Power and Politics in Today’s World - YouTube - Lecture 18: Political Limits of Business: The Israel-Palestine Case
发布时间:2019-11-21 22:55:34
原节目
这份记录文件记录了管理学院就以色列-巴勒斯坦冲突进行的一次讨论,重点关注了失败的“打破僵局”(Breaking the Impasse, BTI)倡议以及随后的由商业主导的旨在促进和平和改善生活条件的努力。活动邀请了像克劳斯·施瓦布(世界经济论坛)、约西·瓦尔迪(以色列科技亿万富翁)、穆尼布·马斯里(巴勒斯坦商业领袖)和约翰·克里等知名人士。
讨论的最初重点是BTI,这是一项2013年的倡议,旨在将以色列和巴勒斯坦的商业领袖聚集在一起,以支持两国方案。尽管最初声势浩大,但BTI由于以下几个因素而失败。它的构思来自外部(达沃斯),使其成为一种自上而下而非自下而上的运动。虽然声称政治中立,但它隐含地支持两国方案,疏远了那些支持替代方案的人。它拒绝与哈马斯(巴勒斯坦地区的一个关键角色)接触。它缺乏一个有凝聚力的“K集团”,使其无法制定和追求具体目标。BTI将政治声明置于实际行动之上,未能建立草根支持或解决冲突的叙事。2014年的加沙战争进一步破坏了该倡议,巴勒斯坦参与者认为以色列同行没有公开谴责暴力行为。
然后,讨论过渡到分析BTI后的商业倡议,主要通过三个案例研究:SodaStream、Rawabi市和EcoPeace Middle East。这些项目旨在改善经济和环境状况。
SodaStream是一家制造气泡水机的公司,最初由于劳动力短缺,在其西岸工厂雇佣了巴勒斯坦工人。虽然它发展成为以色列-巴勒斯坦合作的典范,以具有竞争力的工资和福利雇佣巴勒斯坦人,但SodaStream也面临来自双方的批评。“抵制、撤资、制裁”(BDS)运动指责其使占领正常化,而一些以色列右翼人士则反对整合巴勒斯坦劳工。在将其工厂迁至以色列后,SodaStream在为其巴勒斯坦员工续签工作许可方面面临挑战,突显了即使在商业活动中也存在的内在政治复杂性。
Rawabi市是西岸第一个规划的巴勒斯坦城市,旨在为巴勒斯坦人提供住房、就业(尤其是在科技领域)和一种自豪感。其创始人巴沙尔·马斯里(Bashar al-Masri)打算通过只在A区建设来独立于政治进程运作。然而,该项目遇到了政治障碍,尤其是在用水方面,需要巴勒斯坦和以色列人物的干预。缺乏像通往该城市的充足道路等基础设施是另一个限制因素。Rawabi仍然受到BDS运动的批评,因为它可能使占领正常化。
EcoPeace Middle East专注于以色列、约旦和巴勒斯坦之间的环境合作,认识到尽管存在政治冲突,但他们面临共同的环境挑战(尤其是在水资源方面)。其中一个项目涉及约旦向加沙提供低成本电力用于海水淡化,产生的淡水通过以色列分配回约旦。该组织的负责人吉东·布隆伯格(Gidon Bromberg)认为,无论政治进程如何,都应利用环境来激励商业合作。
分析得出的结论是,在该地区运营的企业面临着困境。试图保持政治中立是不可能的,而且项目经常因使占领正常化而受到攻击,无论如何。然而,可扩展的示范项目可以说明积极的影响,并可能影响政治论述。此外,人口结构的变化、受过更好教育的巴勒斯坦劳动力以及西岸某些地区日益增长的经济活力都在促进一种不断演变的现状。此外,水资源危机正在造成新的压力,迫使合作成为必要,随着不可思议的事情变得可以想象,新的可能性正在出现。
This transcript documents a discussion at the School of Management about the Israel-Palestine conflict, focusing on the failed "Breaking the Impasse" (BTI) initiative and subsequent business-led efforts to promote peace and improve living conditions. The event features prominent figures like Klaus Schwab (World Economic Forum), Yossi Vardi (Israeli tech billionaire), Munib al-Masri (Palestinian business leader), and John Kerry.
The initial focus is on BTI, a 2013 initiative bringing together Israeli and Palestinian business leaders to support a two-state solution. Despite initial fanfare, BTI failed due to several factors. It was conceived externally (Davos), making it a top-down rather than a grassroots movement. While claiming political neutrality, it implicitly supported a two-state solution, alienating those favoring alternative solutions. It refused to engage with Hamas, a critical player in the Palestinian territories. It lacked a cohesive "K-group," preventing it from formulating and pursuing concrete goals. BTI prioritized political statements over practical actions, failing to build grassroots support or address conflicting narratives. The 2014 Gaza war further undermined the initiative, with Palestinian participants feeling Israeli counterparts did not publicly condemn the violence.
The discussion then transitions to analyzing post-BTI business initiatives, primarily through three case studies: SodaStream, Rawabi City, and EcoPeace Middle East. These projects aim to improve the economic and environmental situation.
SodaStream, a company manufacturing sparkling water makers, initially hired Palestinian workers in its West Bank factory due to labor shortages. While it evolved into a model of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation, employing Palestinians at competitive wages and offering benefits, SodaStream faced criticism from both sides. The BDS movement accused it of normalizing the occupation, while some on the Israeli right opposed the integration of Palestinian labor. After moving its factory to Israel, SodaStream faced challenges renewing work permits for its Palestinian employees, highlighting the inherent political complexities even in business endeavors.
Rawabi City is the first planned Palestinian city in the West Bank, aiming to provide housing, employment (especially in the tech sector), and a sense of pride to Palestinians. Its founder, Bashar al-Masri, intended to operate independently of the political process by building only in Area A. However, the project encountered political obstacles, particularly concerning water access, requiring intervention from both Palestinian and Israeli figures. The lack of infrastructure like adequate roads to access the city is another constraint. Rawabi still faces criticism from the BDS movement for potentially normalizing the occupation.
EcoPeace Middle East focuses on environmental cooperation between Israel, Jordan, and Palestine, recognizing the shared environmental challenges (particularly regarding water resources) despite political conflict. One project involves Jordan providing low-cost electricity to Gaza for desalination, with the resulting water being distributed back to Jordan via Israel. The organization's head, Gidon Bromberg, argues for leveraging the environment to incentivize business collaboration regardless of the status of the political process.
The analysis concludes that businesses operating in the region face dilemmas. Attempting political neutrality is impossible, and projects are often attacked for normalizing the occupation regardless. However, scalable demonstration projects can illustrate positive impacts and potentially influence political discourse. Additionally, demographic shifts, a more educated Palestinian labor force, and the increasing economic dynamism in some parts of the West Bank are contributing to an evolving status quo. Furthermore, the water crisis is creating new pressures that necessitate cooperation, forcing new possibilities onto the horizon as the unthinkable becomes thinkable.