Hey, prime members, you can listen to Business Wars Add Free on Amazon Music. Download the app today. Join Wendry Plus and Apple podcasts or the Wendry app to listen to Business Wars early and add free.
嘿,亚马逊 Prime 会员,你们可以在亚马逊音乐上免费收听《商业战争》节目。今天就下载这个应用程序吧。加入 Wendry Plus 和苹果播客或 Wendry 应用程序,可以提前免费收听《商业战争》节目。
Hey, I'm David Brown and this is Business Wars. There was a time when just about every mogul in Hollywood had his eye on Paramount Pictures. Competing for the movie studio like it was the last cookie in the jar. But can you blame them? With smash hits like Top Gun?
There's been 300. Go get them, ma'am. I'm going for Mr. Lock. It's pretty scary this guy out here. Grease? Some love it had me a blast. And of course, the Godfather. I just don't ask what I'm supposed to say. You don't offer friendship. You don't even think to call me Godfather.
The historic studio was the talk of the town, but its chairman wouldn't sell. Ultimately, it was by a comm that made Paramount an offer it couldn't refuse. And in 1994, the tumultuous deal was done. But with the rise of streaming services, changing the landscape of film and TV, Paramount has been on shaky ground lately.
Today, we'll be joined by Matt Bellany, founding member of the Entertainment Newsletter Puck and host of the Ringer Podcast, The Town. Matt will bring us the scoop on present day Paramount and whether this summer's smash hit Top Gun Maverick can bring them out of the danger zone.
But first, we're going to plop down in front of the boob tube and take a peek into the past with former Viacom Television Executive Doug Herzog. He was there when Viacom was plotting its takeover of Paramount Pictures, working in Viacom's booming cable TV division. Doug rose through the ranks, eventually overseeing MTV, the H1 Comedy Central, and other iconic cable channels. Today, he co-hosts Basic, a podcast about the time when cable was cool.
Doug joins us now to bring us tales from the two Doug Herzog. Welcome to Business Wars. Thank you for having me.
道格现在加入我们,为我们带来双道格·赫尔佐格的故事。欢迎来到商业战争。非常感谢邀请我。
In the 80s, seemed like MTV was the hottest thing around it. I understand that you joined the company pretty early in your career. What were you doing there?
在80年代,MTV似乎是最红的事物。我知道你职业生涯早期就加入了该公司。你在那里做什么的?
Well, it really was the hottest thing around it. It's kind of hard to explain how important and big and culturally impactful MTV was back then. I always tell my kids, it's Spotify, TikTok, Twitter, YouTube, all rolled into one Snapchat. It's just hard to wrap your head around just how big it was.
I went there to start the MTV News Department in 1984. They had the MTV launch in 1981. I would say I got there at the height of the music video era, the very first era when they were actually playing music videos 24 hours a day. 1984 was the summer of Bruce Springsteen's Born in the USA. Born in the USA. Prince is Purple Rain. Purple Rain. Purple Rain. Michael Jackson's Thriller. It was like the Mount Rushmore of Music video.
I can't imagine what it must have been like to work at MTV, which was sort of the pinnacle of pop culture at that time. It must have been like a dream come true for you.
我无法想象当时在MTV工作是什么样子。那可是当时流行文化的顶峰。对你来说,这一定是美梦成真了吧。
Literally was a dream come true. I loved music. I loved television. MTV didn't exist the day I went to college. So it wasn't on my radar at all. And I remember as soon as it started, I was like, I want to work. And it took me about three years to make my way in.
这真的是一个梦想成真。我喜欢音乐,喜欢电视。我上大学那天 MTV 还不存在,所以它完全没有出现在我的视野里。我记得一开始就想要从事这个行业,但我花了大约三年时间才进入这个领域。
Take me back now. Comedy Central. You were president of Comedy Central in what, 95 or something like that?
现在带我回去, 去看喜剧中心。你在喜剧中心当总裁,是在95年左右吧?
Yeah, so I was at MTV from 1984 to 95. And then I went over to Comedy Central, which at the time was a joint venture between HBO and MTV or more broadly via Common Time World.
嗯,我从1984年到95年都在MTV工作。之后我跳槽到的是Comedy Central。当时它是HBO和MTV之间的合资项目,或者更广泛地说是由Common Time World来支持的。
What were you thinking as some of these pitches came across your desk for some of these shows that would become household names eventually?
当这些节目的部分提案呈现在您的桌子上时,您当时有什么想法?这些节目最终会成为家喻户晓的名字。
You know, the most notable one, and I could tell you what I was thinking, is when South Park came in. You know, so South Park had started as this little VHS tape.
It was made by Tray Park and Matt Stone for a guy named Brian Grayden. At the time, he was running sort of this development podded fox. And he had seen some work they had done. And this is 1995, 1996. He had asked him to create a video Christmas card that he could send to people on VHS, which is what they did.
So they created the now famous Spirit of Christmas, also known as Jesus versus Santa. And it went viral. People started just making copies of it. Oh, I remember. There was the internet really wasn't a thing yet. So it was getting passed around town and then one of our development executives, a great woman named Debbie Liebling, showed it to me.
And I remember watching it and thinking it was one of the funniest things I'd ever seen. It really blew my mind. I said, you know, I don't think they can do that, which by the way, they ended up doing. But I think we should be in business with these guys and we went out and we signed them. And they're about to celebrate their 25th anniversary. That's crazy. That's it.
And here's what I could tell you. I thought it was crazy funny and really edgy and a little dangerous, maybe too dangerous.
然后我能告诉你的是,我觉得那真是疯狂好笑、真的前卫,有一点危险,可能太危险了。
But at the time, Comedy Central was probably in about 35 million homes and our next big goal was to get to 40, you know, and I thought, well, if it doesn't work at the very least, we'll get attention. And one of the things we needed most at Comedy Central was just attention.
当时,Comedy Central 在大约3500万户家庭中播出,我们的下一个重要目标是达到4000万。我认为,即使宣传不成功,我们至少会得到关注。Comedy Central 最需要的是注意力。
But it turned out that it did work and it worked in a big way and it turned out to be Grand Slam. Because on the day we get attention, we got a lot of people watching as well and talking about us and it really changed everything.
We're going to take a short break here. We're looking back on Viacom in the golden age of cable and paramount with Doug Herzog. He is a former Viacom executive. You're listening to a special edition of Business Wars. Stay with us.
Hi, I'm Sarah Haggi, co-host of Wonderree's podcast, Scample Inswers. In our recent two-part series, Three Weddings and a Funeral, we dive into the story of a German con man who built an entire life on fake names, lies, and schemes, and the unlikely true kind twist that brought this decades-long charade crashing down. Listen to Scample Inswers on Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome back to Business Wars. Our guest today is former Viacom exec Doug Herzog. He was working for the company at the time of the paramount acquisition in the early 90s.
Doug, the timeline of our season on the battle for Paramount pretty much runs parallel with your career at MTV.
Doug,我们在Paramount的战斗的赛季时间轴几乎与你在MTV的职业生涯平行。
Talking about the late 80s, early 90s, a lot of people were eyeing Paramount, including Biacom, of course. Was there something that Paramount had other than just sort of generalized synergy with Hollywood that made it what so many media companies wanted at the time?
Well, Paramount's one of the great Hollywood studios and has a great history and a great library, Sumner Redstone, really has had his eye on a movie studio always and wanted to grow the company. Synergy was the 90s buzzword and the idea is that you're going to take all these great brands and make MTV branded movies and Nickelodeon branded movies, etc., etc., and maybe vice versa. Maybe we'd have the opportunity to dig into their library and make TV shows out of that. It never really got all the way there.
And there were a lot of bloody noses and lips after the fight ended. I guess Barry Diller and John Malone, a bunch of people were circling.
打斗结束后,有很多人的鼻子和嘴唇都流了血。我猜巴里·迪勒和约翰·马龙等一群人在旁观。
But you look at the number of mergers and acquisitions that were happening in the entertainment industry at that time. Putting aside the idea of Synergy, it's hard to overlook the question of whether or not some of the larger-than-life personalities angling for these movie companies, especially, that that was a kind of a crown jewel. That there was a, right? There's something personal.
Well, always personal. I mean, these guys, you know, they don't know how to do any other way. And I've worked for all of them. I mean, over the course of my career, I have worked for Rupert Murdock, Peter Ternan, Barry Diller, Jeff Buchist, Tom Freston, Jeffy Cancer. I mean, you name it. I've worked from all.
The interesting thing to me always was this sort of show business, you know, kind of traditional pecking order, right? Where movies was number one, right? You know, TV was number two, but like kind of a sorry second sister. And then there was the music business. And then within the TV business, there was pecking order, right? There was broadcast, premium, then cable, right? We always had a chip on our shoulder, that cable.
But, you know, the allure of the movies and the allure of running a studio is just something that remains like the golden egg to a lot of folks.
然而,你知道,电影的诱惑和经营制片厂的诱惑对很多人来说就像是黄金蛋一样,仍然具有吸引力。
I watched and they will remain nameless. I watched a lot of respected business leaders, folks who took over, you know, some of these major media companies who I thought, well, you know, they're not going to, they're going to understand that, you know, it's all about TV. And the movies really don't matter. Like on a good year, a movie studio, you know, makes, you know, a couple of hundred million dollars on a bad year. They lose a couple hundred million dollars.
Whereas, you know, the TV business, you know, a pretty clean cable, we're growing 20% every year back then. And sure enough, you'd watch these guys take over these companies and they just get Google ID for the movie studio. And they can't take their eyes off. They can't, they can't, they can't help themselves. They're running out there for premieres. And it's all about the studio. Whereas, you know, like I said, the straw that stirs the drink was always the cable stuff.
Something that's also striking though is that a lot of folks who might have no reason to know a name like Sumner Redstone or Barry Diller, they almost became household names. And I think in some places they did become a household.
I think, yeah. Yeah, I think that's right. And I'm wondering how prevalent these figures were in your career.. I mean, how much power did a mogul really wield?
Well, so it's so funny, I could have I come probably 25 years old and probably 20 and change those for Sumner. I mean, I was there a little bit before Sumner. And I was a, you know, when I left I come, I was a pretty senior executive.
I used to make this joke that if you put me in front of Sumner Redstone, along with two other guys, he would not be able to pick me out out out of the lineup. I used to, I used to always go up to him every time I saw him and I put my hand on it and say, hi Sumner, it's Doug Herzog. And then somebody had whispered, it's Doug Herzog. In his ear. And then he'd go, he'd go, I know who you are. And I rarely saw Sumner Redstone.
He did not get involved in the day-to-day of MTV that was left to folks like Tom Preston and Judy McGrath and myself and Van Toffler and, you know, that group. And what was the buzz around Sumner Redstone at the time? I mean, he was what? We're close to seven years old.
他没有参与 MTV 的日常事务,那些工作留给像汤姆·普雷斯顿、朱迪·麦格雷斯和我自己、范·托夫勒以及那一群人。当时关于萨姆纳·雷德斯通的话题是什么?我想说,我们差不多七岁了。
He was an old man there. Yeah, he was, he was always old. He was old, you know, he was old before he was old. But a clearly, widely, widely businessman driven smart, you know, and, and look, you know, he was, you know, at the end of the day, he was the guy who sat atop Viacom when it was the envy of its peers. Well, so he, so you gotta give him credit.
Who would have been considered more dangerous? Sumner Redstone or Barry Diller at the times?
在那时,史马纳·雷德斯通和巴里·迪勒中,哪一个被认为更危险?
Well, it's a, you know, again, you're talking two different flavors. You know, when I worked for Barry, he was, you know, this was at USA Network. He had USA Films. And Barry was a very hands on guy. And he would kind of come in, in and out, which got frustrating. But, you know, look, he understood the content side of the business. He understood the talent side of the business. And he wanted to be involved.
And he certainly had a point of view about that. And, honestly, everything else. So his presence was always felt. And, and even if he wasn't in the room, he, like he loomed. And I almost, when I got to working for Barry, couldn't believe how much in the details. He would get on things. Same with Jeffrey Katzenberg, incredibly hands on, right on top of you. And on top of everything that's going on to the, you wouldn't believe what he, you know, is able to pay attention to.
When I was at Fox, you know, I was president of the Fox Network from like a minute and a half. I think I said the land speed record. But being the president of the Fox Network was like being, you know, the New York Yankees manager under George Dimebrenner. They kind of came and went fast. So, Rupert, you know, traditionally had tortured all the network presidents prior to me. You know, I Rupert Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch.
So I think when I was there, it was either one of two things or both. A, he sends quickly, I wasn't going to last. Or B, he was just starting to court Wendy Deng. And I thought to myself, well, maybe he's decided he needs to spend a little time on his personal life and stop torturing. Hey, I just give up something. So maybe it's torturing the network president every day. I only heard from, I would only hear from Rupert every once in a while in my very short time at Fox.
Any tension between the TV and the film divisions?
电视和电影部门之间有任何紧张关系吗?如果需要,我可以换种说法。
Oh, yeah. A ton, really. There were some very, very, very contentious meetings. Because, you know, part of the thing was, you know, we wanted to be in the movie business. Like, it seemed glamorous and we had a great brand. And I'm like, we should make movies. And, you know, they were like, well, and the parameter was a little bit like, yeah, well, we decide what movies get made. So just sell down kids. And then when we would agree on something, there was always this, how do you actually make money if you're, if you're us, right? Because the studio, you know, how these studio deals work. They make all the money and everybody else doesn't. So there was always, there's always this push and pull over how to split up whatever profits there should be.
And then also how to reward people when it came to bonus time. And we always felt like we were always doing favorite. So the studio would have a big release that had nothing to do with us. They would buy a lot of time, you know, on the network. But then they would also look for a lot of free promotional time from the networks. So we were always helping them out and trying to help their movies, you know, be hits and feel them like we weren't getting enough credit for that. But it did get contentious.
You know, we have covered Blockbuster versus Netflix here on Business Wars. And one of the things that struck me when we were talking about that as a series was how many points there were at which Blockbuster could have looked more closely at Netflix vision. And instead of copying Netflix, got in the head of Netflix. But it never really happened.
It was all about the kind of story.. Yeah, please. So you know, Blockbuster at one point was in the Viacom family. Yeah, right. Exactly. So when we bought Paramount, we bought Blockbuster. So I remember going down there. This is how to be the early 90s. I was still at MTV.
So we flew down to Florida to meet with their CEO. And this was like a sort of a two day thing. We're like one day they were going to present to us. And then the next day we would present to them. And like the third day, we would start discussing, of course, synergies.
So they do their presentation. And I remember it was the first time I'd ever heard like a couple of, you know, sort of buzzwords that are now sort of coming like bricks and mortar. They were talking about getting out of the bricks and mortar business. In fact, they were like trying to convince Nickelodeon.
They should put some of those kids. I remember those kids play places, you know, dig in the 90s, you know. They were sort of convincing them they should take over some of their leases and that kind of thing. But they were already talking about getting out of brick and mortar. And then they started talking about the future.
And how one day, movies would be delivered to your computer at home. You know, even the idea of everybody having a computer in their home, I think was barely a thing yet. And so what they were talking about sounded very futuristic. And, you know, very much down the road. But my point is they could see it coming. And they still couldn't get there.
That's interesting because I wonder how much of it was because of a feeling that this is kind of science fiction. We still don't, you know, haven't seen the manifestation of computers everywhere, you know. Yeah, or it's a little bit like maybe what's happening right now with like, say, broadcast and cable and streaming.
Like the broadcasters in the cable folk could see streaming coming. I was there. I could tell you. We saw it coming. But we didn't really do anything about it because we were a little arrogant about our business.
And look, what you're seeing now is that struggle to, you know, wind down one business and then really invest in another that's not quite there yet. But, you know, you're, by the way, those, you know, look for all talks of the demise of cable television. They're still making plenty of money back there. It's not going away tomorrow, right?
So, um, I think, you know, companies sometimes get stuck. They got stockholders and a stock price. And they're just, you know, they're trying to hold it together and moving in a new direction means taking some big chances. And, you know, you can't always get those lines.
Do you think that cable could be poised for reinvention? I'm wondering if some visionary out there could see a way to keep it sustained? I think there's an opportunity for something cable-like in the streaming world. I mean, this is just me. Now you're talking to a, an old cable guy.
But, you know, as a consumer, I look at Netflix, Disney, Warner. And I think of them as, you know, Walmart, Kmart, Target, right? Big giant box stores where you can get anything you would ever need. I also find them very hard to navigate as a consumer.
You know, in the cable world, you knew where to go for comedy, you knew where to go for sports, you knew where to go for news, you know, where to go for documentaries, you knew where to go for reality, you know, whatever it was. And I think it's a lot harder sometimes in streaming.
But I don't know. I think there's an opportunity out there as these streamers get bigger and broader and harder to navigate for just like cable did to broadcast television.
Well, you've been awfully generous with your time, Doug. But before we let you go, I have to ask, especially since you have all of this viewing experience and programming experience. When you're flipping through the channels, or maybe you're looking at streams, is there a go-to for you, a show or a movie that you'll always stop for?
Well, there's a couple of movies I always stop for. It's a pretty state answer, but it's the truth. I mean, if I see the Godfather or the Godfather, too, I'm stuck. I'm going to either stay up till three in the morning, maybe I'll be 20 minutes late for my dinner.
I cannot not watch like when I see the Godfather roll around. It's just, you know, one of those things. That's paramount as well. It will, of course, yeah, it will. Which brings us right back to death, doesn't it?
Doug Herzog is the former president of Viacom's Music Entertainment Group and the co-host of Basic, the official podcast on the unofficial history of cable TV. Make sure to check it out wherever you get your podcasts.
Now, when we come back, veteran entertainment industry journalist Matt Bellany brings us up to speed on where paramount stands today. Stay with us.
现在,当我们回来时,资深娱乐业记者马特·贝拉尼将带领我们了解派拉蒙公司今天的情况。请继续关注我们。
It's the fall of 2017 in Rancho Tejama, California. A man and his wife are driving to a doctor's appointment when another car crashes into them, sending them flying off the road. Disoriented, they stumble out of the car only to hear dozens of gunshots whizzing past them. This is just one chapter of a much larger nightmare unraveling in their small town.
This is actually happening, presents a special limited series called Point Blank, shedding a light on the forgotten spree killings of Rancho Tejama, where alone gunmen devastated a small town, attacking eight different locations in the span of only 25 minutes. The series follows five stories of people connected to the incident, from a father that drew the gunman away from a local school to the sister of the shooter. These are riveting stories that will stick with you long after you listen. Follow this is actually happening wherever you listen to podcasts. You can listen ad-free on the Amazon Music or Wondery app.
Once upon a time, Paramount was the crown jewel of the movie business, but has it lost its shine? In a new world dominated by streaming, this legacy studio is an underdog. Doing things a bit differently than its counterparts at Netflix, Disney, and Amazon. Here to help us understand more about Paramount's position in the industry today, Matt Bellany, he's a writer and founding member of Puck, an online entertainment newsletter. He's also the host of The Town, a podcast on The Ring, all about the business of Hollywood.
Thanks for having me. You've been writing about the entertainment industry for a while now. I know and as I mentioned, do you help launch the newsletter Puck? How did that all get started?
Well, I was the editor of the Hollywood Reporter for many years and I was an entertainment lawyer before that. So I kind of put all that experience into one place and said, what is not out there? There's not someone who has that background and is putting his thoughts in reporting and just really what I'm hearing around town talking to everybody. And it proved popular. And the newsletter has been growing really fast. Did we have this company Puck that covers the intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley and politics and media and finance kind of for an executive elevated class. And it's been really good. It's been really successful. We're a year in. It's been fun.
You know, there was a time when almost every mogul in Hollywood wanted to get their hands on Paramount. I mean, that was the gem, I guess. How does the studio really stack up in the industry today?
You're absolutely right. Paramount was the crown jewel of entertainment back when some of the Redstone and Barry Diller and these moguls of the linear television age were fighting with each other. Paramount was this great asset. It's the only studio that is still in Hollywood. In Hollywood proper. It's got this great lot. And they have big franchises that they've had success with like Top Gun and Transformers. But over the past two decades, and I would argue due to some mismanagement of the company by its leadership, it has really devolved into the kind of also ran of the studio system. It, you know, and there's a very, there's a lot of different reasons for that. But it really does not have that crown jewel status that it once did.
Where do you think the studio went wrong over the past few decades? Or was it a sort of casualty of the fights to acquire it?
你认为这家工作室过去几十年里哪里做错了?或者它是在为了收购而打的战争中受到了伤害?
I mean, there's a couple of reasons. One is the leadership. It has been controlled by the Redstone family since the 90s. Right. And some to Redstone was a lion of the cable television age. He built up all of the MTV networks, the Paramount Film Studio. He went into the book business. He did all of these things to create a media empire. But it's very much a media empire of the last generation. And as he got older and he was still in control, he put people in charge that perhaps did not have the company's best interest in mine. Or I should say very much had their own interests in mind.
Paramount had the distribution rights to Marvel. Wow. They were in business with Marvel and released Iron Man, the first Marvel Studios movie that really longed for real life. Franchise we know as Marvel. But they didn't do a deal to keep Marvel. They let Disney come in and buy Marvel Studios for more than $4 billion. And all of a sudden, Marvel is a Disney franchise and has gone on to fantastic success and is powering Disney in the streaming age. Paramount just was not in the game there.
But I'm interested in what you say about the devolution of Paramount especially. When you think about the fact that one of the biggest movies of this year, right, Top Gun Maverick, it just crushed the summer box office. Yeah, that has really been an anomaly for Paramount.
They had hoped that it would be this big. But who would have guessed that a sequel to a 36 year old movie would be the biggest grocer of the summer. And that is unpredictable.
他们曾希望它会如此成功。但谁能猜到一部36年前的电影的续集会成为最大的夏季卖家。这真是出人意料。
For the most part, Paramount does not have as many of those active franchises as companies like Disney or even Universal. They have done well in recent years with some of the smaller level franchises, like something like Sonic the Hedgehog, Mission Impossible with Tom Cruise. The Transformers franchise is sort of on its last legs or needs some injection. But they are not, they don't have a Marvel. They don't have a DC Comics. They don't have an IP trove that they can keep mining for hit after hit. And that has really separated them.
Until very recently, they did not have a streaming strategy. Right. They, you know, there's a lot of different reasons for that. But some of the Redstone, while he was still alive, he was laser focused on the stock price. He split his companies up.
CBS was one company. Paramount or Viacom was another company. And CBS was the broadcast network company. And Viacom was the cable television company with Paramount thrown in. And that was a very short term strategy. Did not plan for the long term.
CBS ultimately launched all access, which was a streaming service. But they didn't really fund it with any premium content. And then just a couple years ago, they launched Paramount Plus, which is the streaming component for the company now. All access was merged into Paramount Plus. Yeah, I guess finally, some people would say. I mean, it's a bit of a surprise that it took so long.
Oh, absolutely. And I'll give you an example. I'll give you an example of something that is just absolutely egregious. The biggest performing show in cable television is Yellowstone, which is on the Paramount network. That is a Paramount show that airs on the Paramount cable network. But when it came time to decide the streaming option for Yellowstone, the powers that be at Viacom decided to put that show on Peacock, not their own streaming service, CBSL access at the time, because Peacock was the higher bidder. Peacock is owned by NBC Universal, a rival company and is a rival streaming service. So now, lo and behold, Paramount Plus launches. It doesn't have the signature show that everyone would assume that it has from Paramount network, which has the same name. You got to go to Peacock to watch Yellowstone. Oh, wow. Wow.
Well, now, is that the result of mismanagement, a lack of foresight? Is it possible that Paramount Plus could help Paramount make a larger comeback despite their missteps? The answer to that is yes.
噢,那是由于管理不善、缺乏远见吗?Paramount Plus 能否帮助 Paramount 在犯错的情况下获得更大的回报呢?答案是肯定的。
And I don't want to blame particular executives for what happened with Yellowstone. It wasn't a priority. The entire focus of the company at the time that the rights for Yellowstone came up was to make money and to make your quarterly numbers and to deliver for that stock price. So they got a bigger offer from Peacock. They put the rights there.
Yellowstone also wasn't the Yellowstone. We know it as back then when they were selling it. It got off to a strong start, but it wasn't the juggernaut that it is today. And they put it on Peacock and then it became huge. And now it's this asset that they own and they licensed it elsewhere.
I would actually say that Paramount Plus has come a long way since it launched. I mean, they do have some things there. They have the entire library of old CBS and Viacom cable network like MTV and BH1. A lot of those old shows are there. They're putting more of the Nickelodeon content on Paramount Plus.
It also, they also own Nickelodeon. So there's things like SpongeBob SquarePants. I have a kid and he's on Paramount a lot because of that. They also, because of the CBS television rights for the NFL, the football rights, they can put football on Paramount Plus. Now it's not exclusive. That's a bigger deal. And that's what's going to Amazon for exclusive Thursday night football. But that is an asset. If you are a court cutter and you want to watch some football, you can do that on Paramount Plus.
So I actually think that there is some decent stuff. They've also done a bunch of Yellowstone spin-offs. And those are going to Paramount Plus, something like 1883, which was a big hit for them. And they've got more coming down the pike on that. So they are funding Paramount Plus. But and it's gotten better. And the subscriber numbers are up. But it is so far behind where companies like Netflix and Amazon and even Disney Plus and Hulu are.
我觉得他们实际上有一些不错的作品。他们也制作了一系列与《黄石》有关的衍生剧集。这些都将在 Paramount Plus 上推出,比如像《1883》,这对他们来说是一次大成功。此外,他们还有更多的作品即将面世。所以,他们在为 Paramount Plus 提供资金支持。不过情况正在好转,订阅量也在上升。但是他们仍然远远落后于像 Netflix、Amazon、Disney Plus 和 Hulu 这样的公司。
Well, Matt, do you think for studios today is it really, does it really come down to it's less about movies more about the TV offerings, the streaming?
嗯,马特,你觉得对于电影公司来说,如今真的是更关注电视节目和流媒体而非电影本身吗?
You know, in the modern television age, the movie studios don't move the needle on the stock price.
你知道,在现代电视时代,电影制片公司对股票价格的影响微乎其微。
You know, everybody used, they get a lot of attention because these movies come out in theaters and everyone pays attention.
你知道,每个人都用这些电影在电影院上映并且每个人都关注它们,因此它们受到了很多关注。
But if you were following the Viacom stock price over the years, the Paramount movie studio was not what was powering that.
但是如果你多年来一直关注维亚康姆股票价格,派拉蒙电影公司并不是推动其股票价格上涨的主要动力。
It was the carriage fees and the ratings on cable television.
这是车费和有线电视收视率问题。
Now that is transferred over to streaming. And the streaming services are what are powering the stock prices of these entertainment companies.
现在这些娱乐公司的股价正在由流媒体服务推动。这些公司已经转移到了流媒体上面。
But it's all related.
但是这一切都是有关联的。
If you have a successful movie studio, the flywheel off of that is extremely significant.
如果你拥有成功的电影工作室,那么它的滚轮效应将是极其重要的。
You know, look at what Disney does when they release a Marvel movie or a Pixar movie or a Star Wars movie in theaters.
你知道的,看看迪士尼在影院放映漫威电影、皮克斯电影或《星球大战》电影时的做法。
Yeah. The downstream from that powers all of the other businesses from streaming to television to consumer products, to theme parks.
是的。它的下游为所有其他企业供电,从流媒体到电视、消费品以及主题公园。
All of these other things can be generated from a franchise that originates as a theatrical franchise.
所有这些其他的东西都可以从一个最初作为剧院系列的特许经营中生成。
So the movie studios are important.
因此,电影工作室是很重要的。
What do you think Paramount has done over the past few years to try and stay afloat? And is it working, do you think?
你认为派拉蒙在过去几年中为了维持生计做了什么?而且你认为它是否有效?
You know, they are now under control of Sherry Redstone who is Sumner's daughter and is a very savvy and smart woman.
你知道的,现在他们处于雪莉·雷德斯通的控制下,她是萨姆纳的女儿,是位非常精明和聪明的女士。
She has a CEO and Bob Backish that she feels confident in.
她有一位 CEO 和 Bob Backish,她对他们充满信心。
And they've made some executive changes to the way the company operates.
他们对公司运营方式做出了一些高层变革。
There are rumors that more are coming, actually.
其实,有传言说会有更多的人来。
And they feel that they have a good mix of a streaming strategy that they are investing in but not spending the entire bank role on that.
他们认为,他们拥有一个不仅在流媒体战略上进行投资,但也没有将全部资金用于此的良好组合。
They feel that they have a theatrical strategy where they are going to release big mission of possible top gun style movies in theaters and then put other stuff on streaming or sell it to other buyers.
I mean, obviously they do listen to their shareholders. And if their stock is floundering and they're not making money, their shareholders can bail on them. But when you buy the stock of Paramount Global, you buy it knowing that the Redstone family controls that stock and she can decide what to do with it. So things would have to get bad for her to be forced to sell. Will she want to sell in the future and secure her family for generations with the money that she could get? Maybe, but who knows?
Matt, I want to look back to something you were talking about earlier, where you mentioned that it was a real asset for Paramount Plus to have access to the CBS programs, the Viacom shows. Viacom CBS actually changed their corporate name to Paramount earlier this year as a nod to the historic studio. Do you think Viacom's 1994 purchase of Paramount has paid off in the long run, sort of taking that long view?
Oh, yeah. In the long run, having a movie studio of Paramount's stature has absolutely paid off. I mean, when you buy a movie studio, we just saw this with Amazon purchasing MGM. It's not necessarily about what you're making in the future. It's about the library that comes along with that studio. And MGM's library is famously a great library, although it's got a lot of encumbrances on it these days. But the Paramount library is a pretty good library. I mean, think back to all those movies from the 70s and 80s and 90s. You know, you get the Beverly Hills Cop movies. You get some of those John Hughes movies like Ferris Bealers Day Off. You get the Godfather movies and all of the 70s style movies. There's a lot in that library. You get Forrest Gump. You get, you know, those movies will always be valuable.
Mm-hmm. You know, there have been so many changes to the industry recently. And I'm wondering, which companies would you say are leading in the entertainment industry right now? And I wonder if anyone has really figured this new landscape out?
Yeah, leading is a very difficult question. Because, you know, if you look at the streaming business, I mean, obviously Netflix is the leader in that one, because it has 220 million subscribers around the world. Now, it has spent a fortune to get there. And until recently, the stock market has really valued that. But the Netflix stock is in the toilet these days. Because all the sudden, Wall Street doesn't think that Netflix can get to 500, 600, 700 million subscribers in the time period that it thought it could.
So in the content world, I mean, most people believe that Disney has really set itself apart as the ultimate modern content machine. The purchases over the past 15 years of Marvel and Pixar and Lucasfilm and Fox have turned Disney into this juggernaut where they can, you know, they are producing all genres of content. And at a very high level and executing on multiple platforms. And it's going to be tough to continue that. And they have some issues there. But if I had to pick one entertainment company to bet on, I would bet on Disney.
Maybe we should flip around to the other side of the screen. Five, 10 years down the road. What do you think the TV and movie experience is going to look like, feel like for everyday viewers?
It will be largely a streaming experience. I mean, the broadcast networks are already being starved of the best content. All of it is going to streaming. That's only going to continue. Cort Cutting will continue to the point where there will be a tipping point at some point where it doesn't make sense for these cable networks to continue. They will consolidate or go away. And the streaming universe will just become television. That's how we will consume professionally produced content.
Matt Bellany, thanks so much for taking time to talk with us on business wars.
Matt Bellany,非常感谢您抽出时间与我们谈论业务战争。
Great to say hello.
很高兴打招呼。
No problem, thanks.
没问题,谢谢。
Matt Bellany writes for Puck and E-Newsletter covering the intersection of business, tech, and entertainment. His podcast, The Town from the Ringer, brings you the backstory on Hollywood's latest happenings. You can follow Matt on Twitter at Matt Bellany.
Next time, we're taking a deep dive into the music industry exploring the relationship between artists, labels, fans, and the internet. And that's coming up next on the Best of Business Wars Daily. From Wondry, this is Episode 5 of The Battle for Paramount Pictures for Business Wars. I'm your host, David Brown. Kelly Kyle and Peter Arcoony produce this episode. Karen Lo is our senior producer and editor, edited and produced by Emily Frost. Sound designed by Kyle Randall. Additional audio assistance by Sergio Enriquez. Dave Schilling is our producer. Our executive producers are Jenny Lauer Beckman and Marshall Louis, created by Ernan Lopez for Wondry.