The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch - 20VC: "Anti-Data Centres is a Chinese Psyop" | How Many Planned Data Centers Will Actually Get Built? | Is Energy AI's Biggest Bottleneck? With Thomas Sohmers, Co-Founder @ Positron
In a discussion with Harry Stebbings on 20VC, Thomas Somers, co-founder and chairman at Positron AI, delved into the evolving landscape of AI infrastructure, particularly focusing on inference, and its broader implications. Positron AI builds hardware—chips, software, and systems—to power generative AI inference, the deployment phase of AI models.
Somers explained that training AI models is compute-bound, benefiting from more floating-point operations. In contrast, inference is heavily memory-bound because each generated token requires reading model parameters, a process that cannot be massively parallelized like training. This highlights a growing "memory wall," where GPU flops have improved 120x in a decade, but memory bandwidth only 17x, largely due to slower advancements in SRAM technology and a historical focus on compute-bound convolutional neural networks before the transformer model.
On token economics, Somers noted the "insane" margins providers make on cached tokens, where processing a cached token is "one one thousandth of the cost" of recomputing it. He dismissed the "absurd" meme that companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are unprofitable, stating they would be "massively profitable overnight" if they stopped training. Regarding the "pacing the frontier" debate, Somers expressed concern that a pause could empower "luddite sentiment" and risk concentrating technological capability among a few entities, which he called "the biggest attack on classical, like liberal freedom concepts." He suggested that some advocacy for pacing might be strategic ahead of IPOs, while acknowledging Anthropic's genuine concerns. He also highlighted the danger of Western nations pacing while China does not, fearing a "Chinese CCP controlled, super intelligent AI scenario."
Somers controversially labeled the growing anti-data center sentiment on both the left and right as "almost entirely a Chinese psyop." He argued that common criticisms about water and power usage are based on "patently false" information, citing that "a single in and out uses, you know, more water than, you know, the largest data centers in the United States." He criticized regulatory hurdles in the West that prevent data center construction in vast, unpopulated areas, contrasting it with China's unconstrained build-out.
KV caching, where Key and Value matrices based on prompts and generated tokens are stored to avoid recomputation, was identified as crucial for inference efficiency. While it saves compute, it demands significant memory, creating a complex challenge as individual user sessions can consume hundreds of gigabytes, exceeding model weights. Somers elaborated on quantization techniques that compress data types from FP16 to FP4, reducing memory usage with minimal model performance degradation.
Looking ahead, Somers predicted frontier model sizes would continue to grow, with GPT-6 Astra being a significant leap he considers AGI. He shared personal experiences of Astra's "mind boggling" capabilities in complex coding, computer use with generic tools (like Blender), and completing full RTL to GDS chip design flows in just over 50 hours, a task typically taking weeks for humans. He believes that while smaller, enterprise-specific models will emerge, they will paradoxically drive *more* token consumption from large cloud models, as local LLMs constantly generate tasks for their more intelligent cloud counterparts.
The cost of tokens has drastically fallen from $60 per million five years ago to under $1 today. Somers argued that while the price decreased, the value per token has increased "a hundred or a thousand fold" due to improved model capabilities. He expects pricing models to evolve beyond per-token costs to "cost per useful result" or subscription models for virtual agents.
Finally, Somers expressed optimism about "human alignment," emphasizing that addressing geopolitical and social problems is crucial for navigating AI's future. He stressed the importance of considering economic factors, which he believes ultimately drive real decision-making and progress in the AI landscape.