I'm Chris Hill joining me today, Motleyful Senior Analyst Jason Moser. Happy Monday.
我是克里斯·希尔,今天和我一起的是 Motleyful 高级分析师杰森·莫瑟。祝大家周一愉快。
Hey, happy Monday. Happy Marathon Monday. I'm in the ladder group. I was streaming a little ESPN watching it down the stretch. Pretty close finish on the men's side.
We're going to dip into the full mail bag, but I want to start with row blocks because for the last time ever, row blocks shared monthly metrics. And on the surface, they look good, daily active users, hours engaged, estimated revenue, all up double digits year over year for the month of March for row blocks. And yet shares down 12%. What is going on here?
This is something that row blocks announced in January that, hey, we're going to stop reporting monthly metrics. March will be the last month. I'm not sure what the surprise is here.
Well, I don't think the surprise has anything to do with not announcing the metrics. I think that's something we've seen many companies do that. I think we've seen what Zillow a time ago did that Netflix even did it. So I don't think that in and of itself really dictates how a company is going to perform. And that, because if you think about publishing these monthly metrics, I mean, it can be enlightening for us as investors. But I mean, at the end of the day, we're not looking at these businesses through a monthly lens, right? We want to see them create value over longer periods of time. Now, getting this data can help paint a picture, but it is very short term focused in nature. And so I don't think that's really the concern.
I think the concern really is two things. Number one, row blocks. So I think the risk for a company like this today at its stage is going to be valuation. Because it's still an unprofitable business. It's still kind of getting its sea legs, so to speak, right? And so it's working towards meaningful, sustainable profitability, which is going to make valuation a bit more of a risk with a business like this. And then secondly, I think the one metric that probably has most investors attention from this release, it's the future. Looking at this, the average bookings per daily active user. And we saw that come in at a range of minus 1% to plus 3%. And historically, that number has just been much, much higher. But it's also, I think it's to be expected.
I mean, this is a company that really benefited, I think, over the last few years from this stay-at-home economy, right? From this digital economy. And you even see it in their 10K that they filed at the end of February. They noted in the 10K they've experienced rapid growth in prior periods, doing part to the COVID-19 pandemic. And these activity levels have not been sustained, growth rates have moderated. For example, they call out bookings increased 171%. From the year end of December 31, 2019 to the year end of December 31, 2020. You're saying that's not sustainable? They can't just keep doing that year over here. 171% is awful nice. And if it could sustain that, I guarantee you, the share price would be in a different place today. But I think it just goes to show you that this is a company that really pulled a lot of growth forward, like many businesses have. And what we're seeing here today is that future, right, is looking a little bit more tepid.
That's understandable, right? And I certainly would make sense as to why investors might be taking a breather on the stock today. That's kind of a one to punch, right? Looking at the future, right, growth isn't going to be nearly as robust as it has been in the past, at least in the near term. And then you add that to sort of the valuation risk that comes with a business like this. And you get these types of knee-jerk reactions.
And yet, Roblox is still a $25 billion company, which makes me wonder if they're in some way stuck. I hear everything you're saying about the unprofitability and all that. And if this company were even smaller, if it was a $7 billion company, there would be probably a bunch of companies looking at it as a potential acquisition target. But it's $25 billion. And that limits the universe of businesses that can do that. And somewhere else in the multiverse, Microsoft is a company with deep pockets looking at this. But they're still dealing with trying to complete their acquisition of Activision Blizzard. So that's not going to fly.
Do you think that's part of what has the stock where it is? It's one more reason for some investors to just say, I don't see what the catalyst is here because for smaller businesses, a potential catalyst is an acquisition. And I just don't see that in the cards right now for Roblox.
And I do agree. And I mean, let's remember, it used to be a much, much larger company, even just a couple of years ago. And even today, even at $24, $25 billion market gap, it's still a very large business with a very glass half full valuation even today.
But I mean, this is one of those quintessential metaverse ideas, right? I mean, this is gaming. It's immersive. It's a whole mother world, so to speak. And in these digital worlds that they help build on behalf of all of the users, they utilize a network of more than 8 million active developers. And they made money in a number of different ways, but ultimately it's by working with these creators to help them monetize experiences.
And so you've got a subscription service there in Roblox premium. You've got mega brands that are actually building unique marketing experiences on the platform. They have their own virtual economy that they serve with their own currency called Roblox.
And so I think that yes, on the one hand, I'm sure there are a lot of larger companies out there that would love to have this capability within their own universe. I don't think they would like to do it at the valuation. It's just a lot to chew. It's a lot to bite off.
But by the same token, I don't think that Roblox is necessarily a business that wants to go that route either. I mean, they do a very good job of reinvesting back in the business and building out this capability.
I mean, let's remember that while that one bad piece of news, right, in the bookings, yeah, that's a little bit of a downer. But I mean, when you look, you said it, if they open there, so many, so many of these metrics looks so good.
I mean, daily active users up 26% hours engaged up 26%. You exclude currency impacts revenue up in a range of 16 to 22%. Bookings up 25 to 29%. So I mean, it's not like this isn't a business that's performing. This is a business that is still dealing with sort of the hangover over the past couple of years.
And given where it is today, it's still going to need to invest a lot into the business to continue building out capabilities and offerings. So look at the cost of goods for a business like this. They have this exchange, right, this creator exchange that ultimately feeds in to this metaverse, so to speak, right, this universe that is Roblox, that makes up about 28% of total revenue. And that's going to be something they'll have to continue to pay because they really depend on the creators to build this business out.
So look at things like SGNA research and development, where those today are a very high percentage of overall revenue. The thesis, at least in part, is that over time they'll be able to start pulling back on those levers and really start to demonstrate a little bit more leverage in the model because it does feel like they have the creators and they have the users. And they know how big of an opportunity gaming really is.
And if the tailwinds here, not only really in the metaverse, but just gaming in general, if those tailwinds continue that it feels like Roblox is going to be a business that benefits from that. But again, very early stage valuation is going to be a risk this business until they can get to sustainable and meaningful profitability. So it may be a little while.
And I'll address his podcasts at full.com. Get an email from Sam in Amsterdam who writes, I'm 29 years old and about to celebrate the two year anniversary of the start of my investing journey. Although it's been hard to celebrate investing over the past year. It has been incredibly helpful to have the Motley Fool on my side.
As someone with decades ahead of him to invest, it would be great to get your perspective on what kinds of investments could be right for me. And the market has currently turned away from growth at all costs and turned to companies with profits, efficiency and positive free cash flow. I'm wondering what to do in this environment.
If you could go back to being a 29 year old investor, how would you balance investing in more rule breaker type companies that may not be profitable yet or are losing money and investing in more stock advisor businesses that are a bit larger and proven and have profits. Thank you for listening. Thank you for the question.
Great question. I love the focus on the timeframe. Here's someone who realizes there are decades ahead to invest and the focus on balance, which is.
很棒的问题。我很喜欢你关注时间范围。这个人意识到仍有几十年可投资,同时重视平衡。
I think if I were to go back to advise my 29 year old self, I would, yeah, I would that would be one of the messages is look for some amount of balance. The balance can shift over time. And maybe as you get older, you move to more stable dividend payers. That's sort of thing. But but going all in on one style of investing.
I don't know. I think it's because we've been doing this podcast so long Jason and we've just I think personally I've heard from too many people who just burnt out. They were in their 20s. They went all in on one type of investing. They got burned and then they just walked away.
Yeah, I fully agree. I mean, we do talk a lot about investing when you start out younger. That gives you so much time right to take advantage of and so typically we say you can take on more risk as a younger investor because you have more time to make it up. And that's true to an extent. I agree with it to an extent. But but that also doesn't mean that you should just max out your risk and just invest in those high growth ideas that may or may not pan out.
I think the word balance. It's just a really great word when it comes to investing. And I think at that age, whether you're 29 or 59, I think it's always good to look at your portfolio and try to look for balance between growth and stability. And I think it ultimately is very important to have a little bit of both even when you're younger.
I think building up some of that income and stability exposure in your portfolio at a young age can really pay off down the line. I mean, imagine you get to 50 or 60 years old. And now you're bringing in $10,000 or even more in dividends each year. Right. And depending on what kind of account you have set up and that could be that could be $10,000 or more in dividends that are just you don't even to worry about taxes. I mean, it can be extremely powerful. It can give you money to reinvest or it can just provide you a nice little stable income stream there as you as you look toward retirement.
And so you know, one thing I always like to look at and I go back to it all the time because it's such a valuable resource here. We have a service here called Rulie Retirement run by our own Robert Brokamp. And he has model portfolios in the service, which really I think helped break down sort of how you might consider looking at your balance and depending on what stage of life you're in.
你知道的,我一直喜欢看的一件事情是我们这里有一个叫做 Rulie Retirement 的服务,由我们自己的 Robert Brokamp 运营。他在服务中提供了模型投资组合,我认为这真的很有价值,因为它可以帮助你了解如何考虑你的资产配置和不同人生阶段的不同需求。所以我一直回顾这个服务。
And it breaks down essentially into three different stages. You're more than 10 years out of retirement, less than 10 years out of retirement and then fully in retirement. So if you have more than 10 years until you're even considering retirement. The portfolio breaks down where you would be looking for any of this is model. This is not set in stone, but just something to work with here. You might look at having 30% of your portfolio allocated to large caps, 17 to mid caps and 17 to small caps with the remainder of mix of international stocks real estate and bonds.
Now if you're within 10 years to your retirement, maybe you're looking at 30% large caps, 13% mid caps, 12% small caps, right. You're taking a little bit more of that risk off the table. And then in retirement, maybe you're looking at 30% large caps, 10% mid caps, 10% small caps, again pulling back on some of that risk and depending a little bit more on stability.
So that can give you some idea as where to start. But again, I do love the idea that even at 29, I mean I would try to counter every growth stock you buy with some type of income stock, some type of dividend stock. If you buy a growth stock, try next time to buy something like an income stock. And if you can alternate that could be a way to sort of achieve that balance through time.
And it makes, it certainly makes going through stretches like this a lot easier when you have some of that stability in your portfolio. And you know that even those stocks are kind of going sideways that you're still bringing in some steady income.
And then one final thing I'll add is just as you know Chris might, my daughter's, you know, I got them into investing years ago, I guess really it's a decade or more now that they've been invested. And in one rule that that I force them to adhere to as I help them build their portfolios is that once they buy a stock, that's it. They can't buy that stock anymore.
The next stock they buy has to be a different stock. Right. So once they buy Starbucks, they can't buy Starbucks again, even if it's a screen screening value, they have to buy something else. And that really is meant to help them get that portfolio up to 30 different holdings before they start adding to existing positions.
Because I think once you get to that 25 to 30 different holdings, that really gives you I think a lot of diversification as long as you're kind of working on that balance along the way. And they don't own just growth or just income right they have a nice mix of it all.
And so I think that's one way to look at it too is in order to get to that 25 or 30 different different holdings in your portfolio, you can't be adding to existing positions along the way really until you get to that 25 to 30 holdings in your portfolio. So maybe, maybe consider doing that.
But again, I think a great question, a great way to look at it. I know that if I were to go back to when I was 29, one thing I would change. And I'm not regretting this, but I think one thing I would change I would I would focus a little bit more on building out that dividend presence in my portfolio early on earlier on that I did because it just it can be extremely powerful. And if you think about it too, every quarter you rake in those dividends, that effectively brings down the cost spaces of the stock that you purchased. And if the longer you own them, the cheaper that stock gets. And as long as you maintain sort of a nice diversified approach to those dividend holders, don't just invest all in banks. Right, because that's a sector that we've seen very clearly can go through some hard times. But if you have that dividend exposure nicely diversified, it can just be a steady, reliable stream that can really pay off when you get in your older years.
Zebra Technologies is a company that sells logistics hardware and software. And I know that sounds a bit dull. But you know what's not boring? The fact that over the past five years shares of Zebra Technologies have doubled the S&P 500's return. Asa Sharma cut off with CEO Bill Burns to talk about robots in fulfillment centers, as well as potential growth areas for the company.
Zebra Technologies 是一家销售物流硬件和软件的公司。我知道听起来有点无聊。但你知道什么不无聊吗?在过去五年中,Zebra Technologies 的股票回报率翻了一倍,超过了标普500指数。Asa Sharma 中断了和首席执行官 Bill Burns 的谈话,讨论了履行中心的机器人以及该公司的潜在增长领域。
I wanted to begin by discussing what the company does today. Many of our monthly full members may be familiar with Zebra's core technologies like barcode scanning and RFID smart labeling. But in recent years, Zebra has expanded into a lot of other business lines from rugged tablets to smart scanners for retail environments and even autonomous mobile robots. Now, I've heard you mention in interviews and earnings conference calls that this comes together, this whole thing comes together and something Zebra calls enterprise asset intelligence vision. Can you explain this vision for us?
We think of Zebra as really empowering organizations to really thrive in an on-demand economy. And enterprise asset intelligence we define as every frontline worker and asset within a business really at the edge of productivity within enterprise to be visible connected and optimally utilized ultimately. So business is to be as effective and efficient as possible. And today, 86% of the Fortune 500 companies are Zebra's customers today. Our markets span across retail and e-commerce, transportation logistics, manufacturing, healthcare. And we talk about, you know, seeing Zebra in everyday life, scanners at the front of supermarket checkouts, mobile computers, you know, when e-commerce orders are being picked or delivered to customers.
The printers inside, you know, health care, improving patient outcomes. And, you know, most recently we've invested in new areas, you mentioned. So warehouse automation through robotics and software for retail associates to leverage, you know, them with technology inside the retail store and machine vision are three new investments areas we've made across Zebra. But we think of our business as really making supply chains, you know, more efficient and effective. We think of it as improving customer engagement and outcomes within, you know, health care. And we think of improving the technology usage of frontline workers each and every day within, you know, their work environments.
So would it be fair to say that some of the strengths the company built, let's say way back when in the 70s and 80s, the idea of tracking assets. Some of those skill sets and strategies have been parlayed into thinking about how people interact in organization, how they interact with customers and vendors, how assets interact. Is there something of the old DNA still present in this modern version of Zebra that we see.
Yeah, I mean, we think of our core technologies is really our mobile devices and hands of frontline workers. We think of scanners, as I said, and the, you know, inside, you know, picking e-commerce orders are in the front of store retail. We think of printers used in, you know, printing labels for e-commerce boxes and parcels to hospital wristbands. That's our core technology. And it still continues to grow today. We think of expansion markets that you mentioned things that are closely adjacent to what we do in those areas.
So, you know, rugged tablets. We think of smart supplies. We think of RFID technology. All is adjacent to what we do in our core. And those areas grow faster in our palm markets. And then three new expansion areas we've invested in, as I mentioned earlier, think of robots working with workers inside an e-commerce warehouse to more effectively pick orders. Think of machine vision used to do inspection on, you know, an assembly line and think of software on those mobile devices used by retail associates, you know, today in their environments so that a manager in a retail store can collaborate with their workers. So, they can send tasks to retail workers.
So, you know, we think of the portfolio as really the breath and depth of the entire portfolio, leveraging our core strengths from the past and things like track and trace as you said or, you know, improve and patient outcomes, but leveraging that into new products, software and services that ultimately expand the use cases of our solutions within our customers environments.
你知道的,我们认为投资组合实际上是整个投资组合的广度和深度,利用过去的核心优势以及像你说的 track and trace 或者改善患者结果等方面,但是将其转化为新的产品、软件和服务,最终扩大我们的解决方案在客户环境中的应用案例。
Well, briefly, we've talked about Fetch, which was the third company that I had mentioned to you before we started taping those interested in. Maybe just describe it and then we can move on. What exactly it does? So, these are autonomous mobile robots in iImagine factory settings. Yeah, there are actually two different types of settings is the primary use case. Think of a factory setting or manufacturing setting for things like goods transport, right?
So, fulfillment of goods back to an assembly line. So, think of a muddots that on the station with an automobile manufacturing ultimately that was putting tires on the car, right? So, the main thing is to take goods to the, you know, the actual assembly line so things transport is one application. The other applications e-commerce picking. So, typically within a warehouse and e-commerce, a worker in the past, but work, you know, a lot, 10 miles a day literally pushing your car picking orders across the entire warehouse.
So, today what you do is you position warehouse workers in the individual isles. They have a mobile device that they've been using in the past today as well, typically awareable or a ring scanner. And the actual robot comes to the IOM, which the workers in taking steps out of the picking process. So, the worker actually picks the item. The robot stops next to where the pick needs to happen. The worker picks the item scans the item and ultimately puts it in a bin on the robot. Ultimately, it moves to the next worker a couple of miles over who picks the next item for that item that's order.
So, it takes the order back to the packing area to be actually packed out and shipped to the end customer. So, taking steps out of the process and ultimately being more efficient, allowing workers to focus on more specific tasks. So, the workers are using the same type of directing robots and humans, both leveraging those mobile devices that the humans are using today, you know, workers inside the environment and robots together makes to pick most efficient within an environment. So, think of goods transport, think of e-commerce picking as our two primary use cases to everything that we've talked about so far.
So, we've got one topic, which is artificial intelligence, whether in a robotic setting or working in a retail environment. It becomes such a hot topic lately, AI, where interest in AI has really exploded this year with the emergence of chat GPT. But I see zebra's use of machine learning and artificial intelligence as we're grounded in practical applications like the computer vision that your machine vision you were mentioning earlier.
Can you discuss some of these technologies and how they play into your major product lines? Or if I'm mistaken and there are some exciting generative AI product that you guys are also working on, please tell us about that as well. So, we think of leveraging AI across the portfolio and as you said, machine learning is a great example of that. We're leveraging vision systems, right, ultimately, and then training and learning around that and then using AI algorithms ultimately to make decision-making. So, as you said, we use it across the entire portfolio.
你能讨论一下这些技术以及它们如何应用于你们的主要产品吗?或者如果我错了,你们也在开发一些令人兴奋的生成式 AI 产品,也请告诉我们。所以,我们考虑将 AI 在整个产品组合中加以利用,就像你说的,机器学习就是一个很好的例子。我们利用视觉系统,最终进行训练和学习,最终使用 AI 算法进行决策。所以,正如你所说,我们在整个产品组合中都使用它。
We use it inside things like optical character recognition, you know, within our machine vision portfolio. We use it to learn and train a model inside, you know, inspection within manufacturing. We use it to train robots, autonomous mobile robots, you know, within an environment and be able to map out that environment, ultimately learn the environment and be able to be autonomous, you know, within that environment. So, there's multiple and to it AI software we talked about leveraging it inside planning within retail.
There's many different use cases across our business that we use AI and machine learning and ultimately AI techniques to be able to allow our customers to make better decisions. And we talk in our business really about the idea of, you know, this visibility and automating and digitizing our customers' environments. And then, you know, if you can sense what's happening at the productivity by giving everything a digital voice and then ultimately analyzing that data in real time and then being able to take action associated with that, then you can truly have an outcome, right?
So, customers tell us it's not good enough to tell me the retail shelf is empty. We need to be able to tell me that this send a worker to that shelf, tell the worker either the goods are at the top of the shelf, they just need to bring them down where the consumer can, you know, purchase them or they have to go to the back of the store and bring those out and fill the shelf or an order needs to be placed back on the distribution center to replenish the products back into the store before they could put on the shelf.
And I give it a sense, analyze at and the idea that machine learning and AI is a way to actually ultimately analyze the data we're sensing in real time by digitizing the environment and then AI is the technique to do this analytics ultimately and then drive to the best outcome within customers' business so they're more effective and more efficient.
What they do each and every time. And as always, people in the program may have interested in the stocks they talk about and the monthly full may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. Thanks for listening. We'll see you tomorrow.