Ernst Roets: Attacks on Whites in South Africa, Attempts to Hide It, and Trump’s Plan to End It

这段文字详细描述了塔克·卡尔森与一位南非居民（以下简称“南非人”）之间关于南非现状的对话。对话围绕着自种族隔离制度结束以来南非的衰落、种族动态以及不同社区未来实现自决的可能性展开。 这位南非人认为，人们普遍认为南非是一个成功的后种族隔离国家的看法在很大程度上是不准确的。他承认围绕纳尔逊·曼德拉和新政治体制的最初兴奋，但认为现实情况大相径庭。他以黑人经济振兴计划 (BEE) 为例，说明民主制度是如何被用来推进社会主义议程，而不是真正的经济赋权。 他声称，执政党非国大 (ANC) 正在积极推行一场旨在将南非转变为社会主义国家的“民族民主革命”。他引用了概述这一战略的已发表文件，声称该党现在处于第二阶段，利用其权力积极实施社会主义政策。他表示，大量歧视南非纳税人的新法律就证明了这一点。 他详细阐述了各个部门的恶化状况，强调基础设施崩溃和犯罪率上升。他说，南非的税收制度扭曲，极少数人缴纳税款，而且税负沉重。一半的人口从政府那里获得补助金。他认为，政府未能保护生命、自由和财产，迫使公民投资于私人保安和其他措施。 对话深入探讨了非国大与共产主义的历史联系，特别是其与南非共产党结盟以及获得苏联、越南和毛泽东支持。这位南非人声称，非国大过去和现在都寻求一场共产主义革命。他还谈到了纳尔逊·曼德拉和温妮·曼德拉的争议行为，挑战了西方媒体经常呈现的英雄叙事。他表示，纳尔逊·曼德拉因在南非的军事行动而被监禁，试图推翻政府，并引用了非国大军事部门的口号：“无耻地攻击弱者，无耻地逃离强者”。 这位南非人谈到了在一些大学教授的“阿扎尼亚批判理论”的兴起，他声称这种理论提倡将白人非人化。他总结说，因为白人没有乌班图（Ubuntu，人性的本质），这意味着如果你杀死一个白人，你实际上并没有犯下谋杀罪。他强调了针对白人农民的农场袭击事件，强调了它们的残暴性，并声称政治言论与暴力事件的增加之间存在联系。 这位南非人还讨论了埃隆·马斯克对引起人们关注南非问题的影响。他说，生活在这个发生这么多事情却没有人谈论的国家里一定很奇怪。 他拒绝了批评现状意味着渴望恢复种族隔离制度的错误二分法。他提倡基于各个社区（包括阿非利卡人、祖鲁人和其他群体）自决的分散式系统。 这位南非人最后强调了有组织、有强烈认同感、自豪感和信仰的社区的重要性。他描述了在实地创造现实的努力，倡导阿非利卡人共和国和祖鲁人王国等解决方案。 采访者和南非人最终一致认为，南非目前的道路是不可持续的，需要转向自决。这位南非人声称，成为一个组织良好的社区，可以赋予社区发言权。如果社区不喜欢正在发生的事情，并且可以动员起来表达意见，那么事情就会改变。

This transcript details a conversation between Tucker Carlson and a South African resident (hereafter referred to as "the South African") about the current state of South Africa. The conversation centers around the perceived decline of South Africa since the end of apartheid, the racial dynamics, and the potential for a future marked by self-determination for various communities. The South African argues that the prevalent perception of South Africa as a successful post-apartheid nation is largely inaccurate. While acknowledging the initial excitement surrounding Nelson Mandela and the new political system, the South African contends that the reality on the ground is significantly different. He cites the introduction of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policies as an example of how democratic institutions are being used to advance a socialist agenda, rather than genuine economic empowerment. He claims that the ruling party, the ANC, is actively pursuing a "National Democratic Revolution" aimed at transforming South Africa into a socialist state. He references published documents outlining this strategy, alleging that the party is now in the second phase, using its power to aggressively implement socialist policies. He states this is evidenced by a wave of new laws that actively discriminate against taxpayers in South Africa. He elaborates on the deteriorating state of various sectors, highlighting collapsing infrastructure and rising crime rates. He says South Africa has a skewed taxation system where an extremely small number of people in society pay tax, that is heavily taxed. Half of the population receive grants from the government. He argues that the government is failing to protect life, liberty, and property, forcing citizens to invest in private security and other measures. The conversation delves into the ANC's historical ties to communism, particularly its alliance with the South African Communist Party and its support from the Soviet Union, Vietnam, and Mao Zedong. The South African claims that the ANC historically and currently seeks a communist revolution. He also addresses the controversial actions of Nelson Mandela and Winnie Mandela, challenging the heroic narratives often presented in Western media. He states that Nelson Mandela was imprisioned for military actions in South Africa with an attempt to overthrow the government and quoting the military wing of the ANC the slogan of the policy was: "shamelessly we shall attack the weak, and shamelessly we shall flee from the strong". The South African discusses the rise of "Azania Critical Theory," taught at some universities, which he claims promotes the dehumanization of white people. He summarizes it, that because white people are incapable of having Ubuntu, the essence of humanity, then it means if you kill a white person, you did not actually commit murder. He highlights instances of farm attacks against white farmers, emphasizing their brutality and alleging a link between political rhetoric and increased violence. The South African also discusses the influence of Elon Musk on bringing attention to South Africa’s issues. He states it must be weird to live in this country where all this stuff is happening and nobody is saying anything about it. He rejects the false dichotomy that criticizing the current situation implies a desire for the return of apartheid. He advocates for a decentralized system based on self-determination for various communities, including the Afrikaners, Zulus, and other groups. The South African concludes by emphasizing the importance of organized communities with a strong sense of identity, pride, and faith. He describes the efforts to create realities on the ground, advocating for solutions like a republic for the Afrikaner people and a kingdom for the Zulu people. The interviewer and South African ultimately agree that South Africa's current path is unsustainable and requires a shift towards self-determination. The South African claims that that being a well organized community, can give the communities a voice. If the community doesn't like what is happening and can be mobilized to say something, then things can be changed.