Part 2: Wireless Charging for Vehicles // The Nitty Gritty Details

Welcome back everyone, I'm Jordan Geisigee and this is The Limiting Factor. In the last video of this two-part series on wireless charging for EVs, I covered key points such as its basic architecture, the costs involved, and its end-to-end efficiency. Today, I'll get into the nitty-gritty details like safety, compatibility between vehicle or wireless charging brands, how precisely the vehicle needs to be positioned over the wireless charger to charge, and what wireless charging could mean for Tesla's other products like the Cybertruck and Optimus. Before we begin, a special thanks to my Patreon supporters, YouTube members and Twitter subscribers, as well as RebellionAir.com. They specialize in helping investors manage concentrated positions. RebellionAir can help with covered calls, risk management, and creating a money master plan from your financial first principles.

欢迎回来，大家好，我是Jordan Geisigee，欢迎来到《限制因素》节目。在这个关于电动车无线充电的两部分系列视频的上一个视频中，我介绍了无线充电的基本架构、相关成本以及整体效率。今天，我将深入探讨更多细节，比如安全性、不同行车和无线充电品牌的兼容性、车辆在无线充电器上需要多精确的定位，以及无线充电对特斯拉其他产品如Cybertruck和Optimus可能意味着什么。在开始之前，特别感谢我的Patreon支持者、YouTube会员和Twitter订阅者，以及RebellionAir.com。他们专门帮助投资者管理集中头寸，可以提供覆盖看涨期权、风险管理和基于财务基本原则的理财规划。

For this video, I'd also like to thank Jeremy McCool of Hevo. Jeremy generously provided technical and cost information about Hevo's wireless technology, which is likely very similar to Tesla's wireless charging technology. So even though this video is about Tesla's wireless charging, I'll be making heavy reference to information from Hevo's technology, because so far, we know very little about Tesla's wireless charging system. As usual, this is my best attempt at communicating a complex topic, so any errors in the video are my own, and not related to advice from Hevo. Let's start with vehicle position. As I said in the last video, the wireless charger for your smartphone uses inductive charging that requires the wireless charger and phone to be positioned precisely to transfer power. That's as opposed to the wireless charger on a vehicle, which uses resonant inductive charging that can provide power over greater distances and is somewhat flexible in terms of charge pad positioning.

在这个视频中，我还要感谢Hevo的Jeremy McCool。Jeremy慷慨地提供了关于Hevo无线技术的技术和成本信息，这些信息很可能与特斯拉的无线充电技术非常相似。所以，即使这个视频是关于特斯拉的无线充电的，我也会大量引用Hevo技术的信息，因为到目前为止，我们对特斯拉的无线充电系统知之甚少。一如既往，我竭尽所能去解释这个复杂的话题，所以视频中的任何错误都是我的错，与Hevo的建议无关。我们从车辆的位置开始。正如我在上个视频中所说，你的智能手机无线充电器使用的是感应充电，需要无线充电器和手机精确定位才能传输电力。而汽车上的无线充电器则使用谐振感应充电，可以在较大距离内提供电源，并且在充电板位置方面具有一定的灵活性。

So how tight are the tolerances on the X, Y, and Z axes? By X and Y axes, I mean how far forward, backward, left, and right that a vehicle is positioned in the parking space. By the Z axis, I mean the height and distance between the charging pads. With regards to the X and Y axes, as long as the vehicle is positioned within the lines on a typical parking space, the vehicle will begin charging. With that said, the more accurately the vehicle is positioned over the ground pad, the better. It's because Hevo, and likely Tesla as well, has designed their system to always optimize for efficiency rather than power output. That means although the vehicle position is somewhat flexible, depending on how far out of alignment the charging pads are, it will affect the amount of power that's being delivered to the vehicle.

那么，X、Y 和 Z 轴的公差有多严格呢？在这里，X 和 Y 轴指的是车辆在停车位中的前后和左右位置。Z 轴指的是充电板之间的高度和距离。关于X和Y轴，只要车辆停在停车位的划线内，就会开始充电。但是，车辆在地面充电板上方的位置越准确越好。这是因为Hevo公司（可能还有特斯拉）设计的系统总是优先优化效率而非功率输出。这意味着虽然车辆的位置有一定的灵活性，但根据充电板的对齐程度不同，它会影响输送到车辆的电量。

With regards to the Z axis, 4 to 10 inches, or 10 to 25 centimeters is the sweet spot, but the vehicle will charge as close as 2 to 3 inches to the charging pad, or about 5 to 8 centimeters, and as far away as 12 inches from the charging pad, or about 30 centimeters. For reference, the cyber truck has adjustable ride height, but can drop as low as 8 inches. The Model 3 has a ground clearance of about 5.4 inches, and the Model Y, 6 to 7 inches depending on if it's a performance or non-performance trim. That is, most of Tesla's vehicles are right in the sweet spot for wireless charging, and that's regardless of whether the ground pad or power pad is buried in the parking surface or protruding from the parking surface.

关于Z轴，4到10英寸或10到25厘米是最佳范围，但车辆可以在距离充电垫2到3英寸（约5到8厘米）处充电，也可以在远至12英寸（约30厘米）处充电。作为参考，Cybertruck具有可调节的车身高度，最低可以降至8英寸。Model 3的离地间隙约为5.4英寸，而Model Y根据是否为性能版或非性能版，其离地间隙为6到7英寸。也就是说，特斯拉的大多数车辆正好处于无线充电的最佳范围，无论地面充电垫或充电板是埋在停车场表面还是突出在停车场表面。

As a side note, given that Tesla's vehicles are capable of parking themselves, and will get better at it over time, parking precision for wireless charging isn't likely to be an issue in the future. Let's move on to safety. The biggest safety risk for wireless chargers is foreign objects that come between the charging pads. Just like an inductive stovetop, if a piece of metal is laying on the ground pad and the vehicle starts the charging cycle, that piece of metal could rapidly heat up, causing a fire or injury. So you'd want to keep the charging pad clear of tools, small pieces of metal that are mixed in with dry combustible material like leaves, or pets that are wearing collars that contain metal.

作为一个附带说明，考虑到特斯拉的车辆已经具备自动泊车功能，并且这一功能将随着时间的推移不断提升，停车的精确性在未来对于无线充电来说可能不会成为问题。接下来我们谈谈安全性。无线充电器最大的安全风险在于充电垫之间夹杂异物。就像感应炉灶一样，如果一块金属物品放在地面充电垫上，而车辆开始充电循环时，这块金属可能会迅速升温，导致起火或者受伤。因此，您需要保持充电垫周围没有工具、小金属块等异物，尤其是不能混有干燥可燃物如树叶，或者确保宠物的项圈中不含有金属。

It would of course also be a potential for vandalism, like someone throwing a piece of metal under the vehicle. With that said, there are ways to mitigate those risks. For example, Hivo has what's called guardian detection, which uses a combination of motion and thermal sensors to detect objects on or around the power pad before and during a charging session. That of course wouldn't completely eliminate the risks I called out above, because sensors can be fooled, but would cover most circumstances. So overall, in my view, wireless vehicle charging appears to be safer than the average kitchen stovetop.

当然，这也可能会带来破坏的风险，就像有人把一块金属扔到车辆下面。不 过，需要注意的是，有方法可以降低这种风险。比如，Hivo 有一种称为“守护 检测”的技术，它结合了运动和热传感器，在充电前后检测电源板上或周围的 物体。当然，这不能完全消除我上面提到的风险，因为传感器可能会被干扰， 但可以覆盖大多数情况。总的来说，我认为无线车辆充电的安全性比一般的厨 房炉灶要高。

While we're on the topic of safety, would the inductive charger generate any electromagnetic fields that would be harmful to humans? No, because wireless inductive charging generates electromagnetic fields and frequencies that are considered safe for humans. It typically operates in the kilohertz range and is tuned to interact with the copper inductive charging coils. That's as opposed to, for example, microwaves that operate at much higher frequencies in the megahertz to gigahertz range, which can heat water molecules in tissues, posing a biological risk. That is, any biological risks with wireless charging are all indirect due to the fact that inductive fields can heat metal. But as I said, there will be safety mechanisms in place to mitigate those risks.

在谈到安全问题时，感应充电器是否会产生对人体有害的电磁场呢？不会，因为无线感应充电产生的电磁场和频率被认为对人体是安全的。通常情况下，它在千赫兹的范围内工作，并且专门与铜制感应充电线圈互动。这与例如工作在兆赫兹至吉赫兹范围内的微波不同，微波可以加热组织中的水分子，造成生物风险。也就是说，无线充电的任何生物风险都仅仅是间接的，因为感应场可以加热金属。但正如我所说，会有安全机制来降低这些风险。

Next, let's move on to compatibility. Will any vehicle of any brand be able to use any wireless charger of any brand? In short, yes, it's likely. Much like the cell phone industry agreed on the Qi wireless charging standard, SAE, or the Society of Automotive Engineers, developed a wireless charging standard for light-duty vehicles, which is called J2954. J2954 lays out communications protocols and charging frequencies so that any vehicles and chargers that use the charging standard are compatible. Heavos wireless charging equipment is fully qualified under J2954, and so would be compatible with any other vehicle or system that uses that charging standard.

接下来，让我们谈谈兼容性。任何品牌的车辆都能使用任何品牌的无线充电器吗？简单来说，是的，很有可能。这就像手机行业统一采用了Qi无线充电标准一样，SAE（即汽车工程师学会）也为轻型车辆制定了一个无线充电标准，称为J2954。J2954规定了通信协议和充电频率，以确保使用这一充电标准的任何车辆和充电器都能相互兼容。Heavos的无线充电设备完全符合J2954标准，因此可以兼容使用该充电标准的任何其他车辆或系统。

The question is, will Tesla use the SAE standard and also be compatible? It looks promising. Why? Why Tricity, which was a company spun out of MIT, played a key role in developing the SAE standard and they own intellectual property for wireless charging. Why Tricity licensed some of their technology to Wifurian in 2022? And Wifurian, in turn, was acquired by Tesla in 2023. Tesla did subsequently sell Wifurian almost immediately, but did keep some of its engineers. That talent acquisition may indicate that Tesla will use SAE-compatible charging equipment, and therefore be compatible with the wireless charging equipment of other automakers.

问题是，特斯拉会使用SAE标准并且兼容吗？看起来很有希望。为什么呢？因为Tricity（从麻省理工学院分拆出来的一家公司）在制定SAE标准方面扮演了关键角色，并且他们拥有无线充电的知识产权。2022年，Tricity将部分技术授权给了Wifurian，而Wifurian随后在2023年被特斯拉收购。虽然特斯拉几乎立即卖掉了Wifurian，但是保留了一些工程师。这种人才收购可能意味着特斯拉将使用与SAE兼容的充电设备，因此可以兼容其他汽车制造商的无线充电设备。

What if Tesla decides to develop their own hardware standard? Then, like the last time Tesla developed their own charging standard, the North American charging standard for wired charging, the rest of the automakers in the US would likely be forced to adopt Tesla standard. That's because, like last time, I expect Tesla will likely have more wireless chargers installed more quickly than any other automaker. With all that said, based on Tesla's wireless charging video, I'd say the most likely scenario is that Tesla is partially adopting the SAE standard. Why do I say that? The SAE standard is for the charging pad to be placed in the front third of the vehicle. That's because it was designed for human drivers, and during testing, they found that human drivers were able to position the vehicle more precisely over the charging pad when it was in the front.

如果特斯拉决定开发自己的硬件标准会怎么样呢？那么，就像上次特斯拉开发他们自己的充电标准——北美有线充电标准一样，美国其他汽车制造商可能也会被迫采用特斯拉的标准。这是因为，像上次一样，我预计特斯拉很可能比其他任何汽车制造商更快地安装更多的无线充电设备。话虽如此，根据特斯拉的无线充电视频，我认为最有可能的情况是特斯拉部分采用了SAE标准。为什么这么说呢？SAE标准要求充电板被放置在车辆的前三分之一位置。这是因为它是为人类驾驶员设计的，并且在测试过程中发现，当充电板位于车辆前部时，人类驾驶员能够更精确地将车辆定位在充电板上。

But that standard was developed before vehicles could park themselves. As I said earlier, self-parking functionality will sidestep the parking precision problem. That means it may make more sense for the vehicle to back into the charging stall. That's because it allows the vehicle to leave the parking stall more safely and quickly. And as you can see in the wireless charging teaser, Tesla has placed the charger near the rear bumper rather than the front third of the vehicle. That is, in terms of positioning the vehicle in the charging stall, we may end up seeing some of the same issues that we saw with wired charging, where each manufacturer decided to place the charging port in a different location on the vehicle.

这项标准是在车辆可以自动泊车之前制定的。正如我之前所说，自助泊车功能将能够解决停车精度问题。这意味着让车辆倒车进入充电位可能更合理。因为这样可以让车辆更安全、更快速地驶出停车位。而且在特斯拉的无线充电预告中可以看到，他们把充电器放在了车辆后保险杠附近，而不是前部三分之一的位置。也就是说，就将车辆停入充电位的定位而言，我们可能会看到和有线充电类似的问题，即每个制造商都会把充电口放在车辆的不同位置。

With that said, so long as auto manufacturers like Tesla are all using the rest of the SAE standard, like the same charging frequency, charging compatibility won't be quite the pantomime horse that it was last time, where different manufacturers were not only placing the charging port in different locations, but also using different charging plugs. This time, the only real difficulty I expect is that a vehicle might have to reverse into the charging stall instead of pulling straight in, or vice versa. I may be incorrect here, but I'm hopeful that the auto industry has learned from the past.

也就是说，只要像特斯拉这样的汽车制造商都遵循SAE标准的其他部分，比如相同的充电频率，充电兼容性就不会像上次那样繁琐。当时，不同厂商不仅把充电口放在不同的位置，还使用不同的充电插头。这一次，我预计唯一可能遇到的问题是车辆可能需要倒车进入充电位，而不是直驶进去，或者相反。当然我可能会错，但我希望汽车行业已经从过去的经验中吸取了教训。

Next, will wireless charging for vehicles be available as aftermarket kits? Or will it primarily just be available directly from the vehicle manufacturer as an option or feature? In my view, the widespread use of aftermarket kits is unlikely. That's because the underside of every vehicle is different, modifying the high voltage system of a vehicle is dangerous, and it would be technically complex to tie into the hardware and software of the charging system of existing EVs. That is, the kits would likely be low volume and high cost, so very few people would be willing to pay the thousands of dollars it would cost to avoid plugging their vehicle in. The exception would be if the manufacturer had pre-installed a hardware adapter for wireless charging from the factory, which is exactly what Tesla appears to have done with the Cybertruck and what I expect they'll do with other vehicles in their lineup in the future.

接下来，车辆的无线充电是否会有售后升级套件？或者主要是作为车辆制造商提供的一种选装配置或功能？在我看来，售后升级套件得到广泛使用的可能性不大。这是因为每辆车底部的结构不同，改动车辆的高压系统是有危险的，将现有电动车的充电系统硬件和软件进行连接也很复杂。因此，这些套件可能会因产量低和成本高，而很少有人愿意花费数千美元来避免插电充电。除非制造商在出厂时就已经预装了支持无线充电的硬件适配器，这正是特斯拉在其Cybertruck车型上所做的，也是我预计他们将在未来其他车型中采取的措施。

However, I'd caution that I expect Tesla's wireless chargers will only be capable of 11-50 kW, and so they may not be capable of fast charging. Why? As I showed in the last video, increasing the power level for wireless charging increases the cost. That's because higher charging power requires more or larger inductive copper charging coils. So Tesla could offer higher wireless fast charging of hundreds of kW, but it would mean they might have to charge a large premium for the equipment. As a side note, if you're curious about Hevo's production and deployment plans, they're starting production of their equipment in 2026. Then, there are two automakers that will start incorporating Hevo's wireless charging equipment on their vehicles in late 2027, with volume production coming in 2028. On that note, is Hevo concerned about any competitive or patent conflicts with Tesla's wireless charging? No, I asked Hevo that question and their response was, quote, a rising tide lifts all boats. Tesla is bringing awareness of this technology to the forefront, which will create acceptance and demand for the feature, end quote.

然而，我要提醒一下，我预计特斯拉的无线充电器可能只能支持11-50千瓦的功率，因此可能无法进行快速充电。为什么呢？正如我在上一个视频中展示的那样，增加无线充电功率会提高成本。这是因为更高的充电功率需要更多或更大的感应式铜线圈。因此，特斯拉可以提供数百千瓦的更高无线快速充电，但这可能意味着他们需要对设备收取更高的费用。 顺便提一下，如果你对Hevo的生产和部署计划感兴趣，他们将在2026年开始生产他们的设备。然后，将有两家汽车制造商从2027年底开始在他们的车辆中采用Hevo的无线充电设备，并在2028年进行批量生产。 关于特斯拉的无线充电，Hevo是否担心竞争或专利冲突？不，我询问过Hevo这个问题，他们的回答是，“水涨船高”。特斯拉正在将这种技术的关注度推向前台，这将促使市场对这一功能的接受和需求的增加。

Next, what will the infrastructure rollout look like for wireless charging equipment? That's important because without that infrastructure, vehicles that completely forego wired charging in favor of wireless charging, like the cybercab, won't be able to charge. In fact, wireless charging infrastructure could become one of the rate limiting factors for the deployment of the cybercab. In order to address the scaling challenge, in my view, Tesla will take a three-pronged approach. First, the tip of the spear will be selling the cybercab and wireless chargers to individual customers or fleets. That offloads the logistics, workload, and costs of installing the chargers to customers, so that Tesla can focus on the manufacturing ramp of the cybercab and wireless charging equipment. Second, Tesla can rapidly deploy charging pads to existing supercharger locations by tying into the existing grid connection. If the wireless chargers end up being around 25 kilowatts, and a typical supercharger provides 250 kilowatts, that means Tesla could install 10 wireless charging stalls for the power supply equipment that's needed for one supercharger stall. Given that Tesla has nearly 3,000 charging sites in North America, the backbone for a rapid build-out of wireless chargers is already in place. Third, Tesla can create new charging locations that are dedicated to wireless charging. This would take the most work, but it would allow Tesla to start optimizing fleet placement, traffic patterns, and create hubs where the cybercabs can be cleaned and serviced.

接下来，无线充电设备的基础设施推广将是什么样的？这一点很重要，因为如果没有这些基础设施，像 Cybercab 这样的完全放弃有线充电、改用无线充电的车辆将无法充电。实际上，无线充电基础设施可能会成为 Cybercab 推广的限制因素之一。为了解决这一规模化挑战，我认为特斯拉将采取三管齐下的策略。首先，特斯拉将通过向个人用户或车队销售 Cybercab 和无线充电器，来分担安装充电器的物流、工作量和成本，从而使特斯拉能专注于 Cybercab 和无线充电设备的生产扩展。其次，特斯拉可以通过连接现有的电网，将无线充电板快速部署到现有的超级充电站。如果无线充电器的功率约为 25 千瓦，而一个典型的超级充电桩提供 250 千瓦电力，这意味着可以用一个超级充电桩的电力设备安装 10 个无线充电车位。鉴于特斯拉在北美已有近 3,000 个充电站，无线充电器快速布局的基础已经具备。第三，特斯拉可以建立专门用于无线充电的新充电站。虽然这需要投入更多的工作，但这将允许特斯拉开始优化车队定位、交通流量，并创建可以清洁和维护 Cybercab 的中心。

Next, is it possible to embed wireless charging in roads, or pre-fabricate it into Tesla's boring tunnels so vehicles can charge while they drive? Yes, and in the long term, that could result in enormous savings. That's because it would allow most of the batteries to be removed from the vehicle, making them dramatically cheaper, whiter, and more efficient. However, the catch is that it would cost billions of dollars, years, or even decades to embed enough wireless charging in roads to make it ubiquitous enough that EV manufacturers would feel comfortable designing and manufacturing vehicles with stripped-down battery packs. Also, who's going to shoulder the investment cost for roads that wirelessly charge vehicles? It's not clear to me if you have an opinion, let me know in the comments below.

接下来，是否可以将无线充电嵌入到道路中，或将其预制到特斯拉的隧道中，以便车辆在行驶中充电？答案是可以的。从长远来看，这可能带来巨大的节省。这是因为这样可以将大部分电池从车辆中移除，使车辆变得更便宜、更轻，也更高效。然而，问题在于，要在道路上铺设足够的无线充电设备使其普及，让电动车制造商放心地设计和制造电池组简化的车辆，需要花费数十亿美元，以及多年甚至几十年的时间。此外，谁来承担这些无线充电道路的投资成本呢？这点还不明确。如果你有想法，请在下方评论区告诉我。

Next, let's tie up several loose ends by doing some rapid-fire Q&A. How is each part of the wireless charging system cool? The power station is air-cooled with a heat sink. The power pad and vehicle pad are passively cooled by the surrounding environment through their cases, and the battery adapter ties into the vehicle's cooling system. However, that's for an 11kW system. At higher power levels, the charging pads might also need active cooling systems that use air or liquid. What are the mounting options for the ground or power pad? It can be flush mounted like a manhole cover, surface mounted with masonry anchors so that it's fully above the road surface, or it can be embedded in asphalt or concrete, or even under-paver bricks or gravel. So long as the charging pads are aligned, the correct distance from each other, and there's nothing metallic between them, they'll couple and transfer energy. On that note, what about water, ice, snow, and leaves? Will they affect wireless charging? No, the ground pads will be designed to be robust to decades of environmental abuse of all kinds. Lastly, what about Optimus, Tesla's robot? Will it use wireless charging? For the time being, it doesn't appear that Optimus is using wireless charging, because the charging hook has what looks like metallic conductor contacts. That doesn't mean it won't use wireless charging in the future, and I don't have a strong opinion as to whether that's likely. In any case, here are the arguments for and against wireless charging for Optimus.

接下来，让我们通过快速问答来解决一些未处理的问题。无线充电系统的各个部分是如何保持凉爽的呢？电源站通过散热片进行风冷。电源垫和车辆垫通过它们的外壳被周围环境自然冷却，而电池适配器连接到车辆的冷却系统。不过，这适用于11千瓦的系统。在更高功率时，充电垫可能还需要使用空气或液体的主动冷却系统。地面或电源垫有哪些安装选项？可以像井盖一样齐平安装，也可以用建筑锚具表面安装，使其完全在路面上方，或者嵌入沥青或混凝土中，甚至在砖块或砾石下安装。只要充电垫对齐、间距正确，并且它们之间没有金属物体，就可以耦合并传输能量。关于水、冰、雪和树叶，它们会影响无线充电吗？不会，地面垫将被设计得足够坚固，能抵抗几十年的各种环境影响。最后，特斯拉的机器人Optimus呢？它会使用无线充电吗？目前来看，Optimus似乎没有使用无线充电，因为充电钩上有看起来像金属导体的接触点。这并不意味着它将来不会使用无线充电，我对这是否有可能并没有强烈的意见。无论如何，这里有一些关于Optimus是否应该使用无线充电的正反两方面的论点。

A vehicle has comparatively little freedom of movement along all axes compared to a robot, and it can't manipulate its environment. So wireless charging is the most durable and cheapest way to self-charge. Optimus, on the other hand, could use a number of different wired or wireless charging solutions to charge itself. That means the decision to use wired or wireless charging for Optimus comes down to other factors. Wired charging is slightly more energy efficient, and would allow Optimus to hang itself up at the end of its shift for charging. It has the benefit of stowing the robot safely in a standing position while it's powered down so that it takes up less space and doesn't fall over. That is, the charging hook would serve several purposes. Wireless charging, on the other hand, would be more durable because there would be no connection point to wear out, meaning lower maintenance and repair costs over time. That would be especially important for industrial or commercial use cases. If you can think of any other positives or negatives that might sway the argument for wired or wireless charging for Optimus, let me know in the comments below.

一辆汽车与机器人相比，在各个轴向上的移动自由度相对较小，而且无法操作其环境。因此，无线充电是最持久且最便宜的自我充电方式。另一方面，Optimus 可以使用多种有线或无线充电方案为自己充电。这意味着对于 Optimus 来说选择有线还是无线充电取决于其他因素。有线充电的能效稍微高一些，还可以让 Optimus 在工作结束时挂起来充电，这样可以在关机时将机器人安全地放置在站立位置，所以它占用的空间更小，也不会倒下。也就是说，充电挂钩有多重用途。而无线充电则更耐用，因为没有磨损的连接点，这意味着随着时间的推移，维护和修理成本更低。这一点对于工业或商业用途尤其重要。如果你想到其他可能影响 Optimus 使用有线或无线充电的优缺点，请在下面的评论中告诉我。

In summary, wireless charging is probably safer than the average stovetop thanks to safety mechanisms. It's fairly flexible in terms of vehicle position and ride height, and it has existing charging standards, which likely means that vehicles and chargers from different brands will eventually be compatible, and the biggest challenge now appears to be the mass deployment of wireless chargers to ensure there's chargers available for vehicles that can only use wireless charging, like the cybercap. However, that remaining challenge is easily solved by selling wireless chargers with the vehicles and by building out wireless charging stalls at existing supercharger locations. Tesla could, of course, also build out dedicated cybercab hubs with all the requisite care and feeding equipment, but that won't happen at scale overnight.

总之，由于安全机制，无线充电可能比普通的炉灶更安全。在车辆位置和车身高度方面，它相对灵活，并且已经有现有的充电标准，这可能意味着不同品牌的车辆和充电器最终可以兼容。目前最大的问题似乎是要大规模部署无线充电器，以确保那些只能使用无线充电的车辆（如Cybercab）能够找到充电器。然而，这个问题可以通过随车销售无线充电器和在现有的超级充电站位置设置无线充电亭来轻松解决。当然，特斯拉也可以建立专用的Cybercab充电中心，配备所有必要的设施，但这不会在一夜之间大规模实现。

So in my view, Tesla will deploy their own cybercab fleet, city by city, deploying hundreds of cybercabs at a time along with the infrastructure to support them. That is a targeted and methodical approach. In the meantime, individuals and fleet owners will build out the cybercab network in a more distributed fashion. If you enjoyed this video, please consider supporting the channel by using the links in the description. Also consider following me on X. I often use X as a test bed for sharing ideas, and X subscribers like my Patreon supporters generally get access to my videos a week early. On that note, a special thanks to my YouTube members, X subscribers, and all the other patrons listed in the credits. I appreciate all of your support, and thanks for tuning in.

所以在我看来，特斯拉将会逐步在城市中部署他们的网络出租车队，每次投放数百辆车，并配套相应的基础设施。这是一种有针对性且系统化的方法。与此同时，个人和车队拥有者将在更分散的方式下建立网络出租车网络。如果你喜欢这个视频，请考虑通过描述中的链接支持该频道。另外，也可以考虑在X上关注我。我经常使用X作为分享想法的测试平台，X的订阅者和我的Patreon支持者通常能提前一周观看我的视频。特别感谢我的YouTube会员、X订阅者以及出现在致谢名单中的所有支持者。我非常感激你们的支持，谢谢观看。