Grok 4.5: AI Creates Flappy Bird in 1 Minute! #shorts

说话人对 Grok 4.5 仅用 1 分 20 秒就创建了一个 Flappy Bird 仿制品感到震惊，而相比之下，Opus 4.8 却耗时 8 分 59 秒才创建出其 3JS 版本。他指出 Grok 4.5 不仅速度快得多，而且“成本也低得多”，这表明如果其最终成果质量相当，那么对竞争对手来说，就是“GG”（完蛋了）。 在测试了 Grok 创建的游戏后，说话人将其描述为拥有一个 3D 小鸟，并且感觉像一个“SpaceX 版 Flappy Bird”，他认为这种关联很有趣。然而，他坦率地表示，Grok 的产出感觉像是“一堆 AI 糟粕”，并且在用户界面设计上让其想起了“GPT 5.5”。尽管对美观方面有所批评，他仍再次强调了巨大的速度差异。 当他切换到 Opus 4.8 的游戏时，说话人立即表示他“更喜欢”其“风格”，但再次强调了巨大的时间差异（九分钟对一分钟）。说话人还提到他不太擅长玩这个游戏，并计划稍后审查这两个模型的“会话日志”和“消耗的 token 数”。

The speaker expresses astonishment that Grok 4.5 created a Flappy Bird replica in just 1 minute and 20 seconds, compared to Opus 4.8, which took 8 minutes and 59 seconds to create its 3JS version. They highlight that Grok 4.5 is not only significantly faster but also "much lower cost," suggesting that if its final output is comparable, it's "GG" for the competition. After testing Grok's game, the speaker describes it as having a 3D bird and feeling like a "SpaceX Flappy Bird," finding the connection humorous. However, they candidly state that Grok's output feels like "a lot of AI slop" and reminds them of "GPT 5.5" in its UI design. Despite this critique of the aesthetic, they reiterate the dramatic speed difference. Upon switching to Opus 4.8's game, the speaker immediately states they "prefer the styling" of it, but once again emphasizes the stark time difference (nine minutes versus one minute). The speaker also mentions they are not very good at playing the game and plans to later review the "session logs" and "tokens burnt" for both models.