Hello my friends, today is March 29th and this is markets weekly. So this past week was a very volatile week in markets, so we have a lot to talk about. Now looking at the S&P 500, we're talking about the potential of a bounce that could last a few days or maybe a few weeks, but looking at this chart, it looks like the bounce is over. It looks like we tried to take back the 200 day moving average, maybe stay above it, but that was not to be and we've fallen, you know, notably below it right now.
Now there are many narratives about this move. Again, I favor looking at things like policy and options positioning and the smart people who follow options positioning are saying that below 5700, it's been negative gamma. And of course you have that very famous JP more position where a JP mortgage fund is long a put, street or short a put, and the strike price of that is just a little bit below where we close on Friday. So that could be driving a lot of price action as well.
Now the legacy media has stories about the potential of this being an inflation scare since inflation data on Friday was higher than expected, but that doesn't really make sense to me because if you look at interest rates, for example, the 10 year yield down, notably you would not expect that if this were inflation scare driven. And of course, this move is most likely connected to the potential for very, very big policy changes on the trade front that will be announced next week.
Now in addition to looking at the stock market, what really struck my eye the past week was of course gold. If you take a step back, it looks like the gold price is going parabolic now we're comfortably above 3000. If you look at the ETF fund flows, they're getting more fund flows and it looks like there's more retail involvement as well. And many stories on the potential drivers of this, it could even be the potential escalation of geopolitical events that we are not fully aware of just yet, because when it comes to these events, someone always knows.
All right, also one thing I'll add again, as you guys all know, I think the biggest driver of market prices is policy. And frankly, looking back the past few months, I think navigating markets has been really easy. Now I would invite you if you haven't yet. Look at that to check out my market outlook. 2025, I taped in December back then the S&P 500 was at 6000, gave you 5500 target, gold was at 2600, gave you 3000 target, and the 10 year yield was at 4.6, I gave a 4% target and everything is moving towards that direction. Policy has been very clear, you just have to listen.
Okay, but today let's talk about three things. First, let's talk about the big tariff move the past week, the 25% tariffs on autos entering the US. And secondly, let's talk about this new study from the New York Fed about student loan delicacies and how it could potentially explain some of the rise in the delicacies we see in say credit card and other consumer debt. And lastly, we have to talk a little bit about liberation day, April 2nd.
Okay, starting with the auto tariffs. So President Trump as we all know really likes tariffs and he's been making a lot of tariff announcements. Earlier in the month he made a big tariff announcement on steel and aluminum imports. The rationale was of course national security. If the US were to ever fight a war, it need to be able to produce its own steel and aluminum. The moment it's highly reliant upon imports. So you got to protect your steel and aluminum industries for national security.
Now we always knew that there would be more tariffs coming with the date focused on April 2nd. But Trump has also noted some other sector related tariffs may be on pharmaceuticals, may be on ships and of course on autos. So for whatever reason he decided on the past Wednesday to announce big tariffs on autos, 25% on imports. Now if you look at the data, you can see that the US imports its autos primarily from Mexico, from Japan, Korea and of course Canada. So these are the countries that will likely going to be affected by these tariffs in a big way.
Now before we go there though, let's actually look at a little bit on the qualitative commentary. Now you can see that there are CEOs of actually US auto companies coming out and saying that this is not good. But on the other hand, you also have the United Auto Workers which is a very big labor union of auto workers issuing this statement saying that this is great. We love this. It's protecting jobs, trying to undo globalization, so forth.
So this should tell you a little bit about the consistency of the mad movement. Now in any case, the stock market didn't really like this, especially the auto company stocks exception being Tesla, which makes a lot of cars in the US. But for a lot of these other companies, a lot of their cars are at least in part made abroad. For example, it's really well known that a lot of US auto companies have part of their supply chains in Canada where they would make something shipped to Canada. The Canadian side will do some value ad, ship it back to the US, add some value, ship it back to Canada. And so it's actually complicated to intertwine supply chain really within North America. So Canada and Mexico. In the fine print of this executive order, and noted that it would exempt the US made parts from the 25% tariff.
So whereas 25% sounds really big, especially for countries like Mexico and Canada that export a lot of auto to the US. Because of these intertwined supply chains, the impact is blunted because part of the cars that are made in Mexico and Canada have these US made parts. So it's not going to be as bad as 25%. So that's the good thing. But for other countries though, they don't really have much US made components and they're going to be badly impacted. What comes to mind of course is South Korea. South Korea makes a lot of really good cars. Let's say Hyundai. And if you look at the data, it looks like auto exports from Korea to the US are about 40% of all exports from Korea to the US. So it's a big part of their exports to the US and having a 25% tariff is going to impact them bigly.
And maybe that's why not too long ago, we had the CEO of Hyundai come to the White House, stand next to Trump and say we are building a factory in the US and building cars and CO and stuff like that because he knows that they are very vulnerable to this and he's trying to build an America to avoid tariffs. Now this actually brings us to Japan where the situation is really interesting. So if you look at this chart of Japanese autos that are, so autos made by Japanese companies that are made in Japan and made in the US, you note that in the 1980s a lot of Japanese autos were made in Japan and then exported to the US. This was a point of contention at the time and it made the US government very angry.
And so after some negotiation, the Japanese companies decided to build more factories in the US. So today a lot of Japanese autos are actually made in the US, which you can see from this chart. Now there are still some cars that Japanese cars made in Japan exported to the US. These tend to be some of the fancier cars like the Land Cruiser from Toyota, for example. So those cars they will be impacted by the tariffs. But since the Japanese auto companies have diversified and are building a lot of cars in America, they're not going to be impacted as much. And of course Japan is a big economy while diversified such that auto exports to the US are, even if tariffs are going to not have a meaningful impact on their overall GDP.
So it looks like Japan will be just fine. The Japanese auto companies can okay as well. So this is going to cause some chaos. But at the end of the day, it is possible that these foreign car manufacturers be at Koreans or Europeans follow the motto of Toyota and actually manufacture more in the US. So we'll see if that can happen. That is obviously ultimately the administration's goal. Okay, the next thing we want to talk about is this really interesting study on student loans from the New York Fed. Now we've been talking about the rise in delinquencies from credit card loans and so forth.
And last we talked about this could potentially be because consumers and having limited amount of money are prioritizing their mortgage payments because their houses prices have gone up so much. They have a lot of home equity in it and mortgages are also low. So it's really, really valuable for them to keep their home. And so they've been providing prioritizing mortgage payments at the expense of other consumer debt. Now there's this interesting work from the New York Fed that shows that, you know, maybe again, this is a connection that I make reading between the lines that maybe this is also because you have more people taking on credit card that should not.
Now if you look at student loan, student loan volumes in the US, you notice that, you know, it's really high, right? In the US, we have about 1.5 trillion dollars worth of student loans for those of you who are not from the US. High education in the US is comically expensive. If you wanted to go to a fancy school, you know, that's like 50, 60,000 dollars a year in tuition. Now there is financial aid to offset it, but still it's a shockingly high price tag. Now part of the reason why prices are so high is because if you go to college, you can get subsidized loans from the government.
Now as the government provides this financing, students, you know, being just 18 years old, happily borrow, go to school, and because their demand is subsidized, the university's charge can charge high prices. But the student loan, the volume of student loan has really absolutely exploded. During the Biden administration, during COVID, there was some effort to try to help students, you know, being given all the chaos to make payments. And so what the Biden administration did was they basically paused student loans. They also tried to forget, tried to forgive some student loans. Again, they're legal challenges and so forth to that. But what they clearly did though was to hit the pause button on student loans. And so for a period of time, these student loan borrowers did not have to pay their debt. And so given that, because of that, no, they, you know, that kind of strength and consumer finances a bit.
And as the student loan aged, you know, their credit stores went up. And so the students did not have to make student loan payments, pausing their delinquencies, everything was okay. They had more money to spend on other things. Now in addition to that, the Biden administration also had this plan called first starts where they set, where they basically wiped out the delinquency records and the default records of previously student loan borrowers who were not in good standing. And so the combination of deferrals and wiping out past delinquencies and defaults basically significantly improved the credit scores of a lot of student loan borrowers. And you can see that in this chart where, you know, over time, people who held student loans saw their credit sources go up. In a sense, these programs artificially boosted the credit stores of millions and millions of student loan borrowers.
Now though, it looks like the party is ending. And so as those, as those special programs fade, student loans are going to come due. And after they are delinquent for, say, 90 days, they began to impact your credit score. Now, the estimate from the New York Fed is that, well, if you have a good credit score and you have a delinquency, it's going to negatively impact your credit score in a really big way. If you have a social credit score, you added delinquency to it. It's going to impact your credit score, you know, slightly less, but because you already, you start with a bad score to begin with, but it's still going to impact it. Now, these researchers are suggesting that in the coming days, since the program is over and we have to wait 90 days for delinquencies to show up, you could have millions and millions of people basically show up in a 90 day plus delinquency section.
And that's going to have a very negative impact on the credit score. How big an impact on aggregate credit scores is just really going to depend on how many people are delinquent and what their current credit scores are, higher they are, the bigger the fall. Now, this strikes me as interesting because maybe one of the reasons why that we have a pick up in delinquencies and things like credit card debt is because some of the borrowers were able to borrow because they had an inflated credit score due to these special programs. And as these special programs fade, again, we get to see that what their real credit score is and these guys should never have had been able to borrow as much as they have. So we'll see. It's unlikely I think to have a big impact on the mortgage market and so forth because, well, I think the standards are a little bit higher to get a conforming mortgage, but it could have a bigger impact on things like credit cards, delinquenties and so forth because the standard to get about loan zero is a bit lower.
Okay. Now, the last thing that I want to talk about is liberation day. So President Trump and his team have been teasing April 2nd for some time. April 2nd is the day when the Trump administration will unveil reciprocal tariffs. Now to be clear, it looks like from current reporting that everything is still in flux. Now recent reporting from the Washington Post suggests that the team actually hasn't fully decided what they're going to do. You know, maybe they'll still do blanket tariffs. In fact, the article suggests that Steve Bannon, who was very influential in the Maga Movement, is saying this is going to be such a big deal that we should make liberation day a federal holiday. So whatever is going to happen, it looks like it's going to be big.
Now when I read the executive order while back, it looked like they were basically giving themselves a lot of leeway to set recent pro tariffs. Now the principle is that whatever other people tear off us, we're going to do the same to them. However, how they define tariffs is kind of a, it's liberally constructed, right? So in the executive order, they also consider things like that tax to be a tariff, which, you know, I could say that many people think it's technically not. And they will also said that they will look at non-tariff trade wares in as also a sort of tariff. So you know, this kind of wiggle room gives them a lot of room to impose basically whatever they want.
So I think it's really just going to be dependent upon what their policy objectives are, how the negotiations are, and maybe how they think that the industries will react. Now, some of several reporting the past week, where representatives from the European Union came to talk, we're suggesting that, you know, it looks like it's maybe some blanket tariffs 20, 25% on EU. So, you know, that's a huge increase from what it used to be.
Now the Trump administration has focused their tariffs on just 15 countries. Now, there are hundreds of countries in the world, but they're just focusing on 15 and to be clear, you know, really only a few countries do big trade with the US that are going to have big macroeconomic impacts. But, you know, looking at the trade surplus through your deficit chart, it's pretty clear that countries like China, like European countries are going to be impacted the most.
So my sense is that this is going to be a really big deal that the market is not anticipating. And I think that, I think that there's probably sizable downside in the equity market, and I'll write about that in my weekly this week. So we're going to find out very soon what this all means. So hopefully everyone is ready. This is going to be an exciting week. And who knows? Maybe we'll have the week, the day off next year. That's why I prepared. I'll talk to you guys next week.