Welcome to Electrified, it's your host, Dileunumus. Quick shout out to Jeff A and Nadine V. Thank you for using my Tesla referral link and congratulations on your new Tesla. Real quick, if you emailed me last week letting me know you used my referral link last year and you did not yet receive my little thank you, just email me again and let me know. But pretty sure I have everybody covered that did reach out. As we all know, there are plenty of different reasons that different people come to be such a fan of Tesla Company. Just make sure you don't forget that Tesla is a company that tries to do good wherever it can. Over the weekend, Altadena Mountain Rescue posted on IG a donation of Cybertrucks from Tesla to be utilized as battery banks at the station until power is restored. This will greatly help the team to power radios, computers and lights as we work into the dark. On X, Elon said apologies to those expecting Cybertruck deliveries in California over the next few days, we need to use those trucks as mobile base stations to provide power to Starlink internet terminals in areas of LA without connectivity. A new truck will be delivered by the end of the week. Elon said we're going to position Cybertrucks with Starlink and free wifi in a grid pattern in the areas that most need it in the greater LA and Malibu area. Sunday evening, Elon said adding a lot more to this effort tonight and tomorrow. Not only is Tesla providing these Cybertrucks but they're adding security personnel, in vehicle and snacks and beverages for passers-by.
Today, diligent Denizin on X said Elon just drove by us after dropping off Starlink to the firefighters at the Palisades. An entire caravan of Cybertrucks drove past us on the PCH, impressive, I have to say, every day I grow to respect this guy more and more. Not only all of that but Tesla said they're covering housing accommodations and supporting employees with transportation and meals, all of their supercharger sites are back online except the one in Pasadena. They're deploying their mobile megapack charging units at various locations, as well as their mobile power wall units. At the end of the day, most of us invest to make money. But it's definitely a bit more enjoyable when you know that your money is going to support a company that does things like that. George Hochts, the president of Comma AI, is typically trying to talk up Comma AI and how they're on a similar level as Tesla's FSD or at least very close. But this weekend he said drove around with version 13, if you haven't tried it, it's really good, Comma AI should be there in two years. We're massively scaling up training compute and data ingestion, finally seeing improvements scale with those things. To that, Sahil said, I wonder how many heads of autonomy at OEMs intentionally ignore your existence to deny their incompetency. To that, George said LOL, yeah, how we feel about Tesla should be how Rivean and Lucid feel about us. It's that much more embarrassing for them since OpenPilot is open source. More importantly, George was asked if he still stands by his prediction that Robotaxes are 5 to 10 years away, to which he said yes, as impressive as my 30-minute drive was, the software crashed once and it made a maneuver that would have gotten us pulled over right away. If a cop was watching, there's 3-4 orders of magnitude to go to human level. One order of magnitude is usually a factor of 10, so what George is saying is that FSD would need to improve by a factor of 1000 to 10,000 before hitting human level.
Again, at some point, I wish somebody would define what this human level actually was, because as many of us would agree, FSD is already better than at least some human drivers. And for what it's worth, I disagree with George on this take, but he has been building in this space now for years, so figured I would pass that along. And yes, that prediction from George has been added to the prediction tracker and yes, we will check in on this in the weeks ahead. Maybe most importantly though, note that George said he only spent 30 minutes with version 13, so one that crash he reported is certainly not the norm, and two in my opinion to make statements about the capability of a software with only 30 minutes of seat time is a bit reckless in my opinion.
However, in fairness, I would say that 30 minutes is probably enough time to know at the very least that it's really good, as he said. Tesla's goat pointed out a historic moment when it comes to Tesla's software saying that there are two different FSD versions on the same Tesla software update. On software branch 2024.45.25.15, for the first time, it now has both FSD 13.2.4 for hardware 4 and 12.6.1 for hardware 3. Why might this matter? They said there's a possibility, Tesla is now able to have multiple FSD builds within the same software update depending on your autopilot computer, but later that uncertainty was erased because they confirmed it was not a typo.
So depending on how Tesla did this from a technical standpoint, they said this could mean anything from receiving FSD builds without needing a new software update to less delays given no need for branching based on model. I would further speculate there's a chance that Tesla has made some model size efficiency improvements to now enable for two different FSD versions on the same software branch. To put it another way, if this is the new trend going forward, Tesla could have one main software branch and then the FSD add on, if you will, just one way to think about it, could be on whatever that software branch is not needing its very own. And in that scenario, these FSD upgrades or add ons could come with greater frequency, not having to wait for an update for the underlying software specific to each version.
In my opinion, Tesla was already rolling out FSD updates at a pretty frequent pace, but that could accelerate from here, but it is just speculation for now. A choke did say 12.6 is now rolling out generally to AI3 vehicles, and its version 12.6.1 that's finally going to some AI3, Model 3, and Model Y vehicles where previously, it had only rolled out to the Model S and X. We also have FSD13.2.4 now rolling out to some Cybertruck owners. Holmars said that Panasonic's 4680 cells are about to enter mass production, as he was told at CES. I wanted to clarify for now this higher volume 4680 production will be at Panasonic's plant in Japan.
The $4 billion dollar factory that Panasonic is building in Kansas is going to start with 2170 type cells. However, if you were following along last year, there were rumors that Panasonic is considering an additional investment in Kansas to make 4680 cells there as well. They called that potential expansion Phase 3, and it would be largely to supply Tesla for the Cybertruck and next-gen vehicles. And because Japan does not have a free trade agreement with the United States, I believe at best 4680s from Japan if Tesla were to use them in the US market could only qualify for half of the EV tax credit. But the hope for Tesla would be by the time they need more 4680s supply, Panasonic does have 4680 lines set up in Kansas.
Because remember, even if the $7,500 tax credit goes away, the production tax credit is likely to stay. Ensure Tesla would not be a direct beneficiary of 4680 cells made by Panasonic in the US. I'm just saying my argument here is that Panasonic will have reasons to expand its production in the US, including 4680s. Here's a photo of the new Model Y out in the wild in China. I just wanted to say, after watching the world react to this over the weekend, I decided to wait until we get the official specs for the North American variant rather than trying to deduce from how Tesla is doing things around the world.
We should have the official pricing and specs, range, all of that good stuff here in the next few weeks. I did want to add, don't forget, much of the improvements go beyond the spec upgrades and won't be understood until you're in the vehicle, preferably driving it. The overall refinement, build quality, material improvements, suspension feel, NVH advances, etc. won't show up in the basic specs that everybody likes to form their judgments on. So let's make sure the North American variant is the same. Get those official specs, yes, but then try to get in one of these vehicles as soon as possible before drawing final conclusions.
And the word is that Gigabrelin is going to start producing the new Model Y tomorrow, which is Tuesday, January 14th. Which in my opinion is a great sign for what's to come for free month in Austin.
This one is squarely in the rumor category, but a Chinese blogger said that Tesla received 50,000 orders for the Model Y on the day that they launched Project Junipert in China. Tesla has over 300 stores in China and at one of them, they received nearly 300 orders on that one day.
But for what it's worth, this blogger was right about when this vehicle was going to be launched in China. A Tesla salesperson revealed to Chinese media that the number of orders on that day exploded. And the outgoing Model Y became China's best-selling car for all of 2024, not just best-selling EV, but the best-selling car of any type. Tesla sold over 480,300 Model Y's in 2024 in China. That number was up just over 5% from 2023.
Tesla's VP in China has been promoting Tesla's safety, highlighting that their brand has not been recalled in over 6 years. But just note, the BYD Chin Plus was only 284 units behind in the number 2 spot.
For my Canadians, unfortunately Tesla has raised the price of the outgoing Model Y by $1000, so now not even the base variant qualifies for the iZev credit. Tesla also up to the price of the Model 3. If there's a silver lining here, it's that the iZev program in Canada was rapidly running out of funds anyway.
根据传闻,Gigabrelin 公司计划明天,也就是1月14日星期二,开始生产新的 Model Y。在我看来,这是奥斯汀未来几个月会有好消息的一个很好的迹象。
这则消息属于传闻类,但有一位中国博主说,特斯拉在中国发布“Juniper项目”当日就获得了5万份 Model Y 的订单。特斯拉在中国有超过300家门店,其中一家在那天就收到了将近300份订单。值得注意的是,这位博主之前关于这款车将在中国推出的预测是准确的。
一位特斯拉的销售员向中国媒体透露,那天的订单数量激增,而现款 Model Y 成为了2024年中国最畅销的汽车,不仅是最畅销的电动车,而且是所有类型汽车中的销量冠军。2024年,特斯拉在中国销售了超过48万3000辆 Model Y,这一数字比2023年增长了5%以上。
特斯拉中国区的副总裁一直在宣传特斯拉的安全性,强调特斯拉的车型已经超过6年没有被召回。然而值得注意的是,排名第二的比亚迪秦 Plus 仅仅比 Model Y 少卖了284辆。
对于加拿大的消费者来说,不幸的是,特斯拉把现款 Model Y 的价格提高了1000加元,因此即便是基础款也不再符合 iZev 的抵税资格。特斯拉同时还提高了 Model 3 的价格。不过,从积极的方面看,反正加拿大的 iZev 项目资金也快用完了。
And for the few thousand of you that watched from the Philippines, if you ordered a Model Y, you'll automatically be upgraded to the new Juniper Model when deliveries start. The word is, Model 3 deliveries are set to start in the Philippines this month. And if you ordered the Deep Blue Metallic outgoing color, you'll automatically be upgraded to the new Glacier Blue exterior for free. As you would expect for Tesla opening up into a new market, a sales person at a Tesla store in the region said that demand for Tesla vehicles is excellent.
On that note, Tesla achieved a pretty serious milestone last year as it beat Audi in overall global sales for the first time. Last year, Audi sold 1.67 million vehicles down 12% from 2023. As we've noted, they've been struggling with intensifying competition in Europe and China and weak demand for their EVs. So yes, Tesla has jumped Audi as they delivered 1.79 million vehicles in 2024.
Audi's deliveries of fully electric vehicles also declined 8% to around 164,000. Audi's also planning to close a site in Brussels because of poor demand for the electric Q8 e-tron. Another brand for Tesla to take down in a future year would be Mercedes. In 2024, Mercedes sold 2.4 million vehicles around the world. Now, if Mercedes were to be flat for 2025, Tesla would need roughly 35% sales growth to eclipse Mercedes in 2025.
Just to clarify, on one of Tesla's recent recalls, part of it was actually a physical upgrade, not OTA. On a small percentage of affected vehicles upon a vehicle power-up, a reverse current may cause a shorting failure on the car computer board, resulting in the loss of rear-view camera functionality. But in some cases, if an affected vehicle experienced the shorting failure condition, then Tesla will replace the vehicle's car computer at no cost to the customer.
Norway is well on its way to achieving the milestone of 100% of new car sales being electric. And listen to what an executive at a car dealership over there said, we think it's wrong to advise a customer coming in here today to buy an ice car because the future is electric. I think many here would agree that is not at all the mindset of most dealerships here in America. But hopefully we do get there one day, and don't forget, this process was like three decades long in Norway. They started little by little, taxing internal combustion cars more and more, while simultaneously exempting EVs from certain taxes. But as far as I can tell, one thing most people don't talk about is how Norway has had long-term EV policies so the entire industry has been able to plan accordingly.
And one thing most people don't mention about the Norway story is that as far as I can tell, they have had long-term predictable EV policies in place so the industry has been able to plan accordingly. Again, at least so far, that scenario is pretty foreign to the American auto industry. Right now in America, EV policies are doing their best to yo-yo impressions. In another beat the buzzer scenario, the Department of Transportation announced $635 million in EV charging, but part of that is for other clean transportation. The money will be deployed across 27 states, four tribal areas, and the District of Columbia. More than three dozen projects expanding community EV charging will get 368 million, and then 268 million will go towards seven corridor fast charging projects.
But these are the ones deploying alternative fueling capabilities, largely hydrogen. In total, the grants will help install more than 11,500 EV charging ports and hydrogen and natural gas fueling infrastructure. Doing some digging, it turns out there will be 42 of these community building EV charger projects. So taking the amount allocated for those 42 projects turns out to about $8,761,000 per project. Or you can do that same 368 million divided by the 11,500 total ports it's supposed to support. Which is $32,000, which would be reasonable, but we don't really know the breakdown between level two chargers and things that are more online with superchargers. I run those numbers because yet again, Tesla has been snubbed in this round of EV charger funding. 49 applicants in total have been selected to receive this money and Tesla's application for about $100 million to fund a semi charging corridor was once again passed over.
Tesla's partner on the project, California's South Coast Air Quality Management District, confirmed that the partnership also applied for this round of funding. Initially, Tesla was hoping to get that $100 million and use $24 million of its own money to build a nine electric semi charging station between its former HQ in Northern California and the southern border of Texas. Each of those stations was supposed to be equipped with 8 750kW chargers for the Tesla Semi and four other chargers that would be open to other electric trucks. The project was officially called Transport Electrification supporting semis operating in Arizona, California, Texas or Tesseract. Tesla's former VP, Roan Patel said last year that some of the sites along this 1800 mile planned route were no brainers, even without funding.
Some are making the argument Tesla was left out of the funding because of the perceived uncertainty around Tesla's supercharger program after the 10% layoffs earlier last year. For what it's worth, there could be a future funding round here but as for a lot of things right now we have to wait and see what Trump chooses to do. So look, does Tesla need $100 million to succeed? Obviously not. But as we've highlighted in the past, it's just the principle when you talk about efficiency and government spending, the fact that you don't want to give Tesla money to accelerate what they're already doing just doesn't make any sense if you really want the best and most reliable EV chargers on the market. Especially for an industry that's building out from its infancy in the EV semi market.
But the truth is, we can't be naive and expect the Biden administration to do the right thing after all of the support that Elon threw behind Trump. And look, I'm not at all justifying that decision, I'm just saying it's the world that we live in right now. Responding to this news of yet another Tesla snub, Elon just said, Si. I'll admit, it'll be tough to draw any conclusions from this news bit but I think it's important to watch what lithium prices are doing. The reason I say it's difficult to draw conclusions is because in most cases we don't have any idea how the contracts for specific companies in the space are actually structured. I believe on a conference call a few years ago, Tesla said at the time that only less than 10% of their lithium purchases were on the spot market. Meaning 90% plus of Tesla's lithium deals are done on long term contracts, which obviously insulates Tesla from many of these price fluctuations. But with that said, lithium prices are expected to stabilize in 2025 after two years of steep declines. From the peak in November 2022, lithium prices are down 86%. But now the global lithium supply glut is predicted to shrink by half. Thus, when it comes to spot market pricing, a battery analyst said we expect to see a price recovery for lithium in 2025, as the curtailment seen in 2024 and the possibility of further curtailments will significantly reduce the market surplus. In this case, curtailments are limiting production. As always, the context here matters. If you look at a chart dating back to 2018, you can see that right now we're effectively back to pre-COVID levels. And so you know, this is the pricing in Chinese Yuan.
Another very important long-term topic, not many are covering, is the current battle over LFP technology between China and the US, and really the rest of the world. Last week, China's Ministry of Commerce proposed a rule to restrict Chinese companies from exporting equipment or know-how to make the advanced LFP batteries used by Tesla and Chinese automakers. And if that rule is finalized, Western battery makers could be relegated to manufacturing second-rate LFP batteries. Not only that, but the US Department of Defense recently blacklisted China's CATL. They actually designated it as an arm of China's military, to which CATL responded by denying that's the case. Hopefully, right now, some of you are remembering that last year Tesla bought older equipment from CATL to make LFP cells in Nevada. Now yes, this change from China is still just a proposal, so another thing we're going to have to wait and see how Trump chooses to handle. And, I think you all know, it's not just Tesla relying heavily on LFP battery tech, it's really everyone in the auto industry that's making or trying to make affordable EVs.
It's speculation for now, but even if the rule is finalized, CATL, BYD, and others could still sell their best batteries to Western companies, but the Chinese companies would be barred from offering the know-how for doing so to non-Chinese companies. It sounds like non-Chinese companies may be able to make older versions of LFP tech just not the latest and greatest coming from China. One analyst is expecting companies like Tesla to simply buy their LFP from CATL, even if politicians scream about the alleged links to the Chinese military. So, unless things go south, the concern here may not be that Tesla can't get access to LFP cells, it's that over the next few years Tesla wouldn't have the ability to make its own LFP cells in-house, vertically integrating as I'm sure they would like to do. This one is quite brutal. A Dutch civil service pension fund ABP, one of the biggest funds in the world, has sold its investments in Tesla. It sold its 2.8 million shares of Tesla because it was unhappy about Elon's compensation plan and poor working conditions at the company. It should come as no surprise then that the fund voted against Elon's pay package last June. This is a perfect example of why more things should be politics aside because September of last year Tesla stock price was hovering around $228 a share. AKA, this pension fund sold right before the major run up. So, basically thanks to mis and disinformation, the company sold about $650 million of Tesla stock at a terrible time. Replying to that news, Elon said, so they lost half a billion dollars and failed their constituents. Yes, yes they did.
Someone shared an invoice with Gregor Truck and it turns out the official Cybertruck off-road light bar cost $2,500 from Tesla, which at the very least now makes the foundation package Tesla was offering a bit more attractive. Porsche's global sales for 2024 were down 3% year over year. Even worse though, when it comes to the Taycon that they spent plenty of time refreshing on their own, it sold just 20,800 units down 49% year over year. Porsche's also planning to lay off 30% of its workforce in China. The Nvidia account posted the Biden administration's AI diffusion rule will stifle innovation and undermine America's global tech leadership, restricting access to mainstream computing, risks derailing AI progress for industries at home and abroad. As of today, this AI diffusion rule is an interim final rule which just means it's currently enforced but it may be subject to modifications based on feedback. Nvidia's VP of government affairs called this one a sweeping overreach but of course from the Biden administration's perspective, but in summary the new rule has three parts, one being more export controls on chips, two more controls on the specific model weights on some of the most advanced models, and third the Bureau of Industry and Security will impose security conditions to safeguard the storage of the most advanced models. I'm not going into detail here because with the Trump transition a week from now, yet again we don't really know how this is going to play out. If you're impatient and want to learn more about this rule before Trump takes office, I'll have a link to the official release below. And here's part of Nvidia's official statement in response. The first Trump administration laid the foundation for America's current strength and success in AI. In its last days in office, the Biden administration seeks to undermine America's leadership with a 200 plus page regulatory morass drafted in secret and without proper legislative review. A morass is basically a difficult situation to get out of. And Nvidia said while cloaked in the guise of an anti-China measure, these rules would do nothing to enhance US security. This rule, however, is not enforceable for 120 days. Obviously, this will be one to keep an eye on, as we know Tesla is increasingly an AI company, so this will have direct impacts not only on Nvidia, but Tesla as well. Ray for Tesla reported the Beijing Municipal People's Congress recently passed the Beijing Autonomous Driving Vehicle Regulations. They're set to go into effect on April 1st, 2025. These regulations for the first time outlined specific rules for the use of level three driving and higher level private vehicles on public roads. In response to this, he said regulatory approval for FSD likely to happen soon. Morgan Stanley put out a new Tesla price target of $430 per share as a base case, but they said ultimately Tesla could double to $800 per share. That's because Tesla's position in semi-autonomous electric robots could allow the company to convert car owners into subscribers generating highly recurring revenue. But here's why I'm sharing this. Jonas is saying they're expecting Tesla to deploy 7.5 million autonomous vehicles by 2040. Let's just be ultra conservative here and assume that none of Tesla's current vehicle fleet will be robot taxis. We know that's not the case, but just stick with me. According to Morgan Stanley, from that basis from here forward 7.5 million over the next 15 years is only 500,000 robot taxis deployed per year over the next 15 years. All I'll say with cybercab set to enter production in 2026 and the goal to be 2 to 4 million units of just the cybercab alone and adding in a portion of Tesla's existing fleet that will of course be robot taxi capable in the future. I think even Morgan Stanley's bull case of 12 million by 2040 is going to be far too low.
有人与Gregor Truck分享了一张发票,结果发现,特斯拉的官方越野灯条售价为2,500美元,这让特斯拉提供的基础包更具吸引力。保时捷2024年的全球销售量同比下降了3%。更糟糕的是,他们花了很多时间改进的Taycan,只售出了20,800辆,同比下降49%。保时捷还计划在中国裁减30%的员工。
英伟达的官方账号发布信息称,拜登政府的AI传播规则将扼杀创新,削弱美国在全球科技领域的领导地位,限制主流计算的访问可能会阻碍国内外行业的AI进展。截至目前,这一AI传播规则是一个临时最终规则,这意味着目前已被执行,但可能会根据反馈进行修改。英伟达的政府事务副总裁称这是一个过度扩张,但拜登政府的目的是加强国家安全。新规则包括三个部分:一是对芯片的更多出口管制;二是对最先进的一些模型的特定模型权重进行更多控制;三是工业与安全局将对最先进模型的存储施加安全条件。
由于特朗普即将上任,我们不太清楚此规则将如何发展。如果你迫不及待想了解更多内容,我会附上官方发布的链接。英伟达的官方声明部分回应指出,特朗普政府的首期奠定了美国在AI领域的当前实力和成就,而拜登政府在离任前寻求削弱这一领导地位,推出了200多页的规章,但并未经过适当的立法审查。尽管这些规则被冠以反华措施的外衣,但英伟达认为它们并不能增强美国的安全。不过,此规则在120天内是不可执行的。显然,这值得关注,因为特斯拉越来越像一家AI公司,这将直接影响到英伟达和特斯拉。
Ray for Tesla报道称,北京市人民代表大会最近通过了《北京市自动驾驶车辆管理条例》,将于2025年4月1日生效。这些法规首次规定了三级及更高级私人车辆在公共道路上的使用规则。对此,他表示,完全自动驾驶(FSD)的监管批准可能很快实现。
摩根士丹利给出特斯拉的新目标股价为每股430美元,但他们表示最终特斯拉股价可能翻倍至800美元。因为特斯拉在半自动电动机器人领域的地位可能让公司将车主转化为用户,产生高且可持续的收入。不过,我分享这个的原因是,Jonas预计特斯拉将在2040年前部署750万台自动驾驶汽车。我们不妨保守地假设特斯拉现有车队中没有车辆会成为机器人出租车。尽管这不符合实际,但请跟我一起假设。根据摩根士丹利,未来每年部署的500,000台机器人出租车,从现在起的15年中,总计750万台机器人出租车。考虑到cybercab计划在2026年开始生产,目标仅cybercab就达到200万到400万辆,加上特斯拉现有部分车队未来会具备机器人出租车能力,我认为即便是摩根士丹利的强势预测,到2040年总计1200万台也会太低。
Kia's timeline for supercharger access has been delayed from January 15th to spring 2025. A PR person said a delay has occurred and we're working with the appropriate teams to confirm new availability and dates. Tesla stock closed the day at $403.31 up 2.17%. While the NASDAQ was down 0.3%, the volume was 25% below the average. Hope you guys have a wonderful day. Please like the video if you did. You can find me on X linked below and a huge thank you to all of my Patreon supporters.