Hello my friends, today is December 18th and this is my December FOMC debrief. So we just had the last FOMC meeting of this year and before we get into what happened let's take a step back and level step. So today was a meeting where we had a dot plot where this fed kind of gives you a sense of how they're thinking about the world. The last time we had a dot plot was in September and at that time the fed was having a bit of a panic. So in the September dot plot they were basically suggesting that you know GDP is going to slow a lot to two percent unemployment rate is going to jump to 4.4 percent and inflation is going to come down. Basically they were in a panic that we would have a recession and so they were forecasting that we would have no another cut today in December. Now between then and now economic data has consistently surprised to the upside we've had. The unemployment rate 4.2 percent below what they were expecting, GDP growth close to 3 percent and inflation a little bit hotter than they expected.
Now even after all of this positive data the fed still decided to cut. So a lot of people were kind of scratching their heads again why are they cutting today. Now to be clear the Fed never surprises the markets or tries not to and so the market fully priced in today's cut already. It was a little bit unsure a couple weeks ago but after Governor Waller came out and gave his nod to rate cut and data continued to cooperate the market was pretty sure we'd get a cut today. And so today's meeting was unequivocally hawkish. Now I was surprised I was thinking we would have a devilish meeting but no it was unequivocally hawkish. Now the hawkishness comes largely through the feds dot plot. Now the market again last time they were penciling four cuts for next year heading into the meeting today the market pricing was suggesting two cuts next year and the economist surveyed were suggesting three cuts on the dot plot but the dot plot today surprised the survey and it actually met the market at suggesting just two cuts for next year. So again that is a hawkish surprise. Now the rationale behind this more hawkish dot plot was that the Fed all around upgraded their economic forecasts. They were thinking that growth is going to be better on employment was going to be better and basically everything is going to be better next year than they had expected and so because of that they're thinking that they don't need to cut rates as much.
So many people are asking okay well if everything is fine why are you cutting rates at all. And I think digging deep into the conference I think the answer to that is that in his heart of hearts, Chair Powell thinks that inflation is over so he's not really concerned about it and he is more concerned about the rise in unemployment. Now we kind of had a taste of how Chair Powell thinks about inflation at his November conference where he was basically you know pointing to three month annualized inflation is coming down six month annualized is coming down. A lot of inflation is just you know lagging shelter which we all know is eventually going to come down. He's very very upbeat about inflation. Now between November and now we did have an inflation print that was higher than expected. So it seems like he he had to kind of reconcile that a little bit but when push came to shove this is what he said. I would say I'm confident that inflation has come down a great deal and I'm confident in the story about why it's come down and why that portends well. And I'll tell you why.
Again you do see with housing services inflation which is one that we've really worried about. It really has come down now quite steadily at a slower pace than we thought you know two years ago but it's nonetheless steadily coming down as as market rents you know at market rents in the circuit to equilibrate better with you know new leases that turn over. Not new tenants but new leases. Market rents is new leases. So that's happening that process is ongoing pretty much as we expect.
Goods inflation which is another big piece of it has returned right to the range where it was before the pandemic. Just for some months this year it kind of moved up in a bumpy way because of used cars and things like that but we think overall that should generally be in the range it was in that that leaves non-housing services and market-based non-housing services are in in good shape it's non-market services and those are those are services that are imputed rather than measured directly and and they don't we think they don't really tell us much about the you know about tightness in the economy they don't really reflect that. I mean a good example is financial services which is really done off of asset prices and that just you know that's how that inflation works and none of them. So the overall picture the story of why inflation should be coming down is still intact.
Basically he's saying that you know we divide inflation into different components looking at goods you know they're about where they were before the pandemic. Now looking at services yeah yeah they're a little bit hot but then you know you got to break out housing which we know is lagging and it's coming down and looking at now in housing services you can further break that down into services that are that we have transactional prices so market-based and services that are imputed which are basically done through a mathematical formula or survey. So he says looking at these services that are marketable let's say the price of meat, price of eggs and stuff like that they're already you know on time towards 2% everything's okay.
The reason that services is high is because of this non-marketable imputed stuff. For example imputed stuff would be stuff that is not actually transactional. A very famous part of imputed stuff in PCE is owners equivalent rents where people are surveyed where do you think your home would rent if you were to rent it. Basically trying to gauge how homeowners are experiencing shelter inflation. Again that's not market-based it's just a survey it's an imputed measure and that stuff seems to be keeping inflation high.
Now what I take away from this is that Chirpao is kind of twisting himself into circles to kind of explain to everyone why that inflation although the index continues to show an above 2% but when you look one level beneath looking at the components it's really just stuff that's either lagging or just stuff that's not really an accurate measure of inflation. So again to me I take that my takeaway is that was really dovish. Again he is not worried about inflation. Although to be clear when you are Fed Chair you are the boss but you still have to manage a whole other people who's opinion matters to varying degrees. Today's FOMC meeting we did get one dissent by a Fed president and this person was not even mentioned in the Q&A she's not particularly important but she is a very smart person but I think it's just useful to know that even after this hawkish dot plot he was not able to get across the board consensus.
So some degree of a little bit about internal political disagreement over there maybe she wasn't the only one. So in any case the outcome was a more hawkish dot plot. Now the other takeaway from this is how Tripao was taking about unemployment. So we all know that the unemployment rate has been gradually rising over the past a couple years. Now his view on this is you know somewhat upbeat not totally. Now you could have a rise in the unemployment rate through more firings right that's what we don't want to see but he's saying that the rise in unemployment rate not so much increased firing it's just the hiring rate is really low. And so as our population grows as new people graduate from the schools and enter the workforce or as laid off people try to find new jobs you know that hiring rate is really low and that's the reason why the unemployment rate will continue. Oh has been rising and from his view will continue to take up a bit every couple months.
So all in all the market again took a look at the dot plot. Rates screamed higher you got the across the curve rates screamed higher and that strengthened the dollar significantly that kind of took down a lot of you would say instruments that are related to the dollar like gold and of course the equity market totally totally tanked.
So the market is kind of in a seems the market was in in a bit of a shock today by this but looking into the conference qualitatively I didn't find it to be particularly hawkish and I still think that we are probably at peak hawkishness for the Fed but I guess we'll find out in the coming months.
All right so that's all I prepared. Today I also did an interview with Felix of Ford guidance and that'll be out shortly as well. All right talk to you all this week this weekend on Saturday. All right bye.