericsson, Spotify and IKEA. What's its secret? Find out by listening to our podcast.
And you heard earlier from Johan Schultt. If you'd like to discover more about his work on transformative investment visit transformativeinvestment.net. And to stay up to date with the development of the deep transitions lab you can follow at D Transitions 2 on Twitter. That's 2 the number as opposed to 2 spell tag.
之前你们听过 Johan Schultt 的演讲。如果你想了解更多他有关变革性投资的工作,请访问 transformativeinvestment.net。如果你想跟进深度转型实验室的最新发展,请在 Twitter 上关注 D Transitions 2。注意,这里的2是数字2,而不是拼写标签。
And if you're listening at home, if you're listening in the car wherever you're listening stay well and look forward to bringing you more insights in our next podcast.