Hey, everybody. It's Friday, first up on this show. I'm going to talk about why commoners demo day and why a lot of VCs are hand-ranging and complaining about, oh my God, the high valuations of Y-Cobard air companies. I will explain why there's resentment from the investment community at Y-Cobard air companies getting $20 million evaluations when non-YC companies with the same amount of traction are commanding five or $10 million evaluations. And I'll explain the three ways investors can avoid paying $20 million, but if they want to do the work. Three specific strategies to avoid overpaying when you're investing in startups.
大家好,今天是星期五,我们节目的第一部分,我想谈一谈为什么普通人演示日如此重要,而为什么很多风投公司对 Y-Cobard air 公司的高估值感到手足无措和抱怨。我将解释为什么投资界会对 Y-Cobard air 公司获得 2000 万美元的估值感到不满,而同样有一定实绩的非 YC 公司仅仅能得到 500 万或者 1 千万的估值。我还会解释投资者如何避免支付 2000 万美元,但要想做好其中的工作,必须采取三种特定的策略来避免在投资初创企业时过度支付。
I'll also talk about what Y-Combinator companies should do in terms of raising money before demo day or listening to the basic rule of waiting till demo day. I have an answer that might be very different. I'm going to give you an actual script on how to email VCs that you're not raising money in order to bait them into investing before demo day. There's a very critical language I'm going to share with you.
Then I'm going to go through the pros and cons of party rounds. A lot of people have feelings about party rounds. Pro and con. I'm going to go through those. I'm going to talk about why the leads are important for startups in these seed rounds. And then I'll quickly break down a law firm named Paul Hastings, non-negotiable expectations for junior employees. It just went viral. I had a lot to say about it.
And then we'll talk about Substack. Is it a good business to invest in? That's $600 million valuation or not? Well, we just got, we funder released an axios covered. The amount of money Substack is making. And I'll talk about what Substacks actual valuation is.
It's going to be an awesome episode stick with us. This week in startups is brought to you by Embroker's startup insurance program helps startup secure the most important types of insurance at a lower cost and with less hassle. Save up to 20% off of traditional insurance today at Embroker.com slash twist. While you're there, get an extra 10% off using offer code twist. Lenovo apply to Lenovo's rise program for founder led early stage startups and get a $500 credit up to $120,000 in infrastructure credits in year one cloud consulting and so much more apply at lenoad.com slash twist and quick node gives blockchain developers unparalleled reliability and speed with access to unlimited endpoints across 18 chains and 35 networks. Get one month free by using code twist at go dot quick node dot com slash twist.
Hey everybody, welcome back to this week in startups. It's Friday and I'm still in Tahoe. If you're watching the video, you can see the massive amount of snow behind me on the slopes and very excited that this extended season because of the atmospheric rivers we had here in California. They had 50 feet of snow in Tahoe record twice as much as we normally have per year and that means some spring skiing. So I'm wrapping up the old spring break with the kids and I've hit 36 days of skiing today will be 37 for those of you counting trying to hit 40.
Okay, lots of news and the biggest news, you know, twice a year, why combinator and accelerator here in Silicon Valley has a demo name and two or 300 companies graduate from that awesome program. It's a great program. I've had many companies I've invested in go to I see highly recommend everybody go to I see, but there's hand ringing that goes on when demo day happens. So I thought I would recap the controversy and explain a little bit about this tension.
There's a lot of tweets going on this is very inside baseball, which is why you listen to this week in startups. I'll tell you exactly what's happening on the inside at accelerators that do demo days. So what's a demo day? What's an accelerator?
An accelerator, which program pioneered really is a 12, 16 week program. I have one called launch accelerator. We've had 28 classes of seven companies each. So and we've had great success with it. We've had multiple companies become worth over a hundred million dollars, multiple company and we've had a company become worth a billion dollars. And it's a relatively new program. It's only been around for a couple of years.
So these accelerators act as a way for entrepreneurs to learn some skills, have accountability for 12 weeks, build a network, get a small amount of money. I think why comedy currently does 125k. We do 100. We tend to invest a half million dollars in the companies after they graduate. Why comment here? Copy that from us and they do 325 and think or 375. And so it's just a great way to start on second base as a founder. And the application process typically results in a small percentage of people getting in. I think in YC's case, it's two or three percent of people get in and they get a large number of applications.
So what are the controversies here? Well, there are so many people applying because YC is now a worldwide program. We do English language startups because they don't have many multilingual people and we don't have people on the ground in other regions. So we don't do startups in India or Japan or China. As an example, there's other accelerators on the ground there would be better for a founder to go to those, frankly. But they claim YC and I don't have any reason to doubt them.
20,000 applications the most ever 1.4% accepted rates. So it's actually gone down and 52% accepted with just an idea and no product 77% accepted without revenue. So they're accepting people early and the issue that comes up is valuation.
YC has had an ethos of being a little adversarial on the margins with the investment community. Why? Well, the investment community resents YC because they get to invest at a $2 million valuation. They put in this money at a $2 million valuation. It's a great deal for YC. In truth, the amount of work it takes to run accelerator is I kid you not 20 times the amount of work it takes to be a seed investor, an angel investor, or a venture firm 20X the cost the time the effort. It is a massive amount of money.
So although you're getting that $2 million valuation, you have to provide a program. You have to be there for 300 founders or whatever it is that tech stars and YC are accept and maybe 600 per year. I think it is between each of those programs. Think about how many conversations have to happen.
Now also Paul Graham had a very bad experience like many founders did 20, 30 years ago with VCs. The founder friendly era of venture capital is a recent phenomenon. It's only the last 15 years that founders were able to gain power over venture capital and say, you know what? You can't kick me off my board. I want to maintain control of my board. I get to pick my VCs because there's many more VCs and founders have gotten smarter. And also a large number of the folks at YC have hacked angel investors and venture capital.
Now I'm an expert on angel investing and we're going to bug on it in fact. And I can tell you that founders are very clever. So when it comes to fundraising, they largely on their own. This isn't YC has figured out hacks. And one of the great hacks is that YC says, don't raise money before demoting. They kind of get everybody to agree to that. Now if you're a YC founder, I would totally ignore that rule. And I would raise from people while you're in the program.
But if you want to take their advice and build up all that energy until demo day, then on demo day, they do this thing called a handshake protocol. It's kind of I wouldn't say high pressure, but it's high pressure. Basically, there is this ethos put out there this, you know, aura that all the rounds are closing. I can tell you probably only the top 10 20%. There's really a sense of urgency. The rest take a month or two to close.
So 90% of the companies take two months to close, but they all put out the front that hates closing. And they do some unnatural acts in terms of getting people to close. They might do increasingly high valuations. So they say, if you invest this week, it's 15 million next week, it's 16 million the week after it's 18 million, and then it's 20 million really weird stuff like that. And I've heard Sam who used to some woman who used to run YC, he doesn't agree with the stuff. And he wasn't in control of it. Right. The founders get to decide what they do.
But there's a thing called a party round. And the party round means no investor sets the valuation returns. You get a bunch of dentists, a bunch of high net worth individuals, perhaps some seed funds. And I'll be honest, a lot of neophytes. When I've gone to demo day, it would be like maybe 20% people in the industry and then 80% people who are somewhat new to the industry. And those folks are going to make bets in a pretty frisky way, I would say. It's kind of like new poker players. They can play a lot of hands. They, you know, they're kind of predictable. They may not be as savvy.
And so what does savvy founders do? They set their valuations very high. There's a valuation number for these, for this stage of company. It's five to 10 million dollars. YC companies can sometimes ask for 15 or 20 million dollars. And that makes everybody lose their minds. And then they go to Twitter and twice a year, we have this big debate over valuations. Are the valuations too high? I might have a surprising answer for you.
There are three ways, three, one, two, three ways for you to avoid paying 20 million dollars.
你有三个方法可以避免支付二千万美元。三个,一个、两个、三个方法。
Number one, you could very easily meet with three founders today over Zoom for three months. And that would be 200 or so companies. You would basically do one-on-one meetings with 200 companies. And you would find all the companies who didn't get into YC who didn't ask for a 15 or 20 million dollar valuation.
They would be in the five to 10 million. And then you'd sort them and let's say you wanted to invest in five companies. You would be able to invest in five companies at, I would say, on average, half the valuation of a YC company, which means you would essentially be like investing in 10 companies.
So you can invest in 10 companies for the price of five YC. And I can tell you in that process, you would find companies that are equally good because at this stage, not me, one of the greatest angel investors of all time, not Y-combinator, certainly the greatest accelerator of all time by far.
I'm tech star, I was right behind the market, I shouldn't say it by far. But one of the top two of all time, I'd like to think minds in the top three, but you get 10 swings of bat and set a fight.
So why wouldn't everybody do that one simple thing? Because a lot of work and people don't want to work. So if YC is bringing you free-vetted companies, remember, they only accept one and a half percent.
That's like going and hiring people from Harvard Business School or Stanford GSB. You've used Stanford or Harvard as a filtering mechanism so you don't have to. But is the person coming out of Harvard GSB or Stanford, sorry, Stanford GSB program or Harvard's MBA program? Are they the same price as somebody coming out of Fordham's MBA program or an MBA program from a university in Canada? Of course not. They're twice the price.
So you pay for value. And the value here is that the YC companies have been mentored by very, very successful YC partners and they've been filtered by very, very successful investors at YC.
The second thing you can do is you can start your own damn accelerator. If you're so jealous of YC, then make one. And you know what? Sequoia has one. Now they started their own program. I have one that I've had for five years. There's plenty of other options out there. You could go make one.
But I can tell you that would be even more money and time and effort than just doing the three meetings a day for three months. So that is the second way that you could do this.
The third thing you can do, very simply, is wait. Meet 30 founders you love at YC.
你可以做的第三件事,非常简单,就是等待。在 YC 上认识 30 个你喜欢的创始人。
Wait 30 days, write all their names down. Email each one of them 30 days and say, Hey, I would love to jump on the cloth and see how things are going. Of those 30, I guarantee you 25, 20, depending on your victim may not be random.
You may pick the best ones. But I would say between 20 and 25 will still have their rounds open. I would say maybe 25. So I think five will be closed like 15, 20% will be closed.
The other ones will still be open. And if they're not open, they would be open to fundraising because founders always will take more money. Or you could wait a year and then contact them and say, Hey, I would love to get an update in the business of those 30, about 20% will have reached the next milestone product market fit and some revenue.
So those six companies you could then meet with. And if they raised that 20 million with no revenue and then they got to let's call it a million dollars in revenue, that would still be 20 X times revenue.
Now you had a company with no revenue. So they had infinite multiple. Now they have a 40 X multiple. They're not going to get more than a 40 X multiple in the public in the market.
So VCs or seed funds who look at them are going to say, you know what? I'll put money in at the last round's valuation. They're probably not going to get enough round. Whereas people who are normal startups, non-wicey startups that don't do this high pressure tactic have the demo day thing, do the party around where there's no VCs setting the price.
So you don't know how the price discovery happened. If you're at five or 10 million, you get the products of market, you get to a couple hundred thousand revenue.
Now you're going to get 20 million. So you're, let's call it seven million dollar valuation. You get 500 can't revenue. Now you can man the 20 million dollar valuation. So you triple your valuation.
The other folks at YC startups, let's say they started at 20, they have to fill that valuation in. And then you can come along and you can invest in the company.
And over time, private companies will have their valuations and the multiple on revenue earnings, etc.
随着时间的推移,私人公司的估值和营收收益倍数等指标也会发生变化。
But let's just do it on top of that revenue because we don't expect earnings since private companies, we want them to grow and get more customers and learn.
We don't really want them to throw off profits. We want all that money to go back into the company and to go back into growth and to go back into the product and go back into customer discovery.
我们其实不希望他们放弃利润。我们希望所有的钱都能重新注入公司、注入增长、注入产品和客户发现。
So all of that will result in the companies that say get to the series A, B, C, and D, especially in a down market like today, starting to sync with the public comps.
So if Uber or Airbnb are trading at five times revenue, 10 times revenue, three times revenue, whatever it is, or a SaaS company is at seven times or six times or it's a dog and it's at three times.
That's what founders in private companies will start to get. They'll get a little more credit because they're growing faster. Long way of saying there are multiple ways, aside from complaining about YC that you can deal with this. I just gave you the three. Meet with 200 companies, play the long game, start your own accelerator.
Hey, everybody, you know, I worked all the time with early stage companies at launch. Talking pre-series, right? Thousands of dollars in MRR, very little capital raise.
They didn't have D&O insurance. That basically protects all the directors and officers. So what do we do? We sent them right to in broker. That got them their business insurance and they did it really quick and at a great price.
Within broker, you do a single application. Startups will get four quotes for four lines of coverage in 15 minutes.
在经纪人内,您只需提交一份申请。初创企业将在15分钟内获得四个涵盖范围的报价。
They connect you with one of their expert brokers for unmatched service that goes beyond your policy.
他们会为您联系一个专家经纪人,提供超出您保单范围的无与伦比的服务。
Listen, brokers such an amazing product that we use it here.
听着,这些经纪人提供的产品太棒了,我们在这里都在使用它。
We love it at launch. It's the insurance I use. So that should tell you everything you need to know.
我们非常喜欢推出期。这是我使用的保险。这就告诉你所有你需要知道的事情。
When you're in that seed stage, you need to get your insurance correct. You got to grow up as a company and it's a lot more affordable than you think it is.
They're start a package and try and broker today with the code twist and get 10% off. They're start a package at in broker.com.sextwist. That's embro.okbr.com.sextwist for 10% off.
And of course, Gary Tan, friend of this program, friend of mine, who's awesome. I'll be trying to get him on the program by him, invited him like three times, I think, to come on the program since he's taken over YC, but he's pretty busy.
当然啦,Gary Tan 是我们节目的朋友,也是我的朋友,他真的很厉害。自从他接手 YC 以来,我已经邀请他三次来参加我们的节目了,但他太忙了,我正在试图让他来。
Both savings and Francisco, which I give him a lot of credit for, he's very active and local politics here and trying to make things better.
我要给Francisco点赞,他非常努力地参与当地政治活动,力图改善情况。此外,他还很节约。
Making videos, which he makes excellent videos. If you don't know Gary Tan's videos, go check him out and also getting his hands around this program.
But he started tweeting about this. He put a tweet out just the other day, I think yesterday, value investing adventure is like restricting your searches, your search for the lost keys under only brightly lit street lamps. Evaluate value to buy a public stock at its terminal growth rate, evaluate potential to buy at early stage chart.
I've just getting started team ability product quality market size competition high valuations exist because large possible markets represent large possible outcomes.
Competition doesn't mean a market or idea is bad. It typically means a great market that has lots of people want. I guess lots of what people want. But consensus is off the wrong and things that are out of favor that turn out to be huge.
The best investors tend not to use heat as the same one way or the other. So he's giving you a couple pieces of vice here and he's obviously talking his own book.
So it's a combination of both those things. So in Silicon Valley, we're all talking our own book because hopefully you're talking your book because you are dedicating your life to a philosophy that you believe in.
So he believes what he's saying here, but it's also in vice he's best interest. Just like I believe what I believe in. And it's also in my LPs best interest.
You're 10 X up on paper in 12 weeks. That's why this resentment exists. But you shouldn't have resentment if you're an investor. You should be thankful to IC for storing these companies. And then you should deploy strategies for investing in them when you think the price is appropriate. If the price is too high now, they're going to raise money five times more. So build a relationship with the founder and then play the long game.
If you're going to be an angel investor, you should be thinking about it in a decade, two decade or three decade, hopefully, arc. And just think about your first decade. You're not going to be a hundred companies a year from tech started launch accelerator and Y combinator. I'm going to follow up with them, et cetera, et cetera. And then you'll build a relationship over time with them.
Harry stepings then jumped in on this. And he did this tweet. Harry stepings is a venture capitalist. Actually, told me he was inspired to do his excellent podcast, 20 minute VC by this week and start up. So Harry's a good kid. He's an adult now. But I still call him a kid because when I met him, he was very young. He's still in his 20s, I think, but what an inspiration that kid is. If you want to see how to do it, he basically studied everybody in the industry and really then made it his own.
So he says founders, this is crucial. If you raise two million on 10 million, even if you do not hit it out of the park, you can raise a next round at a decent valuation markup. If you raise five million on 25 million, a K, a YC company, that's I met in that part, you have to smash it and really smash it to get of 1.5 X on that valuation within 18 months. So he's talking his book. Let me translate his book.
You only get this here on this week in startups, this inside baseball. I know all these people and I know when they're talking the books. Harry is an estate, stage investor. He doesn't want to pay 25 million. He wants to pay 10. If he puts two million in a 10, let's say he puts a million in a 10, he gets 10% of the company puts a million in at 20. He gets 5% of the company. So he wants a larger percentage ownership. And I believe he also believes what he's saying. So he could be talking his own book. He wants to get a good price. And this is actually good advice.
I said this before, if you raise a 25 and then you get to 500 K and revenue, now you've got a 50 X valuation. Now if you're at 10 million, you get to 500 K and you want to raise at 20 million, well, you got a 40 X to get to 20 and you've doubled your valuation, whereas the person with 25 million can do a flat round or possibly a down round.
Interestingly, Gary Tan, president of YC, decides to reply. So Gary Tan is out there fighting this fight. Hey, don't worry about valuation. worry about other things. And is he right? Yes and no. He replies. Product market fit is more important than your last valuation. That is the higher bit. Last valuation may matter, but it's not the low order bit.
So he's using fancy words, higher to bit lower to bit. It's not YC people and people on Silicon Valley talk bottom line what he's saying here is most important, less important. That's what high order bit low order bit. Very important. Not as important.
His point very simply, if you had bet on Airbnb or GitHub or another, you know, Coinbase, whatever great YC company, it wouldn't matter. So you should just study the product market fit. What's wrong about this is the companies don't have product market fit at the stage. Airbnb didn't have product market fit. Coinbase didn't have product market fit when they graduated YC product market fit came years later.
So it's easy to look in the review mirror and say, oh, it's Uber. It didn't matter. In my case, I think we invested a 4.5 million evaluation. It wouldn't matter if you invested a 45 or 4.5. It actually wouldn't matter. It wouldn't matter greatly because the number of shares I would have owned would have been 10% of what they would have been.
So this is not true with Gary Tannis thing. Product market fit is the most important thing in startups, but it doesn't trump valuation because there's another truth. If you were going to invest in one company at 25 million, you would do much better to find those five companies that are raising a 5 million and get five swings at that baton. That's a better betting strategy. You could play five hands to the flop as opposed to one. So if I told you, you've got King Queen suited and it's going to cost you $2,500 to see the flop or it's going to cost you $500 to see the flop, you know, you would rather play King Queen five times for $500. You got a low price eventually to see the flop. If you connect amazing flush, straight or, you know, big over pairs.
So for those of you who are outside the industry, I think of basically I should have demystified this. You'll have a lot of questions. But the party round is one of the major evils here. I just had Satya Patel on yesterday from home, bro.
And he says having a board at the stage stage is amazing. Somebody priced around party rounds are death party rounds equal death. Why do party rounds equal death? They equal death because nobody actually cares about your business enough to fight for it when things go wrong. And you don't have a lead investor joining your board.
Why see has made this and the overall culture of Silicon Valley has made it cool not to have a board, not to have a board member, not to have governance, not to have a lead investor. It's just false. You want to have intelligent people. You want to have four board meetings for an hour, a quarter. You want somebody rooting for you to have a meaningful ownership percentage in your company because they'll fight for it. When somebody owns five or 10% in your company and they got skid in the game, they're going to fight for it.
If you don't allow anybody to have 500k or a million dollars in that seed round and you have only 50k checks, when you have problems, people like, oh, it's only 50k. I only own 10 basis points in that company. Only own 25 bips in that company. I'll let it die. It's only 50k. But if they had 500k or a million, they'd be like, you know what, we have to fight for this company. Let's come up with some strategies and they would pick up your call on a Saturday.
As opposed to just, you know, I got a Saturday night. I'm going to go work with the company that I own 10% of. So party rounds, not a great idea. Satya Patel is exactly right.
So what can we learn from this? Very simply. 98.5% of you aren't getting into YC and the last two classes, you know, there's tens of thousands of you who didn't get an email me YC at launch.co, the letter Y, the letter C for YC on the letter at launch.co. Email me your YC application.
I know many people put them in this Friday, the day the show came out. So it's probably listening to this over the weekend or the next week. Just email me and my team. I'm going to do about 30 meetings next week. So you might get me on the call. We're going to just do 15, 20 minute calls with anybody who emails us their YC on the letter application. We get to know you. Maybe we put an investment in.
Maybe you join founder at university or our accelerator or we invest in your company or at least we get to know you put you in our database. Follow up with you in three, six months and maybe we get to talk about your idea and give you some ideas or some feedback on it and feedbacks great at the early stage, especially from a team like ours, which makes hundreds of investments a year as well.
So if you didn't get into YC send your YC application send me your rejection letter as well. YC at launch.co. Send me your rejection letter. I want to see why they said no. And then you and I can talk about that and figure out what's valid about it. Because if they do not accept you, that doesn't mean you're not going to be successful.
如果你没能进入YC,把你的YC申请和拒信都发给我吧。YC at launch.co. 把你的拒信发给我。我想看看他们为什么拒绝你。然后你和我可以谈谈,并找出其中的问题所在。因为即使他们不接受你,也不意味着你不会成功。
There's more successful companies that didn't go to YC than did. Obviously. So by all means do not be in any way dissuaded from pursuing your entrepreneurial vision. If you don't get into YC that's like saying you're going to just not be an artist because you didn't get into jewelry art or something like the acceptance rate is so low now you should be looking at other programs and other paths for you to get your vision.
Sometimes we had an offer here at this week in startups that's so great from a partner that I don't even need to read the ad. I can just tell you the benefits. Here's the benefit.
Lenoad has a startup program called RISE RISC right? And it offers more than just free credits. Startups can get up to $10,000 per month in year one credits followed by 50% and 25% discounts in the next two years. So they're going to take care of you for three full years. There are no caps and you get lifetime discounts based on your usage. Plus you get that amazing award-winning 24-hour day seven-day week 365-day year customer support. You can do that by phone, email or social media. There's no tears, there's no handoffs. And you get cloud consulting from experts to ensure your tech stack scales seamlessly. And an amazing community where you can connect with program members, alumni, advisors, and more and shout out to our friends at Lenoad, which was recently acquired by Akamai. Yes, Lenoad recently announced 12 new global locations that are coming in 2023. With Akamai plus Lenoad, you get access to leading security and CDN solutions. If you're fed up with your hosting solution, you need to check out Lenoad. So here's an amazing call to action. Visit Lenoad.com.
So I twist to get $500 in free credits. You can also apply to their startup program RISE. RISE members receive up to $120,000 in free infrastructure credits during their first year and up to 50% discounts thereafter.
If you do get into YC, go and enjoy it. And take my secret piece of advice. Go meet with all the top VCs and send them an email. I'm graduating from this is how you read.
I'll give you the exact exactly what you're right. Dear rule off, like I'd say it's a squad. Dear Chama, dear David Sachs, dear Friedberg, I'm not raising money until we graduate from YC. But I am a huge fan of your podcast blog post, Twitter, investments, whatever it is. And then say something very specific.
I know that you wrote the DL memo for YouTube. It was really inspired by that. I thought this section was particularly important. And I'm building something that's very similar to what YouTube did and what Zappos did. And I know Sequoia was investor in both those amazing companies. I'd love to show you what I'm working on. I'm available to come by Sequoia's office seven days a week from 6 a.m. to midnight. I will meet you anywhere anytime for 20 minutes. And that's all I need to show you my vision. Please let me know if you can spare 20 minutes anytime, any day.
You're right. It's just like I told you. You're going to get that meeting. And you say, I'm not raising money until demo day. And you go meet with them. And then they say, well, you know, if they really do like it and you got the nuts, they're going to say, oh, wow, stone-called nuts. I'm talking about a poker term here, folks. You got a boat. You hit your set on the river. You hit your set of aces on the flop and you board-parad on the river. And now you got a boat. You say to them, listen, I got the nuts. And they say, we'd love to put a 500K investment in if you were open to that. And you say, you know what? I would never consider it except for Sequoia because you're such a great firm. I'd never considered it except for craft because you're such a great firm. Boom. And then you just go, you move on and you take the money. And then you go into demo day with either your round filled or you raise another round. You raise a second round. You just decrease evaluation. You got Sequoia in on this early round for 15 million, 10 million. And then you raise that 20. All right.
This is all I could tell you. I hope this is helpful to founders in no way as it's meant to be disparaging of Y-combinator. Hope for the people from YC who are listening to this and Gary, if you listen to this or if Harry Stabbings listen to this, I'm just trying to give everybody their flowers here and explain to the rest of the audience what actually happens in Silicon Valley. So we can all make great investments and work together.
One of the great things about Silicon Valley is the collaboration and that everybody's rooting for everybody. Now what I've seen over the last 10 years has gotten a little chippy. Has a lot of money's been made and some people made a ton of money. Other people didn't make money. It gets a little chippy if I'm being honest. Just like if you're playing in a poker game and a bunch of people lost some people won.
But then hopefully over years of playing Polly together, it all evens out and everybody gets a chance to win and everybody takes their lumps. Everybody gets a couple of bad beads. But you ultimately we should all be supporting each other. And many hands makes for a light work. We should all be trying to get three, four, five great seed investors on a YC cap table on a launch company cap table on Harry Stabbings, you know cap table. And let's let's help these founders win together.
Let's all work together. That's what I was originally enamored with at Silicon Valley. That even this kid from Brooklyn who was a little bit odd maybe a little bit abrasive on the margins, maybe too outspoken. I was embraced by some percentage of Silicon Valley. People found it funny or interesting or annoying, but they still accepted me. And they still became LPs in my fund. They still came on the podcast, Paul Graham came on this podcast. He spoke one of our events, Gary Chan has been on a number of times. So anyway, let's all work together. Congratulations to the folks who got into YC. If you didn't get into YC, send me your rejection letter and let's talk about it. YC at launch.co.
让我们一起合作吧。那是我最初喜欢硅谷的原因。即使是来自布鲁克林的这个孩子可能有点奇怪,也许有点让人反感,可能太直言不讳。硅谷的一部分人接纳了我。人们觉得很有趣或有趣或者烦人,但他们仍然接受了我。他们仍然成为我们基金的有限合伙人。保罗·格雷厄姆上过这个播客,他在我们的一个活动上发言,Gary Chan 多次出现在这个活动上。所以,让我们一起合作吧。恭喜那些进入 YC 的人。如果你没有进入 YC,请把你的拒绝信寄给我,我们来谈谈吧。YC at launch.co。
Yes, there's no difference between the 1.5% they accept and the next 15% probably the next 50% of them being honest. Nobody's that good of a picker. There's no difference between the 1% that get into Harvard and the the top 50% that apply. We all know that, right? I mean, it's we all can agree on that. Like the top 50% of people applying to Harvard, they're all excellent. They're all extraordinary. And they all deserve some investment and support.
All right, I saw something completely inspiring that people found completely horrific on Twitter. And this is going to be polarizing a law firm called Paul Hastings, aka PH. I know them. They generated the 32nd most revenue of all US law firms in 2021 according to the Wikipedia. That's a new website you can check out. But it ranked 18 in revenue per lawyer.
So it's fighting above its weight class, probably due to the absurdly high expectations. So they have a document called non-negotiable expectation. Number one, PH, Paul Hastings, is an AM law 20 law firm. You're in the big leagues, which is a privilege, act like it. Okay, so there's telling you right now, you're lucky to be here. I like this. Number two, we are in the business of client service. You are the concierge at the four seasons, a waiter at a Linnea. Shout out to our friend, the co-founder of a Linnea, Nick Caconis, my guy. The client always comes first and is always right. If a client wants a mountain move, we move it. No questions. As a junior, your clients are the associates and partners on the deal team.
所以它正在超越自身分量级战斗,可能是因为期望过高。所以,他们有一个叫做“不可谈判的期望”的文件。第一条,PH, Paul Hastings是一个AM法律20律师事务所。你在大联盟里,这是一个特权,行事要像一个大联盟的人。现在告诉你,你很幸运能在这里。我喜欢这个。第二条,我们的业务是客户服务。你就像四季酒店的礼宾员,Linnea的服务员。向我们的朋友、Linnea的联合创始人Nick Caconis致敬。客户永远是第一位的,而且永远是正确的。如果客户要求搬山,我们就搬山。作为初级员工,你的客户是交易团队的助理和合伙人。
All right, here we go. This is setting an expression. You're a waiter. You're a concierge and you're lucky to be here. Amazing. What great framing. Whoever wrote this, um, chat GPT could never write this. Well, though I'm going to train chat. My chat GPT-4 is going to be trained with this. This is the source document. Number three, you are online 24-7 in bold and underlined. No exceptions, no excuses. I agree with this. I'm going to, I'm sending this to my investment team and telling them you're on 24-7. No, no exceptions, no excuses. Timelines, quality. Clients expect everything to be done perfectly and delivered yesterday.
Okay, just, we're level setting here. Clients have unrealistic expectations. I like it. Someone is paying 850 for one hour of your time. Think about that in everything you do. All communication and work product needs to be prompt, professional and polished. Number six, take ownership of everything you do. Once you touch a document work stream, you own every mistake in it fair or not, right? Ownership, ownership, quality of work. This one, number seven, I love. WFH is a luxury. Work from home is a luxury. This is, this one hit me deeply. I'm right. I'm scaring my teams. Don't take advantage of it. Buy a full home setup, two monitors, docking station, keyboard and mouse, and a working phone or come to the office.
So they're saying your responsibility to buy this stuff, not ours. Your setup is your responsibility. We have an office come to the office. If you want to work from home, do it. No poor connections, no excuses. See number three, number five. This is what I tell my people.
Have an ethernet cable, have a setup. I pay for their stuff. Maybe I'll have to change that. I'll still pay for it because we don't have an office. If I did have an office, I would maybe think about this saying, hey, you're responsible for your home setup. We're responsible for your work setup. But you have to, I tell my people, have an ethernet cable and I've thrown people off a conference call. I kid you not. If they don't show it with a headset and they don't show up with an ethernet and a high-speed perfect connection, people like, I have Wi-Fi and just doesn't work. Run an ethernet cable people.
Okay, I love this. Number eight, no questions until you've tried to figure something out for yourself. Of course, this is obvious. Google unfamiliar concepts. Yadda, yadda, yadda. Still can't figure out the answer. Talk to your classmates. They're not the same. Don't come to us. Go talk to your classmates. Be self-reliant. This is great life advice. Be self-reliant. Be an adult. Put out quality work. Be of service. This is a manifesto. Chef's kiss.
Number nine. I can't even tell you how much of these I love. Number nine, I don't know. It's never an acceptable answer. See number six and number eight. Go figure it out.
Ten. This is your career. Why oh you are it's in caps. Embrace that reality and always put your best foot forward. If not for the firm or your deal team for yourself at the end of the day and this is in bold and underline and this is critically important. It's your reputation that will carry you. Whether that's here or in house or elsewhere. Make it count. Bravo. I say Bravo to Paul Hastings.
And if this is something you find appalling or too intense. Well, you go work at the post office. Okay. There's a Starbucks job waiting for you. This is a manifesto for you to become elite. This is the Michael Jordan of legal documents. This is the Kobe Bryant.
There's a clip of Kobe Bryant. I'll have my team put it at the end of this rant where he talks about working out twice a day versus his strategy of working out four times a day. Instead of starting at 11 a.m. he starts at 4 a.m. And he just talked about how no matter how much work his competitors did in the NBA over the summers because he consistently got up at 4 a.m. and did that 5 a.m. workout had breakfast at 8 a.m. then went back to the gym at 10 and he did the four workouts and his contemporaries did too.
They could never catch up to him. His fitness, his availability, his technique, his brain, his stamina, everything was just at another level. And he just said over time the gap between him and who was behind him got greater. That gap now is not other players. It's chat GPT for it is AI. AI is right behind you.
If you hear my voice now and this document scares you, it should scare you much less than the AI that's behind you as a knowledge worker. The AI behind you is going to roll over you unless you become elite. The world doesn't need average people. AI is going to do average and above average work. You must become elite and you must do it now. That is what is happening in the world as we speak.
If your job is to try to be the best basketball player you can be to do that, you have to practice, you have to train. You want to train as much as you can as often as you can. So if you get up at 10 in the morning, train at 12. Train for two hours, 12 to 2. You have to let your body recover. Get back out. You train, start training again at 6. Train from the 68. And now you go home, you shower, you be dinner, you go to bed, you wake up, do it again. Those are two sessions. Now imagine you wake up at 3. Train at 4.46. Come home, breakfast, relax. Now your back out of again. 9 to 11. Relax. Now I'll start your back out of again. 2 to 4.
Your back out of again. 7 to 9. Look how much more training I have done by simply starting at 4. So now you do that as the years go on. The separation you have with your competitors and your peers just grows larger and larger and larger and larger.
Larger. By year 5 or 6, doesn't matter what kind of work they're doing in summer, they're never going to catch up. So it makes sense to get up and start your day early because you can get more work.
You know all the complaints about building apps on the blockchain. It's slow, it's less reliable, there's no support if things go wrong. Listen, it's an emerging technology. We all know that.
Well, here's the good news. Quick node has solved all of this. Quick node gives blockchain developers unparalleled reliability and speed with access to unlimited endpoints across 18 chains and 35 networks. Quick node provides amazing response time and dedicated 24 seven customer support. They offer so much consistent performance at any scale. Lightning fast API responses that are 2.5 times faster on average than competitors. And the most sophisticated and globally balanced cloud and bare metal Web 3 architecture. Listen, this is like the AWS or Azure of Web 3. This is where you need to go.
If you're building DAPs decentralized apps, you need to use Quick node. So here's your call to action. Find out why companies like Twitter, Adobe Coinbase, and OpenC use Quick node and get one month free by using the code twist at go.quick node.com slash twist. Once again, that URL right it down now is go dot q i c k n o d e dot com slash T w i c t and make sure you use that promo code twist so they know we sent you.
And some attorney who tweeted this SMB underscore attorney, I guess small medium size business attorney. Yeah, this commentary. This big law firm finally said the quiet part out loud. Nothing matters, but the firm and generating billables. That's not what I took from it.
No, they literally say this is how disingenuous this person is. They literally say your career that matters, your reputation. They said the opposite. And they never brought in generating billables because that takes care of some. And then he says, your family, your health, you know, nothing here said you don't see your family. Nothing here doesn't say your health. And this is about you. Does it matter? Just bill 24 seven no excuses. No excuses. Yes, 27 24 seven for your customers. Yes, but you're also doing that for your family. You're also doing that for your family. If you're the breadwinner and you want your kids and family to have a better life, sure, you got to take them on vacation. You got to have time with your family.
But objectively, this is the road back to extreme success and SMB acquisition attorney had to reply. Never a good idea because I'm going to come back and do it. And he says, and probably divorce alien in relation to kids in poor physical mental health. But yes, you're going to get the steady competition. That's not true. That's not true. You could work 10 hours a day and still have time for your family. You could work a couple hours on the weekend when your family is sleeping or they're working on a task or they're going to their tutor or whatever they're doing. Kids are at soccer, whatever, you know, practice. You don't have to be at everything. And you could be in great mental and physical health like Kobe Bryant, like everybody else.
And do you have to make sacrifices to be elite? Of course you do. Olympians, NBA players like Kobe, elites, CEOs, did they sacrifice a little bit on the market? Yes. Can they have some wonderful relationships? Yes. Those things are completely independent of each other. And in fact, if you bring the same rigor and intentionality in this document and you replace it with your family and your kids, you'll get there. You see me working here. I'm doing a podcast on a Friday. But then I'm going to get those 90 minutes, three hours on the mountain with my kids. And then I'll work at night. They'll go to bed and I'll put it another three hours. And I'll skip game of thrums or whatever nonsense that I could have watched. And I'll just get my work done at night. But I'll get them in their 90 minutes, three hours on the mountain. That's what they like to do. They like to do five to 10 runs. I'll get that in.
Anyway, Billy McFarland, Fire Fest, Felon of Note, says, crazy, that Twitter thinks this is crazy for a 20 year old kid trying to build his horror foundation. We've gone soft. I have to say the hard and criminal mastermind, Billy McFarland, it gets it right here. When you're in your 20s, you can skip Coachella. You know, if you've got a client and that's going to advance your career to a three years, you can skip Coachella. It'll be there later. You don't have to do everything. You should be hustling when you're young and getting you know, advancing in your career.
Anyway, important note. This document is for junior employees who are fresh out of law school. They're probably in their 25, 26, 27, 28 years old range. And they were probably raised on participation trophies. And that's why this is exceptional advice to shake them up and to let them know you're in the big leagues here. Act like it and build your reputation and service the heck out of these customers of ours. This is great advice.
If you want to be a winner, print this Paul Hastings stuff out, edit it, put it into your AI, drop it into your Coda or Notion, and then make your own manifesto of 10 important things for your company. I'm going to take this and make it a template for my investment team because I told my investment team, this is we're an investment company.
If a founder needs our help, I want you on the phone Saturday and Sunday nights with them, whatever it takes. And you know what? Not everybody's up for that. And those people should not work for me. So if you want to come work for me, this Paul Hastings slide.
You might want to read it once or twice because it is actually in line with how I think about our firm launch and our dedication to our customers. We are the concierge. We are the waiter for our founders. You can take this non-negotiable expectations list.
This is for my investment team. If you're listening, sometimes you listen to the bud. Launch is a top 20 investment firm. We are we're a top five seed fund. No doubt. We are in the business of client service. You are the concierge. The first reason that's correct.
The client is always first and always right. That's true with the founders. The founder comes first and is always right. If the founder wants a mountain moved, we move it. No questions. As a junior, your clients, your founders are the managing directors and on the deal teams.
Some founder is giving us not $850 an hour. They're giving us 6% of their company come to our accelerator. They're taking $100,000 of our money to be on their cap table. Okay, let's take it seriously. Everything's got to be perfect.
All right, everybody. That's it. Just a quick follow up here to the substack story from a couple of weeks ago. As I had mentioned, when you do equity crowdfunding, you have to disclose how your company's doing, the revenue of the financials.
I was like, weird, where are the financials on this? It turns out you can test the waters. They did this on a website called WeFundr. The founder of WeFundr actually reached out to me to correct some things in our episode or just clarify some things for me. I'm also going to say hi. Hi to the WeFundr CEO.
Here's what it says. Per WeFundr's website, if you're offering is in the first 120 days of the fiscal year, financials may be for the two fiscal years prior to the most recent complete year. Yada, yada, yada.
This being substack, which required to disclose financials only from 2020 and 2021, which it did yesterday. They did $12 million. This is from Axios, which summarized it nicely for us, not chat GPT4.
12 million if gross revenue in 2021 on a 22 million net loss with $55 million in cash on hand. So 12 million of gross revenue, they get 10% of that. So that means they had 1.2 million in revenue, and they lost 22 million.
And the CEO of Substack Chris Best says we're a private company, we're releasing what we're required to release. So but they'll have to require the rest of them. And we'll see how the company does going forward.
Substack的CEO Chris Best表示,我们是一家私人公司,我们只发布必须发布的信息。所以其他信息必须经过要求。接下来我们会看公司的表现如何。
But as I said in our previous episode, it's a challenged business. Substack is a challenging business, just like Patreon. These businesses are loved by the people who use them. But one of the reasons people use them love them is because of their low take rate.
The percentage that Patreon takes, I think, is 10% and then plus fees, like credit card fees goes on top of that. Same thing with Substack. The app sort of takes 30% for a reason. They want it to be a vibrant business that, you know, makes a lot of money, has a profit.
I don't think Substack can be profitable on the 10% number. If they're losing 20 million a year, like they did in 2021, 22 million dollar loss, that means 10% if you were to 10x that number to get their 10% take rate, they'd have to make 250 million dollars or something like that to get to this magical break even point.
I don't think they're going to build 250 million in Substacks. They said they had two million paid subs. I believe was the last number I heard. So at $5 a month, 10 million a month, I don't know. It's, or maybe they have the million or two million.
Maybe they're getting close. Maybe they're halfway there. Maybe they're at 120 million in top line revenue. So they have 12 million in bottom line. Anyway, it's possible this business gets to break even in the coming years on the cash they have. Actually, I do think that's possible.
Will it ever be a company that throws off massive amounts of money? It will not. Now, if they took 30% nobody would use the product. You would be way too much for somebody making a million dollars a year in subscriptions, two million a day in subscriptions, three million a year in subscriptions, to give 300, 600 or 900,000 dollars.
It made no sense. You could hire developers. You could buy software and you could save all that money. And so that is going to be the challenge of this business, which is why I think they're trying to do other things, podcasts and tweets and other offerings. So they want to build all these subscriptions and then they're going to keep turning over cards.
Would I want to have been a seed investor or series A investor in this company? Very much so. I think it would have been a great investment. Would I invest in this round? No, absolutely not. I think this round is way overpriced by a factor. No, I wish them the best. But if my, if people in my syndicate or angel investors are asking me, I would invest at 25% of valuation.
I value the business at 150 million, maybe 200 million, something in that range would not base it at 600 million. That's like peak valuation price. And the reason they're probably doing equity crowdfunding if you want to take a cynical view is because they can't clear market at that valuation with venture capital firms anymore. So they want to raise from their user base and then put that to work to fill in that valuation.
Infilling that valuation means I think getting to 500 million in subscriptions of which they would get 10% 50 million and 50 million times 12 would be 600 million. I think that would make sense. Anyway, I wish them the best. Substack is an awesome product. I have the Jason Callacanis newsletter there. I have an all-in newsletter. I started there. I have found a university there. I have the twist mailing list there. Why did I move them all there? Because I'm getting free subs because of the network effect. And I'm not charging.
So it's like getting a free email provider. So shout out to Substack for giving me a free, essentially free service. And they give me every day. I get a handful of people recommending my mailing list. So it's growing because the network effect. So I think Substack has executed at a high level. I would not invest at this round. I wish them the best.
And here's a question for you. And I want you to answer me on Twitter. I'm at Jason. I want you to give me your most considered response. Who is the most likely acquirer for Substack? And then too, who would be the most unlikely but interesting acquirer of Substack? Who's the most likely, which would be somebody who's in that business? Right? Think that through. Somebody who has subscription. Somebody who likes writers and journalism. Who could be a really great person to own this business? And then who would be a wildcard buyer? Somebody you'd like to see by it.
I have mine already. I will reveal mine on Monday or Tuesday. You tell me over the weekend. Which ones? Who's the likely buyer? Who's your wildcard buyer? If you got rejected from YC, my YC rejects. Send me your rejection letter YC at lunch. I'll go. Bye bye.