以下是所提供视频转录的摘要，其中包含所有信息： 转录稿的开头部分提到某事表现“不佳”。接着，它转而强调一个视觉呈现，其中“右上角”的位置代表着“最便宜且最好的”选项。这个被识别为 **Grok 4.5** 的选项，其性能与 **Fable 5 High** 相当。然而，Grok 4.5 以显著更低的价格实现了同样的性能：每项任务仅需 **1.51 美元**，而 Fable 5 High 的成本是每项任务 **8.77 美元**。演讲者强调了这种巨大的价格差异，称其为“荒谬”（1.51 美元 对 8.77 美元）。

Here's a summary of the provided video transcription, including every piece of information: The transcription begins with a partial statement that something performed "poorly." It then transitions to highlighting a visual, where the "top right" position represents the "cheapest and the best" option. This option, identified as **Grok 4.5**, performed comparably to **Fable 5 High**. However, Grok 4.5 achieved this performance at a significantly lower price: **$1.51 per task**, in contrast to Fable 5 High's cost of **$8.77 per task**. The speaker emphasizes this stark price difference, describing it as "bonkers" ($1.51 versus $8.77).