Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast, where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life. I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. My guest today is Dr. Bernardo Huberman. Dr. Bernardo Huberman is the Vice President of NextGen Systems at Cable Labs. Prior to that, he was the Director of the Social Computing Laboratory at Hewlett Packard, and he is, as his name suggests, my father. Today, we discuss various topics in science, including relativity theory, chaos theory, and quantum computing. But I'd like to assure you that even if you have zero background in physics, computer science, or mathematics, that entire discussion will be clear to you as to what those things are and even some of how they work.
During today's discussion, we also talk about a life of science, that is what it is to spend one's life in curiosity, in trying to understand the universe around us, and how to understand ourselves. Indeed, today, we also talk about neuroscience, how the brain works, and the different sorts of questions that I do believe everybody asks, whether you're a scientist or not. Questions like, where do we come from? Is there a God? What is our use or purpose in the universe? And how is it that we can ponder these super high-level abstract questions about how we got here and what our purpose is, and how things work at the quantum level, tiny, tiny bits of things that we can't even see, and at the same time, to lead an everyday life that is meaningful and joyful.
We talk about this in the context of understanding oneself in relation to others, family, community, including scientific community, and what it is like to come from a different country. My father immigrated from South America. What it was like to do science in the United States then and now, cultural differences. And of course, we touch on some of our relationship as well. How could we not? I must say, for me, it was an immense pleasure and privilege to have this conversation, not just because Dr. Huberman is my father, but because I believe the knowledge and indeed some of the wisdom that he shares will be useful to everybody, about what it is to carve one's own unique trajectory in terms of career and life, and at the same time, how to savor the simple, everyday things that make life so worth living.
Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford. It is, however, part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science-related tools to the general public. In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast. Our first sponsor is Helix Sleep. Helix Sleep makes mattresses and pillows that are customized to your unique sleep needs. Now, I've spoken many times before on this and other podcasts about the fact that getting a great night's sleep is the foundation of mental health, physical health, and performance. Now, the mattress you sleep on makes a huge difference in the quality of sleep that you get each night.
How soft that mattress is, or how firm it is, how breathable it is, all play into your comfort and need to be tailored to your unique sleep needs. So, if you go to the Helix website, you can take a brief two-minute quiz that asks you questions such as, do you sleep on your back, your side, or your stomach? Do you tend to run hot or cold during the night? Things of that sort. Maybe you know the answers to those questions, maybe you don't. Either way, Helix will match you to the ideal mattress for you. For me, that turned out to be the Dusk mattress, D-U-S-K. I started sleeping on a Dusk mattress about three and a half years ago, and it's been far and away the best sleep that I've ever had.
So much so that when I travel to hotels and Airbnbs, I find I don't sleep as well. I can't wait to get back to my Dusk mattress. So, if you'd like to try Helix, you can go to helixsleep.com.com. Take that two-minute sleep quiz, and Helix will match you to a mattress that's customized for your unique sleep needs. Right now, Helix is giving up to 25% off all mattress orders. Again, that's helixsleep.com.com to get up to 25% off. Today's episode is also brought to us by BetterHelp. BetterHelp offers professional therapy with a licensed therapist carried out entirely online. I've been doing weekly therapy for well over 30 years. Initially, I didn't have a choice. It was a condition of being allowed to stay in high school. But pretty soon, I realized that therapy is an extremely important component to overall health. In fact, I consider doing regular therapy just as important as getting regular exercise.
Now, there are essentially three things that great therapy provides. First, it provides a good rapport with somebody that you can really trust and talk to about any and all issues that concern you. Second of all, great therapy provides support in the form of emotional support, but also directed guidance, the do's and the not to do's. And third, expert therapy can help you arrive at useful insights that you would not have arrived at otherwise. Insights that allow you to do better, not just in your emotional life and your relationship life, but also the relationship to yourself and your professional life and all sorts of career goals. With BetterHelp, they make it very easy to find an expert therapist with whom you can really resonate with and provide you with these three benefits that I described. Also, because BetterHelp is carried out entirely online, it's very time-efficient and easy to fit into a busy schedule. So if you'd like to try BetterHelp, go to betterhelp.com.com.
And now for my discussion with Dr. Bernardo Huberman. Dr. Bernardo Huberman, welcome. Thank you, Andrew. And also great to see you, Dad. Same here. I guess no premonition would have foreseen this one. No, absolutely not. And people might notice today I'm drinking out of a matte gourd. In part in honor of my father's father who drank out of his loosely-frized, every morning, my first sip of matte was taken on sitting in his lap when I was maybe four years old. Yes, yes. Me and my Spider-Man pajamas. In any event, let's talk about science. You're born in Argentina. As I recall, because once we had a conversation about it, you had a teacher, maybe it was in high school, who turned you on to physics, which became a teacher. Yes, yes. But prior to that, were you interested in different subjects? I don't recall if you had an avid interest in academics or you just did it because you were supposed to. Prior to that teacher, then we'll talk about him. Yes, yes. I was always very interested in ideas and so on. Science at that time was a bit vague, but I read a lot of philosophy. I didn't understand much of what I read, but nevertheless, I kept reading it. I was interested in psychology. I was an avid reader.
As a matter of fact, I embarrassed my father, actually, making him disappointed when, for a birthday, I think I was 14 years old. I asked him to buy me the 12 volumes of Freud's writings. Really? Yes, and he said what for? But I was very interested with it. Of course, I couldn't even understand half of what these books had in them. So I was very interested in many things. I must say to you that my interest in science, in particular physics, doesn't come from the standard thing that you see here in the United States mostly. Namely, I was not a wiz kid in math. I was not one of these people that can really do things very, very quickly and so on. But I was interested because I thought that physics was going to complement my attempt at understanding how they call universities put together.
The philosophers were saying all sorts of things. I went to a very special school that I learned six years of Latin and so on. And I had to read things like Canton, Cosmogonos, Cosmogonys and so on. That really didn't mean much to me. But suddenly I started discovering that physics might be interesting. And I had a cousin, Hector, who was a physicist. The particle physicist already. I mean, he was living all that time in France. And so there was a little bit of other influence. But my interest was in things that had to do with fairly abstract ideas. I cannot believe that at one point or the other I was very good in geometry class, being able to prove theorems.
I mean, the teacher was just saying, let's prove this. And I was somehow able to reason through and come to some proofs. So I think that I was very interested in ideas and not necessarily in the very concrete aspects of science. Can I ask you a question about early school? Yeah. So if I remember correctly, you were born naturally left-handed. Yes.
They forced you to learn to write with your right hand. Yes. You went to a very strict school. Yes. Like military levels of strictness. Almost, yes. This is a very interesting type of education. They have an in France, it's called the Lise, in France. And this is a very special school in Argentina. I was actually founded in France.
I was actually founded in the 1500s by the Jesuits. And my father went to that school. And so he wanted me to go there. And my brother went there too. And in six years of a very strict education, mostly humanistic. I learned Greek and learned Latin. I learned in Minnes a month of history, which I loved. And there were other courses in French and so on. In French we had to memorize incredibly long poems that we had to recite. Do you still remember some of them? Because sometimes early memories are embedded so deeply. Yes, yes.
And my brother and I sometimes tell each other some other pieces of these poems. Yes. I'll just say something right now to foreshadow what will likely happen several times throughout today's discussion, which is any time that my father is in the presence of his brother, my uncle Carlos, they start laughing about jokes that they've been telling over and over back and forth with one another since they were a young kid. So just the mere mention of his brother will bring a bit of a smile and a chuckle to both of our faces. Yes, yes.
So I learned a lot of French and also my parents decided, my mother mostly, that I had to learn French and English. And I went to Aliens Fransées, where for five years I went there, I was essentially the only boy in the class, which was very nice in a way. And in order to graduate, essentially, you know, to be fluent in French. But in a special school I went to the discipline, it was very strict, very strict.
You know, we were supposed to do things you don't do in the United States. The moment the teacher walks in, everybody stands up. And if you're late and standing up, you just kick that out of the classroom and things of that sort. But it was a lovely experience in many ways when I reflected in it, because it gave me a humanistic education that has been incredibly useful in my career. Most people don't realize that. I mean, I tend to think of things in a very broad context, and it's because of the education I had. Okay, so, and I loved the history of Rome, and I learned to recite things in Latin. And so it was very, very, I enjoyed that very, very much. My brother didn't, actually. And so.
Well, you two are very different. Yeah. Great, great adoration for Carlos. But you two are very different. Along those lines, I was just about to ask or mention, and some of our Argentine and South American listeners generally, and perhaps even European listeners, might be shocked and perhaps disappointed to learn that you're one of the few Argentines that I know who doesn't care much for the game of football soccer. It doesn't seem to concern you much at all. No, no.
The reasons for that are sort of interesting. I think I've reflected on that because my own wife likes to watch a soccer game. I mean, she's Danish. She likes European tournaments. I never liked mob behavior. I never liked this whole passionate involvement in these things. I don't know why. I was never able to understand that. To the point that I never went to a soccer game the week before I left for the United States, my brother insisted that I had to go to a soccer game. And this is sort of embarrassing.
But at one point or the other, there was a good goal, and so on. It stood up and said, this is great. And I was on the wrong side of the audience. People got very almost violent with me. So, yeah, soccer, to me, is something that I watch, but I'm not passionate about. Right. Yeah, I never really felt that it was that interesting. Although, you know, I was in a rowing team. I learned boxing. I did a lot of sports. But I don't like that much of spectator sports. Like tennis.
I played tennis since I was a teenager. No, I'm not a spectator sport fan either. The other day, someone asked me what my favorite sports team is. You'll like this. And I said the Harlem Globetrotters because they're undefeated. They have the best record. And that was actually the one professional sports team game you took me to when I was a kid. We'd always go see the Globetrotters. They're undefeated. Yes, unbelievable. Yes.
My father took me to see them too. They're fantastic. Yeah. Yeah. I love it. So, your father was not a scientist. No. Your brother is not a scientist. And you were faded according to them to join the family business. But then you had a teacher who exposed you to physics. And to the notion of being authentic in what you want. There were two parts to it. He was a very interesting and tormented man, I felt. But it was very interesting. He were coming to the class. Most of the students really didn't care about what he was saying. And so I was fascinated not only by what he was saying, but his whole personality. But I need to say something here that is important. I also was rather irresponsible. You see, I grew up in a family, a well-to-do family, that I never thought I was going to make a living. So it was easy to be interested in science or anything because it's what you do. You're interested in culture. You read books. You do things. But my father used to say, what are you going to do once you graduate? You don't want to start teaching in elementary schools or something like that. My brother used to say, if he does physics, I'll have to support him because he still says that. So scientists were considered poor. Poor. Yeah. They couldn't get a job. And so I think that science in Argentina has a big tradition in medical sciences, I think, two or three Nobel prices and so on. But in physics, they produce some very good physicists.
One of them lives in the United States. I mean, it's very, very famous, Malda Senna. I haven't met him, but I know this is one of the top people in the field. But I just got into this because I was interested. It sounded fascinating and abstract and the ideas were so powerful. And I think, and I reflected a lot on this, when you're psychologically in another lesson, because my parents made me jump two grades. So I was much younger than my classmates. And that created a lot of problems for me. I mean, at the time when you develop being and so on, all the boys were talking about girls and so on, I still was really interested in understanding why the excitement and so on, you know, I was very young. But it gave me a sense of order, you know, reading a book about physics and understanding that are laws that tell you how things work, gave me a tremendous sense of order and power. So, you know, everything else was still in flow and the family and my own relationships with friends and girlfriends or whatever. And going back to science, it was just a sense of, and I still remember those days. It was very, very soothing in a way. So, it's like a touchstone. Yes, yes, yes. And what grade were you, like this teacher was this like middle school high school? Yeah, no, yeah, high school. Yeah, I was 13 or 14 years old. Yeah, yeah. When I finally, I started listening to this and...
I said, wow, this is impressive. You know, it's powerful. There are ways to know what's true and what's not true. You know, you just don't speculate on things. So, but most of this stuff, I didn't really understand. Then I had this cousin of mine, Hector, who was already gone, but I would go to his parents' house and there were his books, all his incredible books and quantum mechanics, relativity, and I would just take them home. And I didn't really comprehend a lot of the math, but somehow I seemed impressive. It was like looking into a mechanism or something.
So, and I used to take them to school. And one of my teachers once said, you know, you seem to interested in this, but you don't understand this. So you need to, you need to learn it. And he was the one who started pushing into this. On the other hand, my family was saying, you should become a lawyer. Just, you know, my brother and father. And that never interested you? No. It's interesting because now I'm very interested in aspects of constitutional law and so on. When I hear about arguments against, you know, the Supreme Court and so on, I became very interested in law and economics later on. I mean, just to read about it. But when my father was talking about at the dining room table, it was all about strategies of, you know, getting something done half an hour before the opposition. So you win a case. I mean, I was totally interested in that.
I'm sensing a bit of a theme, which is that social dynamics and what other people do, regardless of whether or not they like it or it earns them a particular living, didn't capture you. Like the idea that people and their groups and their ways of thinking and behaving, while they may not bother you, it doesn't, it didn't captivate you. The way that like, it sounds like physics, you know, made you think that there's something kind of bigger. That there's something more universal, which indeed physics is, right? It is, it explains most everything. Yes, most everything. Yes, and I also think that I was a bit of a loner. It was very hard to find people that, you know, children or young people that thought like me. So eventually I became part of a group. We were four or five guys that used to get together on Saturdays and, you know, go to the movies and so on.
And then afterwards discuss, you know, whatever we were interested in and so on. I was only 16 years old, you know, and deciding what to do with my life. Of all four of us, we committed. Some of them came from incredibly wealthy families, two of them. We committed to really be true to ourselves and pursue what we liked. But I was the only one. The other two ended up running the business of their parents and one of them essentially, I don't know what he did. I saw him years later. Money becomes a pretty bright beacon for a lot of people. Yes, yes, yes.
I'm grateful to you that you never pushed me to go in any particular direction. You pushed me to not go in particular directions, but never with respect to academic choices. In fact, I don't recall you telling me or Lara, that by the way, folks, that's my sister's name, that we had to do anything except attend our classes and do our best. But I never felt pushed to go into science. No, no. Although you had a little bit of a curiosity about it. Animals. Animals?
And I remember I was going through a period in which I started getting convinced that there was very little to do in physics. And I wanted to change. And one day, when I bike ride, I think I was carrying in the back of my bike and bicycle. You were young. You asked me, what is the unsolved problem? And I said, I don't think it's in physics, but it's the brain. And you said, okay, I'll go into that. You said, I'll never forget that. Well, it's interesting. I'm fascinated by human memory, as you know, I know you are as well. And I recall that story as well. I recall it slightly differently, but we're really closely aligned, which is I remember used to walk me to school in the morning.
And you would drop me off at the cut-through to the path behind gun high school, because that's, I would pick up Kristin Harnett across the street. And you told me it would be better if I picked her up by myself and walked her to the end of the street, which is where class was. You were teaching me chivalry. And I remember asking you what you do. I was probably five or six years. Let's see, first grade. So it'd probably be somewhere around six or seven years old. I asked you what you do, and you said physics. And I said, well, what is that? And you said, well, let me tell you the feeling it gives me instead.
You said, you know the night before your birthday. And I said, yeah. And he said, you know that feeling? And I said, yeah. And you said, well, that's how I feel every day when I go to work. Yeah. And I remember, I'll never forget that. And I said, what do you do? And you said, I'm a physicist. And I said, well, then I'll be a physicist. And then I recall, so maybe we had the conversation twice, you saying, well, most of the big problems in physics are solved. So you should pick something, perhaps a little less untread like, and I said, like what? And you said, well, the brain is pretty interesting. And then I said, OK, I'll work on that. Yeah.
So this issue of feeling like before your birthday is something I remember saying to you, I don't recall feeling that way every day. I do recall feeling like this when I had an idea and finally worked out and we wrote a paper and so on. You know, it was an incredible, exciting time. You know, well, you know about it. You've done it yourself now. And so I wanted to convey that to you. It was very, very interesting and important to me that you understood that. On the other hand, it made me feel very isolated as well, not only with you, with everybody. I mean, you say it's a very esoteric field. You know, you used to walk into the study, look, I mean, you know, writing equations and so on. And would you say, what's that, you know, or?
I was thinking about your study, which was just a door down from my childhood bedroom. I still remember the way that your study smelled. I can still smell it. I have an incredible sense of memory for certain things. I can still remember, but I remember how your books were aligned, where your stereo was placed, your photos, your photo of Einstein, your photos of me and Laura and Mom. I remember all of it. And the sofa that was just off behind it because you're a napped taker, like, which I inherited from you.
But I remember that, yeah, you would spend a lot of time in that office and listening to classical music. Do you listen to music while you work? Or did you listen? All the time. Yeah, classical music for me is something I discovered very young, very young. My parents also loved classical music, my brother, too. And it's something that I, to me, has a tremendous emotional resonance with the way I feel. Sometimes it's background music. Sometimes I really listen very carefully. It's something that I, yes, I've always had in my life and still have it. I mean, it's very, very important to me.
But not many musicians in our family. No, unfortunately. Yeah. Although there is a very famous one. You've all tried. We've all tried. Yeah, yeah, you in particular. Yeah, yeah. We all failed. Yeah, yeah. There is a very famous Huberman, the violinist Bronislav Huberman. I mean, there's a picture I think I sent it to Yuki and Einstein. He was one of the greatest violinists in the 1920s, 30s and 40s, an incredibly interesting man. He's the founder of the Israel Philharmonic. And that's one of the reasons that the name Huberman is in some street in Israel because of him. Are we related to him? Unfortunately not. Which explains the lack of musical prowess in our family. We all love music, but none of us are good musicians. No, right. Yes. Except my cousin Diego. Diego was, he has a perfect year, so he can really do interesting things. Yes.
So going back to your childhood, this teacher, right? Yes. So, I mean, what was it? You already had a sort of ceded an interest in finding order and things that made the world make sense. What was the political situation in Argentina at that time? Quite horrible parts of it. I mean, there was a dictatorship that lasted for a long time. This Peron thing and so on. He was really a follower of Mussolini and people of that sort of in World War II. So what did that mean, like out in the streets? Like you grew up in the heart of Buenos Aires. Yes. But like what did that mean in terms of, I mean, was there poverty everywhere? I mean, was there violence? No, no, no. What does it spell out to you? Well, it was a very oppressive regime. I mean, I was able to be careful what you talked about, you know, in my family, like most of the social class. We had maids and a cook and so you had to be very careful what you said. Because they would run that information down. Absolutely. And people, and your grandfather, my father, that went from there, was prevented from coming to visit me in the United States because he was classified as a communist because he did not join the Peron's party. Okay.
For the record, we are not communists. We were both big believers in capitalism. He said, in here, he said, yes. Right. So, no, and so it was terrible. It was a terrible time. It was a very oppressive time. But he wasn't a communist. No, of course not. Of course not. It was on the other side. But the idea at that time, it was to be classified as such. Eventually, that information leaked to the American authorities. So when he asked for a visa, they denied him. It was a very complicated story. I don't think we should waste time to know how he got eventually resolved to a friend of mine who was a priest just with here in the United States. But the point being that during that time, you have to be very careful the way you spoke, the way you said things. There was a dictatorship that was very much like the fascist in Italy. And actually, that dictatorship lasted until a few years ago because as you know, as you heard, the new president we have is one that actually ran against this whole ideology, peronism and so on. Mille.
Yes. I was never, I was not political at all, but you had to be careful. But it was a funny time. And when he was overthrown through a military revolution, my parents were delighted and we, I remember the celebrations and so on. But that was considered the minority that was against him. It was a social class movement. The working class was behind, beyond what he promised and what he gave them. So that eventually died. So the real problem was that there was no real commitment to science as an investment that the country should make. Yes, it was nice to have Nobel Prizes and it's culturally good. But they didn't have the pragmatic notions that we have seen in the United States of doing science means solving concrete problems. And this was in the 1950s. The 60s too. Right. So this was the like one of the biggest and fastest progressions of physics and its implementation in the US. Yes. So were you hearing about that? Of course. I was following it all and I wanted to, you know, I wanted to buy books about it and so on. I had some conflicts with my father about spending money on books that he thought they were not going to take me anywhere and so on. I mean, he was a very pragmatic lawyer. He didn't understand why I was doing these things. So, yes, I was aware of everything.
And actually, the university was very good. I entered the university and you had to choose what you wanted to do. And after a tremendous crisis, personal crisis, I decided not to go into law or engineering, which was the alternative my father offered and decided to study physics. And I didn't regret it at all. It was a very impressive time. You know, I got a good education in physics. A little bit too abstract.
So this was experimental physics or theoretical physics? Both. In the lab, I was okay. I mean, I was better in classes. I took a lot of courses in advanced mathematics and calculus and beyond that. And, you know, complex analysis and so on. It was. So it turns out you were good at math after all. Good. Yes. I understand math. I'm not a whiz. I mean, like many of my students have been. I had guys that can do incredible things, you know, that I can do them, but slowly. I understand. Yes. Yes. So, but yeah, physics is something that I knew how to be intuitive about it. I had already interesting ideas that perhaps didn't pan out. But yeah. The teacher in high school, were they the one that told you that there was like a career in this thing? Yes. He said, you know, you should devote yourself to this if you really care about it. He was a man that obviously he was sort of tormented on many levels and so on. He said that because of the way he carried himself physically? Yes. Yeah. He was troubled and was interesting. Intense, man. I still remember his name was in. He was a philosopher in the name of Eggersland, which is a German name. And he started talking about discovering, you know, Christianity and what he meant to him and what it is to be authentic and so on. So. And then I had a very large exposure to the great thinkers of the antiquated, Roman and Greek. So it was all to me fascinating, interesting. You know, and it was good to have friends that I could discuss these things with.
Do you think it's a disservice that nowadays in the United States, and even when I was growing up, but especially now, that we don't force kids to be exposed to all these topics? Like we try and track people into something early on. Actually, a recent guest told me that many schools are now just giving knowledge but not expecting kids to do problem sets. You know, teaching them about physical activity but not expecting them to do physical activity seriously. Well, that sounds a little bit funny. Yeah.
Well, no, but that's. I mean, that is the direction that education in this country is going on. I was visiting professor in France, actually, if you live there because of that in Paris. And I discovered, you know, the French intellectual tradition is also very, very abstract compared to the American. I mean, the English and the Americans are the ones that took physics and the Russians, too, into a very, very practical realm and made progress that are very, very concrete, almost engineering-like.
I'd like to take a quick break and acknowledge our sponsor, AG-1. AG-1 is a vitamin mineral probiotic drink that also includes prebiotics and adaptogens. AG-1 is designed to cover all of your foundational nutritional needs, and it tastes great. Now, I've been drinking AG-1 since 2012, and I started doing that at a time when my budget for supplements was really limited. In fact, I only had enough money back then to purchase one supplement, and I'm so glad that I made that supplement, AG-1.
The reason for that is even though I strive to eat most of my foods from whole foods and minimally processed foods, it's very difficult for me to get enough fruits, vegetables, vitamins and minerals, micro-nutrients, and adaptogens from food alone. And I need to do that in order to ensure that I have enough energy throughout the day, I sleep well at night, and keep my immune system strong. But when I take AG-1 daily, I find that all aspects of my health, my physical health, my mental health, and my performance, both cognitive and physical, are better.
I know that because I've had lapses when I didn't take AG-1, and I certainly felt the difference. I also notice, and this makes perfect sense, given the relationship between the gut microbiome and the brain, that when I regularly take AG-1, which for me means serving in the morning or mid-morning, and again later in the afternoon or evening, that I have more mental clarity and more mental energy. If you'd like to try AG-1, you can go to drinkag1.com.com.com to claim a special offer.
Right now, they're giving away five free travel packs and a year supply of vitamin D3K2. Again, that's drinkag1.com.com.com.au to claim that special offer.
When I came to the United States, I must tell you, I came as a graduate student at the University of Brazil. Yeah, let's talk about that. So how did you end up getting into the United States as a graduate student? You applied. Yeah, I was graduating, and the future looked rather gloomy.
I had a girlfriend whose father was very wealthy, and she said no problem. You're going to work for my dad. And you know, he got a factory or whatever. Why do I feel like that is not the kind of offer that you'll go for? No, not at all. I've never known you to work for anyone except you. Yeah, in a way. You're a bit the same. Yeah, yeah. So, yes, yes. I just the idea of running a business was not.
I was truly idealistic and irresponsible too. But I had a cousin who was already, you know, got his PhD in theoretical physics at Columbia University. He was a professor in France, then Sweden and so on. So I felt that perhaps I should go to the United States. And so I started applying to this. My father was saying, you know, I won't even help you with this.
My parents didn't like it. I was very close to my family in many ways. And so I applied to many places. I remember being accepted at, I think, with Cornell and I said, oh, New York, that's great. Someone said to me, you have to take a plane to go to real New York. He loves New York City. He loves New York City. So in any way, I got this very, very nice fellowship to go to University of Pennsylvania, which is the fellowship from the Navy, the United States Navy.
Yeah, I'm very grateful for that. And I actually wrote that in my PhD thesis. You know, I was very grateful. I think it was incredible that they were supporting that kind of research. They wanted to bring you to the US to build weapons? No, no, no, not at all. Not at all. I came to the United States working for a professor bursting who just died at the age of 100 and 101. And, no, but I was supported by the United States Navy.
It was a fellowship at University of Pennsylvania. But I remember in my first interview with some of the teachers, professors, that I am talking to them about the foundations of quantum mechanics. And the guy says to me, let me give you an interesting problem. You have a ping pong ball. But instead of being a classical ping pong ball, it's a quantum one. Could you tell me what heights will it bounce? I had no idea what to do. I had no sense that you could turn all this knowledge into something implementable, practical and so on. So it was quite a struggle the first year. So you had theoretical understanding? Yes, not experimental understanding. Right, yes, or empirical and so on. I didn't know how to calculate things very well. Yeah, I didn't think it was good at math. It was good. Yeah, math understanding the math is a different thing between understanding math. And you know, you learn that. I had four years of graduate school and got my PhD in physics. So obviously I learned how to do it. But what I'm saying is that I have this very, very vague theoretical understanding of what the world worked, but not really practical. You know, I didn't have it in my fingertips. That's what you learn when you go to graduate school, as you know yourself. So that's one thing to learn about the brain as an undergraduate, but in graduate school is where I learned how to slice brain, stain brain, trace connections, record from neurons. And it's a whole other business to get your hands dirty in the thing. Absolutely, absolutely. The same thing for me. Yeah, I take in courses and discovering what you like and dislike.
I was a little bit bound to my professor because he was the one who gave me the fellowship, but I didn't like what he did, which was always very problematic. It was funny. He sort of became his try to become my surrogate father. But on the other hand, intellectually, I always felt that he was not quite there. I mean, he was very famous. Sure. It's a member of the National Academy. He was not, but he was very famous, very famous. But I always felt that there was a lack of depth into what we were doing. It was not just him. It was just a solid state physics. It was a very famous, you know, Mary Gellman, who had tall contempt for solid state physics. He used to call it squalish state physics. Yeah, for those who don't know, Mary Gellman will get to Mary later because I had the interesting experience of meeting him as a child, but he discovered the Quark. He won the Nobel Prize in many ways is considered at least as superb of physicists as fine men, maybe better.
Yeah, lesser known, but among physicists, you know, would evoke great fear in everybody. We'll get to Mary in a little bit. So did you enjoy graduate school? Yes, but it was incredibly hard. Very hard. The first year in Toba. And also personally, I was very lonely. You know, I say I was transplanted into a whole different world. Philadelphia is not a city. I would recommend to many people to live in. I escaped every weekend to New York and my professor was always upset about that. And you went from being pretty well off financially to basically having no money. I had no money. I lived on very little money as a matter of fact. Yes. My parents, my father felt that, okay, this is what you're going to do. You're going to survive on this. They paid for it. Take it once a year to go back to visit. And it was incredibly nice and soothing to be back, to be taken care of and everything else, you know, the life in the family. And then going back again to Philadelphia and the reality of just being a student. Unlike many people, that, and foreign students that were in with me and other places, I did not enjoy. I mean, it was quite a cultural adventure for me to meet people from all over the world. You learn what they had. I became very close to a Japanese postdoc. A very interesting man. But I was quite miserable. And so this was in the mid 60s? Yes. Yes. Late 60s. Yes. I did not like my life there at all. I mean, I lived for four years. I didn't have a single girlfriend or anything. I, you know, I dated and so on. But I just felt that I was transplanted into an environment that I didn't like. Okay. And that's, yeah, on top of that, my conflict with my advisor was not serious because they were not overt, but they were there all the time. That can be tough. For those listening, the relationship to your graduate advisor is a potentially wonderful, potentially hazardous one because they exert enormous control over your future. Not just through letters of recommendation, but opportunities and opportunities. And I got lucky in that sense.
You were very lucky. Yes. My advice was the kind of person that if you went out to dinner with him, he ordered for you. Are you kidding me? I'm not kidding. He was that kind of guy. He would take the whole group to a Chinese restaurant. And before you said, I don't like this, he just ordered. Once he took me for a whole weekend to his summer house to finish a paper. I couldn't finish a paper. And it was a mess. And he, and he started was there. She was 16 or 17. And she said, are you two going to talk physics? I was going to say, no, let's go for a walk. That's all we're going to do. But the physics consisted of him regurgitating, whatever we were doing. I mean, I remember I was so miserable looking at my watch, seeing how the heck do I get out of here? I didn't have a car. So I was sort of his prisoner from Friday to Sunday night. So it was hard for me. I never really felt that happy.
On the other hand, I had no other options. I had no other options at that time. Okay. So, but then as soon as I graduated, I got out. So I was just thinking about how different your graduate school experience was from mine. I, you know, I delighted in my advisor. Yes. She was amazing. Fantastic people. Yeah. I got lucky. And I got a lot of that from you, which was to, for those of you who don't know, I left a program at Berkeley, which everyone thought I was insane. Insane to leave Berkeley to go to Davis. That was my choice. But I remember what you said. You said, how big is your incoming class at Davis? Right? Because by all standard criteria, Berkeley is the better institution. Davis is great, but Berkeley's considered exceptionally strong. And I said, there are three of us. And you said, well, either you're making the best decision of your life or the worst mistake of your life. And then I think you asked me what was driving the decision. I said, well, there's this person there. Her name is Barbara Chapman. And she just seems to be working on things that if I don't work on these problems, I'm going to regret it. And I can't imagine working on anything else. And he said, go for it, which I really appreciate because any, any parent, if I were a parent and my kid said, I'm going to leave Berkeley and go to Davis halfway through a PhD and start again. I think I probably would have bought.
Well, Barbara also played a very, very nice supportive emotional role in your life. I mean, it was obvious that she had tremendous preference for you. Yeah. You would like her son in many ways. I smile and well up a little bit only because well, she passed away young, but she's just an amazing person. So I feel very blessed for that. That wasn't your experience with your advisor. So during that time, I did want to ask about this. I asked about it being the mid to late 60s because it was the counterculture movement. Yes. Yeah. Right. And one thing that people should know about you, I'll just offer this up, is that in the entire time I've known you, which is a while now, you've been very clear. Like you never had any interest in recreational drugs. No. Never did them. No. Even though that was super common. I've never seen you have more than a glass of wine. Yes. You've never been drunk in your life. And you don't like football despite being from Argentina. It's, it occurred to me on the drive over. Like, like peer pressure is just not something that impacts you. You're not going to do something because people around you are doing it.
Well, no, you're absolutely right. I always felt this sense of uniqueness or whatever. And, but I became very humble because of it. I'm not arrogant. It's not that I feel that others are worse and so on. But yes, when I came to the United States, there was something, there was a decision I had to make, which is, I remember explicitly thinking about it. It was the first time that I was beyond the control of my parents and family and the social environment in which I was in Argentina.
So you could do whatever you wanted. And I was not the only one who came. There were three or four brilliant mathematicians and physicists that came with me. And I saw them within a year just losing it all. They never, one of them never graduated. They got into drugs. They got, they moved to the village in New York and they decided that that was the life they wanted to have. Problem is that I'm 10 years on, what are you doing? Getting into being an old hippie is not that interesting.
So I really had that notion at that time that I needed to be very disciplined. And I had to internalize a set of values and to ask myself what I want and what I don't want. And so, yes, indeed, I used to go to parties. To me, it was quite a surprise. In New York, Philadelphia, people were smoking pot and also some other incredible things, getting drunk and so forth. It was something that I would say, no, thank you. And that was it. And I felt quite okay with it.
And I never felt the need to satisfy a group of people that were like this in order to be included. There's only one person that I've ever met in my entire life now that I'm 49. I can say things like, now that I'm 49, who has never been drunk, never done drugs. Basically, it has never really had a sip of alcohol except for once.
And that's Rick Rubin, my good friend who's elected. By all standards is probably the greatest music producer of all time across a dozen different genres, not just rock and roll, but classical country, all this. And once asked, Rick, you worked in music where drugs and alcohol are everywhere, or at least used to be. And he just said, yeah, it never really interested me. I could be around it, but not participate in it. And so the two of you are the only people I know that have ever had that kind of relationship to what's going on around you where you don't feel pulled into it.
I also didn't understand, I mean, for instance, the role of drugs and alcohol in young people, I was a graduate student. To a large extent, plays a role of relaxation and getting real of stress and anxiety and so on. To me, it was very interesting that people would actually come sometimes to my place and ask, you know, do you have something to smoke or why? Because I'm nervous. So whatever, you know, deal with your state of anxiety, but you don't have to drink to do that.
And I was always a little bit also concerned about my brain. I mean, I was afraid that these things would just take me over the edge of the rails. So I just, but I think I was also, I need to say this, I was also rather judgmental of people who did it at that time. And it was a way by being judgmental, by saying this is wrong, then I was able to stay on my track. Okay, do they have much more understanding? I mean, I hear people and that's what, you know, it works for them. It's fine, although I still don't like it.
And it was even worse when we came to California because that here everything was going on, not just drugs and everything else. So, well, let's talk about that. But not that specifically right off the bat. So you finished your PhD. Yeah. You could have become done a postdoc become a professor. I was playing with that. I was playing with that.
I wanted to go to, my dream was to go to Cambridge University in England, not only because the Cavendish laboratory was fantastic. There was a whole thing on DNA. I mean, Crick was there and so on. So I thought that perhaps I would just start, you know, inhaling some of those papers. You wanted to get into biology? Well, I was interested. I mean, because I read the famous book by Watson, you know, the double helix and I couldn't sleep. I mean, I read it one night and say it's incredible what is kind of amazing book. Amazing book. Yes.
So I said, oh, the whole thing is becoming like physics. It's no longer all these complicated names and so on. Well, it's crystallography, which is, you know, I mean, physics and chemistry are so interesting. So it's boring because you have, it's like botany. You have to learn all these crystals. I'm just joking because the spaghetti model folks, as we call them, the crystallographers are probably covering their eyes right now. But that's all right. They love what they do and thank goodness for it.
No, no, of course. Because they design novel drug pockets and receptors. I mean, they're doing some cool stuff. So I thought that being at Cambridge was okay. I mean, you would suffer from, you know, not even heating in the rooms and so on. But then what happens was, I mean, you know, I met your mother and then, you know, she brought a little bit of reality into my life and said, you know, well, she said, you know, it's time for you to graduate time because I was just staying there as a PhD student. You know, it was so fine. You know, okay, the money was a problem, but I got to live like this.
You were mom in New York. I met your mother in New York. Yes. And she was, she was, she had her, you know, feet on the ground and said, you know, it's time for you to graduate and so on. And then she actually was right. And so I decided to look for a job. And my, my professor wasn't necessarily letting me go. He wanted me to stay as a postdoc with him. Right. You know, this is something people don't often understand is that if a student or postdoc is very good, the advisors are de-incentivized to move them along to their job. Right. But it's a tricky game because you want the support of your advisor, but oftentimes your advisor, if you're very good, they want to keep you. Yes.
So, so there was also another aspect at that time. By then, I started thinking that I wanted to live a much more comfortable life. I mean, I come from a family that lived a very comfortable life and I wanted that very badly. And so I started, you know, looking for jobs and so on. My advisor was not too keen to, you know, tell me what to do. So instead of going, I could have gone for a postdoc to a couple of places, but I wanted to be a little more independent. And I discovered that there were research institutions like IBM and Xerox in the West Coast and so on. There were, you know, people could do science, you know, good science and, you know, battle-apps was the most famous one of all. That was in the East Coast. In the East Coast. I went to battle-apps for an interview and I felt that they were running there like a Russian internment camp.
I mean, it was unbelievable. You were, they were, we were 10 of us and, you know, they took us around and people were taking notes of what you were saying and asking and so on, telling us that was an elite place. It was an elite place. So East Coast. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. East Coast institutions. I mean, it makes sense to me now why haven't been raised in the Bay Area that East Coast institutions are and I are just never going to mix because there's, they love tradition. They love hierarchy and they love history, whereas the West Coast. Well, it's all about the startup, the IPO, what's about what happened in the last three years and what's going to happen in the next 10 years. Right.
Well, on the other hand, there is something nice to be said about the European model of universities in the sense that the biggest contrast, you say this, I remember, I, you know, when you gave when professors came to college, my son, they were wearing suit and tie and the University of Pennsylvania and Ivy League school and so on. I came to Stanford. I went to the first colloquium and the students were coming in shorts with their dogs into the auditorium. I couldn't believe it. I mean, it was, it was such an incredible, you know, change, cultural change.
Yeah. You know, smart. Not smart. I mean, incredibly smart, incredibly smart. They know that about that. So in any event, I, I discovered something which historically became incredibly important, although I was marginally involved in it, which was Xerox Corporation having invented a copier, decided that they were going to get into the information age and they decided to establish a new research center in Palo Alto next to Stanford, where they would recruit people that would work on this whole thing, computers and information and physics and so on. And I came in and the guys, you know, whoever interview me, they said, you know, this is exactly the place for you. So that's what I did. And the interesting thing was that, well, I was there doing what I thought was interesting things. There was a whole group of people, very small, that invented a personal computer. Steve Jobs saw it and built the first Mac out of it.
I had a classmate in high school, Becca Kanara. Yes. I remember because she wrote a Vespa to school. Yeah. Her mother was involved in that. And her mom was involved in creating the, it was a Dell. A Dell. Yes. A Dell Goldberg. A Dell Goldberg in developing the ability to move what appeared to be pages on the screen. Objectarian to languages. I had no idea that was going on. I'll be honest with you. I mean, it was going on the second floor. They were all hippie-like. I mean, it was a scandal of the life that they had there. It was the 70s. And still, the Bay Area was not what it's now. I mean, everybody went to Risades, you know, take long lunches. And there was a lot of stuff on drugs and so on.
Can I ask a question about that? So Xerox Park was this incredible place. I remember going there when I was a kid to your lab. Actually, one of my earliest recollections was you took me into your engine voices. Experimental lab. You told me to pick a piece of fruit. There was a bowl of fruit. I picked the banana. You took the banana. You peeled it and you dipped it into liquid nitrogen. And then you told me to throw it on the ground and we shattered the banana. And I thought, that was like the coolest thing ever. I remember that. So that was happening. But you mentioned the stuff that was happening about developing computer interfaces. And that indeed jobs borrowed or stole mostly because parked in protecting the intellectual property well. I mean, he didn't do it illegally. I mean, he saw it. They basically gave it away. Right. It was he gave it away. Right. Xerox was thinking that, you know, copious, what are their future? That's it.
But I also recall, because I overheard the conversations between you and mom when I was a kid, perhaps, that there were, it was pretty wild at Park. Like there was this whole like the room with the bean bags. People were taking LSD and other drugs. That wasn't your scene. No, no, no, no. I was in the physics lab and we can talk later a little bit about it. Which in voice was a very, very interesting collaborator of mine and so on. We had a lot of fun, but not on that label. As a matter of fact, we were considered very square people, you know, doing what we were doing. I mean, this is a group of people that were truly they I mean books have been written on this whole class of people that became really the embryo of what Silicon Valley became. There were brilliant people trying to do new things. They held their own K. There were many of them. Did you ever want to get involved in that stuff?
I used to see them as so I'll tell you how I got involved. The head of the group, Bob Taylor, a very charismatic man who was responsible for the development of the personal computer. He was the head of the computer science lab. He once heard that I played ping pong. So he started challenging me to ping pong. So we used to play ping pong, you know. And the conversations were so odd because I would say, oh, you do computer science. I have some mathematical problems. I would like some guys in your lab to help me. He said, we are not. We are not the kind of computer scientists you imagine, like at IBM with a white coat fixing machines and solving math. We want to revolutionize the world. We want to change the way you think. He used to say that to me. And I sort of understood a little bit of it, but quite frankly, he seemed totally out of whatever he was doing. This is why when Mark Andreessen, founder and Netscape, et cetera, A16Z, now when he was sitting in the very seat you're sitting in, here he described as this notion of wild ducks that at companies you have these people that are small groups of people that are really kind of wild and outrageous and really testing the outer limits of what's possible. Do you think they serve an important role? Tremendous.
Tremendous. And I was a little bit of that in my field at that time. I was the first one to realize that once I saw these machines, I could use them for doing things even in physics that no one could do. And the kinds of fields that I chose to work on were totally out of what people were doing at Xerox or IBM and so on. I think that these people are essential. Now, the question is, what does a company or a university do with those ideas and so on? Xerox lost it completely. I mean, they showed them the stuff and there's a whole book that had been written about it. Well, one thing that I think I'm realizing now I inherited from you consciously or unconsciously is that, well, I've been more of a risk-taker with various aspects of my life than I probably should have been, but that I've always enjoyed being near people who are really pushing the boundary on something. Like my love of skateboarding, but not just skateboarding, but our friend, anyway, jumping the Great Wall of China, building Mega Ramps in his yard. I knew I wasn't going to do that, but there's something about being adjacent to people like that that changes the way that I've approached things that were more pedestrian, to make them less pedestrian. And maybe we'll return to this because I think that being around people who are real Mavericks and real iconoclass can be very beneficial, but it doesn't mean that you have to jump in and do what they're doing.
Well, I decided, I want to adhere to take huge risks, and as a matter of fact, my first piece of work after I got my job at Xerox Park, which was supposed to work on some solid-state physics or whatever, was I had this notion, this fantasy of Einstein in the patent office. So I would start working on things that were crazy. There was a whole notion in physics, which is called Tachyon's particles that are fast in the speed of light. How do you say it? Tachyon's. Tachyon. They say from the word Tachyon's, which means fast, swift means particles that are faster than the speed of light, which is impossible. But some physicists were playing with that idea. And I became very interested in that. As a matter of fact, my first paper out of graduate school was on Tachyon's, and I had the pride of getting the paper accepted in the top physics journal. Is physics review letters? Physics letters, yes. And I remember my cousin Hector sending me a notice, and he was saying, well, now I see the road to perdition, he said. But I was so proud of it. I really thought that I was doing something incredible. And he had nothing to do with the work I was doing on a daily basis. And I published several papers on things that were very important to me. You have a lot of single author papers. Yes. This is something that is especially rare in biology, but you have a lot of single author papers. I was very proud of that. Yes.
I'd like to take a quick break and thank one of our sponsors, Element. Element is an electrolyte drink that has everything you need and nothing you don't. That means the electrolytes, sodium, magnesium, and potassium in the correct ratios, but no sugar. We should all know that proper hydration is critical for optimal brain and body function. In fact, even a slight degree of dehydration can diminish your cognitive and physical performance to a considerable degree. It's also important that you're not just hydrated, but that you get adequate amounts of electrolytes in the right ratios.
Drinking a packet of element dissolved in water makes it very easy to ensure that your body is in the right way. It's very easy to ensure that you're getting adequate amounts of hydration and electrolytes. To make sure that I'm getting proper amounts of both, I dissolve one packet of element in about 16 to 32 ounces of water when I wake up in the morning. And I drink that basically first thing in the morning. I'll also drink a packet of element dissolved in water during any kind of physical exercise that I'm doing, especially on hot days when I'm sweating a lot and losing water and electrolytes.
There are a bunch of different great tasting flavors of element. I like the watermelon. I like the raspberry. I like the citrus. Basically, I like all of them. If you'd like to try element, you can go to drinkelement.com slash Huberman to claim an element sample pack with the purchase of any element drink mix. Again, that's drink element spelled L-M-N-T. So it's drinkelement.com slash Huberman to claim a free sample pack. Today's episode is also brought to us by ExpressVPN. ExpressVPN is a virtual private network that keeps your data secure and private. It does that by routing your internet activity through their servers and encrypting it so that no one can see or sell your data.
Now, I'm familiar with the effects of not securing my data well enough. Several years ago, I had one of my bank accounts hacked and it was a terrible amount of work to have that reversed and for the account to be secured. When that happened, I talked to my friends in the tech community and what they told me was that even though you think your internet connection may be secure, oftentimes it's not, especially if you're using Wi-Fi networks such as those on planes, in hotels, at coffee shops and other public places. Surprisingly, even at home, your data might not be as secure as you think.
To make sure that what I described before would never happen to me again, I started using ExpressVPN. The great thing about ExpressVPN is that I don't even notice that it's running. Since the connection it provides is so fast, I have it on my computer and on my phone and I keep it on whenever I'm connected to the internet. With ExpressVPN, I know everything is secure. My web browsing, all my passwords, all my data, and of course anything that's behind an account wall, like a bank account. It can't be tracked and no one can access or steal your data, which is terrific.
If you'd like to start protecting your internet activity using ExpressVPN, you can go to expressvpn.com slash Huberman and you can get an extra three months free. Again, that's e-x-p-r-e-s-s-s-vpn.com slash Huberman to get an extra three months free. Can I ask you a question as a slight departure, but it's something I've always wanted to ask you. Feel free to say no if it's not something that could be done in a couple of minutes.
So many people here on Stein's name, they think of the hair or they think of relativity. Is it possible to explain relativity in a way that the everyday person can get it a little bit better than they perhaps understand it now? Yes, as a matter of fact, I learned not long ago that Einstein himself wrote a popular book on relativity that seems to be very, very accessible. Now, there are two aspects to relativity. I mean, there are two things that our brains were not made by evolution to understand intuitively. One is relativity and the other one is quantum physics.
We know we have intuitions like an animal, for instance, if you see a lion running after a zebra and so on, the lion can actually calculate intuitively the speed at which he can move and so on. We can do the same, but if you start thinking about what happens when you get to near the speed of light, we have no intuition whatsoever. Time almost stops. There are all sorts of complicated things, lengths, contracts. I mean, it's a very complicated set of things, and that's why it's very hard to understand, although the math works.
Then there is generativity that is even worse because there is some kind of a warping of space time that is responsible for gravitation. But I'll go into that in a second. The other one is quantum physics. Our brains are not only are they are not wired to understand that near the speed of light because no one moves near the speed of light. I mean, we move as speeds that are fairly small compared to the speed of light. Quantum mechanics is at such a microscopic level that is below basically the level of molecules, and molecules, atoms, and inside the atom. So it's very, very hard to visualize, or even understand some of the very counterintuitive ideas like entangled men and also, you know.
So relativity can be understood in the sense that you can explain certain things, but people say, well, how can kinetic work like that? And then you have to get into the math. Okay, but I think that I took a course a few years ago in generativity, and I just. I just. I wanted to learn it finally. It's profound, deep. And it makes you feel that this man, I understand, he had a help from a lot of people, but still, it's an incredible thing. I mean, you know, it's on a level of bit of symphonies and Mozart's piano concertos. I mean, it's something that comes into your head, and you're able to do, you know, through a lot of struggle. I mean, it took me years to do that. Okay, so. But it's profound.
Now, the question. When you say, can you explain, I mean, the point is Einstein one day discovered that if the speed of light is speed of light, no matter how fast you move, respect to a beam of light, it's still moving at the speed of light, that means that the notion of simultaneity between two events is relative now. So you and I might say, yes, now is one ten, but if you are moving very fast with respect to me, instead of one ten, you'll say something else. Okay, just because time for you and I are not synchronized. And that leads to also some very interesting effects and practical effects, too, because from there comes the idea that mass and energy are the same, from their nuclear weapons came out of that, also some very interesting things, you know, and today, you know, we can even detect gravitational ways that are coming from the almost the beginning of the universe. We can detect that because of those theories. They can calculate. So it's profound. Yes. I mean, Einstein, I think, stands on Newton, too, by the way. I mean, Newton and Einstein, I think they're top people, you know, but they talk to God in a way, as they say. We'll get back to God a little bit later.
Yeah, it seems to me that even though it's very hard to grasp, it's worth asking for those of us that don't have an intuitive sense of relativity theory that is starting to, you know, peer into these things a little bit trying to understand them. Do you think that it gives one's mind and ability to, you know, to tap into forms of cognition that we don't normally think about when we're looking at macro mechanics of the world around us? That objects fall down, not up. And, you know, helium balloon goes up. Okay. And you can learn something about helium, but it's all pretty straightforward with just a few simple bullet points. Whereas when you get into quantum mechanics, it challenges the mind in a way that it really feels like for most people, there's a cliff. And we just kind of go, okay, you know, and obviously there's trust there, but for people that are curious about understanding how the really tiny bits of the physical universe linked up with the really big bits of the physical universe, where's the best place to start?
Well, okay, you're asking a very, very interesting question, which is, for most of us who are training physics, we learn how to calculate, we learn how to operate with these things. I, you know, I just got a patent on using quantum mechanics for communication and so on. But it is still the puzzle is why does it work the way it works? So what I'm saying is you learn an operational way of doing these things operationally. I don't know what happens in your brain because I have ideas that come out of intuitions, not just formulas and equations. And yet I don't necessarily think I understand deeply why these things are the way they are. They are where they are. And there's no reason why they shouldn't be like that. Our brains, as I said before, you know, they are essentially conformed to understanding macroscopic world, not high speeds and so on.
So physicists who work in general activity, I don't can do incredible calculations. Can you tell you what black hole collapsing to another whole black hole would do? And, you know, they're using general activity things. And so they can do it. Now, what it does to your brain that allows you to operationally work with these equations and solve it and have no ideas, it's something I don't understand. Namely, I, for instance, the example that I give about quantum mechanics, that's a very simple one because I talk to a lot of people nowadays that work on this is I can give you two dice. Okay, you know, you just dice. You can go to the Mars and I stay here.
The dice are, let's assume they are quantum mechanically entangled. I throw my dice. I see three. You got three. And we don't communicate. They're entangled. They go, this is faster than the speed of light. I throw again five. You get five. I do one. You get one. And it's an amazing thing. What is the origin of the entanglement? It's a property of quantum systems that they can get entangled as they were. And somehow, what happens to your system affects mine but doesn't affect it in the sense of signal. No signal.
They're entangled. Now, let me, now, this becomes rather- They're not entangled through other bits of the universe. No, no. They're totally independent. Totally independent. Yes. They're entangled in the sense of quantum mechanically they started like this. You know, there are ways, I mean, there are trivial things. There's a famous example of the socks. Okay, so you take a trip and you took a pair of socks. Let's assume they're blue socks and so on and then you open your bag and you, oh, I forgot one sock. So this is my blue sock.
So you know that there is a blue sock at home. So knowing that is a correlation but that's trivial, right? I mean, you can do that with anything. In quantum mechanics, imagine that your look at the sock, but the sock is changing colors all the time. So now you observe it is red. The other one is red. I observe it is green. The other one is green. Okay, randomly. So little bits of the universe are entangled. Well, some people, and I, a friend of mine who's a Buddhist, claims that there is a whole religious or Buddhist voice saying that everything was entangled.
Yes. Originally, all atoms, all electrons, all elementary particles were entangled. Yes, because the universe started very, very tiny and everything was entangled. Okay, so you can imagine that the universe is entangled. So what happens here affects other, but it gets, the entanglement gets lost when perturbations and noise appears and so on. So we are not today entangled with, I don't know.
I mean, we don't think that we are. Some people think that. Yes, yes. People are entangled. Yes. Well, let's get to it. Oh, yeah. That's the whole thing. That's a boy tree. That's poetry, exactly. There's another example that brings us to a very salient aspect of my childhood, which is chaos theory. Okay. Right. So I'll say it so you don't have to. You're one of the founders of chaos or certain aspects of chaos theory. We'll talk about that. But you know, for those of us that grew up in the 80s and 90s, I was born in 75. You know, who saw the movie Jurassic Park?
You know, there's a moment in that movie where I think Jeff Goldblum is explaining, you know, what is it? Chaos theory and maybe it was the butterfly flapping its wings in one location and impacting something someplace else. For the poets in the world, right? That was a very captivating example because I think the human brain can naturally understand that, you know, things around us, we can have an impact on them and they can have an impact on us. But that the notion that a small insect, you know, thousands of kilometers away can impact something that's going on more adjacent to us.
It seems outrageous sci-fi, but, you know, the notion that one thing impacts another impacts another, that's pretty straightforward, right? There's just a dominoing of the physical world. Chaos theory is different. Yes. Okay, could you explain chaos? Yes. And I'll just add one more thing just for context for you, you know, these sort of the paints in the palette. Around the same time, I remember the book Chaos coming out and where there was a lot of excitement around chaos and this was coming out. There was also a lot of discussion about fractals. The idea that when you zoom into things at a very, very small level, you start seeing some regularities. We know this about crystal structures, right? Like, you could drop a water under a high-powered microscope, you see structure there. It's not random. The angles are very consistent, at least, around certain nodes, et cetera. So I think people love this idea that we have repeating, you know, repeating patterns and numbers in nature, that things at a distance can impact us more closely. Like, this is the kind of stuff that the non-physics brain can understand. And it does enchant, right? We sort of poked it poetry. I love poetry. You love poetry. But I think it enchants because I think humans are naturally interested in how, you know, the randomness of life might not be as random as it appears.
So what is chaos? Where does it exist in our lives? Not emotional chaos, but. And what is the relationship between fractals and chaos, if any? Okay, let me say first of all about why chaos is what it is. And it's not quantum. And there is quantum stories. And there is a quantum chaotic thing filled, but I won't go into that. Chaos is a very interesting idea, which is it flies against our intuitions. Since the times of Newton, we know that if you give me the position and the velocity of the initial particle, I can use Newton's equations of motion to tell you where that particle is going to be anywhere. So we can use the equation of motion to predict that trajectory and it's a precise trajectory. This is how Elon was able to capture the rocket with the chopsticks recently. That's something that's. Yeah, that's. Yeah, okay.
Now, the idea of chaos is. So that's okay, it works. There are some cases where let's assume I'm going to give you a question. I'm going to give you a question. I'm going to give you a question. I'm going to give you a question. I'm going to give you a question. That's okay, it works. There are some cases where let's assume I'm going to give you a simple example. So I take a ball, I put it on a billiard ball on a billiard table. I send it out and at the moment I can talk and know exactly the position of velocity, I can tell you exactly where it's going to go.
Chaos says that a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny difference in the initial position or velocity of that ball will take it very, very far from the other one, which is ridiculous. I mean, if I tell you that two cars start at exactly the same speed and the same position and one of them has a little more. They'll stay parallel to each other. In some systems, and I'll tell you in a second, that actually those two trajectories diverge completely. So it's what we call sensitivity to initial conditions.
Okay, that's what chaos is all about in classical mechanics. What is really weird about it is that it happens in systems that are also undergo friction. Let me give you an example that I used to teach chaos at Stanford for many years. So imagine I give you a beaker full of molasses and you take a very big ball, stainless steel ball, and you just throw it into the thing. Well, after a while, it will just drift with the things that go slow, because friction slows it down and it just goes.
Now you throw another one from another attitude and all of them are going to do exactly the same. Some systems that are chaotic do exactly the opposite. Even though there is friction, everything tends to just slow it down. They just keep going far apart from each other. Amazing. Amazing thing. So that's chaos. Okay, and I can tell you a little bit why I got so involved in this and the work we did.
Does chaos exist in every physical system? Mostly, yes, yes. Maybe even in neurons or the brain. Oh, yes, absolutely. I mean, this is why I don't want to get into controversy here about issues of where now we live in deterministic lives or not. But if things are a little bit random and so on, or even just a tiny difference in initial conditions can take you to very different outcomes. But this, we're not talking about many particles. We're talking too. Okay, so that's one.
Now fractals is a different story that comes out of a guy who I knew very well, Ben-Wamandelbrod, a very, very funny character, brilliant too, but very strange, who discovered that certain things are so similar. That if you look at a coast of Britain, he used to say that. You look at the coast of Britain and he said, okay, tell me, how long is the coast of Britain? You go with a meter and you measure it. Now, to post that the meter that you're using now can measure up to an inch. Well, you're going to get a different distance, even though you are adding the same, because there are all these little things in the coast of Britain that are essentially so similar that add a tremendous amount of length. That's what a fractal is all about.
These are structures that are not just a simple line, but they have all these other things. He thought that it was a whole new geometry. As a matter of fact, and I tell you this because I know Ben-Wam very well, I met him through a talk that I gave on chaos. He used to hang out with chaos, he was a mathematician, brilliant man in many ways. I was having dinner with him in Copenhagen in a restaurant. And then the very pretty waitress came to us and so on and served us and, you know, we were talking to his French man. He spoke with a very heavy French accent. So she says something, what are you doing here? He says, we are at a conference, but I'm not just at a conference. I'm a very special man, he said to her.
And she said, how come? And he says, do you know who Euclid was? And she says, sort of, she said, well, he was a Greek man who invented geometry. And she said, oh, well, guess what? I am better than Euclid. I invented a different geometry. He said that. Yeah, he said that. Points to the waitress in Denmark that knew about Euclid. That was very good. The Danes are smart. Yeah, yeah, okay. That was very funny. That he would talk about it. So he would give a talk and he would say, my equations can generate anything. Indeed, he could generate any patterns. So he would say, you want a mountain? Here goes a mountain. But you see a mountain, beautiful rafts and so on. So self-similarity is a very powerful idea in physics because it allows you that if you know something at a certain scale, you can predict what's going to be on a different other scales. And I use that.
But chaos and fractals are not always the same as he used to say because he didn't like physicists. Because we never liked his talks. We always said, okay, so you're telling us that things are. He used to say, I'm not interested in police. I'm not interested in things that move things up and down. He used to say. He came about elementary physics class. It's something of that. So, yeah. But fractals are very interesting because these are self-similar structures. At all levels, they look the same. You look at them big. They're small. They have the same type of geometric behavior. Chaos is all about dynamics, how things evolve in time. And their chaotic systems, they tend to diverge from each other for a long, long time.
The man who invented the idea of the butterfly effect was a man called Ed Lorenz, who was a very famous meteorologist at MIT. And he was solving the equations of the atmosphere trying to predict the behavior of the weather. And he noticed in these very old computers and so on that sometimes he would get different behaviors. He thought there was something wrong about the computer. And he discovered that the only thing that was wrong was that the initial conditions that he was giving them was very, very tiny, different things. And he would get different things. From there, he went into that. And there are ideas that are very beautiful, like strange attractors and so on. I mean, we don't have to go into that.
So chaos is really a field that essentially explains why things that seem to be simply explained by classical physics tend to diverge from each other. And they give rise to random outcomes. That's important thing. You can use chaos in order to generate random numbers. You can use chaos to generate random patterns. I've done that. And chaos exists at the quantum level and the macro level. Okay, so I was working at some there and I don't think it's interesting, but I got into this because I was doing something else and suddenly I decided I was going to do this and I really started going very fast at this. But then I had a very bright student, you met, ten-hug. And we decided, let's see if we can see chaos in quantum mechanics. And we started doing it and there were a couple of papers by the Russians actually showing that in this was a case. And we discovered that it was not the case. We actually proved that quantum systems are not chaotic. There's some kind of interference between them and so on that makes them recur back and forth periodically.
I know I find that reassuring that if you get down to a small enough level that you can really predict what's going to happen as opposed to small perturbations leading to big differences in outcome. That was the whole point. We discovered that quantum mechanics, there are waves and interferences and so on that make the system recur. As a matter of fact, I had quite an exchange with Dick Feynman about it. When I met him, I went to give a talk at Caltech and I was in his office and he said, what are you going to talk about? Because I don't want to waste my time. And I said about chaos. He said, okay, I said, some things are very important, particularly in quantum mechanics. So I'm smiling because he was so sharp and so on. So he said, okay, give me the problem. And he said, well, okay, I give you an electron and you have any potential. And I give you a laser. And he says, the laser inside or outside the apparatus is just like that.
So I said outside. So you turn on the laser. I said, so what happens to the electron? And I knew he was going to give you the answer that was already in the literature. But he appeared to me thinking, stood up and walked around and was making. What's the sound noise? And then he says, the energy grows linearly in time. I said, no, it doesn't. How do you know? I said, we measure it. I can show you. And so on. And he was very impressed because that means that there is no chaos actually. Then he said, oh, you know why it got it wrong? And I said, no, because I wasn't thinking in colors only black and white. Was he trying to be funny? Of course. It was always funny.
Let's talk about fine men and gill man and Mandel brought in all the rest as a collection for a moment. One of the great gifts of my life has been that you would talk about scientists. It really enchants me. I'm so delighted when I hear it. I grew up hearing the stories about these scientists and not athletes, which is great, but scientists. It seems to me that every time you talk about another scientist, you both revere the work that he did, you see something unique about them.
And something I learned very early on, and I've certainly internalized is, and forgive me because I'm assuming here, is that there's a certain aspect of like their quirkiness or something about them, like to take them seriously, but not too seriously. Like I never learned to assume that because somebody was a Nobel Prize winner that they were perfect, for instance. You would tell me Einstein had, he was amazing. Like there was relativity, the patent office, all this stuff, and he had all these problems with women. Oh yeah. And I read the books, right? Or this person, I won't name names because these people are still alive, still Convalley. Actually, when you and I used to take walks when I was a postdoc, we used to see jobs walking around, right? No shoes, he had feet, no shoes.
And you would say, he's amazing, like this guy's brilliant, but then we would chuckle about some of the jobisms. And so one thing that I learned was that scientists are just people, that these founders, they're creators, they're just people, and they often have very challenging areas of their life as well. Like they're not perfect, they're not gods. Some of them have almost godlike access to the universe and understanding it. But it seems to me that you hold people up for their contributions, but you never actually, thank goodness, put people on a pedestal to the point where you're like, this person is spectacular in every way.
And I'm not saying you cut them down to size, but I learned very, and this has served me well in my life and now public facing, or on Twitter. Like if I make a mistake and someone comes at me and somebody that I respect, I go, but then I remember this person has a lot of issues in certain domains of their life. So to realize that we're all human, this notion of none of us are gods. And yet there are people like Feynman, like Gelman, like Einstein, who have almost supernatural levels of ability. So what's that about? How do you hold knowledge, insight, and stature in your mind alongside the humanness, the inherent flawed nature of all of us? Well, okay, it's complicated. There are many ways to think about it. In some of these names, for instance, these people are built into giants by the media too. I mean, Feynman, if you go to core and so on, everybody's asking, what did Feynman do?
What was he wearing and so on? As if he was a god. I mean, obviously what he did in physics, he interrupt myself here because he really worked very hard, very hard, according to Gelman, in particular, to creating a myth about himself. He worked very hard. When I met him, I can even tell you the anecdotes. I only met him for an hour, but he was obviously the kind of man that wanted to live an impression with you. Or rated and x-rated anecdotes. Exactly. But the good one was, I was going to give the colloquium and he said, should I come? I said, I think you should come. And then he said, well, then I'm going to give you a piece of advice. Do not look at me. Because if you look at me during your talk, you're going to get confused and so on. And actually, that's exactly what happened. I started colloquium at Caltech, the Marine Board Camp of Science. And there I am starting to talk. And suddenly I said, instead of saying the next star, where I said something like him the next week or something or so, because there he was. And then he started saying, look elsewhere else, that kind of guy. For anyone who hasn't lectured, there's a tendency sometimes when one is going fast to fill in without thinking, it's just something that one learns. I mean, I've had to learn it the hard way when we missed it in the recording and this kind of thing. It's a humbling moment. But yeah, I think that, well, Feynman would have been canceled by the standards of the last few years.
I took even my father once to a lecture. He was given in San Francisco. And he was giving a beautiful lecture to, I don't know, get some award for teaching and so on. And suddenly a bunch of women walked into the front of the big room, you know, and they started coming. Because it turns out that in one of his lectures, he said something like, you know, if you do it this way, you're as bad as a woman's driver. Feynman said that. And then all these women were saying things. And then he said, I love women. You know, he was very clever. He would have lost his job by the standards of. Might be. Yeah. But regardless of that, because I really want to go back to this issue, people like Merigal Mann, I mean, it was, to me, he was the most intimidating person I've ever met. I mean, I mean, now eventually I got to know him because he liked what I was doing. And as a matter of fact, he and I organized a workshop in Crevel, luxurious place in France at the state of Manam Schlambe, the oil depot. Actually, it was an incredible meeting that he and I organized. So I got to know him a little bit personally. And, well, he was complaining at that time, he couldn't get a date. He was a widow and he wanted to, you know, women were intimidated by him too. As I recall, because I remember meeting him when I was a kid and we both shared a love of birds, but he was perhaps one of the world's most obnoxious people. Right. But you impressed him. As a matter of fact, I still, you know, I don't know if you want me to remind you of this, because we had two stories there. Your mother and I were taking a hiking aspen and we saw a bird that looked incredibly complicated and so on. So we looked over the next day, we went to him because he loved birds, as you know. And I said, I saw most unusual bird. He said, describe it. So I grew up and he gave me the name of in Latin of the bird. And then he said, that's the most common bird in the Bay Area of California. As a matter of fact, you should see it when you pick up the newspaper next time you're there. And indeed, two weeks later, I went to pick up the New York Times and there was the bird.
But at the same time, I said, Andrew likes birds. And he asked you, what is your favorite bird? And you said the rainbow lower key. Still is. And he said, this kid knows, this kid knows. He said, I know my birds. I know my birds. It's amazing. I never heard, you know, because if you could have said a parrot, he would have not been very interested. Okay. So, but he was intimidating, very intimidating. And he was nasty too, when he wanted to be. So he enjoyed the power he had. I was on the, I was a member of the board of the directors of the Aspen Center. So we had to decide what programs we had every summer. And he would come to me and say, whom do you want me to insult today? He had all sorts of very funny names for all sorts of physicists and so on.
The downside of people like that in science, because I've known some too, there's a very famous neuroscientist now in his 70s who has a Nobel Prize, who also is known for generating anecdotes about himself. Like, and in recent years, because of political correctness, wokeism and so forth tends to do that less because they have sort of a chunker's mouth. And he's a young guy. But he's got it known for being outrageous and trying to create tales about themselves. This is something that scientists do. Yeah, right, right. To in order to maintain their legacy. Yeah, also to feel good about themselves.
I mean, by the way, I mean, I work with him. It was incredible. I mean, you know, and the way he would interrupt people and so on. And there are two things I can tell you that are interesting. Once he was announcing some new results, he was working on this whole thing on, on, on quarks and other things. And actually it was a string theory. And he announced the seminar and everybody goes into the garden, you know, the seminar said nice. I need to remind the audience perhaps here that the Aspen Center for music was right next to the tent. They were rehearsing. So the seminar was supposed to start at three and there's young man comes with all his notes and he's always had notes, walking, pacing and nothing happened. And suddenly they were rehearsing the, the tone is 15, 20, which just says, ta, ta, ta, and then you heard the sound and then he started. I will now tell you about a new theory of how the universe works. That's the way he spoke.
翻译如下:
我是说,顺便提一下,我和他一起工作过。那真是太不可思议了。我是说,你知道的,他总是会打断别人,诸如此类的。有两件事我可以告诉你,这很有趣。有一次他在宣布一些新的研究成果,他在研究夸克和其他东西。其实那是弦理论。他宣布了一场研讨会,大家都到花园里去了。需要提醒一下观众,亚斯本音乐中心就在帐篷旁边,他们正在排练。研讨会原定下午三点开始,然后有个年轻人带着所有的笔记来了,他总是带着笔记,走来走去,但没有发生任何事情。然后忽然他们排练的曲调15, 20出现了,只是发出“ta, ta, ta”的声音,然后他就开始了。他说,我现在要告诉你们关于宇宙运作的新理论。他就是这样讲话的。
So what strikes me is that these people take themselves very seriously. Absolutely. Absolutely. Do you think that's important in life? I don't. I like to, I mean, as you know, I like to be, to have a good sense of you and myself and be self deprecating. I think some people, you know, have issues and they do that. I mean, it's all depends on how, how do you, you know, see things. I'd like to take a quick break and acknowledge one of our sponsors, Matina. Matina makes loose leaf and ready to drink your bamatte. Now I've often discussed your bamatte's benefits, such as regulating blood sugar, its high antioxidant content, the ways it can improve digestion and its possible neuroprotective effects. It's for all those reasons that your bamatte is my preferred source of caffeine.
I also drink your bamatte because I simply love the taste. And while there are a lot of different choices out there of your bamatte drinks, my personal favorite far and away is Matina. It's made of the highest quality ingredients, which gives it a really rich, but also a really clean taste. So none of that tannic aftertaste. In fact, given how amazing Matina tastes and their commitment to quality, I decided to become a part owner in the company earlier this year. In particular, I love the taste of Matina's canned zero sugar cold brew your bamatte, which I personally help develop. I drink at least three cans of those a day now. I also love their loose leaf Matina, which I drink every morning from the gourd. So I add hot water and sip on that thing and I'll have some cold brews throughout the morning and early afternoon. I find it gives me terrific energy all day long and I'm able to fall asleep perfectly well at night. No problems. If you'd like to try Matina, you can go to drinkmatina.com slash Huberman. Right now, Matina is offering a free one pound bag of loose leaf your bamatte tea and free shipping with the purchase of two cases of their cold brew your bamatte. Again, that's drinkmatina.com slash Huberman to get a free bag of your bamatte loose leaf tea and free shipping.
Let me ask you about this. So further down my list of things I want to talk to you about is that you've always loved it. It's clear from a young age, like high level concepts, deemed concepts, order in the universe, working on hard problems. You just filed another patent. As long as I've known you, you've been pursuing some new area of knowledge or implementation of knowledge. And yet you like your father. I know you delight in everyday things. I mean, since I was a kid, you've taken a walk after dinner. You bite to work if you can that day because of the weather. You love a really good espresso, a really good meal. The high and the low are checked off boxes for you. That's different I think than the way most people think about scientists, especially theoreticians, theorists, excuse me. Which one is it? Theoreticians or theorists? Theoreists, they say. Theoreists. Yeah. Theoreists. That we assume like the academics that are always somewhere else, like they're up here, they're not grounded. They're not feet on the ground. But you like everyday things.
Oh, absolutely. Like where we're going to eat dinner tonight is. Every bit as important as this. Absolutely. The conversation about relativity. Absolutely. I think that there is a myth that it can sometimes get perpetrated at universities. My first meeting with my advisor when I got to University of Pennsylvania, he said, I want you to know one thing. You're going to live like a monk. I said, what does that mean? No fun, nothing.
You're going to work. I want you to work. You're beginning to pay to do something. I was sort of scared. And then I told him that on weekends I had to escape to New York City to take a walk on Central Park and look at nice things. You know, I always enjoyed the good things of life. And at that time I couldn't afford them. But that doesn't mean that I didn't, you know, I enjoyed them. And I do believe that I inherit this from my father. It's tremendous enjoyment of life in general.
And yes, I am very physical and tactile about things. I like to surround myself with things that are beautiful. I enjoy, as you said, good meals and the daily things about life. I'm not just living in some stratosphere and not being able to enjoy a meal I'm having and so on. No, the opposite. And yes, in that sense, I am very much like that. And you know, the mayor is the same way. And so that's why you enjoyed that.
Your wife. Yeah, my wife, sorry. Yes, we really enjoy, you know, she in particular being Danish, you know, they have this idea of slow eating and enjoying the good things of life. I'm very much like that. Yes, very much. I don't feel guilty about it. You know, if I can afford some. No, should you? Well, there is a certain aesthetic component to science and the idea that they sell you that, you know, Einstein didn't care about anything. Actually, if you look at the negotiations that Einstein had with Institute for Advanced Studies for salaries, you'll see that he really cared a lot about these things too. So our notion of him is just kind of like, it was just science and he had no interest in material things.
Right, right. Yes. I had an uncle actually, Hector's father. You know, there was a branch of the family that was very much into culture. They had beautiful collections of paintings and so on. And I was what, fifteen or so. And I remember at a party, we had big social parties in my parents' house. And he was lecturing me that I should never care about anything but truth and concepts and so on. I was a little bit scared. I wanted to enjoy life as well. Okay. It was a little bit complicated.
No, no, I enjoy everything. Of course. I think I got out of my father mostly. Yes. My mother was a little more ascetic in a way. But yes, the tiny little things of life are what makes one's life. You know? I'm slowly starting to get that. Yes. I think I've been a little like rabid about my interests, almost to an obsessive level to the point where I've sometimes overlooked how many opportunities for just lovely daily interactions I have. I try.
But I feel like I've just been chasing the carrot of knowledge. Like, I love doing what I do. I've always done that. Well, but you have to be careful indeed. I, you know, as you know, I meditate for many years and so on. I'm being in the present and being able to just be there and nothing else is the tremendous source of satisfaction and comes, comes me down and so on. And when did you start that?
Well, I started actually out of, out of the discovery. I mean, the trivial thing that many people have. I discovered that every time my blood pressure was taken by the doctor, he was just going through the roof. You know, I used to call it white coat phenomenon or something of that sort. And I got very, very upset about it because I tried to control it and it got worse and worse and worse and they told me, you know, to the one. So I want one or the other. I have a friend, a colleague more than a friend who's a Buddhist who started telling me about, you know, have you tried, first of all, by your feedback? That's a good one. I tried for a year. I did by a, by a feedback. And then he started telling me about meditation.
So one day, actually, he's a physicist as well. He was visiting me in my lab and I said, he said, let me, let's do it. I did a session with him in meditation. I couldn't believe it. My hands suddenly were warm and, you know, felt incredibly nice. So I decided that I really wanted to learn how to do it. And I started doing it at a time when I really needed it because I realized that without being aware, I was anxious. Like for instance, I would see myself walking down the street holding my, you know, fists this way. That's not a very relaxed way of living. Okay.
So I really started doing this meditation on a fairly continuous basis. And I really enjoy it. And it's very important as, you know, as a father, I say this to anyone too, that you have to enjoy life. I mean, pursuing these things, you know, eventually what, you know, the, the, the value is in the pursuit not in achieving them anyhow. So you might as well pursue many things at the same time. I mean, a good meal, eating properly can be very, very nice too. You know, I love that about you.
And I'm working on, I remember when I, along those lines, I remember when I was in graduate school, we, we published a paper and then we published a second paper in science. And I remember thinking like, this is like such a proud moment of first author paper in the journal science. And I, I told you, and you said, um, you said, um, well, enjoy it and just be aware that by tomorrow you'll be worried that you'll never do it again. Exactly. Yeah. And finally we published in nature and a few other journals a bunch of times after that, but you also warned me about the postpartum of post excitement. Like something great happens, you know, at that time we, as a field of neuroscience, didn't really understand gopamine dynamics, but now we do what you were describing as this trough and dopamine that we get a day or two after some big event.
Yes. Typically postpartum associated with the birth of a child, but it could be, you know, getting a degree or a great party or a paper in science or nature for saucer paper. And, and you said a couple of days from now you're going to feel low and you just have to wait and I'll never forget what you said. You said, just go back to what inspired the first project, pick a different problem. It'll happen again. Yes. And the second time it happened, I was like, he was right. It happened again. Yes. And again and again, I haven't had an infinite number of those papers in those journals, but I learned about the dopamine dynamics associated with pursuing a goal. And then you get the thing and you're very excited and then you feel the drop.
Yes. Yes. And that I think that is something that even ancient philosophers knew about it. The Buddha, many, you know, the Greeks and so on, this idea that they said the things we pursued, they are ephemeral in a way and the way the feelings that would be eliciting us, you know. And I think that you're right. And there is also another tendency one has to try to avoid, which is you're successful in something and you continue doing exactly the same thing because by now you know how to deal with your hands. You're right.
And I always felt that I want to go the swear and you know, I have sort of a reputation for changing fields. And you know, I don't do that in order for others to be puzzled by it. It's just that I'm curious and I want to have a feeling again that like falling in love, you know, the new thing, you know, it's nice at the beginning. But eventually whatever you're doing, it becomes, you know, trite and so on. Yeah, let's talk about that because after chaos, which you brought a lot of, you know, I remember we had reporters in our house and there was like a TV and the book by Jim Glick and then and then you switched to something completely different.
Yes. And you got into computer science. Yeah. Well, computer science is a computer computer. What happened was that a lot of the success that we had was because I was at Park, we had phenomenal computer facilities there, things that we could visualize that at a time very few people could do. And so one of them, actually, someone suggested I get a patent, but he said, patent for the chaos that sometimes people have in t-shirts that actually we discovered the first time with guys from UC Santa Cruz, which in Crutchfield and so on, you know, he was actually very instrumental in getting me into chaos and so on. But that is, but when I, what happened was, okay, so we did this, we did quantum.
And then one day I said, okay, so what do I do now? Okay. Well, you can go and publish one paper after that in chaos. I mean, you can produce 10 PhDs with this. But then I said, why don't I do the opposite? Are using computers to help me with the physics? Why don't I use the physics to study computers? Well, that's an interesting idea, but you know, I mean, this is, so how do you do that? So what happened to me, I was at a meeting on chaos in Copenhagen and I couldn't sleep one night and I had a book called The Computer Red Brain by John von Neumann, perhaps someone that was a true genius. I don't know if you heard of him.
The inventor computers, he was a phenomenon at all levels and he was part of the Manhattan Project. He was perhaps one of the most brilliant people that ever existed, at least that we are aware of. He was a being still for advanced studies, von Neumann. There are all sorts of anecdotes about him. He had a photographic memory. You could give him a page of a phone book.
He would look at it closer and then he would recite the phone numbers from bottom to top. Totally useless skill. Yeah, but he was a genius, a genius, true genius. The inventor computers, he invented game theory in economics. I mean, useful skill. Yeah, exactly.
In any way, so he wrote a very little book called The Computer and the Brain. No equations, nothing. And one night, four o'clock in the morning, I cannot sleep, I get done, you know, I was summer so the sun was still sort of the incorporating it. And I went there to read it and I said, this is what I'm going to do. I don't know anything about brains, but I can imagine, you know, if the brain is like a computer, I could do something like that. But I also want to apply some of what I know to these things.
And the first thing that occurred to me was to start looking at a computer network we had on park. These computers were communicated with each other as we nowadays, we know it as the Internet and so on. So there were many, many aspects of this. And I decided that because I was very influenced by one or two students that were very much into economics and libertarian ideas and so on, and one of them had taken two courses in econ at Caltech.
So we decided to start looking at this as a market where computers essentially buy and sell programs to execute and their machines and so on. So we started really doing what we call the ecology of computation. It was a big effort which married economics with artificial intelligence and computer. But it became a big thing. And so I became again, it's like falling in love again. It's a new field. I thought it was great. The discovery process of falling in love is half the fun. Absolutely.
And I also was able to, I mean, there is a lot of formalism in economics and some of it is really, I mean, sort of academic. But there are some ideas that are very profound. To the extent that some people consider me an economist sometimes because I think in terms of utility rewards and risk and all this stuff. And as a matter of fact, a lot of the work I'm doing now on resource allocation in networks comes from ideas from economics. When you go into a new field, in order to learn about the field, is that mainly through talking to people in the field, reading books? Both. And it doesn't strike me that you have ever tried to ingratiate yourself into any field. It's not like you're trying to be a member of the field. Like you go in as an observer and a learner.
Yes. I need to say this. I don't think that many people have said that if I stayed in one field, I would have done much better in terms of reputation and so on. As a matter of fact, I can tell you an anecdote that is, you mean like awards and stuff. Yeah. Like for instance, not long ago, I was already doing computers after kills and so on. I won't name the person, but a very good physicist professor at Berkeley came into my office. He says, Bernardo, we have an issue here. I say, what is it? That your name for a membership in the National Academy of Sciences is coming up.
I say, oh, that's nice. He said, but it's a problem. I'm not writing papers in physics. You're writing papers in computer science and we need a physics because otherwise the chemists will get that job. The physicists don't like to get it. Like a welcome to academia. Yeah. So I say, well, you want me to do? He said, well, can you graph right one or two more papers on this topic? I said, no, I can't do that. I can't. Well, there's a isn't there a famous story about Feynman and being elected to the National Academy? Yeah, he refused to.
Yes. Right. He I think they told him he was in the National Academy and then he said, well, what do I do? And I said, well, you elect in other members and he said, I quit. Yeah. Well, yeah. So in any event, I never became a member of the National Academy, but you never sought prizes. No, I mean, I would have liked to get them. Why not? I mean, you know, I'm not. It's not that I said they are meaningless, but there was nothing that I could do about it. And I since I was not, as you said, I was always a little bit of a, you know, always moving on to the next thing, never staying long enough going to these meetings where by now you heard it all, you know, over and over and over again. So yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I have to say that, you know, like, I mean, as you know, I still have my position at Stanford and teach involved in a little bit of research, but you know, one of the great advantages I had is that all my advisors died or killed themselves. So I was orphaned in science. And so there was never an expectation from my advisors that I do the next thing because they were dead. So I thought about that.
And but I remember when I launched the podcast or started going on podcasts, I remember you being a little bit concerned. You're like, you know, what are your colleagues going to think? And I think at that point, the, um, the way that science was going and the structure of academia relative to what my needs and life were and just a passion to wanting to do something new. I, I put a lot of thought to the fact that you've changed fields many times and I just felt absolutely compelled to get into science communication. And there was no stopping that.
But I have to thank you. A lot of the reason I was able to take the step to do the podcast in addition to being supported by Lex Friedman's suggestions and a lot of help from others. Um, Joe Rogan and others, but is that I was like, well, that's what you're supposed to do when you hit, when you hit up, when you hit up point and where what you're doing isn't as compelling. You wait for the thing that draws you forward. It seems like you were always drawn forward. I was thinking of carrot and stick.
It's not like you disliked where you were. It's that there were some carrot that you identified and you go towards the carrots. And also something very, um, the other day, my wife was actually mentioning, I've been in a sense in our fund. I never had mentors. It's very interesting. So the, the, this, uh, frankly, not terrific graduated by the, he was not my mentor. Really? I mean, you know, he didn't even want me to do the things that I wanted to do. Uh, so I mean, I never had someone who was whispering, Bernard is the guy to, you should be considering for this or that.
I mean, I had the fortune to really get to the top of many of these fields and I interacting with the top people. I mean, we talk about fine man, there are many very famous people that I respected mentally that I met, uh, when I was in France, you know, I was teaching there. I met people that are brilliant and so on. And I felt treated with tremendous amount of respect as a colleague and so on. But I never had mentors in that sense.
And also as I said, I, I am a little bit restless. Uh, I am very curious about everything. And so, you know, sometimes I see something and I say, oh, there's an opportunity to do something interesting. I think that the issue of being curious is extremely important. And it's interesting because I reflect a lot on my father. My father was an immensely curious person, but all about details. He never liked abstractions of any kind. He was very proud that he went to the same school I went and the only course he flaked was philosophy because he said it doesn't make any sense.
Now, perhaps he was right about that. You know, sometimes you wondered about what these philosophers talk about. A couple of months ago, uh, in Denmark, we were invited, uh, my wife and I to a dinner with philosophers, talking about artificial intelligence. I thought that his people were, they didn't really know what was going on. But nevertheless, uh, yes, I am curious and sometimes I move on to things.
And I feel that the reward, the internal reward you get from doing something new and interesting and exciting is much better than a recognition that someone will come and say, you know, whatever. I mean, don't mean to understand this, I mean, I was not saying no to a recognition. And I, but it's not really that I'm, I, I do this in order to get that. That's not me at all.
Yeah. I mean, the, the whole thing, it sort of brings my thinking back to like the, the early discussions about, you know, other students are not interested in physics. You're interested in physics. Other people are like smoking a lot of weed and, and partying like, no, like, like you said, you, you've not had mentors.
That's one area in which you and I have been very different. I've always attached myself to mentors. Many of them. Many of them. I mean, well, there might be a psychological reason too. Yeah. Yeah. That you need this, you know, or need it at one point, I got these parental type figures. Yeah.
I said, yeah, it might be, I wish I had them. Don't misunderstand me. I, I, as a matter of fact, I mean, my influence on my students, I produce more than 15 PhDs. It's also strange because none of them stay in, stay in physics. Now, the department at Stanford, not too happy with that. It's not that I told them not to, but they all smelled that, you know, I, I was doing something else.
I mean, you know, from computers, I became very aware of what was going on, very early on with the internet. As you know, I started doing all this stuff on social long before anyone was doing an economics, our attention and all that stuff. Many of these students, the other day, I found one of them, I met one, a lot of damage who, you know, I think you, you just early at Google.
No, she went to Facebook. And the other day, she wrote me a note. I was so lucky that I met you. She was going to do a thesis and I don't know what solar collecting solar is. Yeah. You've collected some pretty interesting students. They're like a pretty, we won't name names other than than laws, but like some of them are, are very well known people in the tech industry now.
Oh, yeah. Yeah. And, and I think that, yeah, it seemed like the people that would gravitate towards you. It's interesting, your laboratory is off campus. So anyone that decides to be off campus is already making a choice toward like, they don't want to be part of the standard culture. I think that was interesting. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
So let me, I want to get back to this issue of like internet and Silicon Valley. I recall it was the early 90s. So it'd be like 89, 90, 91. Remember I had this, this girlfriend Gretchen, remembering her dad was the editor of guitar player magazine. And I'll, I'll never forget. He told me, he said, you know, it's, it's going to be all about multimedia. Remember that? No one talks about multimedia. He said your, your television is going to be your computer is going to be your stereo is going to be, he was, he was right. Right? He was basically everything was going to be synthesized into common devices.
And we now know that, that, that were not to be true. But at what point did you decide that things like computers were mainly going to be a route to industry and not to academia? This, this is really important, I think for people to understand because right now it's kind of happening in biomedical sciences. But you see this at Stanford, people get degrees in computer science, but not to become computer science professors sometimes, but really so that they can go into industry.
So how do you see nowadays, like for people that are interested in science or technology, do they need to go to graduate school? Like is a PhD useful anymore? Peter Theta says, you shouldn't even get a bachelor's. I think that's what he, you know, I think he's, he's, he's, he's, he's, he's I mean, I, I have great respect for Peter, great respect for Peter.
There are a lot of things that are easier to say when you're already a billionaire. No, no, no, like, like, Steve Joe saying, you know, passion is everything. Right. I mean, it's necessary, but not sufficient. Right, right. Right. Necessary, but not sufficient. So I think that what's happening today, I mean technology, we are going through a technological revolution. There's no doubt about it. We used to learn about the printing press and now it's the same thing with computers.
I still remember and I, you know, we, this is amazing because, you know, today's so, so obvious. I mean, people didn't know much what was going on. I parked everything. One night we were having for dinner, I remember, you know, Emmanuel Minnio, who was, you know, they discovered the Orexian hyperkreaton relationship. That's the cause of narcolepsies of mutation. Yeah. It was a friend of ours and his wife, they were home with our dinner and I was telling them, I was telling them that you could go to a computer and go through the Louvre museum in Paris and they say, what are you talking about? So we finished dinner and we all drove to park at night and I turned on my computer and there was a man, they still remember his name, something Pioch was the last name. He had gone taking pictures of every painting that they lived and put them on online so you could just navigate through the Louvre. Today's obvious, trivial. At that time they couldn't believe it. There you are in Palo Alto and an evening going through all the rooms of the Louvre. They just couldn't understand what was going on. What year was this? I don't remember it but it was just the day before.
When the web started coming, you know, that was, you know, right before. So we all had to get email in college in the year 97. So it must have been somewhere around like 94, 94. Something of that sort, right before, right at the time and reason made the web available to everybody basically, you know, Netscape, you know. So in any event, so it was an amazing thing. It was amazing.
Now, all these developments were really done in companies, non-necessary in academia. Okay, that is an interesting point. And I think that today an immense amount of the advances that we see in biotechnology, in computers, in everything are essentially done, I would say, for profit by companies. Okay, I think social networks, we started doing social networks at a time when no one even thought of doing it. I used to do social science with a capitalist because sociologists used to study the behavior of five widows in some Norway, Norwegian village and write a paper. We could look at 150,000 people, how do they visit this side or not side and predict how we were able to predict behaviors, you know. So I think that today everybody knows that that's the case and it's the same thing with artificial intelligence.
But for a kid in high school or kids in college or kids, I mean, is it worth getting a graduate education? Well, it all depends on what you want to do. I mean, law, medicine, you need a, I mean, those are, you need the professional degree. I mean, these are ultimately professional degrees. So you need the training. I want a surgeon that didn't go to medical school. Okay, but the danger is you'd, and I remember a very, very bright guy I had in my, in my team, you don't want to become a blue color worker. See, what I'm saying is a following being a hacker or being to deal with software is an, it was an incredibly profitable profession. Now you have these large language models that can actually program for you. You need to write a program. You go to charge ETP and you'll write it for you. So suddenly, you know, if you don't have a set of talents, a way of imagining things of doing something, you become basically just someone like, just hacks for, you know, for so many dollars an hour. Now it's true that they can give you options if the company does well, you get rich and so on. But I still believe that you need some, some contextual cultural part of this.
Okay. Now I personally believe that humanities and all sorts of other things are very important and to understand where is your cultural environment? Where are you coming from and where is the society going is important. But on the other hand, as you said, you can just finish high school and start hacking and become very good at it. And that doesn't require much more than that. Do you think the examples of like to suck, Elon, you know, and others, you know, going from, you know, essentially departing standard education to start companies? Do you think they've served? I mean, certainly not talking about the companies, but do you think those examples are good examples for people to internalize or they just, are they unicorns? Well, I think that they are unicorns and you have to be very careful. We only talk about the success stories. We don't go and interview the guy that is loading a landscaping truck because his startup didn't go anywhere. Okay. So it is a very, our tendency to see these people as heroes and to try to imitate them is a very dangerous one, I think.
Now that doesn't mean that you should not be working on the things you care and un-cambled. But these are the guys who played a lottery and won. Do you remember there were many other websites, social websites before, you know, Facebook and they all died and Facebook could have died too. I mean, Zachar might disagree with me, but you know, it could have died. Okay. And, you know, all these things are like that. Apple, when almost under, they brought Steve Jobs again and the guy put them into, you know, into the stratosphere. And the same thing with Elon Musk, he said, high-tech risk taker. And so far, every time he flips the coin, he comes the right way. But to say, I want to be like him, you have to be very careful and to calculate the odds. Okay. So when you say this, how many of these kids really make it? I mean, it's a very complicated thing.
So I think that to have a strong background in something will help you when suddenly they feel switches from being a programmer and making a lot of money to suddenly program and start, you know, a dime a dozen or becoming a technician, basically. Okay. I mean, I had a perfectly thriving career as a lab scientist with grants and private funding and a bunch of other things publishing regularly. And when I decided to switch to this, were you worried? No, because I saw it as a very slow departure from what you were doing. And I saw the success very early on. I mean, I realized that you were essentially satisfying two things that are very important to you. You like to explain things. You're incredibly good at explaining things since you were a little kid.
Okay. You were always explaining everything to people and you have a talent. Let's face it. I mean, you know, I'm not saying this because I want to flatter you. I really believe that. Everybody says the success of your podcast is a success at explaining things in ways that people understand. They don't have to go and buy a book on New York anatomy to understand what you're saying. So I knew that this was a path. Now, I didn't realize how incredible the path was. And there was a lot of randomness in it. For instance, you started podcasting at a time when very few people were podcasting. If you start today, the story would be a very different one.
Yeah. The timing was the pandemic. People were home. They were saying podcast. And this brings to something to me that many times people have asked me about me. What makes me do what I do? I believe in the idea of walking on beaches with very few footprints. And you're going to a crowded field is a mess. So many of the times that I move into something else is when I realize that there's a mob scene of scientists working at this and the chances of doing something interesting are very, very small. Okay. The internet has a lot of information to go everywhere.
A guy in Zambia can actually read the same things that I read here. So it's very hard to compete against such crowd. And many people are brilliant and many of them are smart. So you started something very early on and you were lucky that you chose a field. That resonates with the needs of people. Okay. There are also other people who do podcasting and go nowhere. So I think that I never worried. I actually was, you know, elated to see the trajectory of your podcast. The only thing is you have a tenure position. And that is a nice safety cushion. Everything else where today you're beyond the reach of justice, as I say. So no problem.
You know, you don't need it in a sense. There's no one's beyond the reach of justice. But yeah, I still maintain my tenure position. I spoke to my chairman and optimality this morning and I'll teach the spring or anything. And it's good for you to really to interact with young people and to hear what they did care and so on. But I never worry in the sense that I thought that you have enough talent to do well and you chose to do it. I mean, I remember during COVID at the beginning, you were, we were at your sister's house and you were drawing all these little diagrams. I showed up my drawings. Yeah, yeah. So I think you put them on Twitter or something or that sort. And it was the beginning of something much more interesting and important. And so I never worried about it.
I think that all of us, the whole family and those who know you are sort of impressed at the explosive success of this story here, you know, your podcast is amazing. I mean, I don't have to tell you. That's why we're flexing kind of an early compulsion more than anything of learn and teach, learn and share. Yeah, but there's also, I need to say something. The other day, actually, we were watching your interview with Esther Perel in regard to the fact that I think it's a great interview. Both my wife and I were reflecting on the fact that it's also an incredible tribute to the way you conduct an interview.
Okay. So there is a talent there. I mean, not many people can take someone and talk for, and make it interesting. Let's put it that way. So you have that. I inherited your curiosity. No, but it's more than that. It's also a way of drawing people out and so on, which is also part of your practice. So I never had any doubts at the opposite. I mean, the issue is, you know, obviously you're taking it to many, many places, beyond what you started, which was essentially explained to people how neuroscience works, right? Yeah, we've gone into a lot of health domains and other things. And I've also been blessed with an amazing team.
This is something that I think while we share a lot of things in common, if I may, I mean, I've always been kind of a pack animal. You know, if it was skateboarding, like draw friends together, if it's birds, I have my bird club with Eddie Chang, who now, as you know, is a chair of neurosurgery at UCSF. It's kind of wild to think about. But yeah, I've rarely gone alone. Like I'm just struck. I mean, I mean, we've had many conversations over the years, but I'm just struck at how you've been able to be, you've been a bit of a lone wolf with these different camps. You make friends, you have colleagues, you maintain long-term relationships. The roots of people who collaborate with me, I don't release alone. Right. Right. But there's, I haven't changed crowds very often.
You know, and it seems like you've had to go into economics and theoretical physics and all these things. And yeah, that's an interesting difference. And look, I don't think I'm thrilling at the same time. Sometimes when you start giving talks in a field that you've never done much before, and you see this audience, you know, come intimidating too. You know, even when I started doing chaos, I thought I was doing very well till I gave a talk at Berkeley, and there was a mathematician. I regard mathematicians as the top, top people in the world. And I was saying something, and a guy, he's very famous mathematician, he said, that's a lie. I said, what do you mean? He said, can you prove it? No, because, you know, physicists don't prove theorems. He said, well, then he's a lie. You cannot prove it's a lie. It was quite a, you know, a cold shower.
And that happens to me on Twitter every now and again. Well, if they'll find something where I misspoke and they do it, and it's super embarrassing, you correct yourself, you move on. No, no, and then you learn things too. If you have a conversation with someone. And you never forget those things. This is what I learned. Like, you never forget the errors you made. Like, on a qualifying exam, most people will never take a qualifying exam. But they basically ask you questions until you get it something wrong. The moment you say, I don't know or you get something wrong, that's an important moment because it's also the thing that you go look up and you never forget.
Yeah, right. And then also the tiny humiliations can be very good too for you. I mean, this is very important. I know. I know. I know. I do too. I mean, I think it's a very, very important part of growing up and discovering that you don't understand something. But I always, I need to say this. I mean, in spite of fact that, you know, you paint me as a lone wolf, I'm not. I'm very social and I interact, I love interacting with people. And I always been very lucky that I surround myself with groups of people, including today that are brilliant and resonate with the kinds of things I want to do. And so it's very stimulating. I'm not the kind of person that sits in a corner and does theories and publish it.
I publish papers on my own. That was my romantic period where I needed to be Einstein in the patent office. Not that I thought I was Einstein, but it was very important. I was the only author. Okay. Today, I don't mind putting my name, whatever. And I don't need it. I mean, I have hundreds of papers and lots, you know, more than enough patents and so on. So I like, I like interacting with people. It's very, very important to me. And I have an idea. I need to tell people about an idea. So I can relate. Yes. Yes.
So that's very good. And I still see some of my old students and collaborators like, you know, Ted and so on. And we take walks every once in a while and discuss things, you know. And so I learned a lot from him too. Right now you're working, as I understand, on quantum internet. Yes. This is a mysterious term to most everybody. Yes. Yes. You alluded to it earlier about quantum entanglement. Yes. But my understanding is that foreign governments, countries, and our government and country, are very interested in quantum internet. Yes. That it might actually be at least as important as AI, maybe more important for security reasons, et cetera. Can you explain quantum internet in a way that I can understand in the list? Yes. I can explain. I mean, I'll tell you the original thing. Quantum mechanics was essentially finished in 1925. So we are not reinventing new physics here. OK. There's the physics of the gravitation and quantum, but that's not really what we're talking about. What happens is they're following the basis of all secure interactions in the internet on computers are based on the idea that there are certain mathematical equations or functions that are very hard to resolve.
So when I send you something encoded, if someone is listening to that conversation, that is encoded, and tries to read it, it's very, very hard to do because in order to decode that code is some kind of symbols and so on, you need to, I don't know, months or years of a computer to do it. OK. But it can be done. Computers get broken. Computer codes get broken all the time because the basis of these codes are mathematical functions. You have a mathematical function. You can create a computer program that will try to unravel it. And it can be unrollable. OK, so that's one thing.
Now here comes quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics provides security that is not given by mathematics, but by the laws of physics. So if you have a way of interacting, sending messages from one computer to the other, encrypted using quantum mechanisms, they cannot be broken. Can you give me an example of a quantum mechanism for encoding information? Imagine, imagine that I'm sending you messages. Every message is encoded in binary, one's and zero. OK, so I'm sending a message, which is a string of one's and zero's. That string of one's and zero's could be hello Andrew or could also be something that is secretly encoded into something. If it's classical encryption, which is what we use today, a computer in principle can look at those symbols and unravel them.
Now let me tell you how it works in quantum. In quantum, when I send you a quantum message, the act of touching it, trying to look at it, destroys it. That's what happens in quantum, not in classical thing. I can look at the strings of one's and zero's and I look at them and I can make a copy of it and then I read them, I take into my lab and I decrypt them. OK, if I look at a string of quantomb bits moving, there are not ones and zeros, there are different things. These are moving parts. They're moving parts. Usually photons can use fiber optics. You can use them. So these are photons. I know photons are. So they're bouncing energy away. Yeah, they're bouncing energy away. Yeah, little bunches. Yeah, because photons, if they're going around, they're also, you know, the photon could be polarized up or down or whatever.
But if it's in a quantum state, which is in the intermediate between, the moment I look at it, the moment I capture it, I collapse it into one of the other and I destroy it. The interaction with it changes. The measurement destroys it. This is the mystery of quantum mechanics that the measurement collapses. We call it the work collapses into one state or the other. Before that, it was anything. We could be anything. So when I use quantum signals, I'm sending qubits, quantum bits, they're called qubits. The act of observing the qubit renders into a classical one or zero. So then there's no way you cannot break it.
So does that mean that the practical implementation of this? Yes. Equates to unbreakable code. Exactly. Which is why, of course, other governments, I mean, what I've been told is that in China, they're working very hard on this. Oh, absolutely. And that here we're working very hard. We are working. I'm working too. And you're working very hard on this. Yeah. So, but who's there? Has anyone gotten there yet? Okay. The problem is the following. In order to decrypt this, do you remember that I told you that you can use mathematics, okay? Some of these functions are incredibly complex. It might take the edge of the universe perhaps to decode them mathematically. Let's not talk about quads.
But if you have a quantum computer, now we're talking about a quantum computer, it can do it in a couple of hours. A quantum computer could decode any mathematical function of the ones used in encryption in hours. Whereas it would take the edge of the universe for a monster computer, standard computer you can buy to do it. So in theory, whoever gets this ability first can read essentially all the information that's being sent around the world. Not only that. And many people are doing the Chinese, the Koreans, and we're doing. They are grabbing everything now that is encrypted. They cannot decrypt it. And they store it because someday they'll be able to decrypt it. But who knows if it will still be relevant? Oh, but it may be. And we don't know what they have.
Imagine. Imagine if you can't get. Remember when North Korea hacked, what was it, Disney? One of the, and then they discovered all these emails where people, like George Clooney, I don't know who was complaining about this or that. So imagine. And worse. And worse. We just didn't hear about that. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So if you grab all this information, we cannot decrypt it today. But if quantum computers become available and there are people working on quantum computing, they'll be able to decrypt it. In the meantime, people are working on deploying these quantum networks. We're working on that too, not to deploy them, but just to see whether or not it's feasible to do that. Okay.
The Chinese are ahead of almost everybody. They have two satellites already in orbit that are sending these qubits. So they are impossible to decrypt. Okay. Wait. So they're sending the qubit. So you can already communicate in quantile. Oh, yeah. Yeah. We communicate all the time. Yeah. Yeah. I have a lab in Colorado that does that. Yeah. Absolutely. No, no, no, no. But eventually we will have a quantum internet based on all this because in order to talk to these quantum computers, you have to send qubits, not just normal bits. So this is a race. Yeah. A race. We are not really, I mean, since we are not a, yeah. Yeah.
And there are a lot of people, I need to tell you that a lot of people including this government that claim that this is not really that relevant or important. But in Europe, for instance, they're really putting a lot of money into that. Why would our government not think it's important? Because there is a sociological phenomenon here. Cryptography has always been the promise of the mathematicians because there are mathematical functions, you know, like discrete logarithms and so on. They believe the moment they heard about quantum computers, they said, oh, we can solve the problem. We can create algorithms, mathematical algorithms that are going to be even harder to break. They call that post-quantum. But they don't know it's true. The United States government is following this post-quantum because they think it's easier and so on. Already they published two of these very, very fancy two students with a laptop were able to decrypt it within a week.
So obviously you cannot prove that no one will ever decrypt these things. Okay. So there is the cryptographers, they're not like physics, they don't work as physicists. So they say quantum key distribution, that's the name of this thing. It's a taryic, it's not important and so on. And also it won't work. Well, they say it was going to work for short distances, about 10 to 20 kilometers, which has published the paper that got tremendous publicity and award and so on as best paper that we were able to send this stuff over 100 kilometers. So I mean, the Chinese are sending that from satellites.
Okay. So impossible to decrypt. Military communications based on these kind of things that are impossible to decrypt. So they're very important. But there is a whole group of people that are saying, no, post-quantum is what we want. And so next the National Institute of Science and Technology, they are really pushing the post-quantum thing. In Europe is the opposite. They're really embracing quantum. I mean, I was Denmark for instance, very far ahead into these things. NATO just gave them a pile of money to work on quantum and so on. So it all depends, it's a complicated thing because the crypto people are all mathematical people. So they don't care about quantum.
Is any of this going to be useful for trying to understand, I don't know, how the brain works? Or is it, I mean, you know, there's still debates to whether or not the way that we're thinking about brain function is even like the right way. We think about neurons, action potentials and chemicals and, but the physicists, whenever they like poke their noses into this stuff, they tend to think about it a little bit differently or they start to think about, well, you know, state dependence, like the brain that you have at 8 a.m. is very different than the brain you have at 2 a.m. or 4 in the afternoon. Like maybe everything's happening differently and maybe some of this actually gets down to the quantum level. Like we can't say this neuron talks to this neuron and when they talk in the following way, you get a certain output. Like is there relevance here?
There are two things I want to say. Beware of physicists getting into brains in brain work coming in. They always end up. It's like the new thing now. I know I know I know I know I was open to. I was into neuroscience for a while. And I think recently neuroscience has done made a good move of including people from psychology, computation, even philosophy, economics, and biology. These are all levels of analysis. Yeah, yeah. But the other thing you asked about quantum and the brain,
there is Roger Penrose who just got the Nobel Prize in physics. He's one of the few people who have various other ideas about the brain being totally quantum. And he's an incredibly brilliant man. He was the advisor of Calking. I heard him on Lexus podcast. And he does have interesting ideas about how neurons might be communicating maybe as bound networks as opposed to independent entities. No one really follows it. I'm not an expert in that. So Roger Penrose is the one who's pushing this. Many of the physicists go into brain science are not very clever at doing brain science because I hear a story. I think it was Francis Crick or someone who told I was at a conference and he was saying this, that if this is a game, the woman said, I decided to go into brain science. And so he said, OK, what have you done? And the guy says, I'm usually a specific kid of the brain. What do I do with it?
Well, I think it's good that computationally minded people have joined neuroscience because it was getting too modal, too descriptive. That said, I do think that math is so important, but it's often used to intimidate biologists into thinking that their ideas either might not be true or that there's better ideas out there. I will say that when computational neuroscience first started, it seemed like the attempts to model the brain were pretty feeble. Yeah. And actually, I'll just say they were pretty lame. But now I think with AI and LLMs, the biologists have had to step back and say, hey, you know, these math physics engineering AI types, they have the potential to really evolve the field. Right. Right. At least that's my stance. Yeah. I was at conferences where people say things like the brain is a massively parallel machine. And I say, wait, wait, are you sure of that?
Yeah, that's a meaningless action. Yeah. So I said, if I show you a row of trees and I said, tell me how many are they? Do you really take the whole thing? And you said 75 or you have to go sequentially? It's not parallel, it is sequential. You know? But LLMs are pretty interesting, right? I mean, yeah, I'm working on this. You can take four or five large language models, essentially sort of pseudo brains and have them work on the same problem. It's hard to work with five people in parallel in a way that's coherent, right? You can all talk. You can only talk so much over one another. Yeah. It's very interesting. That's exactly what we're doing now.
Years ago with Jeff Stregher, we wrote a paper on the idea of showing how programs collaborating with each other could solve problems very, very fast that human others cannot do. And it's a basis of a lot of the work we want to do now. Yes. And there are people who are really thinking of putting many, many of these LLMs together and then see whether or not they do better than a single one or better than a human. So you think AI is going to improve life for the typical citizen? Yes, because you can use these things in order to do things that were very hard to do before. I mean, I use them and it's amazing.
I just published a paper on hallucinations in LLMs and so on because they hallucinate everyone and say, oh, they say anything. But yes, yeah. They are very useful. And I think that the companies that use them will make more money than the companies that produce them like OpenAI and so on. Yes. Yeah. It's a very, very important field. But 10, 15 years ago, whenever I'd bring up AI, you would chuckle and say, this stuff is life. Well, the funny thing is the other day, well, I don't want to name him, one of the managers at Xerox Spark, when I was at Park, I started playing with the idea of using machine learning to see what they can do. And AI people at that time said, that's nonsense. We need to think about logic. How does a brain think? How do we do cognitive psychology and so on? We were just doing neural nets. That's exactly it.
And the other day, I was meeting with some of these people and they were saying to me, we used to laugh at you doing this stuff because we could do only very little. And today is the rage. Now, the difference between what I was doing, what is being done today is a scale. I mean, I don't know if you know that they are now using nuclear power reactors in order to power the data centers.
I didn't know that. But it's an immense cost of computing. I have no idea the amount of work I take to one trillion tokens in order to get one of these things to work. It strikes me you've always been very open-minded and very willing to adopt new technologies. Yes. But it hasn't changed your daily life very much. Like not much at all. I remember early on, you showed me the internet and you said, be very careful. And I said, why? You said, it's like mental chewing gum. Absolutely. You chew and chew. Those were your words. And at first, it tastes good. Then it doesn't taste very good at all. Then you don't taste it at all. And then you realize there's no nutrition.
And I always think about that in terms of phone usage or web foraging behavior. And you still like to work. You take a walk in the afternoon or after eating. You've always been incredibly regular with your routine despite the evolution of all these technologies. Like you're not the guy in Silicon Valley who's like tricked out with all the gear. No, no, no.
Well, there is another. I actually have never seen you at a cafe with a laptop. Well, sometimes. But there's another aspect to this. As you know, in the last up to five years ago, I spent four years working on the economics of attention and why is it that people attend two things. And I really believe, and I'm not an expert, that there is a tremendous resonance between these machines and our human brains and they're addictive. And this the former CEO of Hewlett Packard, where I was in direct and the labs, Meg Wickman, she used to say, you know, I wake up in the middle of the night to look at my phone. And I know people who do that. And I get a memory of my family who do that more often than I would like to see them do that.
You don't do that. No. I mean, I do it, but not not I don't have this compulsion to see what's going on. I had a student that he said, I love spam because at least something is happening. Oh my goodness. He said, he spam spam. He said, I get spam and I look at it because something's happening. He used to say, he's not a very successful financial guy. Stop doing so. Brilliant fellow, brilliant fellow. But that's because maybe your internal world is rich enough that you don't are being in the. Oh, but I look at news. I like to look at things. I like to look at videos, don't misunderstand. It's not that I ignore it.
But yeah, I'm not, I mean, I like the latest things and so on, especially if you are beautiful and so on. Yeah, I'm not into whatever the latest is and so on. And I remember I got some Oculus things that I got for free from this. I gave them to you and I never used them once or twice. I mean, I've used VR in my lab, but I don't want to spend time in VR. And also, as my conversation with one of your collaborators here revealed before this podcast, I love mechanical things and the details, the analog world. Okay.
Digital is interesting and fascinating in some ways, but I like things, you know, like mechanical watches, cameras that click when they oppress them and so on, but not artificially. Okay. So I really like that. I like things that are very classical and so on in many ways. And I enjoy that. I like technology. Don't misunderstand me. And I use it a lot. And I use it and I do new things with them that I get patterns and so on. But yeah, I'm not a techie guy in the same sense.
I enjoy, I like to have an analog life, not a digital life. Writing a bicycle is analog, walking is analog, you know, sitting and meditating is analog. You know, I, of course, you can also listen through the internet to a good thing that helps you meditate or go to sleep, don't misunderstand me. But I don't have this fascination with things and so on. I mean, some people do, but it seems like a lot of people have a fascination with the future.
You see, very grounded in the present. I've never read a single book of science fiction. Most of the people I work with, and I imagine they all come with ideas from books and science fiction. And they always say, did you read this or that? And I don't have no idea. I never liked it. I like to read about real people with real blood and real feelings. Science fiction to me is devoid of that.
It's imagining, you know, droids doing this or that. I couldn't get less. You know, as I always think that physicists must love science fiction because they never, never read a single book or looked at it in a movie of science fiction. I couldn't tell that. I don't relate to that. I don't think that these people display human-like behavior anyhow. So I mean, I'm not saying there's not interesting to others.
I mean, you're not a futurist. No. No, even though they call me futurists because I always anticipate things. Right. But you're not somebody who like thinks about what life is going to be like 100 years from now. No, I like to know life is now. Yes. Yes. And I also, as Nielswar once said, it is hard to predict anything, especially the future. Okay. We all predict the past very well. I don't know what's going on. I mean, you know, we seem things happening in the unbelievable things.
I mean, the technology that allows you to become such a well-wide known phenomenon is because of the technology. Imagine if you were just declining the Roman Senate centuries ago. Very few people. I mean, exactly what I'm doing now but with no microphones or cameras. Right. I'm not a futurist. And that's it. The people tell me I am because I anticipate things but not because I imagine, you know, a world in which, you know, I couldn't care less about going to Mars, for instance, even though Elon Musk thinks this is very important. Do you think it's a cool project? I don't know. I want to ask him why. And then he tells me things like he says things like, well, you know, civilization is going to die here. We are going to fix it. And so I don't know. I mean, let it happen.
I don't know. Just enjoy now, you know. You're not worried about the future. And that says, oh, I'm an optimist. I believe that technology will solve the global warming problem. Everything is obvious how to solve it. There's nothing very mysterious. Nuclear power is going to do it, you know? Absolutely. And once we get out over our preconceived notions of nuclear power, I mean, very few people have ever died of a nuclear accident. Let's face it. Yeah. They need to name it something else. Maybe. Yeah. And then things that once were thought to be dangerous when renamed, we were, you know, turn out to not be so dangerous that when renamed, people are willing to adopt.
Yeah. Yeah. Right. Yeah. So, yeah, I don't really, you know, I don't worry too much about the future. I think that people are ingenious and wise enough to stay away from the brink, hopefully. You don't seem to worry too much generally. You're not a big warrior. Mm-hmm. Yeah. Yeah. You and I are different that way. You and I are different that way. You're a warrior. Yeah. Not if I keep busy. Oh, okay. Yeah. These days a lot less.
I think that I think at the transition points between different circumstances and at the transition points between different career things, I think it makes sense to worry. It sort of drives some of the urgency to make sure that, you know, you reach for the next rung and grab it, right? And not, you know, not miss. I mean, there's been, I think there's been elements of uncertainty in my life where I felt like, okay, I'm going to ground to the things I can control, but no, I don't stay up at night worrying about things. Yeah. Also, I think meditation is profoundly effective at this.
Suddenly, you're here and that stays. The past is a past. You cannot do anything and the future hasn't arrived. So what the heck? You know, I really believe that and it has helped me immensely. I'm very, the few things I'm very proud. I went for my medical checkup a year ago and the doctor says, I'd love to hear you breathe. I said, what's wrong with my breathe? It's so slow and calm. So you got over the white coat syndrome? Yes. Yeah. Because of meditation. Yeah. You send me your lab results this morning. So everything looks great. Yeah. People always been, you know, regular about exercise, not excessive. No. You're never one of the like the marathoners or the, you know, five AM in the pool, people. But you know. It runs to running marathon actually. So, yeah. I mean, it's very common in the area where, you know, in around Stanford to be pretty extreme about athletics. That was never your thing. No. Steady long distance runner. Yeah, I told you that once. Yeah. I'm not a sprinter. Yeah. Some people are, and by the way, I admire them immensely. You mean in life, they were speaking math for you. Yeah. In general, yeah. There are some people who really can do things incredibly fast and they move from one thing to the other. And, and so on. Yeah.
I, I like people who reflect some wisdom. For instance, I have a, it's very strange for someone like me, but I see a Buddhist monk and I just, I mean, I feel calmer by just seeing that person, you know. I don't know. I, there is something, it's not just a spirituality, the power they have to be here totally and absolutely. It's impressive to me. I mean, some of the people say, okay, that's funny robes or something, you know. I like that a lot. Not, it's not necessarily a way. I mean, my therapist used to stay on me and that to use meditation to move away from trouble and, and trouble, travelling thoughts is not a good idea. So you have to embrace the world too. But I, I use it so it's just to stay calm and to enjoy and to see things for what they are. And I think it's, yeah. Yeah. The future is the future. I don't know. Well, you can only control what you can control. Right. That's, but you know, there's some people that worry all the time about the future, you know.
You're understanding of quantum mechanics, relativity and the real world. And perhaps just generally knowing what you know and experiencing what you've experienced, do you believe in some sort of higher power organizing force or let's just be blunt? Do you believe in God? Well, okay. The word God has a lot of implications, right? I mean, I don't necessarily, I don't believe in a God that keeps track of what you and I are doing at this point. There are too many people and so on. So I don't believe in this notion of, you know, of an agent there that is somehow knowing what, what everybody on this planet is doing out of, you know, and so on. I, I do feel sometimes and especially because of the studies I have, I, and actually from reading people who have been very, very deep, you know, in particular the thoughts of people like Einstein, Heisenberg and so on, that there seems to be at times a sense of an organizing principle in the universe and to learn those rules. So there is this notion, I mean, philosophically it's called pantheism that God is in nature already. It's been us and all these people started this. That is very appealing to me. The notion that there is something that this thing is, if it's evolving, it's like an entity. And not an entity that says, oh, tomorrow, you know, you'll die or so on. I mean, you'll die.
You'll die. There are lots of events that lead to death or to happiness and so on, but not because someone is out there checking. I mean, I don't believe that there's enough memory to store all this. Although today I saw you can buy Sandis Gaimuris terabytes study this big. So I don't, I don't believe in that. But it's a matter of belief. No, no, anything else. Unfortunately, these beliefs are, you know, translates sometimes in complicated action. I do believe that there is a sense of mystery. Oh, yeah. I sometimes, I once heard, I don't know who said it, but it's a very good sentence that if you listen to Gethof and say, I mean, the man's struggle, but it's amazing. He was able to create that music.
On the other hand, Mozart seems to have been getting the messages from heavens, you know, on a daily basis, just for the dawn. So some people are given this connection to something much bigger and you have access to that through listening to the music, the experiences we have. There is this idea out there that consciousness doesn't just exist within our brains, but it's sort of a like a collective network and things come through us, not just as individuals, but as Jungian think is a lot of that. I was, I am very interested in the word spiritual and what it means, you know, to see that things transcend our particular needs at any point.
But the idea of a God that tells you one thing or the other is funny. You know, if you look at any movie, you know, Braveheart or whatever, you see the one warrior, one group of warriors has a priest saying, God is with us. The other one is about to engrage. It's just the same thing to the other group. That's a little bit funny, right? I mean, humans and human brains in particular are amazing. And what human brains can do, this computer in our heads is spectacular. And yet it also has limitations. And I think, well, put differently, does it make you nervous or worry you that I seem to have an increasing interest in God and religion? No, I think that is a beautiful journey in which you're in.
And there are two pieces to this provided you don't start using this to somehow spout, you know, arguments why people shouldn't do this or that. No, no, it's only my own exploration of my life. I respect that I think is a very important thing. You know, there is an issue here that I read reading Wilson, actually, Joe Wilson, which you know, he wrote this beautiful book on human nature. And he claims that the religious instinct comes through out of a submissive component in us. That animals have.
Dogs are submissive. And we believe that we need to be submissive to a king and to something beyond a king, you know, some deity or something other. That's his theory. I certainly don't feel any compulsion to be submissive to other humans. I mean, I think in knowing the limitations of the human brain and cognition, I don't care how smart. I don't care how successful an individual or a group is, but it's very clear that the human brain is limited in parsing the universe that we're in. Otherwise, we wouldn't continue to have the same issues over and over.
Although I do like to think that we're falling forward, we're evolving forward as opposed to devolving as a species, but we tend to repeat a lot of the same mistakes over and over again. But there's also a technical thing here. We sometimes confuse randomness with premonition or God doing something. I mean, dodging a bullet by turning your head as our next president did is an incredible thing.
The probability is so, so, so small. But that doesn't mean that there was someone who said, turn the head, do it and so the bullet will pass. I mean, we ascribe causality to something that was truly random. It could have also in another scenario, the same turn of the head would have been to the other side and this person would be dead. So I, but sometimes we are confronted with these incredible coincidences that we cannot explain and we say, oh, it must be God that makes sure that you and I met or that we thought the same thoughts and so on.
Although as a biologist who started off as a neurodevelopmental biologist, I think I just had to see there are two things that changed my understanding of what might be possible. One was Barbara Chapman, my advisor, once treated me to an experiment. It was kind of a funny thing. Typical Barbara, you know, how nerdy she was. She said, are you willing to stay up all night? And I was like, okay, yeah. And she took zebrafish eggs and fertilized them. And I sat for 11 hours with food. I got up to use the restroom and I watched a zebrafish egg duplicate and become a fish. Like in real time with my eyes, not some movie on YouTube. Although that's impressive too. People can look these up. But to just actually see life emerge from a set of cells through its own organizing principles, all of which can be explained by genes, transcription factors, the physics of the mitotic spindle, all, I mean, math and biology and chemistry can explain all of it. But there was something truly spectacular about it that seems so non-random because it's not random.
And then the other one is that, I mean, I guess I've had enough experiences with prayer and the consequences of prayer in my real life that I just, I sort of can't get my head around the idea that there's not a God or some sort of organizing force. I can't accept it because there's, yes, there's causality, reverse causality, correlation and mistaken correlation and causality, but somehow, like, I mean, I like to think I'm grounded in science and reality, but I don't think science can explain at all. Oh, no. And I think that this experience of the spirituality, for instance, I remember and still happens spending a night outdoors and looking at the sky. I mean, it's an incredible thing. The stars and you feel so small and yet there is order to all that. It's not just random stuff. I mean, they move according to laws that fortunately we humans were able to discover, which is an amazing thing when you think about it. Dogs did not discover gravity. No. They experienced it. The experience. It was gravity. Yeah.
So I really think that there is something to be said about these spiritual experiences. And I really believe that very importantly, and I listened to people talk. I recently have been looking at some stuff that C.S. Lewis, you know, he was a man who was studying the sagas and the mythology of the Vikings and so on and eventually became a devout Christian, you know, thinking that this was the only answer to the, because all religions have the same element. So I understand that. I respect it. I experienced that, you know, at times in my life. But when I think seriously about it, I think that the moment, you know, we have this computer and, you know, we can get glimpses of all this. But I don't believe that it's this notion. No one can prove to me that there is someone there organizing my life minute by minute or second by second. I don't believe that. I do believe that there are fantastic chances in life and randomness, beautiful ones.
我确实认为对这些精神体验有一些值得说的地方。我真的相信这很重要,我倾听人们的诉说。我最近查看了一些C.S. Lewis 的资料,他是一个研究北欧维京传说和神话的人,最后成为了一位虔诚的基督徒,因为他认为所有宗教都有相同的元素,他认为这是唯一的答案。我理解这一点,也尊重它。我在生命中的某些时刻也有过这样的体验。但是当我认真思考时,我认为随着我们现在拥有计算机,我们可以略微了解这一切。但我不相信有人能向我证明,有某个存在在逐分逐秒地安排我的生活。我并不相信这一点。我相信生活中确实有奇妙的机会和美好的随机性。
Okay. And, you know, having Yuan and Lara as children is a fantastic randomness in my life. Hopefully it wasn't too random. No, no. In this sense that, you know, children, you know, you know, children that come unhealthy or whatever. I mean, you know, it's a very impressive thing. Yeah. The number of things that have to organize to create a healthy child is it's truly a miracle.
Yeah. It's true. Yeah. And it's random too, you know. I mean, the same, the same set of parents can produce two different set of children too. Okay. I mean, that's a very, very important. Warren and I are pretty different. Oh, absolutely. But in very beautiful ways too.
So I mean, neither of you does behave or conducts a life that, you know, I would be a trap your mother would be happy with. So, but going back to this, I believe that indeed spirituality is important. I have a lot of access to that through classical music. There are times that I really believe that is it. I mean, I can get very, very emotional listening to music, very emotional. You know, my wife always notices that when I do that and I think that then you're having access to something very different.
Of course, you can be explained physiologically by all sorts of resonances and so on. But who cares? You know, you mentioned that you can peer into the future with ideas that you're working on. And you don't get too far ahead. Like you're not thinking like a hundred years from now. Once again, I look like do you spend a lot of time thinking about the past?
Sometimes sometimes. And there is a, I've always, because I left my, my family very, when I was told very young, I always had a certain nostalgia for things. Okay. I, I met a, I became friend with a very impressive guy in France, Clougeau Park. I think he was the director of the geophysics institute and both of us had very similar parents in different, you know, French and Argentina, but still, and similar education. And we, we had, I have sometimes a certain nostalgia that is almost melancholy about the way we grew up and so on.
Melancholy. A little bit about it. I mean, I recall your stories about growing up in Argentina, like you would have 10, 15 cousins over for lunch every Sunday. Yeah, yeah. It doesn't sound melancholy. No, no, but there were moments, moments of loneliness, moments of times where I felt very misunderstood. I had, unfortunately, a very punishing mother.
So that, but I still remember her and I think about her in the ways that are not necessarily always very happy. I was looking at photos a while ago and I, there are pictures of her that is, you know, she's smiling coming out of the Pacific Ocean in, in Carmel. She took a walk and so on. But I, I, I reflect back in the past in that sense. I mean, and sometimes, you know, I'm asked, you know, how did you grow up? My wife being Danish, she grew up in a very different way from, you know, upper middle class, Argentines. So you know, that we reflect on that, you know, the kinds of childhoods we had and so on. But not, not in the sense that, you know, oh, I wish I had that now. No regrets.
Well, not many, not many. I mean, I, I mean, I, there is one regret that is more theoretical than anything else, which is if I look at my family, my brother stayed, produce family, children, grandchildren and so on, I came here and I produce children and grandchildren. They are going to be two diverging branches of the family. Not just. We still get together. We got together last year for your birthday.
Yeah, no, I know. That's what is so important to me. Yes. But I think about it sometimes. And when I go back and I see the lives very similar to what I had, you know, different breaths, there is a sudden, you know, sense of thinking about it. But I also realize that if I didn't take the steps I took, I would be as miserable as some of my old friends that are really struggling even to find meaning in what they do or even surviving economically. So I was really lucky.
Well, so was I because I wouldn't have existed because you wouldn't have met now. True. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, maybe you would have, but no, no, no, no, no. I'm grateful I didn't grow up and want to sire us. I love, I love the city. I love the country. I don't feel that I couldn't have done. Any of the things I've done in South America, given maybe, but the landscape was just completely different. Oh, I go there and after a week, I want to come back.
Yeah. Yeah, definitely. Do you love this country? I love this country. I feel very much part of this country. I'm very grateful to what this country has done for me, for my family. And that includes you and your sister, okay, and my wife. When did you become a citizen? Oh, many, many years ago. And I really did it consciously.
No, not because, I mean, I mean, they were practical things, but no, I really believe in it. I really believe it is an incredible country. I mean, gives incredible opportunities to people. As Elon says, Elon Musk, I'm also an immigrant and very happy to be one. Yeah, you've always been a patriot. Absolutely.
And on the other hand, as I said, Argentina is complicated. I go there and a lot of smells and things that bring memories that are not that easy. I mean, the food's not bad. Yeah, yeah, but it's also the whole atmosphere. And the first two, three days are an incredible experience of meeting friends and talking with them and so on. And after a while, I also see a darker side to it. I must tell you that on the other hand, my country law, Denmark, is also a country that I like immensely. There's nice people and pleasant and soft, very soft, especially in summer.
But the Danes are also strong people. Like they're, the average Dane is so smart. I think the high school education there must be one of the best in the world. Yeah, there is a notion of proficiency. I mean, people are proficient at what they do. Yeah, you go to a store, you go to, you have a problem, an airline or whatever, you'll get someone who really knows how to solve it. But there's also a very, it's a small society, very homogeneous, tremendous sense of humor, which I enjoy.
And it's very soft. People enjoy life. They have notions like slow food movements and things of that sort. So I like it. I could not live there because it's a very homogeneous way of behaving. The Lutheran ethic is there. They're not religious, but they're Lutheran. So I feel very comfortable in Europe and so on. But I like being here. Yes. Yeah, I feel like our family now includes so many different nationalities and religions and backgrounds and philosophies and political stances. Well, it's good too.
Yeah, it's great. It's starting to look like the UN with some extra. Well, I grew up in a family that I had in ideological diversity. It was incredible. Incredible. That's good. But that was also good to be as its child to hear these arguments about politics and so on. Yeah, I hear a few of those now. Arguments throughout politics. We won't get into politics.
One thing that I did want to say, however, is that I remember a long time ago, and I'm certain because I wrote it in my journal, you said, politically incorrect views are often right. Is that true still? Yes. Yes. Politically true for you. I should say. Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. Because this has only to be judged in time.
I think that the issue of political incorrectness is some kind of a mob behavior that says you should think like us. We should be able to express our views with respecting others and so on, and we should be respected for that. I think that this whole notion that others are telling you what to think or not to think is a little bit complicated. And I must say something which I hope it doesn't get in trouble with my Danish side of the family or friends. These like the Scandinavian societies that are extremely uniform in thinking, the worst should is used all the time.
You should do this. You shouldn't do that. Good that you did it. It's a very, the enforced behavior in a very, very particular way. It's not a hurting instinct, but there is a very, very strict Lutheran tradition of telling you what you should and you shouldn't do. So I know very few people, and I've been going to Denmark for many, many years, that really have, I cannot, plastic ideas that are away from the mean and they're considered odd. Okay. Very few, including the physicists and they have fantastic school of physics there. The board was there. So it's a society that conformity is the issue there, right?
So on the other hand, I think that it's good to think differently. And you know, there's a man, perhaps you heard of him. I know where, I mean, I admire him. He died, Freeman Dyson. He was on a level with Feynman and Gelman, by the way. He used to have very strange ideas too. He used to say, global warming, what's wrong with it? There's a high risk going to be a garden. And yeah, you know, there's a high risk there. It will become a garden. People will be able to eat all that food. Well, I think people hear that, but then they countered against these, you know, very heart wrenching pictures of like polar bears on ice caps that are shrinking. This kind of thing. There are more polar bears today than when Mr. Al Gore said that we're going to die. Listen, I'm not going to argue climate change with you because I have no knowledge there. No, no, no, no, I'm not, I'm not countering. I'm just saying, you know, like, uh, it, I mean, this, this is getting very intense on the internet now because the arguments on both sides seem pretty strong, at least as they're presented. So who's right? No, the question is, what can we do about it? That's the issue. And I think that technology and wisdom are going to solve it. I think so. I really believe that very strongly. I mean, optimist, when he comes to that.
When I'm talking about being politically incorrect, this is idea of saying things that a group of people say you shouldn't be saying or thinking those thoughts. And the question is, can we debate those things rationally or nicely respecting people's beliefs? Okay. And I, I, yeah, I believe in that very strongly. And I think being politically incorrect is a way of saying you're sort of just smiling at them. But it's okay. Why not? You know, I said, you know, who said that? We shouldn't be like that.
I remember encountering the first libertarians when I was already, you know, working as a physicist and they were saying to me, why should we, why are we afraid of the Russians? I said, well, you know, what do you think they're going to invade the United States? Can you imagine rushing dating? I mean, if they invade, how are they going to control us? You know, they had these arguments. They were very funny arguments, you know. Why do we need an army? Why do we need taxes? And I really thought that was so provocative, so interesting. Do you consider yourself a libertarian? In many ways, I like the idea of liberty. I believe very strongly in it. I mean, this country was founded on that. I think that we're founding fathers really believed in it. And I admire them for that. I, you know, reading Jefferson and so on is really inspiring to me. I think that some of the political movement is a little bit odd. They always end up with political candidates that go nowhere and so on.
What do you think that is? Why do you think that is? I think they're so rational. They're often among the smartest people. But they are not strategically smart. I've met at times libertarians, I think, you know, incredible thoughts. And they're working, they're living in Silicon Valley and they're poor. I mean, even though they're the ones who are supposed to know more poor, some are not. I'm saying it's very interesting. They choose presidential candidates, no one ever heard of. I think many of them are, you know, they are on the spectrum in a way that doesn't allow them to get into the minds of other people in a way that would allow them to convince other people about their arguments.
I mean, a lot of politics, as we know, show business, I mean, in this recent election, it was all posturing. It was all about grabbing emotion. It was not about logic. It was about emotion. Yeah, I have several of my people that, you know, they put all their money to freeze themselves. You're going to cry out yourself? No. My dad and I have had this running joke for a lot of years because someone we know very well and several people we know well have set aside significant amounts of money to have their heads or entire bodies frozen on the idea that they're going to be brought back later on solo style. You've always laughed at this idea. No, but not only that, there's a colleague of mine, a Stanford who accuses me of being friends with a guy that is like that. I told this guy, I said, you know, a few things that you're about influence on me. And the guy said, well, tell him that we're the ones who are going to come back and do what we believe. Yeah. He's going to be gone. I'm interested in living to be 200. It's not an issue. These people are interested in living for a 9,000 years. So when they wake up, they see how they were looked. They read science fiction. So they're very interested to know what they were looks like once they wake up. So there are people in the health space that are trying to not die, you know, Brian Johnson and others. I mean, what's your thought on trying to live to be 150 or something like that? Well, if you can live, the issue is not the age. Is the conditions of your body and mind. Okay. So that's the issue. I had the misfortune, unfortunately, having two parents that lived very long lives. One was incredibly, my father was incredibly lucid until the end. My mother had everything, you know, all every dimension and complications that came from, you know, being an anorexical her life and so on. So my father enjoyed being lucid until the end. And so he, you know, he didn't take care of himself physically so well. So the idea is if you live up to 100 or 150 or 200 and you can still do the things you enjoy in life is one thing. To be like my mother who couldn't even comprehend what was in front of her when you put a cup of tea, you know, then he's very sad, but it can happen at the age of 35, you know. So yeah, I'm not in to a race to live forever. I want to live healthily. I want to enjoy life. Enjoying is the most important piece. That's the point of being, you know, tethered to cues all over the place, you know, flat on a bed. And you say, oh, I made another year of my life. I mean, that's not really a life, at least for me.
翻译成中文:
我是说,很多政治,就像我们所知道的那样,像是演艺圈,尤其是在最近的选举中,全都是表面功夫。都是在抓住情感,而不是逻辑。完全是情绪化的反应。是的,我认识的几个人,把他们所有的钱都用来冷冻他们自己。你会这样做吗?不会。我和我爸爸多年来一直有这么一个玩笑,因为我们认识的人中,有好几个把相当多的钱存起来,准备将他们的头部或整个身体冷冻,希望像科幻小说里那样将来能复活。我们一直觉得这个主意很搞笑。不仅如此,我在斯坦福有个同事还指责我和这样的人是朋友。我告诉那个人,我说,你对我的影响真的是几件事情。他说,好吧,告诉他,我们才是将来活过来并实现我们信仰的人。他会消失的。我对活到200岁很感兴趣,这不是问题。这些人对活9000年很感兴趣。他们醒来后想看看自己以前的模样。他们读的是科幻小说,所以他们很想知道自己醒来后会是什么样子。所以,健康领域里有些人像 Brian Johnson 等,正在努力不让自己死去。我想知道你对活到150岁这样的事情有什么看法?如果你能活下去,问题不在于年龄,而在于你身体和精神的状态。这才是问题所在。我有幸也不幸地有两个长寿的父母。我的父亲一直非常清醒到最后。我的母亲则饱受种种问题困扰,如厌食症等,所以是两种情况。我父亲享受着直到最后保持清醒,而他并没有很好地照顾自己的身体。可如果你活到100岁、150岁、200岁,并且还能做你喜欢的事情,那是一回事。但要是像我母亲,她连面前的茶杯都不能理解,那就很悲哀了。但这种情况在35岁时就可能发生。所以,我不是为了活得更久而活。我想健康地生活,享受生活。享受才是最重要的。在床上插着各种管子的时候,你说,哦,我多活了一年。但这对我而言不算是生活。
Do you worry about or and or wish for anything for me, for Lara? Yes, to be super happy people. No, I don't want to use they were happy. I want to see you joyful. Joy, joy is more important than happiness. Joy is a state of mind. This is okay. Yeah, I said a list of things I want to have and I have them and I smile a lot. Joyfulness is the sense of being in yourself. And I would like that. I mean, you two are very different. Lara lives much more in the moment than you do for reasons. Okay, it's her view of the world. It's her demeanor. It's her demeanor. It's very good. I'm a large focus on what she's going to do this weekend. Yes. I'm focused on what I'm going to do this weekend next week, the next month and I would personally like to see you enjoying today and this weekend and that's it and everything else going to come to you. I believe and now I'm speaking in a way that is more paternal than anything else.
I've been, you had a charmed life and everything came to you since you were very little and you exhibited, you know, behaviors and so on that everybody was even smiling, being impressed with you from the very beginning. I mean, it's not that you were a genius, a chess or a Rubik's Cube or anything. I know some kids that are like that, but there was something, something in there. And so I think that, you know, learning to just relax and rest, but it's part of your behavior since you were little, you had these problems. Okay, I used to take, put you in my lap and say it's going to be fine and say, well, what if I cannot do my homework? Okay.
But you could, or even my stuffed animals. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They say they gave you two people organized and two people. Well, I probably have, remember I had the grunting tick? Yes. Yeah. I probably, I probably have a little bit of an OCD type thing. I mean, not diagnostically, you know, significant, but when I bite down into something that I'm pursuing, it's very hard for me to think about anything else. No, I know. Well, we talked about it. When you were a Berkeley, once you told me that you were starting to run, but you wanted to run like everybody else was running, I don't know. I mean, he must.
And instead of just- I heard there was a guy who had been in the department, Randy Nelson. He's now a professor in Ohio. Everybody just like off, you know, just in passing said, oh yeah, you know, Randy worked, you know, like 80 hours a week or 90 hours a week and I was like 95 hours. Yeah, I remember that. But what's interesting is I'm not a naturally competitive person. It was just this idea. Like I've tended to want to know, I've, and I've since stopped this, but there was a long time where I wanted to figure out what my body and mind were capable of. I just wanted to see like how high is that ceiling? And it was only when I almost suffocated on a scuba dive or when I was working to the point of exhaustion or, you know, or, and then I also realized that, you know, I published a number of papers to get tenure. Like I didn't need that many, but I enjoyed every one. It's not like I'm not having fun. I'm having fun. Yeah. This idea of pushing oneself to limits. The question is why.
I mean, I think there is so much to enjoy on a regular life and the things that we have already. We have to work to get them the way we want. I don't think that worrying for the sake of worrying or just worrying. I mean, I don't tend to worry. Well, you know what changed that for me in a major way. I mean, I've had moments. I've had moments. I think I can recall like I have a favorite best day of my life moment. I won't share it here. It's not, it's not relevant right now, but Costello helped bring me into the moment. Yeah. Like he would do these things that like I would delight in that were just so simple. Like the way he would like pull like fall over or something or. You know, I think that like having another creature there that that is very much in the moment brings you into the moment. Right. And we're very connected to it too.
I mean, I think that if you were connected to someone that has that property of bringing you down and so on, you would start enjoying it. Yeah. The people I've had amazing partners, as you know, some less than amazing, but many amazing partners and they and they tended to be also kind of into the future, like focus on what's not quite there yet. I must say, I think women in general do it better than men that they're better like grounding to the present. Well, depends. I think that my wife tends to be more anxious than I am about if you. So maybe it's not general. Well, I tend well in trying to sort of, you know, tell her that she shouldn't worry so much. I think that I also suddenly reflect what am I doing here?
And I try to also slow down myself. I think that, you know, yeah, I think you're someone who's running from one thing to the other. Say colloquially, but it would be nice if you said, okay, I'm fine. You know, you have a podcast that is doing well. You don't have to worry what the podcast is going to be doing in five years. No, I don't think out that far. I don't think about the career piece. I think that I, I mean, I often don't have a plan. I know what we're going to do this year. I don't know what we're going to do after that. But professionally, I think, look, I think part of it was science. I mean, we're talking about a lot of things, but for many years, right, from the time I like squared my life away and when I turned 19, it was like, okay, I'm going to get things right now. There's always been these milestones. You're going to finish your undergraduate degree. I did a master.
They did a PhD, then the postdoc, then you're going to need to get tenure. You know, I think the academic system was a system of two to five year bursts, like, like sprinting marathons in many ways to try and, you know, grab the next thing to get to the next level. And there was a lot of uncertainty for a long time. You know, I think I'm finally now coming into a place of certainty, like feelings of like, oh, like things are good and they've gone great. But yeah, but it's hard. Oh, of course it's hard. Especially if you have that kind of temperament. Yes. And I think you need to train yourself almost to, I just had the words that are, it's a matter of bringing elegance into your life almost, to live it in a way that is elegant, is nice in itself, you know. That is important. One of the things I learned, I mean, you know, living with a dain, dains don't like you to eat standing. They sit at a table and they light a candle and, you know, it's very nice. It creates a place.
They're ritual. They're ritual. Rituals are very important. And also the other thing that is very important, and I discovered, is to have something to look forward to. You cannot just wake up on this and now what? There has to be something. Okay, that's important. I mean, you know, we all have that. So Rogan talks about this thing about, you know, because he has a podcast, he does four episodes a week, plus he's an announcer at the UFC. He has his comedy career. He has three kids. He's in a happy marriage. And, you know, he's really into working out and all this. And he, I heard something recently, it was actually the forward to Cameron Haines' book. I was listening to it and he, it was amazing. He said, you know, you have to approach your life, no matter how busy or how simple as a kind of work of art. Like you can't just think of it as daily life. You have to have some macroscopic view of this so that you know where to put things. And it's a lot of what you're saying as well. Like, yeah, life has to have elegance. Otherwise it's just disjoint moments and sometimes it would be like that and it can be very creative too. But most of the idea is to really get into something.
I mean, I personally think that when you describe me as being very steady or whatever, sounds are very boring too, for that matter, right? I mean, I don't know. I mean, there's a beauty in steadiness because from places of steadiness you can take good risks. Well, right. I mean, and I think that my mind is not, you know, in a steady, you know, the state. But I don't have these notes. I have to see things. Everybody's talking about something. I have to see it. I never felt like that. No. I mean, I'd like to see things. Don't misunderstand me. But it's very important for me to be in the moment and do things the way I like them to do. I don't seem to need to go on like jungle adventures or like where I skate across Antarctica. Like you've never been one for like the kind of wild outing. No, the wild outing is here. That's my wild outing. Yeah, I can have very wild thoughts about things that I would like, you know, sometimes they're totally wrong and so on. But yeah, in a funny way, I am a little bit of what the French call in armchair, philosopher or whatever. You know, these people who write articles about France and Africa without ever having left France or something or so on. So I'm not like that. But I don't necessarily crave this physical adventure for the sake of adventure. I like beautiful things.
And I don't mind repeating the same beautiful thing every year if necessary, going vacation to the same place and so on. Yeah, you like to go back to the same place. Well, there's a difference between tourism where you see new things and so on. I like that. There's also the idea of vacation, which you just sit and enjoy what you have. I confess I've not ever done it. And you know this about me.
I've never taken a vacation. You know, do the summer house in Denmark. You can spend a week there just enjoying it. That's it. I know if I show you pictures, you know, from the window, they see the deer in the garden. You know, they just sit there. You know, it's nice. So there's nothing, you know, it's nice. You cannot spend a life doing that. You know, I'm not a monk. Okay, I'm not a meditator that will spend hours on this. But you know, it's nice to rest. You know, it's very important, I think. And the rituals are important to you. Very important.
Yes. Yeah. The rituals have a, it's also a very reassuring because then you know it's predictable, right? You don't want to totally unpredictable life all the time. That's what people create rituals. You know. You early on taught me about etiquette. You know, it's something that years later, I think it was probably in the mid 90s. For some reason, we were at the movies together and we saw some people at the movies and they were wearing their bathroom slippers. And more or less, they're pajamas to the movies. And I'll never forget, you grabbed my arm. Like you didn't grab it forcefully. We'd grab you. So you see that? And you said, people are coming to the movies and they're pajamas. I said, yeah. And you said, that's the beginning of the end to any society. And I thought you were joking. But you know, it's something I thought about a lot.
You also said, and I'll never forget, you know, you're always better off being overdressed. Because then at least your class that you're speaking to or your hosts, etc. They know that you took them seriously. And I don't think we really appreciate etiquette. As Americans, especially, we've somehow confused freedom of choice with discarding etiquette. Yes. Yeah, it's not something you hear discussed very much, but what about etiquette? Well, there are many components. I think the most important one is a societal one. I mean, one of the things that I like, for instance, if you go to England, how polite people are.
So, the kindness is a virtue. And for lightness, the higher the social class, the higher the demand to be polite. It's behavior. It's being nice to people. It's understanding what they are. And associated with that, there are codes. Some of them are behavior or some of them are dress codes. I had a brilliant economist, Italian economist working with me. And now he's in these codes who told me he went to a wedding in Italy after living in the United States. And he went to his cousin's wedding, and his uncle said, you show no respect. You're not wearing cufflinks. He said, well, but my shirt is all but none go home and get cufflinks because you're showing lack of respect for not dressing the proper way to this wedding.
So I think that there are expectations that people have of a certain types of behavior. I mean, if you look at the pictures of what's going on now in Washington, so on, you notice that Mr. Elon Musk who's always in a T-shirt that says, let's go to Mars, suddenly he's wearing a tuxedo because now at least now he's part of a group of people that are behaving like government officials should behave. You don't go in sandals and shorts. But Silicon Valley is famous for the flip flops and the hoodies. Right, because the problem is that people confuse the style with the message. They think that because you wear a hoodie because Mark Zuckerberg was wearing hoodies, makes you brilliant.
And I think that the issue of dress codes elicit a certain sense of behavior in people, as you said. I mean, how would you feel if you went on a first date with someone that comes in and care slippers and a bathrobe and say, let's go to the movies? It's not happened yet. Well, okay. So what I'm saying is you don't have to overdo it. That's another issue. You have to also conform to the roles of the society. I noticed, for instance, that in the East Coast people dress much more properly than in the West Coast. You go to New York and you see men wearing suits and ties. You don't see that here. Grabbing in LA, not in the Bay Area, ever.
One thing that you pointed out is that at any wedding in Argentina, men keep their jackets and ties. Oh, and the whole night, I've always kept my jacket and tie on the entire night. In the United States, it's almost like moments after people arrive at any party in a suit, they start undressing. Yeah, right. Why did they dress up then? Yeah. Okay. So that's my view. I'm not necessarily someone that I have a case wearing a tie when I got to work and so on, but I really believe that there are codes of conduct that sort of reflect many things. And you're also, you're projecting a message, right? I mean, the idea of a hoodie, I want one or the other, first of all, was hurting behavior. Everybody had to wear one because then you're cool or whatever. Okay.
In other lessons, I understand it. I mean, that's what you do as another lesson. You do what others do. But as you grow up, you can also signal whom you are by the way you dress and you behave. But what do you think about the discourse on platforms like X where you can see a mix, including a lot of academics and high level thinkers acting kind of like teenagers? Well, okay. They want to be popular. They want to throw attention. Yeah, this is kind of a new thing. I mean, I mean, I won't name names, but some people who are considered some of the smartest people in the world, like what they, their discourse on social media is like, I mean, they wouldn't last two seconds on the schoolyard is how they get hit in the face. You know, they suck weird, like grown men acting kind of like teenagers.
Okay. Well, that's, they have a problem because they want to be thought of as young. That's a whole different story. Okay. That's a different story. Now, having said what I said, I respect that some people eventually reflect on whether or not they rules the rules that, you know, that rule, you know, that rules are safe, how you should dress to do one thing or the other are not do not operate for you. And then you decide to be very different. You know, there are many people who are like that and like to be iconoclastic. I hear many stories of what we were talking about, Richard Feynman, who actually made a case, I mean, Mary Gellman used to say that about him to be so different that people will talk about it because he was very interested in people telling stories about bongo German naked on the roof, not rushing his teeth. Exactly. All that.
Okay. So, but he, he was very good at drawing attention. Okay. That's fine. You can also draw attention by dressing very nicely. You know, it's all, it's all a matter of, I mean, I was reflecting, you know, we're we go to the symphony in San Francisco regularly and we are donors and so on. Sometimes you go to a concert. It's an amazing thing. What you see there, some people nicely dressed, some people dressed as they just woke up. They didn't have time to get dressed and, you know, got there, you know, and whatever. And they do. But do you think that going back to the initial, you know, ping of the question, do you think that that we have societally gone that we're sort of drifting towards like, for lack of a better word chaos?
So, so social interaction chaos. Well, you know, I think the pendulum will swing again. The other day I was talking to some reading actually that suddenly not only New York, but in the Midwest, men are starting to wear jacket and ties, not just for work. Okay. They go on dates like that. So, you know, it's a pendulum. He goes back and forth, back and forth. I don't think we're going to end up at a time when, you know, you have to wear tails to, to have a breakfast or something. I think only the Ristocross used to do that. I think that, you know, it's an issue of how also how we perceive the world through the eyes of television and movies. Okay. If movies start showing and everybody's dressed, whatever, you know, people are going to do the same thing.
If movies start showing, you know, the trends that we see movies are the trends that essentially society follows. Okay. So, I think that we did this is, I don't think we're going to chaos. It's going to revert. California is a particular place because it has always been a place where people in order to feel free, they had to dress differently and who cares and all that stuff. But it's not everywhere. Yeah. It's kind of interesting that now counterculture is conservatism. Right. Right. We're back to that. The anti-war group is more conservative anyway. It's, you know, people like, you know, it's interesting how Americans are fascinated with English aristocracy and traditions.
I've been to high table dinner at King's College in Cambridge twice. You know, everybody dresses properly. They wear gowns and they fellas are sitting at a top table and everybody else and people have it. And we'd like to see that in the movies. Well, it's theater. Yeah. I mean, it's academic theater, a little bit of pomp and circumstance, but it's theater. I'd say, well, we have the same thing on commencement, you know, traditions and so on. Yeah. No parent wants to go to a graduation that's, you know, kind of a free for all. They want to see some order. Absolutely. Absolutely. And I think that, you know, there is a place for that. And some people will, I mean, there are designers and so on of clothing and so on that exploit. There's nostalgia for that kind of elegant world, you know, Ralph Lauren and so on. It's always, you know, 1960s, fancy, you know, club type clothing and so on.
So do you plan to ever retire? I don't know what it means. I mean, if retire, no, no, because I'm not a postal worker. I'm not a cook at a restaurant that eventually says, okay, I cooked it long enough that I collect my retirement and go home. I have a mind that it works and I need an environment where that mind can thrive and I need an environment where, you know, for one year when I left Hewlett Packard, I was basically, I took a course in general activity and so on. But I was really a very idle. So suddenly, I mean, in a context where people have problems and so on that I'd really like to listen to this social component to work as you know.
So retirement means what, you know, you're a postal worker and one day you stop delivering mail and you stay home watching the paint dry and that's not me. Okay. So to me, I'm working and I enjoy it and, you know, the day that will come that I cannot enjoy it, I'll stop. And I think that again goes with this issue of getting bored with things that you don't like to do because you've done it for a long time. Now I enjoy my life but I don't think in terms of, I'll say something, my CEO of my company said, great guy, Phil McEnany said, whenever I don't work for the money here, I said, I don't either. I mean, I like to get paid but I don't like it. I'll walk and I can do that. So it's not that I'm doing this for the income. That's what I'm trying to say.
It seems like you've never pursued money for its own sake. No. Have you ever encouraged me to pursue money for no zones? But as my cousin, the physicist used to say, money doesn't bring happiness but it points in the right direction. I would say money doesn't bring happiness but it can buffer stress. Right. And it allows you to have the things you want to have and you don't have to, absolutely, absolutely. Right. Yeah. I think money is an important aspect of our lives, you know, having it and so on. I live for many years as a graduate student with no money and it was very painful. I'll tell you. Sometimes I didn't eat dinner because I didn't have any money. So I like having money to do the things that I like but I don't work for money. Many people say, well, you know, I invented so many things I could have started in some common in these companies and make a lot of money. I don't really, I don't regret that at all. The ultra-rich people that I know who are happy are still working every day. Right. Because beyond a certain amount of money, you still have to brush your teeth like everybody else.
Okay. You can dream of having 152 brushes but so what? Right. And you can only eat so many steaks. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, that we all cover. The question is what do you do with your life? Now, you want to travel or you can travel. It's nice if you can travel, you know, in better ways than being an undergrad with the backpacker that can be a bit true. I have fun backpacking. Yeah. You're on a limited budget where, you know, part of the joy of traveling that way is you're thrown into kind of street level interactions. I think you've hostels and things like that. I went through Europe like this. I wouldn't change that for anything. No, I went through Europe as a graduate student. I quit everything. I went through Europe in winter. And it was quite an adventure. In the winter?
And it was horrendous. I had very little money. I stayed in places where in Paris where the lady in the little hotel would turn off the light if I turn around in the middle of the night. It was awful. And yet to save energy. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. And it was very funny. But I met people that were interesting and I engaged, you know, I still, I still, every once in a while, I hear from one or two of those people I met years ago in trains. I went by train everywhere. I ended up in Denmark in the middle of winter, you know. Everything seems to lead back to Denmark. Yeah, it's a nice country. Well, now you have a Danish wife.
Yeah. And have for a long time. And have for a long time. Yeah, yeah. I, yeah. I like it. It's a very different contrast to Europe, the central Europe and so on, you know, then northern Europe, Denmark, Sweden, Norway. It's a very special kind of, you know, country and people. Yeah, I like them a lot. Life is very easy there. I like Scandinavia. Yeah. Yeah, it's very nice. Yes. Good, good, good natured people. Yes. Good saunas. Yeah, everything. Yes. And sunshine, at least in the summer. In the summer only. Yeah.
Any plans for the next couple of years, anything that we should put on the calendar, make sure that we get in? No, because I cannot plan that well. I don't plan. I just need either. Maybe I inherited it. Well, I just move. I just move intuitive. I'm very intuitive about these things. I suddenly see something in all this quantum stuff. I don't know. I started hearing about it. I talked to a brilliant guy who was in my lab and said, hey, what do you think about these? He said, sounds interesting. Let's do it. And we're doing it. I'm lucky that I get paid to do that. But, no, I don't have plans like that. I would like to, we would like, I mean, we would like to organize our life a little bit differently now that we have a summer house in Denmark and so on. I still plan to travel there. I like Europe a lot. But I don't know if I can live there. I like Switzerland a lot. I want to go to Argentina every year. And I feel very close to my family. That's very important. We are all going for an event there. I hope that you can join us if you can. So those things are very important to me. But I, no, I don't have plans for anything. I don't know. I'd like to be surprised.
Well, dad, I want to extend a real sense of gratitude from me, from everyone listening and watching. Although you may argue that they're not going to be interested. This has been our back and forth over the last months as I've tried to convince you to do this podcast. I can assure you that they were, they are very interested. Their story is a really unique one. And I can say that both as your son, but also as somebody who's sat across from scientists from all different domains and backgrounds, not just neuroscientists.
I also really appreciate your ability to explain complicated things in ways that at least we can start to get an understanding because these are hard concepts. And I think what comes through so clearly is that somehow you've been able to grab these high level, really abstract concepts and work with them and try and understand them. But you've also been able to lead a life where you're really grounded in the day to day and in reality.
And I have to say your wish for me and for Lara, and I assume for everyone else to be joyful. I'll work on that. And also, I must say it just hit me like square in the face during this discussion that I get such peace and I can really focus on being joyful knowing that you're joyful. Like it's so clear that you have a joyful life at so many levels and that you pursued what you wanted to do over and over.
And you know, some people may have tuned into this podcast thinking that we were going to get into our issues and things like that. But I'll just briefly say that, yeah, we've had our ups, we've had our downs and we've certainly landed up and much, much higher than we ever would had we not had all of that. And as I told you last year, around this time on your birthday, when we all got together to celebrate, like we're not just good, we're beyond good.
So anything that comes up around that, I want to just go on record saying that like that's water under the bridge and I don't ever think about it. All I think about are the incredible gifts that you've given me about curiosity and pursuing my curiosity about putting new footprints on untread beaches, the early discussions around the excitement that science can bring.
I mean, I remember all of it. I really remember all of it and in immense detail. And I love your stories about scientists, both how they soar and also how human they are and how they're fallible like the rest of us. So there's not a day that goes by where I don't thank God because I do believe in God, that you're my father, that you and mom created me and Laura and that I've had the life that I have and that I continue to have the life that I have.
So I just want to thank you for the example and the nurturing and for coming here. There aren't words. Well, thank you. You know how much I love you. I think that these words are the biggest gift that I get and I think any father listening to that to his son or daughter saying that would also feel the same way or a mother, for them all.
It is a very fulfilling feeling, you know, to have that notion that you feel that you owe so much to what you got. And also the fact that you've done incredibly well and the kind of person you are. Yeah. I wish you all the wisdom that you need in order to just go through life the way you know you're going. But I think that it's nice to also that we are sort of on the same wavelength and many things.
In you, I see more of a reflection of what I always wanted to be as well. So that's easier in a way. Perhaps it's because fathers and sons have that. So we certainly relate. Yes. Well, thank you. Thank you. I love you. I love you too. You know that. Joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Bernardo Huberman. To learn more about his work, please see the links in the show note captions.
If you're learning from and or enjoying this podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube channel. That's a terrific zero cost way to support us. In addition, please follow the podcast on both Spotify and Apple and on both Spotify and Apple, you can leave us up to a five star review. Please check out the sponsors mentioned at the beginning and throughout today's episode. That's the best way to support this podcast.
If you have questions or comments about the podcast or guests or topics that you'd like me to consider for the Huberman Lab podcast, please put those in the comments section on YouTube. I do read all the comments. For those of you that haven't heard, I have a new book coming out. It's my very first book. It's entitled Protocols, an operating manual for the human body.
如果你对播客、嘉宾或希望我在Huberman Lab播客中讨论的话题有任何问题或意见,请在YouTube的评论区留言。我会阅读所有的评论。对于还不知道的朋友,我有一本新书即将出版。这是我第一本书,书名是《Protocols: an operating manual for the human body》(《协议:人体操作手册》)。
This is a book that I've been working on for more than five years and that's based on more than 30 years of research and experience. And it covers protocols for everything from sleep to exercise to stress control protocols related to focus and motivation. And of course, I provide the scientific substantiation for the protocols that are included. The book is now available by presale at protocolsbook.com. There you can find links to various vendors. You can pick the one that you like best. Again, the book is called Protocols, an operating manual for the human body.
If you're not already following me on social media, I am Huberman Lab on all social media platforms. So that's Instagram, X formerly known as Twitter, threads, Facebook and LinkedIn. And on all those platforms, I discuss science and science related tools, some of which overlaps with the content of the Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which is distinct from the content on the Huberman Lab podcast. Again, that's Huberman Lab on all social media platforms.
If you haven't already subscribed to our neural network newsletter, our neural network newsletter is a zero cost monthly newsletter that includes podcast summaries as well as protocols in the form of brief one to three page PDFs. Those one to three page PDFs cover things like deliberate heat exposure, deliberate cold exposure. We have a foundational fitness protocol. We also have protocols for optimizing your sleep, dopamine and much more. Again, all available, completely zero cost. Simply go to Huberman Lab dot com.
Go to the menu tab, scroll down to newsletter and provide your email. We do not share your email with anybody. Thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Bernardo Huberman. And last but certainly not least, thank you for your interest in science.