首页  >>  来自播客: The Sovereign Individual - Mastering the Transition to the Information Age - YouTube 更新   反馈  

The Sovereign Individual - Mastering the Transition to the Information Age - YouTube - PR Report #6 The Sovereign Individual::Chapter 6 - The Megapolitics Of The Information Age

发布时间:2021-11-09 15:33:09   原节目
这份PR报告总结了《主权个体》第六章的内容,标题为“信息时代的巨型政治:效率对权力的胜利”。该章节深入探讨了历史上保护与勒索之间的紧张关系,认为信息时代正在将天平倾向于个人保护,并削弱政府权力。 作者首先将历史的中心挑战定义为需要防御暴力侵略,并引用了弗雷德里克·C·莱恩关于战争和保护的经济意义的著作。莱恩强调,对暴力的控制从根本上塑造了资源分配和经济活动,使政府的首要角色成为保护。在工业时代(20世纪),框架主要由保护与勒索的二分法来定义。 保护被定义为防止伤害,而勒索是指通过武力或威胁获取某物。20世纪大型工厂和大规模生产企业的兴起与规模更大的政府和工会的增长相吻合。作者认为,这使得天平倾向于勒索。虽然整个世纪收入都在增长,但政府收入通过对所有者(公司税、财产税、资源税)和工人(所得税)的各种形式的税收而更加显著地增长。政府表面上提供的保护成本低于其通过税收收取的费用。作者认为,政府的运作方式类似于由其员工经营的企业,缺乏降低价格(税收)的激励。 同样,工会利用抵制和罢工等策略,能够为他们的成员获得不断增长的收入。然而,作者认为,信息时代标志着这种动态的转变,将钟摆摆回了保护的一侧。与工业时代集中化的资本和财富容易被掠夺不同,信息时代的特点是基于信息的产品和服务、微处理技术、工作站而非工厂,以及小型、自主的组织,甚至个人。 作者将历史上无法在公海上建立强制垄断与在网络空间中不可能实现垄断的可能性进行了类比。他们认为,网络空间的无限性和无边界性使得任何政府都几乎不可能施加绝对控制。 报告随后列出了信息技术的几个特点,这些特点有助于这种转变: 1. **可忽略的自然资源含量:** 信息技术不依赖于地理位置与自然资源的接近程度。 2. **高度可移植性:** 基于信息化的企业较少受特定地点的限制。 3. **企业规模的降低:** 在信息经济中传递重要价值不需要大规模运营。 4. **减少了社会对高于市场工资的广泛支持的可能性:** 抵制和罢工等策略不太可能在分散的信息环境中产生共鸣。 5. **较低的资本成本:** 建立基于信息的企业所需的初始投资较少。 6. **缩短的产品生命周期:** 与工业时代相比,信息时代的产品生命周期更短。 7. **同步和分散的活动:** 信息技术通常不是顺序的,而是同步和分散的。 8. **个性化工作:** 微处理技术对暴力的回报施加了下行压力。 基于网络空间的资产和服务将较少受到政府对暴力的领土垄断的威胁,从而更容易免受敲诈、盗窃和掠夺。这种免疫性阻碍了在 20 世纪蓬勃发展的民族国家和工会的策略,可能使政府作为物理保护者的作用变得不那么重要。 作者认为,政府在保护网络空间的银行余额方面不会比个人做得更好,这将迫使税收下降。网络经济有望使福利国家面临真正的竞争,从而导致保护成本远低于勒索。 总而言之,20 世纪见证了大型工厂和中心化资本的兴起,使其容易受到政府税收和工会胁迫的掠夺。相比之下,信息时代的企业在分散、地域无关且资本密集度较低的环境中运营,可以预期税收和胁迫会显著降低。如果没有大型资本集团可以剥削,工会将减少,政府将面临对其超出其主要服务(保护)成本的征税能力的下行压力。

This PR report summarizes Chapter 6 of "The Sovereign Individual," titled "The Megapolitics of the Information Age: The Triumph of Efficiency Over Power." The chapter delves into the historical tension between protection and extortion, arguing that the Information Age is shifting the balance in favor of individual protection and diminished government power. The authors begin by framing history's central challenge as the need to defend against violent aggression, citing Frederick C. Lane's work on the economic meaning of war and protection. Lane emphasizes that the control of violence fundamentally shapes resource allocation and economic activity, making government's primary role one of protection. In the industrial age (the 20th century), the framework was largely defined by the dichotomy of protection versus extortion. Protection is defined as safeguarding against harm, while extortion is obtaining something through force or threats. The rise of large-scale factories and mass production enterprises in the 20th century coincided with the growth of larger governments and labor unions. This, according to the authors, tipped the scales toward extortion. While incomes rose throughout the century, government revenues increased even more dramatically through various forms of taxation on owners (corporate, property, severance taxes) and workers (income taxes). The cost of protection ostensibly provided by the government became less than what it charged through taxation. The authors argued that government operates like a business run by its employees, which lacks incentives to reduce prices (taxes). Similarly, labor unions, utilizing tactics like boycotts and strikes, were able to secure rising incomes for their members. However, the authors argue that the Information Age marks a shift in this dynamic, swinging the pendulum back in favor of protection. In contrast to the centralized capital and wealth of the industrial era, which was vulnerable to seizure, the Information Age is characterized by information-based products and services, micro-processing technology, workstations rather than factories, and small, autonomous organizations or even individuals. The authors draw a parallel between the historical inability to establish monopolies of coercion on the open sea and the likely impossibility of monopolizing cyberspace. They argue that the infinite and boundary-less nature of cyberspace makes it nearly impossible for any government to exert absolute control. The report then lists several characteristics of information technology that contribute to this shift: 1. **Negligible Natural Resource Content:** Information technology is not dependent on geographical proximity to natural resources. 2. **High Portability:** Information-based businesses are less bound to specific locations. 3. **Lowered Scale of Enterprise:** Delivering significant value in the information economy doesn't require massive operations. 4. **Reduced Likelihood of Broad Social Support for Above-Market Wages:** Tactics like boycotts and strikes are less likely to resonate in the dispersed information landscape. 5. **Lower Capital Costs:** Setting up an information-based business requires less initial investment. 6. **Shortened Product Life Cycle:** Products in the Information Age have shorter lifespans compared to the industrial era. 7. **Simultaneous and Dispersed Activity:** Information technology is not typically sequential but simultaneous and dispersed. 8. **Individualized Work:** Micro-processing technologies put downward pressure on the returns of violence. Cyberspace-based assets and services will be less threatened by government territorial monopolies on violence, making them easier to protect from shakedowns, theft, and predation. This immunity thwarts the nation-state and union tactics that flourished in the 20th century, potentially rendering government less relevant as a physical protector. The authors argue that government will be no better equipped to protect bank balances in cyberspace than individuals themselves, forcing downward pressure on taxes. The cyber economy is poised to expose the welfare state to genuine competition, resulting in protection costs being significantly less than extortion. In summary, the 20th century witnessed the rise of large-scale factories and centralized capital, making it vulnerable to predation through government taxation and union coercion. In contrast, information-age enterprises, operating in a decentralized, geographically agnostic, and less capital-intensive environment, can expect significantly lower taxation and coercion. Labor unions would diminish without large capital groupings to exploit, and governments would face downward pressure on their ability to tax beyond the cost of their primary service: protection.