Hello my friends, today is December 14th and this is Markets Weekly. So this week, another good weekend markets, we have the Nasdaq making you all time highs. Now going forward, we are heading into a seasonally very bullish period of time. This is great chart from Geiger Capital Substack. I believe he gets it from Scott Rupner of Goldman showing that over the past few decades, these last two weeks in December tend to be pretty positive. Now Jim Carssong who studies the options flows notes that this is because there's a lot of hedging activity due to long-rated options like leaps. But in any case, the data strongly suggests that we are heading into a bullish period and again, everyone already knows that. It doesn't mean we can't go down by the way.
你好,我的朋友们,今天是12月14日,这是《市场周报》。本周市场表现良好,纳斯达克创下历史新高。接下来,我们将进入一个季节性非常看涨的时期。这是来自Geiger Capital Substack的一张很棒的图表,据我所知,他从高盛的Scott Rupner那里得来。该图表显示,过去几十年中,12月的最后两周往往表现相当积极。研究期权流动的Jim Carssong指出,这是因为存在大量与长期期权(如LEAPs)相关的对冲活动。但无论如何,数据强烈表明,我们正步入一个看涨的时期,这一点大家都知道。不过,这并不意味着价格不会下跌。
All right, so today let's talk about three things. First, last week we got a whole bunch of central bank meetings and it looks like the global rate cutting cycle is accelerating. So let's talk about what happened with respect to central banks. Secondly, big news the past week on China. Looks like we're going to get more China stimulus. Again, I feel like we've seen this movie before, but it looks like the Politburo over there is becoming more serious. And lastly, let's go for some interesting research from the BIS about the relationship between interest rates and housing. Okay, starting with foreign central banks. So the past week we got rate cut news from three major central banks, the Swiss national bank, the European central bank and the bank of Canada.
Starting with the S&B. Now the S&B is different from many other central banks like the Fed. They like to surprise the market. So last week the S&B did indeed surprise the market. Everyone was expecting a 25 basis point cut, but the S&B gave a 50 basis point cut. Now when you're thinking about the Swiss national bank, it's important to realize that when you are thinking about these smaller countries, foreign exchange is a really big part of the transmission of monetary policy. Now for the Swiss, because there's been political turmoil in your land, a lot of money has been pouring into the Swiss and causing the Swiss to bring to appreciate.
Now that's a big problem for the S&B because Switzerland obviously a small country, a very open economy. A lot of their GDP is through exports, selling watches, selling chocolates and so forth. And so when the Frank appreciates, that's bad for their businesses and it puts downward pressure on inflation, so deflationary pressures. Now the S&B is actually forecasting for inflation there to be around zero going forward. And more importantly, they noted that inflation could even become negative so they could have deflation. So they're not actually ruling out a return to negative interest rates. Again a lot of this is to manage the currency. Now the S&B can also deploy balance sheet measures in the past. They have actively, let's say sold the Frank and taking the proceeds to buy it say Apple stock or something like that. But they're not doing that so far so far it's still about interest rates.
So the S&B is one of the more interesting central banks in the world because they could really return to negative interest rates whereas I think when we look at the US, I don't think anyone thinks that we're going to go back to zero. Moving to Canada, now the Bank of Canada surprised them, well not so much surprised the markets but they did another 50 basis point cut, their second 50 basis point cut. So this again is about two things. Again looking at inflation, if you look at their measures of inflation, you can see that inflation is not a problem in Canada. Their measures of inflation are very much within their target range. But on the other hand, if you look at their unemployment numbers, it looks like it's jumping higher. Most recently unemployment rate went up to 6.8% and there seems to be a lot of excess capacity there.
Now when you're looking at unemployment rate in Canada, it's really important to keep in mind that they've also had tremendous amounts of migration. So again, when you're thinking about the economy, it's not just what the central banks do but also what the government is doing. And if you import millions of people as much as 3% of your entire population in a single year, obviously you're going to get a lot more people looking for work and that increase in supply and labor is going to cause excess capacity in a higher unemployment rate.
And in fact, there's research from the Bank of Canada that shows that the jump in the unemployment rate is largely due to newcomers. So this interesting chart here shows that the unemployment rates for newcomers, that is people who entered Canada within the last five years, is notably higher than others. And it's been rising at a fast rate. So when you're a newcomer, oftentimes you have language difficulties, you have cultural difficulties and you just don't have as strong a professional network.
So very easy formula, increased population, hugely unemployment rate goes up and obviously the government does not like other central banks don't really distinguish between immigrants and native people. And so they have to pay attention to that and they're easing again and suggest that they're probably going to be more measured going forward when it comes to cuts. And last week, we also had the ECB again, cut rates. Now there were some whispers of a potential 50 basis point cut, but we just got 25 basis points.
Now in addition to that, you can see from the ECB's forecast why they were, they're on a rate cutting cycle. So their forecast for inflation, revised lower and for growth, revised lower again. Now there's a lot of headwinds happening in Eurozone, especially ahead of potential tariffs, which the ECB also hinted at. Now Europe again is a lot of countries in Europe, like Germany export a lot of stuff. They have a big trade surplus with US and tariffs will be bad for their economy.
On top of that, there is of course some degree of political disorder in France, as we've discussed in the past, and that all harms sentiment. Now the ECB seems to suggest that even though they did not have a 50 basis point cut on last week, they're going to continue to do 25s for the maybe next few meetings. Again, this could all change. But so far that seems to be what they're telegraphing. We got a whole bunch of centro-bank cuts the past week. And next week we have the Fed and the BOJ and we'll find out what they do pretty soon.
Okay, the next thing that I want to talk about is what's happening in China. Now over the past few months, we've got we've seen this headline over and over again. Chinese authorities or the PBOC just jump out and talk about some kind of stimulus, right? So for context, China has not been doing well. Over the past few years, they've had a tremendous implosion in their property market and property is a big part of their economy. A lot of businesses build homes and sell to the public and the public likes hold homes as an investment. And it was all working really well when housing prices were going up, but they haven't been going up for some time. So households are facing a negative net worth impact.
Again, they're feeling poor. And so there's less animal spirits and the businesses that are that borrowed to develop homes are underwater. So that's been a huge drag on the Chinese economy. And on top of that, again, China is a big export driven economy. And so some of their major exporting people that they export to, like the European Union, are not doing that well as well. So looking at say Chinese CPI, Chinese growth numbers, they've just not been good over the past few years.
Now as authorities try to jumpstart the Chinese economy, it doesn't seem to have been very effective. And now we all remember that, say in September, we had some noises of big stimulus. We had major US investors go on TV and say buy everything China. Well, if you look at their stock market, after that jump, it doesn't really seem to have gone anywhere. Now, the authorities seem to be becoming more and more concerned because heading into next year, we know that we are heading into a probably more contentious period in global trade or President Trump has promised to levy big tariffs on China. So again, the US is a country that has a lot of leverage because it is the largest consumer market in the world.
The US is the client and we are the client, you have leverage. So when President Trump makes angry noises to Mexico and Canada about enforcing their borders, the president of Mexico immediately tasks the military over there to reduce migrant flow through Mexico. And immediately there is less illegal migrants into the US. When President Trump makes similar noises to Canada, Governor Trudeau rushes to Marlago and then goes home and promises to enforce border security more strictly. So obviously the US has a lot of negotiating power. But when it comes to China though, again, China is a much bigger economy than Mexico and Canada. But also at the moment, it is also in a weaker state. And so when you're thinking about what China would do, it's not super clear. They could fold like other countries, but maybe they're not going to fold and maybe they're trying to put themselves in a better negotiating position.
So the new news the past week is twofold on the China stimulus fund. First the Politburo is noting that they're going to have monetary policy to be moderately loose. Now I'm not a PBOC or a Politburo watcher, but the people who specialize in this say that moderate lu-li-loose, this language is very, very strong. The last time we saw this was during the Great Financial Crisis over a decade ago. And so this suggests that the authorities over there are going to put stimulus on a level comparable to what was during the Great Financial Crisis. So that's big, big stimulus and that suggests, again, maybe things will get things will turn around, although we don't see that in their stock market yet.
The other thing is that they also suggested that they're willing to let the R&B depreciate to us much as 7.5. Now again, depreciating their currency, it's another tool to help stimulate their export growth, which is a big part of their economy. And they seem to be trying to bracing themselves for what could be further trade wars, suggesting that maybe this may be going forward, they're not just going to fold as easily as other countries. And so we could have some more contention next year. But in any case, these announcements have been coming for some time. We'll see if this one is more meaningful than the others.
And the last thing that I want to talk about is this interesting study by the BIS on the elasticity of housing supply and this relationship with interest rates. So when you think about any commodity or product, you'd think that as prices go up, you'd have an increase in supply of that product or commodity and that increase in supply would put downward pressure on prices. Let's say the price of iron ore were to surge, you'd expect mining companies to build new mines. And when those mines come online, that increase in supply would put downward pressure on prices. Or let's say there's a huge demand for cars, then car companies would build new manufacturing plants. And when those manufacturing plants come online, that increase in supply would put downward pressure on auto prices.
Now the BIS is fighting that that's becoming less and less true when it comes to housing. In developed markets, housing has become less and less elastic over the past few decades, although in emerging markets, it's still pretty elastic. What that means is that when house prices go up, you don't actually get more of a supply. Now in the US, just looking at the US, that seems to be largely driven by heightened regulation. So a lot of building is about local zoning laws and local politics. Now looking at states like Texas where it's easier to build, you can see from this interesting post that in one month in the past, the number of homes permitted in the metro area of Dallas was greater than the number of homes permitted in the entire state of California, a state that is known to have very strict regulation.
So in some states, it's still very easy to build. And so over the past few years, you've had an increase in supply and that increase in supply has led to downward pressure on home prices and taxes. In other states, where it's known to be easy to build like Florida, but as a whole though, in the US, housing supply has to become less elastic to prices. And so you have this weird dynamic where when monetary policy goes up or down, you don't actually have too much of a supply and housing impact as you have a house price impact. So what the study finds is that because the supply of housing has to become less elastic in developed markets, when interest rates go down, you don't get more houses built. You just get higher home prices. And when interest rates go up, you just get lower home prices. So it doesn't seem to be a product unlike other products that's responsive to prices in terms of the actual supply.
Now, another interesting point that this research makes is the impact of monetary policy on rents. Now, when we're talking about inflation, what makes it into the CPI is not home prices, but rents. Now looking at CPI index in the US, you notice that over the past couple years, a big driver of CPI inflation has been elevated shelter inflation. That has to say high rental growth. So whether or not rent, whether or not CPI gets back to 2%, a big part of that we'll have to do with whether or not rents come down or decelerate. So the interesting finding in this piece is that rents don't actually respond to monetary policy. So the Fed is hiking interest rates to try to slow down the economy. Ideally, of course, they get rents to decelerate. But their finding is that it doesn't really impact rental inflation. So that's a problem because as we can see from the CPI chart, rental inflation is a big part of CPI.
So there's another point there where monetary policy is not super impactful on the rural economy. If you wanted to get shelter inflation down, it seems like you would have to go through the government path, try to loosen zoning laws, increase the supply of homes, and maybe that would get shelter inflation lower. But monetary policy seems to be not very effective on that front. Okay. So that's all I prepared for today. This week, we have the Fed meeting. So I'll be back to the review on what happened at the December FOMC meeting. Again, the market is pricing in a 25-base-point cut. My sense, my best guess is that, of course, we'll get the 25-base-point cut and it would be a dovish meeting.
All right. And if you're interested in hearing more of my thoughts, check out my blog, FedGuy.com. This week, I will write about why I am bearish for equity markets next year. All right. Talk to you all soon.