Is it rude to leave your Airpods in? #Vergecast

以下是这段内容的中文翻译： 这段文字记录了一场生动的辩论，内容是关于在公共场合持续使用AirPods和耳机所涉及的不断变化的社交礼仪。讨论的核心在于科技便利与人际互动中传统的礼仪规范和在场感之间的张力。 一位发言者表示，在戴着AirPods进行对话时，她感到非常不舒服，甚至觉得自己像个“混蛋”。她区分了两种情况：使用AirPods与手机上的AI交流（她觉得这完全可以接受），和在与他人直接互动时使用它们。她觉得社会对后者的“许可”令人深感不安，认为“这场仗已经输了”，言下之意是不情愿地接受自己的观点已经过时了。这位发言者还提到了她觉得特别刺眼的具体例子，比如看到情侣手牵手散步，两人都戴着耳机，她形容这很“离谱”和“糟糕”，并质疑他们共享的在场感的本质。 然而，另一位发言者立即挑战了这一观点，坚定地宣称“这场仗已经输了”，并且第一位发言者的这种情感已不再普遍。她认为“大体上人们不再认同你的看法了”（指人们不再反对持续佩戴耳机），尤其是在“年轻人”中。这一观点凸显了在个人音频设备的社会可接受行为方面，代际之间存在的巨大转变。 讨论随后转向了一个实际且常见的场景：在咖啡店与咖啡师互动。这个“咖啡店问题”成为了衡量当代社会规范的基准。尽管第一位发言者隐含的偏好是出于对服务人员的尊重，移除*两只*耳机，但第二位发言者则提出了一个更宽松、但仍带有些许体谅的规范：即在与柜台人员交流时，“社会最多要求你摘下一只AirPods”。这揭示了人们对承认并与他人互动所抱持的最低预期。 讨论以一个生动且极具说明意义的轶事告终，这个轶事突出了这一社会转变的极端表现。一位发言者讲述了她看到有人戴着“巨大的索尼降噪耳机”，显然沉浸在音频中，然后走近柜台，在没有摘下耳机的情况下“大喊”她的订单（“一份培根鸡蛋三明治”）。这一具体事件引起了观察者发自内心的难以置信和沮丧，她当时很想插嘴说：“伙计，你大可以把它们摘下来。这样，每个人都会更开心。太疯狂了。”这一刻具体化了对服务提供者明显的粗鲁和完全缺乏考虑，甚至超出了第二位发言者所提出的更宽容的底线。 从本质上讲，这段文字探讨了根深蒂固的社交礼仪与个人科技快速融入日常生活之间的冲突。它探讨了在一个个人可以轻易制造“个人声音泡泡”的时代，在公共互动中保持在场感和尊重的意义，以及对于那些珍视传统面对面交流的人来说，这场被认为“已经输掉的仗”是否真的输了。

The provided transcript captures a lively debate concerning the evolving social etiquette surrounding the constant use of AirPods and headphones in public spaces. The core of the discussion revolves around the tension between technological convenience and traditional norms of politeness and present-mindedness during human interaction. One speaker expresses strong personal discomfort and even a sense of being a "jerk" when engaging in conversation while wearing AirPods. This speaker draws a distinction between using AirPods to communicate with AI on one's phone—which they find perfectly acceptable—and using them during direct interactions with other people. They find the societal "permission" for the latter deeply unsettling, feeling that "that fight is lost," implying a reluctant acceptance that their view is now outdated. This speaker highlights specific examples that they find particularly jarring, such as observing couples walking hand-in-hand, both wearing headphones, which they describe as "wild" and "sucks," questioning the nature of their shared presence. The other speaker, however, immediately challenges this viewpoint, firmly asserting that the "fight is lost" and that the first speaker's sentiment is no longer widely held. They contend that "by and large people agree with you anymore" (meaning, they *don't* agree with the first speaker's aversion to constant headphone use), especially among "younger people." This perspective underscores a significant generational shift in what is considered socially acceptable behavior regarding personal audio devices. The conversation then converges on a practical and common scenario: interacting with a barista at a coffee shop. This "coffee shop question" serves as a benchmark for contemporary social norms. While the first speaker's implied preference is for *both* headphones to be removed out of respect for the person serving, the second speaker suggests a more lenient, yet still somewhat considerate, norm: "at most society is it take one of your AirPods out" when addressing the person at the counter. This reveals a perceived minimum expectation for acknowledging and engaging with another individual. The discussion culminates with a vivid and illustrative anecdote that highlights the extreme end of this societal shift. One speaker recounts witnessing someone wearing "giant Sony noise-cancelling cans," clearly engrossed in their audio, approach a counter and "yell" their order ("a bacon, egg and cheese") without removing their headphones. This specific incident elicits a visceral reaction of disbelief and frustration from the observer, who wanted to interject, "buddy, you can just take these off. Like, everybody will be happier. Insanity." This moment crystallizes the perceived rudeness and complete lack of consideration for the service provider, pushing beyond even the more accepting boundaries suggested by the second speaker. In essence, the transcript explores the clash between ingrained social graces and the rapid integration of personal technology into daily life. It questions what it means to be present and respectful in public interactions in an era where individuals can easily create personal sound bubbles, and whether the perceived "fight is lost" for those who value traditional face-to-face engagement.