首页  >>  来自播客: Trumponomics 更新   反馈  

Trumponomics - The Tariff Trade-Off

发布时间:   原节目
由斯蒂芬妮·弗兰德斯主持的《特朗普经济学》播客,探讨了特朗普政府关税政策的卷土重来,以及其复杂的经济和政治影响。该集录制于7月29日,重点介绍了白宫最近的举措,包括对80多个国家的进口商品征收10%的关税(取代了之前被裁定违宪的关税),对加拿大和巴西的新关税,以及可能导致更多进口税的正在进行的301条款调查。核心问题是,这些被吹捧为经济复兴工具的关税,是兑现了承诺,还是仅仅作为美国消费者的一项税收。 彭博社高级撰稿人肖恩·唐南以“马口铁罐头”行业为例,说明了2018年最初的钢铁关税的影响。他回忆起前商务部长威尔伯·罗斯曾保证,关税不会影响汤罐头的价格,并将创造数千个就业岗位和数百万美元的投资。实际上,自2018年3月以来,罐装水果和蔬菜的成本上涨了近50%,空罐成本则上涨了80%。国内马口铁生产下降,工厂从12家减少到3家,而进口量从占罐头制造商钢材需求的50%上升到80%。钢铁行业的就业岗位仅适度增加了1,300个,据报道,整体制造业的就业岗位甚至比特朗普首次上任时还要少。唐南指出,美国工业对生产马口铁兴趣不大,导致了意想不到的后果,例如一位番茄种植者因罐头成本上升而减少种植面积。 彭博经济部的首席美国经济学家安娜·黄对制造业提出了细致入微的看法。尽管政客们关注就业数据,但经济学家则还会考虑利润、投资和生产力,而就业往往是一个滞后指标。黄女士承认,近年来制造业在产出和生产力方面有所改善,尤其是在计算机、航空航天和高价值硬件等耐用品领域,而非那些与中国市场高度相关的行业。她认为,尽管关税可能不是直接原因,但它们对企业来说是“成本增加”,促使企业提高运营效率。企业通过选择性地提高价格(有时会减少销售额),增加对现有员工的要求(从而提高生产力),并重新调整供应链来做出回应。肖恩补充说,一些罐头制造商通过生产更薄、更高效的罐头来适应。 播客随后审视了关税的财政影响。安娜·黄指出,去年关税收入约为2000亿美元,但由于法院裁决,约800亿美元已经退还,另有800亿美元可能随后退还。这使得10年关税收入预测从3.3万亿美元大幅削减至约2万亿美元,影响了财政赤字。肖恩·唐南强调,退款仍在进行中,甚至在6月份,财政部还出现了净流出。他还指出,由于持续的法律挑战以及理论上成功的制造业回流将减少进口关税,这些收入的长期可持续性受到质疑。 最后,讨论转向了更广泛的经济和政治后果。与最初的担忧不同,其他国家并未出现大规模报复,关税也并未显著推高美国的通货膨胀(尽管消费者常常将其与更高成本联系起来)。两位嘉宾都同意关税不受欢迎。安娜·黄认为,政府将它们视为一种“痛苦较小”的创收方式。肖恩·唐南指出,民主党人正在利用关税作为总统的政治弱点,认为特朗普的经济政策制造了混乱,未能兑现承诺,导致其经济管理支持率较低。对话最后回顾了关税在美国政治中受欢迎与不受欢迎的历史周期性。

The Trumponomics podcast, hosted by Stephanie Flanders, examines the Trump administration's re-emergence of tariffs and their complex economic and political ramifications. Recorded on July 29th, the episode highlights recent White House actions, including 10% tariffs on imports from over 80 countries (replacing previous ones ruled unconstitutional), new tariffs on Canada and Brazil, and pending Section 301 investigations that could lead to more import taxes. The central question is whether these tariffs, touted as tools for economic revival, have delivered on promises or merely act as a tax on US consumers. Sean Donnan, a senior writer for Bloomberg, uses the "tin can" industry as a case study for the original 2018 steel tariffs. He recalls former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's assurance that tariffs wouldn't affect soup can prices and would create thousands of jobs and millions in investment. In reality, the cost of canned fruits and vegetables has risen by almost 50% since March 2018, and empty can costs are up 80%. Domestic tin plate production declined, with mills dropping from twelve to three, and imports rising from 50% to 80% of can makers' steel needs. Steel industry jobs saw only a modest increase of 1,300, and overall manufacturing jobs are reportedly fewer than when Trump first took office. Donnan notes that the US industry has little interest in making tin plate, leading to unintended consequences like a tomato farmer reducing planting due to higher can costs. Anna Wong, Bloomberg Economics' chief US economist, offers a nuanced perspective on manufacturing. While politicians focus on job numbers, economists also consider profits, investment, and productivity, with jobs often a lagging indicator. Wong acknowledges that manufacturing has seen improvements in output and productivity in recent years, particularly in durable goods like computers, aerospace, and high-value hardware, rather than China-exposed sectors. She suggests that while tariffs might not be the direct cause, they have acted as a "cost increase" for firms, prompting them to increase operational efficiency. Firms responded by selectively raising prices (sometimes reducing sales), increasing demands on existing workers (boosting productivity), and rejiggering supply chains. Sean adds that some can manufacturers adapted by making thinner, more efficient cans. The podcast then examines the fiscal impact of tariffs. Anna Wong states that tariff revenues were around $200 billion last year, but approximately $80 billion has already been refunded due to court rulings, with potentially another $80 billion to follow. This significantly cut 10-year tariff revenue projections from $3.3 trillion to about $2 trillion, impacting the fiscal deficit. Sean Donnan emphasizes that refunds are ongoing, with June even showing a net outflow from the Treasury. He also points out that the long-term durability of these revenues is questioned due to ongoing legal challenges and the theoretical outcome that successful reshoring would diminish import duties. Finally, the discussion turns to broader economic and political consequences. Unlike initial fears, there hasn't been widespread retaliation from other countries, nor have tariffs meaningfully driven US inflation (though consumers often link them to higher costs). Both guests agree that tariffs are unpopular. Anna Wong suggests the administration views them as a "less painful" way to raise revenue. Sean Donnan notes that Democrats are using tariffs as a political vulnerability for the President, arguing that Trump's economic policies have created chaos and failed to deliver on promises, leading to low approval ratings for his economic management. The conversation concludes by recalling the historical cyclical nature of tariff popularity and unpopularity in US politics.